Best Writer

o Objective is to prepare
a Nature/Science style overview of recent advances in an area of
signal transduction research by examining four papers
o Maximum length 12 double-spaced (Use 12
point font)
§ in addition to
this include a reference list and any diagrams (optional)
o There is no need to present the actual figures
from the papers
o The presentation of the papers will obviously
be less detailed than in your oral presentation, only brief mention need
be made of techniques

Compare two different advanced registered nurse roles with regard to ethical guidelines. Are there any differences in the ethical guidelines that govern these roles? What situations might require one role to respond differently, depending on the ethical guidelines?

Behavior modification experiments have been both interesting and controversial. From Pavlov’s dogs, to Jones’ Peter and the rabbit, Watson’s Little Albert experiment, and Skinner’s boxes, famous behavior modification projects have taught us a great deal about human behavior. However, the methods used to modify the subjects’ behavior have often raised questions regarding psychological ethics.
For this assignment, you will select one famous psychological behavior modification experiment to study. Research the experiment, then write an essay answering the following questions:
Who conducted the experiment?
When and where was the experiment conducted?
Who or what were the subjects or participants of the experiment?
How was the experiment conducted?
What type of learning was demonstrated in the experiment?
What conclusions did the experimenter(s) draw?
How did the experiment contribute to the field of Behavioral Psychology?
Was the experiment ethical? Why or why not?
What did you learn from studying the experiment that you can apply in your personal, professional, or social life?
Your paper should be 3 to 5 pages in length (not including the cover page or reference page), formatted in APA style, and include at least three references, also formatted in APA style.

The assignment for your second graded paper is to write a rhetorical analysis.
WRITER’S ROLE: You are motivated by curiosity or interest in the process of persuasion and in the
persuasive strategies used in a particular work. You want to look closely at how persuasive strategies are
used in this work, and you also have a point that you want to make to your readers about the effectiveness of
these strategies in persuading an audience.
WHOM YOU’RE WRITING FOR: This may very well depend on the kind of work you’re analyzing. If
you’re writing about a text, even a newspaper article (see for example the essay “A Mockery of Justice,”
beginning on page 214), then you are probably writing to a more academic audience, in which case a more
formal(or “high”) writing style might be called for. If, on the other hand, you’re analyzing an
advertisement, you’re probably writing to a general audience, and a less formal (or “middle”) writing style
may be more appropriate. (See below under “Requirements.”)
OVERVIEW
Your assignment is to write a rhetorical analysis of a work of your choosing. Rhetoric can be defined as the
art of persuasion. Rhetorical analyses, then, are essays that analyze the persuasive strategies used in a particular work and how effective they are. In writing a rhetorical analysis, you will want to pay close
attention to text and images,to the types of appeals used, and to the purpose and intended audience of the
work you choose. (Information on appeals will be given in class; also refer to pages 205-207 in your
textbook.)
With this assignment, choosing the work to write about one of the most important decisions you will make.
Choose something that interests you, arouses your curiosity, or provokes a reaction from you in some way.
Keep in mind that the reaction it provokes does not necessarily have to be positive; one motive forwriting a
rhetorical analysis, in fact, might be yourdisagreementwith the author’sview. Disagreeing is fine, butit will
require that you effectively demonstrate thatthe author’s rhetoricalstrategies are somehow flawed(for
example, by proving thather logic is faulty in some way). Regarding the choice of work, you can choose
anything thatyou feel is rhetorical and that you feel you can write convincingly about—with oneexception:
the notorious Sarah McLachlan SPCA commercial.
In choosing a work to write about, considerthat you’ll needto be able to look at it closely and from multiple
aspects, presenting a coherent and persuasive argumentto yourreader. Choose something you’llfeel
comfortable analyzing; if you don’twantto write about an academic essay,this assignment doesn’t require
you to. However, you will wantto write about a work that makes some attempt to persuade its readers;
possible types of works you could considerinclude advertisements, political messages, speeches, visualtexts,
newspaper editorials, etc. You can also do a rhetorical analysis of a work from popular culture—for example,
a movie or an episode from a TV series—butif you do that, keep in mind that you will want to be able to look
at it closely,reflect on it and quote from it in support of your analysis;therefore, justwatching it once is not
going to be enough, andhaving accessto it on DVD or some other media would be strongly encouraged. (For
a literary model of a rhetorical analysis of a work of popular culture,read the essay “Why That Catastrophic
Pepsi Ad Was Actually a Resounding Success” by JakeRomm, which begins on page 785 of yourtextbook.)ENG 121 (DuCharme):Summer,2021
If in doubt, ask your instructor whether or notthe work you wantto write aboutmight be a good fit forthe
assignment.
LITERARY MODELS
To get an idea of what a rhetorical analysisis, andhopefully to become inspiredto write your own, read the
sample essays “A Mockery of Justice” by Matthew James Nance (beginning on page 214) aswell as the two
essays posted on D2L: “The Other Car” by Stanley Fish and “Food, Inc.: A Rhetorical Analysis” by Rowen
vonPlagenhoef.
REQUIREMENTS
 Three pages, a minimumof 900words, and a maximum of 1,200 words. Please note thatthe
minimum number of wordsdoesnot includetheWorksCited sheet.
 Yourpapermust be an analytical persuasive essay, andmust have a thesis statement in its
introduction which issupported in the body of the paper. It must also have a conclusion which sums
up or restates your argument.
 You may write your essay in either “high” or “middle” style, depending on the type of work you’re
writing about and the readership your essay is intended for. If writing about an academic essay or
printtext other than a newspaper orpopularmagazine article, itis recommended that you write in a
more formal style, avoiding the use of the first- (“I”) and second-person (“you”) pronouns. If writing
about an advertisement or a work of popular culture, itis recommended that you write in a “middle”
style, in which case use of first- and second-person pronounsis acceptable. Rememberthat, in either
case, the use ofslang is never acceptable in an academic paper except in passages directly quotedfrom
a source. If in doubt aboutwhether“high” or “middle” style is the better choice, ask yourinstructor.
For more information on “high” and“middle” style, see pages 368-373 of yourtextbook.
 As with all graded papers, we will be doing a workshop during which you willreceive peer feedback
on yourrough drafts. Also, as with all graded papersin this class, you will be requiredto submitthe
final draft in the dropbox on Desire2Learn (D2L) by the start of class on the due date. Rough drafts
are not submitted on D2L.
 For this assignment, you may cite only one source:the work which is the subject of yourrhetorical
analysis. You must quote this work in yourpaper and cite it in-text using MLA format; you may not
refer to any other source forthis assignment. You must also include a separate Works Cited sheet
which followsMLA format. (Note that the Works Cited may either be includedin the file containing
yourpaper or submitted as a separate file on D2L. However, theWorks Cited does not count toward
theminimumword countrequirement. Also, if you failto submityourWorks Cited, I will not grade
your paper.)
 All final papersin this class must be submitted in MicrosoftWord.
 Both the rough draft andthe final papermust be typeddouble-spaced. See the section of your
syllabustitled “Papers, Rough Drafts andWritten Assignments” formore detailed information.
 The term “rough draft” may be misleading:these should be fair drafts that have already been edited
to correct misspellings, grammatical errors, etc., to the best of your ability. The rough draft should
be the best version you are able to produce on your own withoutthe feedback of yourpeers and the
instructor. It shouldfollow allthe requirements of the final paper, andbe the version that you would
turn in for a grade if you were not given the opportunity to revise yourpaperbased on feedback.

Eulogy
A great many characters die in Macbeth. Select one and imagine the funeral context. You have been tasked with writing the eulogy to commemorate the life of this person. You will need to extract information about their life from the play (and background supports) and anything you can’t find you can make up, in keeping with what you do know!
How to write a Eulogy
Infographics of steps
Eulogy of Juliet by the Priest
Eulogy of Romeo and Juliet

This assignment is part 2 my profession is probation officer im going to include the first part if you need to see it
For Part II Major Course Assignment
A Media Analysis Paper

Write a 3-5 page paper describing an ethical dilemma for a person working in your desired profession, depicted in at least two forms of media. For example, you might select a movie and a radio talk show to discuss ethical dilemmas of a psychologist. A news article and a short story might be used to discuss ethical dilemmas faced by a counselor. Or, a movie and a YouTube video might depict the ethical dilemmas of an attorney. You must have TWO DIFFERENT FORMS OF MEDIA. You may NOT use two movies, two news articles, two blogs, etc.
Writing the Paper: Describe the ethically problematic situations in which the real or fictitious professional(s) are involved (remember, there are two situations – one from each of your forms of media). Answer the questions below using the Code of Ethics of your chosen profession:
What actions did the person take?
Were those actions within the profession’s ethical standards?
What actions could the person have taken to remain within the profession’s ethical standards?
How can and does the profession respond to ethical misconduct among its membership?
Choose 2 ethical theories we studied and explain how each theory would view the ethical dilemmas and the actions taken by the professional(s).

Read the article “Relationship Building in Virtual Teams: An Academic Case Study” by Kathy Egea and answer the following questions. Be sure to answer questions completely.

An annotated bibliography is a very efficient tool for selecting appropriate professional literature for literature reviews. For this assignment you will select 12-15 sources to review related to learning communities (communities of practice) or themes related to learning communities. It is recommended that you review current (1-3 year old) full text professional journals for this assignment. You may use the Internet, but no more than 5 sources should be from web sites. Annotated bibliography is different from a literature review in that it is not a running narrative. Instead, it is a collection of summaries of selected works. In other words, each listing in the annotated bibliography will have complete bibliographical information and a short summary of the content. The notion is that an annotated bib acts as a pre-cursor to a literature review, or a source of first phase of information for a research project, etc. There is no need for a reference list at the end of the assignment.

To receive the highest grade please make sure to follow guidelines: The Annotated Bibliography is well-organized and well-written. All references are relevant
to the topic and are correctly cited, using APA format. The reference list is in correct APA format. Only references that are cited in the Annotated Bibliography are listed in the reference list and all resources that are cited in the eview are listed in the reference list. There are at least eight primary, research-based journal articles cited. There are no errors in grammar or spelling.

1. Please write 1 page – about 250 words discussing and analyzing the pdf document attached file. This course title is Aboriginal people in Canada and social work practice. The paper should be written from this page perspective

2. The word document is someone else’s discussion post which you’re to respond to and give your view . Please write this in half a page – about 150 words
This is the video the student analyzed in their post – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTruP6r2cAA

The post must demonstrate not only knowledge of the content presented but analyse through the comparison of different sources of information. The post engages classmates by asking for feedback on information that was new. The post must contain an in-text citation and reference entry that meets APA standards. The post is well-written and without grammatical error.

You can also use the student’s post as a guideline to writing
yours

Please select 5 sentences from a reading of your choice. Please be sure to number the sentences and to place each sentence on a separate line. You will then label each sentence. You should retype the passage word for word. Do not cut and paste it.
1. You should then number each sentence 1-5.
2. . Place each sentence on its on line.
3. You should identify and label the sentence by its structure [simple, compound, complex, compound-complex]. Do this for each sentence.
4. You should identify the sentence opening using the 20 Ways to Start a Sentence handout in Blue booklet. Do this for each sentence.