Best Writer

Answer the following question based on the readings THe Prince by Machiavelli and Utopia:Book I and II by More.
Each answer must be at least 250 words. The questions are as follows…..
1. In AT LEAST 250 words, answer this question. When Machiavelli talks about a “good ruler,” he means one that stays in power. That is all he means. Based on that and the characteristics of what a “good ruler” should be, mention one President or world leader you would consider to be Machiavellian. Explain what characteristics the ruler has. Please don’t cheat on this. Use your own knowledge. Or, you could name a ruler who is not Machiavellian and explain why.

2. In AT LEAST 250 words, explain whether or not you agree with Machiavelli that a “good ruler” should have the characteristics he mentions. Remember, he says that “good ruler” is one who stays in power.

3. In AT LEAST 250 words, respond to the following. In More’s Utopia, everything “seems” to be one thing, but really…is it? I’m going to argue that even though the policies/characteristics say one thing, that these things aren’t true. Choose 3 characteristics of the society and show how even though they “seem” to be true, they aren’t.

Family History Paper Overview:
This paper will be a reflection on your family history and will help you see how
your own culture has helped shape your identity.
Assignment directions:
Write a 3-4 page paper on your own family’s history. You may take either or both
sides of your family. Develop a written account of historical events of your family
through interviews with your immediate relatives and analysis of family
documents. Include background characteristics of your family. Also, be sure to
address the following topics:
1. How does your family view the role of religion and education in its members?
Does everyone share these views?
2. Has anyone in your family married someone of a different race, nationality,
religion or social class background? If so, how did that affect family
relationships?
3. Has anyone in your family ever had to care for a family member during
illness? During their old age?
4. Do you view yourself as someone who carries the same family values or do
you see yourself more as someone transitioning your values?
5. How have you seen the topics discussed in the first half of this course at play
in your family history?
Formatting:
Your paper should:
• Follow all APA formatting guidelines
• 3-4 typed, double-spaced pages
• One-inch margins
• 12-point font, composed in a word processing program
• Include your name, date, title, and assignment title in APA style on a title page
• Be written in your own words, not a restatement of what is in the text or
websites

During each module, you will submit an annotated bibliography. This is a clear and concise summary (200 to 300 words) of a journal article, book, or other primary academic source that will be used in your thesis paper. Each submission must also include a brief critique of the source (e.g., how could the study be improved, criticism of the author(s) assertions, ideas for future studies, etc.).

Describe the history of cognitive psychology.
Explain how and why psychometric studies are used to study cognitive psychology.
Discuss the benefits of research in psychometrics.

Include at least two scholarly articles and speaker notes with your presentation.

Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.

Recall– You feel like you are noticing a trend of more and more young children being raised in single-family homes in your community. You wonder if maybe some sort of program needs to be developed to help keep couples together during the transition to parenthood. After doing some research, you decide that you would like to model a program after the Family Expectations program being implemented in Oklahoma. Please review a summary sheet of this program from 2016 on page 30 of this document, as well as their change model on page 31.

To complete the assignment:
Think about how you might draft a logic model for your program. In looking at the Family Expectations Change Model, what are at least two additions you would make to create a logic model for your program? Consider important categories commonly included in logic models as described in your readings.

For each of the two additions, list what you would write for that category of your logic model (e.g., if you would add an outcome objective, what would a specific outcome objective be? If you would add inputs, what might be some examples of inputs you would include? etc.)

You are to develop a PowerPoint presentation on one of the
following current educational issues:
Every Student Succeeds Act
Charter schools, vouchers, and school choice
Teacher Accountability
Bullying
Inclusive Classrooms
The Education Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Student Assessments (National and International)
*If there is another current educational issue, not provided
on this list, that is of interest to you, you must seek the approval of your
course instructor, prior to working on and submitting this assignment. The
focus of your presentation is two-fold.
Part of your presentation will serve as an informational visual for
students in our class. Highlight some of the key points from the issue you are
exploring by providing specific examples.
The other half of your presentation must include a clear &
reasonable application of existing educational law that supports your
particular views on the educational issue you are sharing in your PowerPoint
presentation. Use the provided resources
in your course module for information on educational law. Be sure to properly
cite your research and other resources you use in your presentation in APA
format, on the final slide. Your PowerPoint should be no fewer than 6 slides
(not including your title slide and references page – which needs to be in APA
format).

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/social-media-_b_6960960
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/conspiracy-theories-study_n_58ac87ede4b06e5f777b28c4
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/01/04/heres-how-scientific-misinformation-such-as-climate-doubt-spreads-through-social-media/
there is three articles to do the outline.
This is about one cause and two effect
and the thirdn page is MLA

A point to consider is how the threats have migrated outside of Al-Qaeda and the nations of Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, and Somalia.
Traditionally, transnational terrorism groups are classified as heterogeneous groups, foreign fighters, and suicide bombers. Pick at least one terrorist group that fits the classification of transnational terrorism. Conduct research to provide an overview on the affiliations between your chosen group and domestic terrorist groups. How do these affiliations between your chosen terrorist groups relate to the various types of terrorist cells, the chain network, and terrorist organization models? You must use at least two sources

1) Please review online sources and read 3 newspapers or magazine articles that span at least three decades between 1900 and today (e.g., one from the 1960s, one from the 1970s, and one from the 2000s). The articles should all discuss one type of family behavior (e.g., divorce rates, teen pregnancy, premarital sex, extramarital affairs, domestic violence, blended families, adoptive families, same sex marriages etc). -Compare and contrast how these articles from these different decades discuss your particular issue.
-What norms are assumed and what judgments are made? How do the assumptions and points of view in the articles compare to the family trends that were actually occurring at that time? What argument can you make about public perceptions of this family behavior and of changes in this family behavior over time? In addition to the three articles, please make use of at least two sources from the class (your textbook). Your paper should be at least two pages.
This paper is due by July 4, 2021. This is more of a paper detailing your opinions of these articles. It should be quite easy to complete within this short time frame.

each lesson needs 200 per lesson

lesson 2
Chapter 3 – Kyllo v. the U.S.
Describe specifically the information agents Elliott and Haas got from Kyllo’s house.
Describe exactly how the officers got the information.
Summarize the arguments the majority makes to support its conclusion that getting and recording thermal images constitute searches and seizures.
Summarize the arguments the dissent makes to support its conclusions that they aren’t searches and seizures.
Justice Stevens distinguishes “through-the-wall” from “off-the-wall” surveillance.
What does he mean by this, and does he have a point? Do you agree that it should make a difference?
Chapter 4 – Navarette v. California
List all the facts and circumstances relevant to deciding whether the CHP officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette.
Summarize the majority’s decision that reasonable suspicion supported the stop.
Summarize the dissent’s decision that the stop lacked reasonable suspicion to back it up.
In your opinion, is the majority, dissent, or neither more consistent with the balancing ideal? Defend your answer.
lesson 3
Chapter 5 – Graham v. Connor
List all the specific uses of force by the officers.
State the standard that the Court adopted for determining whether the use of force violated the Fourth Amendment.
How does the Court’s standard differ from the test that the Court of Appeals applied in the case?
Why did the Court change the standard? Which test do you favor? Explain your answer.
If you were applying the tests to the facts of this case, what decision would you reach? Defend your answer.
Chapter 6 – Young v. City of Radcliff
List all the facts and circumstances relevant to interrogating whether law enforcement officers violated Young’s idea of privacy in his home.
Summarize the court’s interrogating and in applying of the individual privacy/ public safety ideals balance.
In your opinion, was Stephen Young “innocent”? Defend you
lesson 4
Chapter 7 – State v. Ellis
List all the actions taken by the resident assistants and the Central State Police Department officers
that invaded Ellis’s Fourth Amendment right of privacy in his dorm room.
Explain why the court’s interrogation of resident assistants’ actions was consistent with reasonable Fourth Amendment searches but the police officers’ actions were unreasonable. Do you agree? Defend your answer.
Interrogate Ellis’s Fourth Amendment privacy ideal from his standpoint. Back up your answer.
As they relate to the special needs/privacy ideal, should it matter whether the resident assistants, campus police, or city police conducted the search? Defend your answer.
Chapter 8 – Miranda v. Arizona
According to SCOTUS, what do the words “custody” and “interrogation” mean?
Why is custodial interrogation “inherently coercive,” according to the majority?
Identify and explain the criteria for waiving the right against self-incrimination in custodial interrogation.
On what grounds do the dissenters disagree with the majority’s decision? What interests are in conflict, according to the Court?
How do the majority and the dissent explain the balance of interests established by the Constitution?
Which is more consistent with the relevant criminal procedures ideals regarding the law of police interrogation, the majority’s bright-line rule, requiring warnings, or the dissent’s due process test, weighing the totality of circumstances on a case-by-case basis? Defend your answer.
lesson 5
Chapter 9 – Perry v. New Hampshire
Was the show-up accidental? Explain your answer.
Summarize the majority opinions arguments supporting its decision that the
Manson two-prong test does not apply to the show-up.
Summarize Justice Sotomayor’s arguments that the Manson test should apply.
In your opinion should the Manson two-prong test apply to the show-up? Back up your answer with arguments from the facts and SCOTUS opinion(s).
How does SCOTUS address the innocence and evidence-based decision-making ideals? Explain your answer.
Chapter 10 – Hudson v. Michigan
List the relevant facts regarding the police entry into Booker T. Hudson’s home.
Summarize the majority’s reasons for creating the “knock-and-announce” exception.
Summarize the dissent’s reasons for opposing the “knock-and-announce” exception.
Summarize Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion. What is the significance of his opinion? Explain.
In your opinion, who has the better argument? Defend your answer.