What were the consequences of World War II for women and minorities at home?

Please Make sure you are reading each indivdual question to satisfy each answer correctly please this determines a final letter grade for me please make sure to read the asssignment througly. Also please make sure its your own words I have a very strict professor and he is critquing very little thing.

Final Exam
HIST 1302, Summer 2021
Dr. Cameron

The exam is based primarily on these events/people/concepts. Before you turn this in, please delete this list so it doesn’t mess up your “turnitin.com” report. You may opt to do the same for all of the instruction sections as well, but that’s up to you. I’m only looking for similarities within your content – not mine

Fascism
Isolationism
Lend-Lease Bill
Atlantic Charter
Pearl Harbor
War Production Board
Tuskegee Airmen
Bracero program
Zoot Suit Riots
War Relocation Camps
Holocaust
Yalta Conference
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
The Big Three
Office of Price Administration
A. Philip Randolph
Appeasement
Operation Overlord
“Arsenal of Democracy”
Island Hopping
GI Bill
Cold War
Iron curtain
Containment
National Security Act
NSC-68
Marshall Plan
NATO
Massive Retaliation
Domino Theory
Berlin Wall
Fair Deal
Dixiecrats
LULAC
NAACP
Sweatt v. Painter
SCLC
Freedom Riders
Montgomery Bus Boycott
MLK
Black power
Civil Rights Act 1964
“Southern Manifesto”
“massive resistance”
McCarthyism
HUAC
New Frontier
Great Society
“silent majority”
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Voting Rights Act 1965
Bay of Pigs
Gulf of Tonkin
War Powers Act
Cuban Missile Crisis
Stagflation
Vietnamization
Détente
Stonewall Riots
New Left
counterculture
United Farm Workers
Red Power
Post-WW2 Women’s movement
Reaganomics
SDI
Iran-Contra
HIV/AIDS crisis
perestroika
glasnost
Desert Storm
New Democrats
NAFTA
Contract with America
War on Terror
Great Recession ‘07-‘09
Affordable Care Act

Section 1. Identification (45 points). This section will test your knowledge of the key people/events/concepts of the course and whether you can explain the significance. From the list of terms given above, choose FIVE (at least one from each column) and write a paragraph (4-5 sentences) for each that discusses the who/what/when/where information. Then you should be able to argue why it/they is significance to American history. (The significance could be at least one of the following: the event/person created a change or led to something else happening; and /or the event/person is an example of a larger concept or phenomenon; and/or the event/person corrects a common misperception about American history). Type your responses in the numbered area below. Use as much space as you need.

Section 2. Consequences (20 points). This section will test whether you can identify and explain the consequences of events in American history (in other words, you’re discussing what happened because of something). You must provide the consequences for these key events. Answer in 3-5 sentences.

What were the consequences of World War II for women and minorities at home?

What were the consequences of the Truman Doctrine?

What were the consequences of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling?

What were the consequences of the Watergate Scandal?

Section 3. Historical Progression (35 points). This section will test whether you understand the relation of events in American history to each other. You will choose one the historical progression questions below and provide seven events in that category in order. For each event, you will provide a 2 sentence statement that explains why that step was significant or served as a turning point in a given progression question. Some of the terms above could be points or could inform your points. Begin by deleting all the questions except for the one you’re choosing.

How did the role/place of the United States in the World change after the 1930s?
How did the role of the Federal Government in the Economy and Society change after the 1930s?
How did efforts to reform American Government and Society change after the 1930s?
How did the labor movement evolve after the 1930s?
How did strategies to confront racism/discrimination change after the 1930s?

Event/moment:
Significance:

Event/moment:
Significance:

Event/moment:
Significance:

Event/moment:
Significance:
Event/moment:
Significance:

Event/moment:
Significance:

Event/moment:
Significance:

What is the mainstream ‘best practice, evidence-based’ approach to designing a selection process?

Write a 3000-word essay on the following essay title:
“Selection and assessment reproduce social inequalities in organisations rather than challenge them”. Critically discuss this statement, drawing on both mainstream and critical literature and analyses.
You are welcome to use headings as you see fit, but this is not compulsory.
Some guiding questions to help you unpack the question and structure your essay:
· What is the mainstream ‘best practice, evidence-based’ approach to designing a selection process? Describe the key steps in the selection process, paying particular attention to the mainstream literature on assessment methods and how choices should be made in relation to which methods to include in a selection process.
· Consider the extent to which a ‘best practice, evidence-based’ selection process can be considered to be ‘fair’. You should aim to demonstrate an understanding of how ‘fairness’ is discussed and debated within a) the mainstream literature and b) the critical literature.
o Is fairness about neutrality and objectivity and if so, then how can this be achieved and what are the limitations to this approach? What assumptions does the mainstream approach to selection and assessment make about ‘selecting the right person for the right job’?
o Or is fairness about social justice and therefore relates to tackling social inequalities? To what extent does the mainstream selection process, with its different assessment methods, help advance this aim of challenging social inequalities in organisations?

Write an analysis of this artwork by Romare Bearden.

Write an analysis of this artwork by Romare Bearden. Use the standard method for analysis laid out in the book: Description, analysis, interpretation, and evaluation. The description is formal, what you can see: the materials used, and elements in the composition, just write down everything you can see. The analysis has two parts: A physical analysis (how the elements in the composition are used) and a contextual analysis (how elements in the work relate to (historical) things you know. The interpretation is what meaning the work holds. What do you think the artist intended? What does it mean to you personally? In the evaluation you list the reasons why you think this work is either good or bad. Length: 300-400 words (one page) or more. Make sure you have read chapters 4 and 5 of our textbook and followed the video presentations this module.

Why would Amazon accept responsibility for the shipping problems of its vendors, UPS and FedEx?

Why would Amazon accept responsibility for the shipping problems of its vendors, UPS and FedEx? How would you feel about the company’s response if you were among the customers who did not receive two-day shipping as promised?
6-25. List the pros and cons of Amazon’s customer relationship management system from the company and customer perspectives.
6-26. How has Amazon compensated for its lack of brick-and-mortar stores?

Discuss an overview of the Madeleine Leininger nursing theory.

Discuss an overview of the Madeleine Leininger nursing theory. Provide evidence that demonstrates support for the model’s efficacy in nursing practice. Explain how the theory proves the conceptual model.A detailed overview of the nursing theory is presented. Support for the efficacy of the model in nursing practice is strongly demonstrated. A detailed explanation of how the theory proves the conceptual model is presented.

kafka assignment

Kafka’s novel and Sartre’s philosophical treatise on Existentialism are in many ways linked and though Kafka’s novel was written before Sartre wrote anything on Existentialism, many critics see Kafka as an existentialist thinker. For this assignment, write a two-page argument for or against reading Kafka as an existentialist. Whether you argue for or against, be sure to cite from both Kafka and Sartre in your response. You can’t clarify your claims without support from the texts. There is no right or wrong answer here–you can argue successfully either way, as long as you provide well reasoned support for your claim.
Nuts and Bolts: Typed, double spaced, MLA formatted on Microsoft Word and attached as a document that I can open. 700 words minimum and quote at least twice from The Metamorphosis and once from “Existentialism is a Humanism” in support of your answer. Your work will be judged based on the uniqueness and quality of your argument, your familiarity and engagement with the material and of course fulfilling the formatting and length criteria of the assignment.

Proposal Argument – What can be done to promote better health for the American population?

Proposal Argument – What can be done to promote better health for the American population?

Proposal arguments are common forms of writing, especially in the professional world. The goal of a proposal argument is to propose a solution to solve a problem. This task requires you to propose a clear solution to a specific problem and then provide evidence to support your recommendation.

REQUIREMENTS
A. Write a proposal essay (suggested length of 4–7 pages). In your essay, do the following:
1. Respond to one of the given topics.
2. Provide an effective introduction.
3. Provide an appropriate thesis statement that previews two to four main points.
4. Explain the significance of the problem.
5. Propose a clear recommendation, with support, to solve the problem.
6. Provide an effective conclusion that includes an evaluation of the importance of the topic.
B. Include at least three academically credible sources in the body of your essay.
1. For your sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly.