Best Writer

It should not be a descriptive paper but one that critically examines current problems and contemporary solutions. You should make an argument or prove a point. You will be required to make some technical assumptions and devise alternatives based upon the material you are studying. Regardless, a response template will be provided to the student to reduce confusion as to what is required for the particular assignment. Each problem paper must utilize significant, technical, scholarly, peer reviewed resources that are relevant to the topic (current, credible, and each carries its weight) with a clear and meaningful connection between all the resources. You are encouraged to use the textbook only as a resource that might lead you to other more pertinent sources. The paper must properly follow current APA style
The case has been provided and a template on how the paper should look
Acceptable sources (e.g., scholarly articles published within the last five years)
Must also cite the book ” Guide to computer forensic and investigations” 6th edition by Nelson, Phillips, and Steuart 2018
Format:
Organize and format your paper according to current APA style (double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman
Discuss the legal, policy, and technical issues involved with each facet of this scenario critically examining each point and conclude by offering a resolution(s), if any.
Remember to identify, assess, and interpret all of the evidence before you.
Bibliography (or Reference page) of the sources you cited in the short essay
Problem Scenario:
Read the included search warrant (Case #15-190459)
You are a certified digital forensic examiner and retired police officer hired by a local attorney who deals primarily in criminal cases and representing clients who have been charged with Class A felonies. The attorney tells you that his client, Randall M. Peterson, has just been arrested by the police for Rape of a Child in the First Degree and Sexual Exploitation of a Minor. Your attorney has asked you to read the search warrant and provide him with an assessment of what you might believe to be of concern to him.
As the defense expert on the matter, discuss all of the issues to this point and then direct, explain, and discuss any further issues that will or potentially may arise as a result of your direction in this matter. If something legal, policy wise, or technical does not obviously appear in the search warrant, assume that it does not exist or did not occur. Indeed, there are many unknowns here in this scenario. It will be up to you to provide the most comprehensive assessment possible.

Read the introduction and background for the lab and then complete the Pre-Lab table. Perform the necessary calculations to complete the data table and then respond to the 4 analysis questions.
Here’s how the lab will be graded.
Pre-Lab Table = 18 points (1 point per correct box in the table)
Data Table = 6 points (1 point for each correct box in the table)
Analysis Questions = 16 points (4 points per correct response)
Total Points = 40
Due Date: Wed. 6/30 by 11:00 pm (You will want to complete this before the quiz that will be due at this same time)
This is an “Informal” lab assignment so you should copy my document, complete the data tables, and answer the questions directly in the document.
You will upload your lab to this “Assignment” post. Do not email assignments to me unless told to do so.

Topic needs to be discussed as in terms of the social contract between the individual and the state. References need to be in the Harvard style.

For this assignment you will be watching the movie Ordinary People (1980) in class. The link to the movie is posted on our Canvas site. Be sure to use the questions below to guide your attention as you watch the film.
The written portion of this assignment must be computer-generated, double-spaced, 12 point font with 1-inch margins, and written in APA format. The final document should be 1100-1200 words with a word count shown at the end of the paper. This page count does not include the Title page or Reference page. The word count should not include the set of questions. A grading rubric is provided on the Canvas site for the class. This assignment must be submitted in Canvas and MUST generate a Unicheck score.
Steps for writing the paper:
Create a title page which includes: The title of the assignment, your name and your Instructor’s name. (3 pts).
The body of the paper will focus on answering the questions below:
Question #1:
Summary of the movie plot, in your own words (1/2 page maximum) (5 pts)
Question #2:
Discuss 3 possible psychological disorders that Conrad could be diagnosed with and justify your answers by linking the disorder to his symptoms. (1 2 pts)
Based on the majority of symptoms that Conrad shows in the movie, choose the psychological disorder that you think Conrad was diagnosed with. (5 pts)
Substantiate your answer with information from the film and your textbook. Make sure you cite the textbook in your answer.
Question #3:
How does Conrad cope with his illness and what steps does he take to be treated? (5 pts)
What impact does the treatment have on his life? (5 pts)
Support your answer by citing specific examples from the movie.
Question #4:
What type of therapy is Conrad’s therapist using? (5 pts)
Describe specific techniques and evaluate their effectiveness for Conrad. (5 pts)
What other therapy techniques might the therapist use? (5 pts)
Substantiate your answer with information from the film and your textbook. Make sure you cite the textbook in your answer.
Question #5:
How does Conrad’s illness impact his relationship with his mother and father? Make sure you discuss his mother and father separately! (5 pts)
Conrad’s father goes to see the therapist himself. Evaluate the impact this had on his relationship with Conrad’s mother (5 pts)
If Conrad’s mother had gone to see the therapist when her husband asked her to, what impact do you think it would have had on the family? How might the therapy have changed the ending of the movie? (5 pts)
Question #6:
Apply the diathesis-stress model to explain how Conrad developed his disorder. What advice would you give to someone in the future who suffers from a trauma and/or disorder Similar to Conrad’s. Cite 4-5 concepts from the book to explain your answer. (15 pts)

Bachelor Thesis
Topic: Real estate bubbles, but the main part should be about the real estate market in Europe (Focus on Germany and Luxembourg!!).

– with research question
– max 5-10 graphs and statistics (selfmade)
– history of bubbles (America real estate bubble. How are they disappearing?)
– finance crisis: Effects on real estate–> property sale due to interest -> DAX -> How does the state helped
– Are we concerned at the moment with this kind of situation (real estate bubble)
– Conclusion: recommendation, federal government and central bank

sources that should be used:
– Wirtschaftsforschungsintute Munchen/ weltfroschungsinstitut Hamburg
– VISO/ Statista

This is a specific requirement of this essay required.

Based on a previous essay I have written, we need to write a reflection essay on it based around distributed leadership model (DLM)

before confirmation of order I will need to discuss with writer on the my previous assignment and my diary entries on how these can b help relate to this reflective esssay.

———————————–

brief of assignment

Leading Assignment 1B
Assignment 1(b): Reflective Leadership Journal (25%).
This assignment is a reflective assignment that is evidence-based. The evidence will be diary entries that will be used to inform your reflection. Learning to be reflexive is a key skill to develop in the work place as people will be telling you things about yourself. You have to decide how true or untrue they are.
Assignment 1b has two parts: diary entries and the Reflective Journal. The link between the two is that the diary entries will form the evidence, together with your Hero and Zero moments, that you will reflect upon in your Reflective Journal. If you have no diary entries, you can only reflect upon the Hero and Zero moments using the lenses provided by concepts in the course.
Diary entries: No marks – This is the evidence for the Reflection
In week 1, you will decide on how frequently you will make your diary entries. These diary entries can only be viewed by you and teaching staff in the unit. No one else can view them. Diary entries are voluntary. Please number your diary entries.
What are the diary entries about?
Every week, you are expected to complete the required readings and complete the pre-seminar activities as well as the post-seminar activities from the preceding week. Many of the seminars will also have activities. The outcomes of the activities form the evidence to support any conclusion you draw about yourself in the Reflection. The central issue in relation to these diary entries is quality. Of course you can simply answer ‘Yes’ or ‘No’, but the question is ‘Why?” – Why did I get this result? Why did the seminar group react in this way? What assumptions did I make that led to the outcome? How did those assumptions come to be? Why didn’t I do it the other way? Why didn’t I recognise that my classmate would react in that way? Your answers to these questions can, and should be, used as entries. If you find yourself writing “if only… then….” you are going off track.
You will also need to apply the course concepts to the Hero and Zero moments. In relation to the Hero/Zero moments, and for the diaries to be useful, don’t make it about hindsight i.e. “I should have done X, or I should not have been quiet”. The central question here is why did you do X in the first place? Or Why were you quiet in the first place?
Reflection (2,000 words) Due end Saturday, Calendar Week 8; Submit in Word Compatible format; fully referenced (diary entries as well as academic references) please include your name in the file name.
Using Witherspoon’s Practices, use the data from your Hero and Zero moments, your diary entries or any insight gained over the teaching period to enhance your understanding of yourself. The goal is to gain insight to the lessons of your experiences. This is the most important part of this assignment. There are four components to this assignment:
1) report,
2) reflect
3) reframe and
4) Re-design.
Report
Report your key findings about yourself. The activities, readings and questions are experiments that you conducted upon yourself. What happened when you undertook these activities, read the readings and answered the questions? Summarise and report these results from your diary entries.
Reflect:
You are expected to look back retrospectively at the results you reported. Adopt a high level view to tease out the patterns that exist in your experiences in the course. Apply course concepts to look at the Hero and Zero entries, and other diary entries you may have made to draw conclusions about your understanding of leadership, what it means to be a leader, your assessment of your leadership capabilities, assumptions that drive you, and default approaches to situations that may exist within you. Here are some possible questions to start you off, to help you focus your analysis and interpretation. Please note that these are trigger questions only and are intended to aid your reflection. Do not use these trigger questions as headings, or structure your paragraphs around each of them.
Table 1: Question triggers from Witherspoon 2014, p264
Re-frame:
In this step, you are being asked to consider how you saw the situations you saw your self in in the Hero/Zero moments, the in-class activities etc. In other words, what lens were you viewing the world through? What identity was activated at that moment? Again here are some triggers for you.
Table 2: Question triggers based on author and Witherspoon 2014 p265
By the end of this step, you should be in a position to evaluate your own DLM capabilities. Such as:
o To what extent do you practice the capabilities of the DLM?
o Are you a good Sensemaker? What evidence do you have?
o Are you good at Relating? What evidence do you have?
o Are you good at Visioning? What evidence do you have?
o Are you good at Inventing? What evidence do you have?
o Why do you rate yourself this way? Do you think your peers and subordinates would rate you the same way?
o Did you treat an adaptive challenge as a technical challenge? Why?

Re-design:
Having analysed your Hero/Zero moments, ask yourself what does this mean for yourself? This is a big picture perspective. You may find contradictions; you may find hidden strengths or unknown weaknesses. Link these insights back to the capabilities of the DLM i.e. the extent and quality to which you practice these capabilities. Then outline what needs to change in relation to the capabilities.
You need to identify three concrete actions to take:
– What have you done well and should continue to do?
– What specific behaviour should you stop engaging in? Why?
– What specific behaviour should you start engaging? Why?
The re-design may take the form of “If…then.. statements”. If I encounter this situation X, then I will take actions Y”. These actions must be concrete steps and not statements like ‘I will sensemake better’. What will you do to engage in better sensemaking? In this last section, it is more than just 3 sentences. The identification of these behaviours should be flow from the data to your analysis and your interpretation. You must relate these actions back to the capabilities of the DLM.
· Using Witherspoon’s Practices, use the data from your Hero and Zero moments, your diary entries or any insight gained over the teaching period to enhance your understanding of yourself. The goal is to gain insight to the lessons of your experiences. This is the most important part of this assignment. There are four components to this assignment:
1) report,
2) reflect
3) reframe and
4) Re-design.
· Advice on how to incorporate theory in your reflection:
Your Reflection needs to be more than just thinking about your Hero/Zero and diary entries. Your Reflection needs to apply theory to ground your analysis. So the focus is NOT to tell stories, but to ground your stories in theory. The question is why are you relating a particular incident? This incident must be used to illustrate the theory. So instead of saying “X hid in his office for large parts of the day”, say instead “sensemaking is social. This means it requires social interaction. By staying in his office the whole day, X was not interacting with people. Consequently his sensemaking was faulty.”
Now, the example I have given you is in itself incomplete so don’t go round reproducing it as a couple of important parts are left out. However it does demonstrate my point: I start off with theory (Red), explain it (green), then use the story to illustrate the theory (purple); and then conclude (orange)
In short, you need to introduce theory and use stories to illustrate the theory.

It’s a seminar/ academic paper. Please include table of contents like https://shsulibraryguides.org/ld.php?content_id=21454218. Some examples for the structure/ topics to include:

Technology:
Which memory card is used where?
Why is it not possible to use an SD memory card in a Red or Alexa (camera manufacturer, lord of the rings etc)?

Structure:
– Progress: Development of the memory card until today (tape), difference between disk storage and solid state drive

Where are they used?
– Definition, what does it say on a memory card?
– Writing and reading speed
– Size (physical size and GB) of the storage media
– Where are you deployed? Why? (Data rate, pins -> more data rate goes through)
– Heat development from memory cards (is ventilated (processor))

Some devices (Sony A7III) do not accept every memory card (4k) depending on the resolution in which the film is being filmed
– because it is, for example, too slow, therefore not compatible

Market:
– Development of prices (compact flash),
– the size in the future (Red card like an SD card), size as in memory space
– supply and demand

Function overview:
Where are the memory cards used in film and video production; which memory cards for which device?

The Admissions Office recommends a word range of 250-750 for the following statements.

Asbury University is a Christian Liberal Arts University committed to equipping men and women for a lifetime of learning, leadership and service to the professions, society, the family and the Church.
* At Asbury University, students are encouraged to “Start here. Impact the world.” What role do you see your college education having in preparing you for your future goals? How do you want to impact the world and why?

* If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, please describe that relationship. If you do not have a personal relationship, please explain why the Christian emphasis at Asbury appeals to you.

1- What are the history, chemical composition and physical properties of the pollutant?

2- What are its sources and modes of transport?

3- How prevalent is it in the environment and where would human exposure occur? Are animals or other environmental systems also affected?

4- What are all the modes of exposure (e.g. Dermal, inhalation and/or ingestion)?

5- What are the different ways one may measure the pollutant in the environment and in people to estimate exposure and dose?

6- Are in vivo and /or in vitro methods or direct and/ or indirect methods used?

7- What populations are affected? Are some populations particularly at risk (with high exposures and/or high sensitivities)?

8- Using time/activity patterns, what is an estimate of either a daily or yearly exposure of a typical population, a specific subpopulation or an individual (show the calculations and where you got the data on a separate piece of paper)?

9- What are an estimated internal dose and an estimated biologically effective dose of the above exposure of the individual or population (show the calculations and where you got the data on a separate piece of paper)?

This Essay will be an Argument Research Paper on a topic “The Process of Becoming a BC Teacher Presents Too Many Difficulties”.

-You need to think about it as an argument with specific claims that you want to make “The process of becoming a teacher in BC presents too many difficulties (or obstacles)’ and then both explain what the difficulties are and why you conclude that these are excessive and for what reasons.
-Include the difficulties of teachers who graduated from another country, came in Canada to continue on the same field but have to go through challenging process and difficulties.
Outline:
-Introduction
-Write a strong Thesis Statement
-Body Paragraphs
-Point 1
*Argument
Examples, Process, difficulties
-Point 2
*Argument
Examples, Process, difficulties
-Point 3
*Argument
-Point 4
*Argument
(and so on)

Conclusion must answer your Thesis
-Point 3
-Point 4
-Conclusion must answer your Thesis

The topic should be sufficiently complex to allow the student to take a specific position to argue and defend and require supporting evidence that will be obtained through topical research. Research to support the argument should be gathered from no less than 5 credible scholarly sources in addition to other sources. The Essay will follow either MLA or APA 7th e documentation style. All quotes and references will be appropriately cited and a ‘Works Cited’ or ‘References’ section will be included.

N.B. Indicate on the title page which style format (APA or MLA) has been used. The first page of the Essay should be numbered as 1, not on the Cover Page.