Best Writer

Reading responses from book.I will provide you all the guidline.This is a CMNS style.I strictly or strongly recommend plagiarism free content.

Analyze the areas of your overall plan that you wish you had addressed more deeply. This can include topics such as intellectual property, the effect of recent political events, the economy, or other factors. Provide a brief overview of how you might strengthen these areas more deeply.

Watch 4 tours and write a response to each one in a single document.

LINK: https://glasstire.com/category/feature/five-minute-tours/

EACH RESPONSE MUST BE 250 WORDS OR MORE, TOTALING MORE THAN 1,000 WORDS FOR THE WHOLE PAPER!
RESPONSES SHOULD BE A THOUGHTFUL CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU VIEWED THE EXHIBITION AND MADE EFFORT TO UNDERSTAND THE WORK. IS NOT A FORMAL ANALYSIS.
WORK MUST BE CITED!!
THANKS!!

Beneficence and nonmalificence
Fidelity and responsibility
Integrity
Justice
Respect for rights and dignity
Before continuing, read more about each of these principles here:

http://www.apa.org/ethics/code

Chose a psychological researcher that you believe has done some unethical things in their research. Bear in mind that their research may have taken place before research standards were clarified and enforced. Their methodology may have led to the development of ethical principles. You can choose any researcher, though some likely candidates are listed below:

Stanley Milgram, John B. Watson, B. F. Skinner, Martin Seligman, Phillip Zimbardo, the “Monster Study”

Give specific examples of the researcher’s unethical behavior and for each example identify which ethical principle may have been violated. Start with an explanation of your researcher’s topic and methodology then specify how he/she violated ethical principles. Finally, make suggestions on how to improve their work. Design a research study that may get at some of the same information while not violating ethical standards.

Your critical thinking essay should be 2-5 pages long with a 12-point font.

The following rubric will be used for grading.

Grading Rubric

25 points-Interpret information accurately by identifying obvious violations of ethical standards in psychological contexts.

22-25 points: Correctly identifies all ethical violations. Meets all expectations.

10-21 points: Correctly identifies several ethical violations, but not all. Partially meets expectations.

0-9 points: Does not indicate understanding of ethical issues.

25 points – Explain – accurately and thoroughly- relevant ethical issues that reflect principles in the APA Ethics Code.

22-25 points: Accurately and thoroughly explains all relevant ethical issues.

10-21 points: Partially meets expectations.

0-9 points: Does not meet expectations.

25 points – Create a detailed conclusion or complex solution that is complete, well-supported, logically consistent, and often unique. Elaborates on how the researcher could fix the ethical issues while still seeking the relevant information.

22-25 points: Creates a detailed, complex solution. Meets all expectations.

10-21 points: Partially meets expectations.

0-9 points: Does not meet expectations.

25 points: – Recognize and develop overall organization (e.g., beginning, development, ending).

22-25 points: Paper is well written using the authors own words and few, if any, grammatical errors. The paper has a clear introduction, development, and conclusion. The paper flows well throughout.

10-21 points: Partially meets expectations. Too many grammatical errors and transitions are choppy.

0-9 points: Does not meet expectations. Paper incomplete or poorly written.

Choice #1: Instrument Validity
Describe one of the following five ways to assess validity of a research instrument in your own words (see image below). How would you assess for this type of instrument validity in a published research study?
Include at least 1 reference (APA format).

Over the next few weeks, you will be developing a Persuasive Speech.
Assignment You may chose any topic that interests you. The sky is the limit!
Once you have selected your topic, explore various points you wish to research and share. The intent is to teach your audience about something with no bias; just the facts.
You will submit a document which discusses your chosen topic and various points you may want to discuss in your speech. The organization of your points is not relevant at this point. This is a freestyle/brainstorming assignment that sets the foundation.
Should you choose to map your ideas out with activities such as clustering, then you may scan or take a picture of your work and submit it in lieu of a typed document.
COM301 Brainstorm Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Mechanics (15%)
Spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct. Both sentence and paragraph structures conform to current conventions.
3 to >2.0 pts
Exemplary (15%)
Meets all guidelines with no errors.
2 to >1.61 pts
Accomplished (10%)
Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.
1.61 to >1.01 pts
Acceptable (8%)
Meets some of the guidelines; contains major errors.
1.01 to >0.0 pts
Inadequate (5%)
Does not meet the guideline
0 pts
No Submission
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Purpose (25%)
Submission reflects the purpose of the intended occasion; topic is appropriate for the assigned speech (informative, persuasive, special occasion, etc).
5 to >4.0 pts
Exemplary (25%)
Meets all guidelines with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Accomplished (20%)
Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Acceptable (15%)
Meets some of the guidelines; contains major errors.
2 to >0.0 pts
Inadequate (10%)
Does not meet the guideline
0 pts
No Submission
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Structure (60%)
Topic is fully explored; sub-points are identified and explored for inclusion in the speech. Research is included to boost sub-points as assigned.
12 to >10.0 pts
Exemplary (60%)
Meets all guidelines with no errors.
10 to >8.0 pts
Accomplished (50%)
Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.
8 to >6.0 pts
Acceptable (40%)
Meets some of the guidelines; contains major errors.
6 to >0.0 pts
Inadequate (30%)
Does not meet the guideline
0 pts
No Submission
12 pts
Total Points: 20
Previous
Next

Goal
Completing the Lifespan Developmental Paper earning 70% or higher is one of the student learning outcomes for this course. It must be turned in or the student will not pass the course. Therefore, it is essential to complete the assignment.
The paper has been divided into sections for you to work on to stay on track for turning in your paper on time. For this section you will turn in body sections 3 and 4. I will provide feedback on the document or in the comments.
Guidelines
Submit the the Body – Sections 3 and 4 for your paper. Remember to include answers to all questions. You should have one paragraph at least for each theorist, a paragraph for emotional development, and a paragraph for social/play activities.
Section 3
If your chosen group is infant, early childhood, middle childhood, or adolescence:
Describe the cognitive achievements according to Piaget
Describe the psychosocial achievements according to Erikson
Describe how moral thinking develops according to Kohlberg
Describe language development according to Vygotsky
8. If your chosen group is young adulthood or middle adulthood:
Describe the cognitive achievements according to Piaget
Describe the psychosocial achievements according to Erikson
Describe how moral thinking develops according to Kohlberg
Choose one of the following:
Describe cognitive theory according to Loevinger
Describe psychosocial development according to Levinson
Describe developmental tasks according to Havighurst
9. If your chosen group is late adulthood or advanced old age:
Describe the cognitive achievements according to Piaget
Describe the psychosocial achievements according to Erikson
Describe how moral thinking develops according to Kohlberg
Choose one of the following:
Describe cognitive theory according to Loevinger
Describe psychosocial development according to Levinson
Describe developmental tasks according to Havighurst
Describe developmental tasks according to Peck
Describe developmental stages of retirement according to Atchley
Section 4
10. Describe how emotional development advances and give an example.
11. List at least 3 appropriate play/social activities.

Art Appreciation Final Assignment: A Personal Art Museum and Exhibition Project.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
WHAT IS A MUSEUM?
Museums are storehouses of our cultural treasures. Some focus on specific times and cultures, others main purpose is to collect artworks from most historical (and pre-historical) eras, and are known as encyclopedic museums. In contrast, commercial art galleries showcase the works of artists, and are often for sale, but works owned by a museum are held in its care long term. Often, museums are designed by renowned architects, and are therefore works of art in themselves.
A museum is a collection of objects that go together for a reason, with spaces that put those objects on display in a way that helps the viewer understand the reason for that collection. An exhibit is a group of objects that explore a particular idea. Exhibits are laid out (have a physical organization) that shapes the viewer’s experience.
Curators are people with extensive art knowledge who choose what goes in a museum exhibit, how to organize it and present it, and what information to put on labels which help viewers understand the ideas of the exhibits and collections. For this assignment you will become the head curator for your personal collection and exhibition.
MAKE YOUR OWN MUSEUM EXHIBITION
For this project you will be the curator for and create your very own art museum exhibition, based on absolutely any theme or connecting thread you want it to be among the selected artworks, as long as it utilizes examples of artworks from our textbook. Consider that your collection can be based on colors you like, subject matter you enjoy (themes of war, portraiture, mythology, genre painting medium, religious/spiritual theme, etc.), things that remind you of your uncle Juan (his heritage, depictions of men in hats, etc.), artworks representing romance (theme of love)…. In other words, ANYTHING. The only criteria is that you give a thoughtful explanation of the collection theme, why its selection, and how it connects to the material studied in this class.
Example of thoughtful approach to this assignment: Blue Museum. In this collection the Blue Museum is pleased to present a selection of artworks that have color in common, in particular, representations of multiple variations of the hue, because it is a color with deep associations to emotions (like sadness) and sensations (like seeming cool to the touch). We are interested in exploring some of those relationships.
Not thoughtful: “my museum is all blue artworks, because blue is my favorite color.”

INSTRUCTIONS
NOTE: YOUR PAPER SHOULD BE ORGANIZED WITH THE FOLLOWING 5 SECTIONS CLEARLY MARKED. Following these instructions will ensure earning the best possible grade.
SECTION I: NAME THE MUSEUM, PROVIDE A TITLE FOR THE EXHIBITION AND CHOOSE THE ARTWORKS IN IT – 10pts
⦁ Name
a. Provide a name for the museum, and select a title or name that reflects the theme for the exhibition.
b. Explain why you chose your particular theme. Be thoughtful and complete. In other words, create a mission statement encompassing the overarching idea of your collection. Remember to give a thoughtful explanation of your collection theme, why you chose it, and connect it to ideas studied in this class. What do you want the visitors to learn about?
c. Describe two prominent characteristics found in most artworks in your exhibition. Think about what they have in common. For example, are the works connected/unified by the same media (most are two-dimensional photographs, drawings or paintings). Perhaps all the works are sculpture, installation and reliefs, thus made of three-dimensional artworks. Were the artists working during the same time frame? For example, your collection is made of six oil paintings on canvas, created within the span of twenty years.
SECTION II: CREATE YOUR SPACE – 10 pts
⦁ Define the building style and physical experience. Go to chapter 2.5 in the textbook, and choose an architectural style. Ask yourself what kind of experience you want your viewers to have when entering or visiting a building in the style you selected. How would the design of the building best connect/match to your museum’s collection, exhibition and mission statement. In this section, briefly describe the selected architectural style and describe how it best connects to the style or them of your artworks. Provide one example from the chapter in the book. Provide the name of the architect (if known), date and style (see guideline below).
Consider the location of the building. It can be located anywhere you wish, but explain the reason behind your place selection. Would the building be classical in style (as in an ancient Greek temple), tall as gothic cathedral, modernist or perhaps post-modernist? Perhaps you need lots of natural light to best showcase the artworks and gothic architecture is the way to achieve this goal. Explain your selection. Consider practical reasons for the exhibition. For example, if you prefer to create a collection of three-dimensional work perhaps it would be nice to set in an outdoor space for their installation (think of the Nasher Sculpture Center garden in Dallas), but remember that paintings cannot be shown outdoors for conservation purposes (the sun and changes in temperature/humidity would damage a painting in a relative short period of time).
Again, be thoughtful in so that the architectural design best enhance or further reflect aspects in your collection.
SECTION III: WRITE YOUR LABELS – 60pts
⦁ Select six artworks from the textbook, and write the labels for each containing the following:
a. List artworks and provide a thumbnail picture next to each title. Include the artist (if known), title, date, dimensions, period, and current location (museum where the selected work resides). Explain what it is about them that made you include them in your exhibition. What part do they play in it, why it is a good choice for your museum.
b. Formal analysis. You must identify two visual elements and two design principles for each artwork. This part involves looking closely and in detail at each artwork, giving examples of how they function in the compositional aspect of the artwork. Give evidence to your claims. It is not enough to mention the vocabulary, you must back up your assertions with evidence. For example, if identifying colors in a painting, do not just mention yellow, blue, discuss the color harmony used and how the colors interact with one another to create a certain mood. Read about color in the textbook. Is it complementary, cool, warm? What kind of feeling does it evoke? You must demonstrate understanding and mastery of the art vocabulary and how it works/functions within artworks. Consider how the elements and principles of art are used to convey the meaning of each artwork. These are labels for the public to read. They should be written for a public that might be unfamiliar with art. You are helping the public better look at and interpret each artwork.
Elements of Art Principles of Art
Line Unity
Shape (found in 2D artworks) Variety
Form/Mass (found in 3D works) Balance
Texture Scale/ Proportion
Color Focal Point/Emphasis
Space Pattern/Rhythm
Value Contrast
Movement/Time
SECTION IV: Write an exit label – 10 pts
This is a wrap up of your ideas and the viewer’s experience. What do you hope they learned about your theme? What do you want them to continue thinking about after they leave?
SECTION V: Word Cited Page – 10 pts
List page and image number for each artwork.
FORMAT EXAMPLE FOR COMPLETING THIS ASSIGNMENT, THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL NOT BE WRITTEN IN TRADITIONAL ESSAY FORM
Student name
ARTS 1301-add section here
Personal Art Museum Assignment
Prof. Marian Lefeld
SECTION I: Museum Name
10 pts Exhibition Title
Characteristics
SECTION II: 10pts
Read chapter 2.5 in the textbook, and select an architect or architectural style that will best house your museum and exhibition. If known, name the architect you would hire to design the building housing your collection, and explain the reason behind this selection. Keep in mind how the building will relate to the artworks. (Would the building blow be the best to house a collection of prehistoric artifacts? Why or why not?). Briefly describe the experience viewers would have/ associations between the artworks and the building housing it. Add thumbnail showing the selected architectural style
SECTION III: 60 pts Add a thumbnail for each of the six artworks selected from the textbook. Provide the following information: artist’s name (if known), title of the work, date, dimensions, and current location (museum housing the work today).

Purpose
To assess your ability to assess the role and importance of science and research in criminal justice.
Overview
In this assignment, you are required to examine the role of science in criminal justice. The students, as consumers of research, are required to critically question “what they think they know and how others claim to know what they know” (Maxfield & Babbie, p. 3-4) while identifying different types of research.
Review the following scenario:
Over the last several decades, policy makers have turned to a more punitive approach to crime control and prevention by increasing sentence lengths. Most states changed their juvenile sentencing policies to increase the numbers of juvenile offenders that were transferred to the adult criminal court so they could receive longer adult sentences. This get-tough-on-crime approach was very popular in most states. Yet, empirical research has failed to find that juvenile crime decreased after these laws were changed. A popular senator urged his state to try more youth as adults so they could get longer sentences, learn their lesson and not recommit. He read about a youth who shot his teacher and only received two years in a juvenile institution and another gang member who received three after aggravated assault.
Discuss which errors in personal human inquiry might apply to this case including over generalization, inaccurate or selective observations, illogical reasoning and resistance to change or ideology and politics. How might these errors impact this get-tough approach on delinquency? If you were aware of these errors and knew how to overcome them, how would you use the scientific approach to overcome them?
The assignment requires you to write a three page paper following APA style. To successfully complete the assignment, you are expected to read and study the key points and all assigned readings for this module. In particular, use the Brown (1981) article as your sources. You should also familiarize yourself with the grading criteria provided. This criteria includes information on how your professor will grade your assignment. Ensure you cover all relevant information expected of you in the assignment. Make sure you carefully proofread your assignment to ensure proper grammar and spelling. Remember: submitting your written assignment to Turnitin is NOT optional.
Reference
Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. R. (2012). Basics of research methods (3rd ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Action Items
Complete all required readings prior to working on this assignment.
Review the scenario in the overview section and address the following USING EACH AS A HEADER
in a 3 page paper:
Discuss which errors in personal human inquiry might apply to this case including over generalization, inaccurate or selective observations, illogical reasoning and resistance to change or ideology and politics.
How might these errors impact this get-tough approach on delinquency?
If you were aware of these errors and knew how to overcome them, how would you use the scientific approach to overcome them?
Use the Brown (1981) article as your sources.
Your paper is to include your name, the assignment name and number, the course and section number, and the date on your title page. Format your title page, paper, and cite ALL sources according to APA guidelines
(Links to an external site.)
.
Submit the completed first draft of your assignment. Your work will automatically be checked by Turnitin.
Access your Turnitin report by reviewing your Submission Details for this assignment. Revise your work as needed based on the feedback.
By the due date indicated, re-submit the final version of your work.
Grading Criteria
Points Earned At the college level, the emphasis in grading is on the content of assignments and the effectiveness of communication.
Expected PointsAssignment Meets All Requirements
Maximum PointsAssignment Significantly Exceeds Requirements
Content and Focus (40%) Response addressed the subject matter of the assignment in a logical, cohesive manner
24
32
Analysis and Critical Thinking (40%) The student’s response indicates a level of knowledge of the material that is based on analysis and evaluation. (The student has thought about and understands the topic). The student’s response indicates the ability to synthesize and apply the material learned
24
32
Writing Style, Grammar, Sentence Structure, APA, and Research (20%) Sentences consistently clear, concise, well written; grammar and punctuation are correct. Correct use of APA style in body of paper and in bibliography; appropriately references all research sources
12
16
Subtotal (points earned before any applicable deductions)
60
80
Points Deducted Error-free mechanics and meeting stated format criteria are the baseline expectations for assignments. Points will be deducted for failing to meet these requirements.
Mechanics (-10%) grammar, spelling, punctuation
up to – 8
Format (-10%) length, appearance
up to – 8
Total (points earned minus any applicable deductions)
0 – 80

Project is an integrative summary of seven short papers.
Each paper that is used must be at least three pages long. For example, if it’s a newspaper article that is only 2 pages long, it will not count as one of the papers.
For each paper that is read, you must summarize the paper in approximately one page, but usually about 3/4 page.
Each paper that is read must be preceded by a bibliographical citation.
After summarizing all the papers, you must write an Integrative Summary that ties all the papers together and demonstrate how they address a narrow topic. For example, How Pharmacies in England resisted resisted laws to limit the free distribution of addictive opium during the 19th Century.

These papers may be from a academic literature or current news on drug controls, the drug war, history of illicit or psychoactive drugs or drug policies from anywhere in the world. You may select articles from journal articles or working papers on Drug Policies, Economic Analysis, Economic Historical Analysis, Medical History, Scientific Analysis, International Diplomacy, and Social and Philosophical Analysis.

The documents you cite must include research papers, magazine articles, newspaper article or government policy documents published during the last 10 years.
The bibliography topic must be narrow and specific. You cannot select papers that address the War on Drugs in general. An example of an acceptable topic could be “The Medellin Cartel: It’s Rise and Fall” or Comparing the Methods of Pablo Escobar and Other Drug Gangs or How the Dutch Profited from the Trade in Opium and Why and When they Ceased to Trade in Opium.

The bibliographical selection may address topics from the examples listed below or other topics that you may select:
Comparative international policies
Historical analysis of policies in different countries
Socio-Economic analysis of drug policies
Social and Psychological Issues of Drug Use and Policies
The Politics and Economics the War on Drugs
International Drug Cartels and their Activities / Violence and Corruption
European colonialism and the drug trade in history
Foreign Trade and the History of Drugs (Opium and Cocaine)