Do you think Haney exemplified effective teaching practices?

Critiquing Teacher Professionalism and Practices
• Do you view Haney as a professional? Support your response
with specific references to your own view of professionalism
and the Learning Resources.
•Why or why not?
• How might you argue that Haney was creating positive social
change?
• What is at least one question would you want to ask Haney?
Provide an explanation (i.e., rationale) for your particular
question.
Support your response with specific references to the Learning
Resources including media and at least one outside source (see
acceptable outside sources in the MSED Documents area), as well
as your own professional experiences to support your thinking.

In text citations
Why we teach now (Chapter 9) Required Book Reading Nieto, S. Author
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). (n.d.). Middle Childhood generalist Standards. Retrieved June 23, 2021, from http://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/MC-GEN.pdf
Nieto, S. (2015). Why we teach now. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
RWRCOEL Diversity Proficiencies. (n.d.). https://class.content.laureate.net/a08a4a2a6f6799ef98d006d658fd2a67.pdf
RWRCOEL Professional Dispositions. (n.d.). https://class.content.laureate.net/390c0924723dc502253f764a9c468bc3.pdf

Describe what you would add to improve this theory.

In this assignment you will review the concrete-operational and formal-operational periods of cognitive development. You will review the various theories of intelligence and analyze the influence of hereditary and environmental factors on intelligence.
Objectives
Identify the distinguishing characteristics of cognitive development in middle childhood
Determine how heredity and environment can influence intelligence
In a 3-5 page paper describe the concrete-operational and formal-operational periods. Provide an example from your life that illustrates each stage. After reviewing Gardner and Sternberg’s theories of intelligence describe what you think is missing from each theory, ensure you use outside research to support your thoughts. Evaluate the contributions of nature (heredity) and nurture (environment) to intelligence. Which factors do you believe are most influential? Choose at least 2 factors from each side of the debate. Does nature or nurture have a greater contribution to intelligence? What research supports your position? Should gifted, traditional, and special needs children be educated in the same classroom? Why or why not? What are the pros and cons of the integrated classroom?
To complete this assignment be sure to address each of the following elements:
Describe the concrete-operational period. Provide an example.
Describe the formal-operational period. Provide an example.
Review Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Describe what you would add to improve this theory.
Review Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory. Describe what you would add to improve this theory.
Evaluate the genetic/hereditary and environmental factors that influence intelligence.
Identify and describe 2 hereditary factors.
Identify and describe 2 environmental factors.
Determine your position on which set of factors (hereditary or environmental) has the most influence on intelligence.
Briefly describe research that supports your position.
Review the characteristics of the gifted, traditional, and special needs children.
Summarize the pros and cons of the integrated classroom.
Assignment Submission:
The use of outside resources is strongly recommended and all papers must be cited and written in APA format.

What topic in this module did you find most interesting and why?

What topic in this module did you find most interesting and why? Perform an online search related to the topic and share with the class one or more interesting fact(s) you discovered about the topic that was not presented in either the PowerPoints or the textbook. Please include the Lesson number (e.g., Lesson 1, Lesson 2, or Lesson 3) and the topic or concept in the title line for your post. You must also correctly cite/reference all sources used to research and/or find your interesting fact(s).
Which of the topics in this module did you find most relevant to your everyday life? Explain how the topic relates to your life and why it important to you. Please include the Lesson number (e.g., Lesson 1, Lesson 2, or Lesson 3) and the topic or concept in the title line for your post .

Explain what the result of not using competent communication was.

After reviewing the Reading & Study items for this Module, create a thread that explains why competent communication is important in the field of criminal justice. Within your response, provide a personal example of a scenario in which competent communication was not used. If you have had personal experience in the criminal justice field, draw from this. Explain what the result of not using competent communication was. 1 Scripture reference in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation and 1 Scripture reference in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the presentations found in the assigned Module: Week, and academic journals.
Thoughtful analysis, required citations, biblical worldview, and examples must be used throughout the thread to support the major points.

Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Using the Research Analysis Template, conduct a research analysis of article you identified. Be sure to address the following:
Correctly format an APA citation of the article you selected.
Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Complete the Research Analysis Matrix Template.
Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 2: Reflection and Narrative
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph reflection and narrative in which you address the following:
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

Why becoming a Nurse Practitioner in Mental Health.

Essay is 520 words, no more than 2 pages, typically 1.5-2 pages, Times New Roman, size 12 font, double-spaced; Essay should have an Intro, please explain interest in becoming a Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, explain how to use education to affect patient ooutcomes, a paragraph eexplaining strategy for finding a preceptor, and Conclusion.
(just to clarify: Im already a Family Nurse Practitioner, this essay is to continue my education in Mental Health, a preceptor is a professor who will be my tutor during the clinicals hours I need to complete as part of the program)

Identify the key problems and issues in the case study.

Read the attached scholarly article on the topic of corporate culture and provide an analysis of the article. Review and critique the article by integrating its content with the material covered from the course material and class discussions. Prepare and submit a 4-6 pages APA formatted paper of your analysis.
Preparing Your Written Critique:
Once you have gathered the necessary information, your analysis should include these sections:
Read and examine the case thoroughly
Take notes, highlight relevant facts, underline key problems.
Introduction
Identify the key problems and issues in the case study.
Formulate and include a thesis statement, summarizing the outcome of your analysis in 1–2 sentences.
Background
Set the scene: background information, relevant facts, and the most important issues.
Demonstrate that you have researched the problems in this case study.
Why do they exist?
How do they impact the organization?
Who is responsible for them?
You basically are identifying information that exposes the issues, gather data, perform calculations (if necessary) that might provide insight.
Proposed Solution
Provide one specific and realistic solution
Explain why this solution was chosen
Support this solution with solid evidence
Concepts from class (text readings, discussions, lectures)
Outside research
Personal experience (anecdotes)
Select the Possible Solutions/Recommendations
Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution.
If applicable, recommend further action to resolve some of the issues
What should be done and who should do it?
Conclusion-Summarize your findings/recommendations

Describe the purpose and background of the development of ZAP.

• Scope – OWASP ZAP is an open-source web application security scanner. At this web site:
https://owasp.org/www-project-zap/ (click on Quick Start Guide/Videos/ZAP Deep Dive Series)
you will find a number (19) of 20-30 minute tutorials that discuss the applications and tool use
contained in ZAP. Review the ones that are relevant to you. Detail ZAP in terms of the security
tools and the associated threat vectors identified by the tool. Unless you are already a user of
ZAP, spend time on the web site reviewing the tutorials.
• Suggested research questions (components in your research report):
o Describe the purpose and background of the development of ZAP
o Discuss the primary tools found in the security scanner
o Also associate the security threats that each tool detects
o Develop conclusions from your research work
• Document requirements – The 2000-word (total minimum) report should additionally include a
cover page and a reference list page. Diagrams and graphics are encouraged but not mandatory.
At least 2 references are required. APA format should be observed.
• Post the document in Assignments on the eLearn site.

What are the benefits of diversifying prison staff?

What are the benefits of diversifying prison staff? What are the benefits of having a diverse staff of probation officers?
Has the war on drugs disproportionally impacted certain groups in society? What have been the negative effects of drug enforcement policies?
In order to receive any credit for weekly discussions all of the
following mentioned below must be met: NO EXCEPTIONS
Is
the commentary to initial question at minimum 400 words?
Is
the commentary to classmate at minimum 400 word?
Does
the commentary show evidence of having read the material?
Does
the commentary show evidence of thinking about the reading beyond just
summarizing it? (This may include extension to new circumstances extension to
new circumstances/other readings, contradictory evidence, internal (in)
consistency, and analyses of assumptions.)
Does
the commentary include relevant evidence to support its own argument? HINT YOU WILL NEED CITATIONS
Refrain
from simply stating “I agree” Or “great post”. If this is
all you write you will lose points for discussion HINT: YOU WILL ONLY GET 5 POINTS. If you agree with student clearly
state what it is you agree with or disagree with?
The standard practice (“netiquette”)
for participation in networked discussion requires that all participation be
focused on the topic at hand, not become personalized, and be substantive in
nature.
Ex. Author’s last name, year, and
page number

Ordaz, 2017, pg.6
Discussion Questions will be graded
based on response quality, and that an in-text citation is provided for each
original response. Integrate various main ideas from the book, thoughtfully
describe what the concept and/or issues mean to you, evaluate/analyze the
reasonableness or quality of ideas, identify hidden assumptions, fallacies, or
things take for granted.

What information is necessary for your audience to know that you were unable to include on the slide?

designed a professional development day for your content-area team. You created an outline,
conducted research, and expanded upon that outline. Now, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that you could present at your training.
Your PowerPoint presentation will include the training you are going to perform. Think of this presentation as what you
would use to follow while conducting the training.
Your PowerPoint presentation will include the following:
• Slide 1: Title Slide (not included in the required slide count)
• Slide 2: Intended Outcomes For The Day
• Slide 3: Agenda/Schedule (detailed)
• Slide 4: Ground Rules For Our Work Together
• Slide 5: Ice Breaker/Team Building activity
• Slide 6-9: Content For The Day (overview)
• Slide 10: Implementation Plan/Communications Plan
• Slide 11: Closure Activity and Evaluation
• Slide 12: References (not included in the required slide count)
Your PowerPoint presentation must contain a minimum of ten slides. You may have more slides than those indicated
above; this is simply a guide.
Below each slide (except the title slide and reference slide), include a narrative explaining the slide. This narrative will be added in the “Notes” section. Here, explain what you say in your presentation. What information is necessary for your audience to know that you were unable to include on the slide? Make this slide presentation meaningful to you. How
would you construct it to meet the needs of your team?