Best Writer

Think of a good physics problem on any topic within a Module of your choosing. The problem must be original, not copied from the internet. Try to make it interesting and fun, as some of the better problems might be incorporated into the course in the future.
Write your problem on the attached template. Be sure to complete each section completely.
I will attach an example of a good physics problem.

Directions: Respond to the following three questions and thought experiments. Do not worry about giving me the “right” answer. I just want to see what you think. Most importantly, I want you to think about why you believe what you believe. This, to me, is the most important part about this particular RP. It is an opportunity for you to get a sense of the sort of questions that we ask and try to answer in ethics. Your answer to each question should be:
Typed, Times New Roman, 12-point font
College essay (introduction, main body, conclusion)
About 2 or 3 pages in length, double-spaced
Submitted via the Blackboard Turnitin link.
Due on Sunday, 6/27 by 11:59pm
Questions and Thought Experiments
Welcome to PHI2604 – Critical Thinking and Ethics! You might be wondering what in the world this class is about. Ethics is a branch of philosophy that seeks to understand the nature of appropriate human conduct. It tries to evaluate the morals that we use to determine the difference between right and wrong. In ethics, it is often the case that one will ask some of the BIG questions about morality—like, “is there such a thing as moral truth?” or “how do we determine moral truth?”. Ethics also provides avenues to question particular moral issues—like, “is it morally wrong to have children?”; “is it wrong to enjoy pornography?”; “is it justifiable to euthanize someone who is seriously ill, is suffering greatly, and who has no hope for a cure?”; “do we have any duties towards ecosystems and the environment?”.
Loads of fun, this discipline known as ethics! Here is what I would like to do. I would like to see where you might stand in relation to your own moral thinking. I have three questions for you. The first is the broadest, the rest are based off of a famous thought experiment that many of you may undoubtedly be familiar with. As I said up there in the directions part of this assignment, do not feel any pressure about being ‘right’ in your response to these questions. I just want you to think about what your answer is and, most importantly WHY you think the way you do. I care most about the ‘why’ of your answer, and I would like you to spend the most amount of time addressing that ‘why’. Ok. Are you ready? Here comes the first question:
Consider the following scenarios:
A stranger saves a small child from drowning.
A soldier risks their life to carry an injured civilian to a hospital.
A medical doctor ensures that the cure they developed for a serious virus remains affordable to the general public.
I do not think it is controversial to suggest that these are examples of actions that are morally right, or morally praiseworthy. However, my question to you is, when you think about the morality (the rightness or wrongness) of an action, what do you think matters more—the intentions (the motives) of the person who is doing the action or the consequences (the results) of the action? Which of these two—the motives or the consequences—matters most when determining whether someone does the right thing? Why do you believe that? Give me 3 – 5 sentences here. Tell me what you think and why you think it. Don’t worry about being wrong. Just be honest.
Got your answer? Alright. Good. Let’s have some fun. Consider the following thought experiment:
Suppose that construction at the Kendall Campus of Miami Dade College has allowed for an advanced railway that encircles the entirety of the school grounds. As construction progresses, you are invited to take a personal tour of the railway, via a prototype of one of the small railcars. You enter the car and begin the tour. Unfortunately, as you are touring the campus, you notice that there are five workers on the tracks, making some last-minute adjustments. You try to hit the brakes, but they have malfunctioned. The railcar is heading towards the five workers. Their backs are turned to you, and since they are working loudly, they do not hear the car’s approach. If they are struck, they will surely die. However, you also notice that there is a fork along the tracks. If you pull a lever, the railcar will change its course. Unfortunately, there is one worker along this alternate path. Do you pull the lever to save the five workers, while sacrificing the one? Why or why not? Give me about 5 sentences for your answer to this one, too. You can write more than 5 sentences, though. I won’t mind, and I won’t tell on you. Think about the relationship between this second question and your answer to the first question. Is your response to the first question informing how you respond to this one?
Ready for the last question, suckers? Here it is. Wait. First, do me a quick favor. DON’T read this question BEFORE giving your full and honest answer to question 2. Got that? I have to trust you on this one, kiddos. If we had the luxury of being in a face-to-face class, I would be able to make sure that you got these questions one-at-a-time. But the world is burning, so what else can we do?
Alright. You ready? Here it is:
Now suppose that, instead of riding in the car, you are walking along the tracks next to a large, muscular man. You happen to notice that several yards ahead of you are five workers, loudly toiling at their labor. Tragically, you also notice an unmanned railcar several yards behind you. It is careening down the tracks, heading right towards these unlucky workers. If they are struck, they will surely be killed. However, you also correctly estimate the following: If this large, muscular man is pushed onto the tracks, his mass will manage to stop the railcar, saving the five hapless workers, but resulting in his untimely demise. The element of surprise is on your side; you can push the muscular man onto the tracks. But is this the right thing to do? Why or why not?
Don’t you just love how ruthless this last one is? It’s very Slytherin, is it not? Here’s a follow up question for you: Is your answer to this question different from your answer to the second question? Why do you think that is? Does it make it re-evaluate your response to the first question? I’m not asking this by accident. I’d genuinely like to see what you have to say to this final series of questions. Incorporate them into your response.
Best of luck on this assignment!

Reading Strategies 1: Mythological Strategies, Reader-Response Strategies, Deconstructionist Strategies.

pick one of the reading strategies from above and write an analysis that conforms to any of the Reading Strategies covered in the Reading Strategies Section that best relates to the poem. Remember to use logic and textual evidence (quotes) to support your claims (i.e. to show how what you say is valid). Avoid using first and second person pronouns (“I,” “me,” “my,” “mine,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “ours,” “you,” “your,” “yours,” or commands) because your response should not be about yourself (first person) and it should certainly not be about your reader, me, (second person); your response should be about the poem.
REMEMBER SOURCES MUST COME FROM THE POEM ONLY!!!

Argumentative Research Paper (topic can be anything business or IT related)

Writing a research paper gives you an opportunity to explore a topic of special interest, research that topic, and organize your research findings in writing for an academic audience.

A. Write an original and cohesive argumentative research paper (suggested length of 8–10 pages).
1. Provide an effective introduction.
2. Provide an appropriate thesis statement that previews three to four main points.
3. Develop each of the previewed main points in effective paragraphs with support from a variety of sources.
4. Provide an effective conclusion.
B. Incorporate eight academically credible sources in your paper.
C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly.

In each lecture the professor will introduce a historical narrative about an interaction between the U.S. and a part of the African continent. These lectures will give examples from regional, national and individual experiences. The weekly short papers will require students to chose ONE (1) historical document from the Hypothesis exercises (if students find a different document they wish to use they need to get permission from the professor first). In the short paper, the students must:
Explain their understanding of the historical narrative for the event/topic of the document based on lectures, class discussions, films, and primary source documents read for the topic students choose. Please cite in the paper from where you are drawing your evidence [reading, lecture, document, podcast, film, etc].
Then the student should explain the historical document they are analyzing and how it relates to that narrative – does it confirm the narrative and if so how? Does it contradict the narrative – why and how? Or does it add nuance to the framework of the narrative and give more explanation and if so – how and why?
The point of this exercise is to think about how historians, journalists, filmmakers, and others create historical narratives about topics. How does our western centered perspective shape our approach to the narratives and information? How might African narratives of events differ from people in the U.S.?

Many entrepreneurs sell products over the Internet on eBay and Amazon and are therefore moving beyond the jurisdiction of the United States legal system, if there is a problem in the transaction. Research the United Nations convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the evolution of Cyberlaw. In your paper, evaluate how these two sources of authority would affect your business if you were to be selling products on the Internet, which ship to a foreign country. Does your duty of “good faith,” which was discussed in this week’s forum, still hold when selling your products internationally? Will the laws which affect the transaction be different depending on which country you are shipping your products to? Are the laws different for physical goods versus intellectual property? What are the legal risks involved in direct marketing of your products versus selling them through an existing electronic commerce websites such as eBay or Amazon? Evaluate the applicability of the U.S. law in these situations and provide and explanation of your findings to the above proposed questions.

The textbook opens by saying “health systems informatics strives to align the disparate components of a healthcare organization – professional, financial, and organizational – 2 cheap optimal system performance. How did these components become so dysfunctional and advanced Nation such as the United States? The great irony is that we built the u.s. health system that way, and we continue to maintain it that way.” A grim perspective that plays out daily in the conflict between business and clinical functions. But health system informatics can be transformational change.
Your Task
Read the required readings and write a post that addresses the following:
Based on your experiences, what do you think is the transformational change?
Why do you think health systems informatics is considered to be transformational
How do you think the EMR has disrupted clinical practice?
Please use the questions and answers format for this assignment. As always write in the first person
Before you complete any of the activities or assessments, please read the following:
Textbook
Brown, G., Pasupathy, K., & Patrick, T., (2018). Health Informatics: A Systems Perspective, Second Edition. Chicago: Health Administration Press.
Chapter 1: Health Systems Informatics: A Transformational Science
Chapter 2: Knowledge-Based Decision Making
Web Resource
HealthIT.gov. (2019, May 2). What are the differences between electronic medical records, electronic health records, and personal health records? Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-are-differences-between-electronic-medical-records-electronic-health-records-and-personal
Hughes, R. (2018, December 5). Improving health outcomes with Big Data. TEDxUofSC. [Video] Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWGmAZOX6gU

The topic is about Covid-19 and the economy
8 full pages
these are my sources
References
Avery, C., Bossert, W., Clark, A., Ellison, G., & Ellison, S. (2020). An Economist’s Guide to
Epidemiology Models of Infectious Disease. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(4), 79-104. Retrieved June 4, 2021, from.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26940891
Darian-Smith, E. (2021). Dying for the Economy: Disposable People and Economies of Death in
the Global North. State Crime Journal, 10(1), 61-79. doi:10.13169/statecrime.10.1.0061 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/statecrime.10.issue-1
Finley, L. (2021). State Crime, Native Americans, and COVID-19. State Crime Journal, 10(1),
45-60. doi:10.13169/statecrime.10.1.0045. Retrieved from.
https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=Finley%2C+L.+%282021%29.+State+Crime%2C+Native+Americans+and+COVID-19
Friedrichs, D., & Vegh Weis, V. (2021). COVID-19 and the U.S. Health Care Industry: Towards
a “Critical Health Criminology” within State Crime Studies. State Crime Journal, 10(1), 126-146. doi:10.13169/statecrime.10.1.0126. Retrieved from.
https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=covid+19+and+the+economy&groupefq
Murray, E. (2020). Epidemiology’s Time of Need: COVID-19 Calls for Epidemic-Related.
Economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(4), 105-120. Retrieved May 13, 2021, from
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26940892

Kurlantzick, J. (2021). COVID-19 and Its Effect on Inequality and Democracy: A Study of Five
Large Democracies (pp. 9-14, Rep.). Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep31128.6
World Health Organization. (2020). Global Spending on Health: Weathering the storm (pp. 53-
72, Rep.). World Health Organization. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30130.9

To prepare for the Written Assignment:
Review chapter 3 of the course text
Conduct independent research on domestic violence/intimate partner violence (one additional reference)
Due by Sunday at midnight:
Craft a 2-3 page paper that explores the effects of domestic violence/intimate partner violence on children and adolescents, as well as potential interventions. Include a title page and references page. Those 2 pages do not count towards the 2-3 pages.
All

What was Steve Biko’s message in this article?
Why was his writing seen as so controversial?
How did his work challenge the arguments of multiracial organizations such as the African National Congress (ANC), the largest and best know anti-apartheid group in 1970?
What does Biko mean by “Black Consciousness”?
Why does Biko see leadership as such a profound issue?
How does Biko challenge the status quo thinking about racism?