Best Writer

Individually, you are going to propose one to two research questions and
design a PRIMARY research strategy (which can be based on the ideas
of your previous group research proposal), and write a project of not more
than 3,000 words (excluding tables, graphs, references, appendices)
which covers:
• The research question(s);
• The primary data collection methods used;
• Your findings;
• Your conclusions;
• The action that you think ought to flow from your findings and
conclusions.
Assessment criteria
Your research project will be assessed against these criteria using the
headings below. You are strongly recommended to self-assess your
project against these.

The effect of Big Data growth is felt everywhere. It is especially affecting how organizations are conducting their business to stay competitive in the marketplace. This assignment enables you to gain an understanding of what Big Data is and how organizations are using a framework for implementing Big Data to enhance their value.

Watch the following TEDTalks and in a one-page document, summarize your findings addressing these elements:

Describe why Big Data is a big deal.
What changes did the people in the video expect Big Data to have on organizations and society?
Which predictions and/or what perceptions proved true and which ones did not?

Ted Talk downloaded below.
tHIRD tED tALK: https://www.ted.com/talks/erick_brethenoux_the_big_data_behind_complex_human_emotions?utm_campaign=tedspread&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=tedcomshare

In
a Word document, provide an article review of a future sport industry issue or
trend. The chosen article must be from a scholarly journal– Deductions will
occur if article is not from a scholarly source.

Topic: PARALYMPIC GAMES.
Minimum 2 pages, double-spaced. APA format. Provide reference list.

Article can only be 5 years old or less.

Wine in the Wilderness by Alice Childress
– PLEASE READ PDF ATTACHMENT FOR THE PLAY IN QUESTION
Afterwards write an analysis paper using the format and the information from the Analysis Criteria. This paper must be at least 1000 words in length and includes all 9 of the analysis components. Be certain to cite all of your sources, unless the the actual play / textbook it self. Utilize the subject from your outline of the play to support your conclusions.
Each analysis paper will contain 9 sections/paragraphs that break the play into following components in this order:
1. Plot Summary of the play
2. Social climate of the play
3. Cultural Climate of the play
4. Political Climate of the play
5. Economic Climate of the play
6. Dramatic Purpose OR Theme of the play
7. Perception of Reality of the play
8. How are Bias, Stereotypes, and Prejudices dealt with in the play
9. Playwright’s Attributes
DETAILS AND DEFINITIONS FOR EACH COMPONENT
1. Plot: The sequence and pattern of events of a drama
Summary: Presented in a condensed form
The plot summary needs to have a beginning, a middle, and an ending of the play. Since the plot summary is “condensed” it should be a paragraph of approximately half a page in length (approximately 150 words).
a. Beginning: The beginning clarifies the initial setting of the play: including the time period, the locale, the social context, the characters, and the characters’ relationship with each other, and prior events mentioned towards the beginning of the play. Most importantly the beginning of the play introduces the “main conflict” of the plot of the play.
b. Middle: The middle of the play reveals the development of the “main conflict of the play; basically, this describes what happens in the play sequentially which are problematic complications with the characters. These problems usually develop because of the conflict in desires of the characters with themselves, other characters, the environment, etc.
c. End: The end of the play usually builds to a climax; when the conflicts culminate to the highest point of tension in the play. Usually the the protagonist must make a major decision, take a life changing action, etc. This climax usually leads to a resolution of some kind at the end of the play.
Climate: a prevailing condition, atmosphere and/or attitude the affects life
2. Social: Of, or pertaining to society or communal living; living in an organized group
Social Climate is about people who are characters in the play and any and all people and groups of people mentioned in the play. Students are required to describe three main examples of “Social Climate” and list at least 7 more.
3. Cultural: The totality of socially transmitted patterns of human activity within a community or social group and the symbolic structures that give significance to such activity. Customs, laws, dress, architectural style, social standards, religious beliefs, and transitions are all examples of cultural elements. Although political and economic structure, as well as stereotypes and biases could be considered cultural, these components have their own separate paragraphs. Students are required to describe three main examples of “Cultural Climate” and list at least 7 more.
4. Political : Of, or pertaining to, or dealing with the study of the structure, or affairs of government, family, politics, the state, tribes, gangs, nations, cities, or any other group. Politics is the way that people living in groups make decisions; making laws, breaking laws, enforcing laws, interpreting laws, etc. Students are required to describe three main examples of “Political Climate” and list at least 7 more.
5. Economic: The study of how society uses its limited resources. Of, or pertaining to the production, development, and management of material wealth, goods, or services: as of a country, household, or business: the necessities of life. Students are required to describe three main examples of ” Economic Climate” and list at least 7 more.
6. Theme : The implicit or recurrent idea, point of view, or perception embodied and expanded upon in a work of art or literature. It refers to the main idea or moral of the story. The theme is what the playwright is trying to convey based on the summary of the plot, the various climates, symbolism, etc. You may support the theme which you discover with the title of the play, recurring statements and actions in the play, metaphors, symbols, allusions, etc. used in the play, the climax and resolution of the play, other works of the playwrights, etc.
Purpose: An aim, goal, result, or effect that is intended or desired. it is the reason for which something is done or created. After your have read the play and studied the playwright, discern for whom was the play written (for children, for minority groups, for the general public), ask is it “agitprop” theatre which focuses on agitation and spread propaganda, what is the state of the society in which the playwright wrote the play, what is the playwright try say, trying to change, trying to establish, etc.
7. Perception: the ability to see, hear, or become aware of something.
Reality: the world or the state of things as they exist. Reality can be experienced “externally” through the 5 senses ( sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell). Reality can also be seen through a dream, imagination, make believe, exaggerated satire or farce, abstract, spiritualism, etc.
8. Bias: A preference or inclination; especially one that inhibits impartiality. prejudice in favor or or against on thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.
Prejudice: Preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.
Stereotype: a widely held, fixed, and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing.
9. Playwright Attributes: Students need to write about the five attributes of the Playwright, including:
1. Their life, growth, and development of the playwright.
2. The education that the playwright received.
3. The other works that the playwright has created.
4. The organizations with which the playwright that has been involved.
5. The awards that the playwright has received.

Prosecutor’s Report
–
As part of their initiation into the Westside Boys Gang two men decided to go on a vehicle theft rampage in Silver Spring, MD to raise money for the gang. The men agreed to commit the thefts on the evening of March 12th. They agreed that Offender A would drive Offender B to the locations of the targeted vehicles. Offenders B would be responsible for the actual theft of the vehicles and the transportation of the vehicles to the gang’s chop shop. In the event they needed to make a quick exit from the targeted locations Offender A would act as their get-away driver.

In preparation for the heist, Offender A stole a green Honda Civic to drive during the crime spree. Offender B purchased two UZI semiautomatic pistols to use during the commission to the thefts. (Each offender would be armed with one of the above listed weapons on the night of the thefts in the event they ran into problems.) [Hint: I chose the above weapons for a reason. They are not defined as fully automatic weapons for purposes of the Uniform Machine Gun Act. Please review the other Maryland firearms statutes.]

On the day of the crime the men met up to go over the plan at Offender A’s house. They both promised that no one would be killed during the events. When they reached the first targeted house, Offender B put on a ski mask and armed himself with an UZI. He entered a Potomac, MD property and stole a 2017 BMW from the driveway. Offenders A & B quickly drove the vehicle to the chop shop and returned to the area for more vehicles.

The second Potomac, MD home required Offender B to enter an attached residential garage to steal a 2016 Porsche 911. (Offender A had been monitoring the home during the week and it appeared that the homeowner was away on business.) Offender B broke into the garage through a side exterior door and began to work on the car. The homeowner entered the garage as a result of the noise. Offender B quickly shot the homeowner in the chest. The homeowner died as a result of the bullet wound. Offender B exited the home to meet up with Offender A so they could flee the scene.

Offender B met Offender A at the end of the road and jump into the Honda Civic. Offender A exited the neighborhood at a high rate of speed. The vehicle was observed driving erratically by a Montgomery County police officer that was patrolling the area. The officer tried to stop the vehicle (using his emergency lights and siren) for the erratic driving. The men attempted to evade the police which resulted in a high speed chase. Offender A eventually crashed the Honda Civic. The two men fled on foot and physically fought with the officers when the officers attempted to apprehend them. The men were eventually restrained and arrested by the police.

As the prosecutor what crimes would you charge each of the offenders with? Use the Maryland Code (statutes) to identify the specific statutory codes for the crimes that you would charge them with. When choosing a statute you should be able to identify what specific facts or evidence (from the above narrative) you would use to meet the requirements of the statute. In addition, you need to provide the maximum statutory penalty for each of the offenses and indicate whether the legislature has defined the offense as a felony or a misdemeanor. (This is for the Criminal Law Statutes only. You do not need to fill out this box of the chart for charges under the Transportation section of the code.) You should attempt to charge the offenders with as many crimes as you can reasonably identify. Use the following chart format to collect your information. Please see the rubric in the course syllabus for further grading details.
–
Offender A
Maryland Criminal Statutory Code Criminal Charge Facts relevant to this charge Maximum Criminal Penalty (Felony/ misdemeanor)
Criminal Law § 7-105 Motor vehicle theft Identify the applicable facts from the fact pattern
The defendant is guilty of a felony and subject to a sentence of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years or a fine not exceeding $ 5,000, or both
– – – –
– – – –

–
Offender B
Maryland Criminal Statutory Code Criminal Charge Facts relevant to this charge Maximum Criminal Penalty (Felony/ misdemeanor)
– – – –
– – – –
– – – –

–
You can access the Maryland Code through the Maryland Law Libraries website at: http://mdcourts.gov/lawlib/researchtools/sourcesmdlaw.html . From there you can follow the following directions:
–
1. Click on the link titled Current Code and Rules from Westlaw. You will find a list of all the Maryland statutes.
–
2. You will be looking under the Criminal Law and Transportation sections of the code. Once you click on the titled sources you will find the defined statutes as sub-categories or sub-folders below the link.

Prosecutor’s Report: Students will receive a crime scenario in which they will be required to determine which crimes they would charge the offender(s) with if they were the prosecutor in Montgomery County, Maryland. The students will be required to use the Maryland State statutes (Criminal Law and Transportation sections of the Maryland Code) for each crime they intend to charge the defendant with in court. The students will need to identify what evidence they would use to prove each of the elements of the crime. Further information regarding the assignment will be provided at a later date. DUE UNDER THE MODULE 10 MATERIALS.
–
Prosecutor’s Report Rubric
Point Value
Identification of relevant facts which indicate a criminal offense
5
Identification of the Maryland criminal statutory code and statutory title for each criminal offense committed by the offender(s)
10
Identification of the proper facts and/or evidence that the prosecutor would use to seek a conviction against the offender. You need to match up the facts of the case to the elements of the criminal statute to make sure you are charging the offender under the correct law.
10
Identification of the classification of the offense (felony or misdemeanor) and the maximum penalty that the offender could receive (Complete this section for offenses under the Criminal Law section of the Maryland Code. You do not have to complete this section for offenses under the Transportation section of the Code.
5
Total:
30

639872
3 minutes ago
Make as long as needed. Two charts ill pay extra if not than two pages!

ONLY USE THE ATTACHED FILE: Please answer the following questions based on the attached reading
As briefly as possible the
responses must answer the following questions:
1. What is the research question?
2. What is the central argument?
a. What is the central outcome (dependent variable) of interest the
author is trying to explain?
b. What is(are) the central independent variable(s) of interest the
author argues drives this outcome?
3. What approach does the author take to provide evidence for this
argument? What is the research design?
4. How could the work be made better? What is your opinion on the
findings?
5. Further Questions or Questions for Discussion?
To re-iterate, these memos are not intended to be heavily work-intensive, but to
help structure your reading and guide your understanding of the reading. Please
keep responses to 1-3 as brief as possible (1-2 sentences or even bullet points)
and focus your time more on putting careful thought into 4 and 5 (2-4
sentences)

In the discussion post asnwer the following:
How do the four lenses of education approach the study of diversity with respect to the individual and
society?
How do the four lenses represent a way of seeing diversity?
What are the implications of diversity on the future?
How can you implement what you learn about diversity into your own life?

SCI 200 Project Part Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Basic scientific literacy is essential for understanding real-world applications of the natural sciences. As a consumer and voter, you will be faced with issues that require a basic understanding of science. For example, you might ask yourself the following questions: How can genetically modified foods affect my health? Should scientists be held liable for not predicting earthquakes that led to human casualties, as they were in Italy in 2012? Is anthropogenic climate change real? Is fracking a concern where I live? Because of the prevalence of natural science issues such as these, it is important to understand basic natural science concepts and how they impact our daily lives.
The project for this course has two parts. In part one, you conducted a research investigation that examined an issue in the natural sciences. You identified appropriate resources for investigating the issue you selected, used these resources to develop a question related to the issue, and applied natural science principles to the issue and question. In addition, you identified an audience who would be interested in the selected issue. In Part Two, you will develop a presentation for the audience you identified in Part One. In your presentation, you will explain how scientific thinking has impacted you and your audience, supporting your claims with evidence.
Part Two of this project addresses the following course outcomes:
● Illustrate the impact of scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences
● Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of the natural world
● Utilize empirical evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary scientific issues on individuals and society
Prompt
Referring to your research investigation, create a presentation that explains how scientific thinking has impacted you and discusses the impact of your selected issue on your audience.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Provide a brief overview of the scientific background of your issue and question. How does the issue relate to the natural sciences?
Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about
the response to your question or the outcome of your hypothesis? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
Describe the empirical evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support
your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate?
1
Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research, develop a question, and formulate a hypothesis affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did scientific thinking change the lens through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s potential knowledge of current natural science (or lack thereof), and what is specifically important to the audience.
Project Part Two Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation should have approximately 5–7 slides in Prezi, PowerPoint, or another comparable presentation tool. Make sure to include your speaker notes so that your instructor knows what you would say if you were actually giving the presentation. Note: If using Prezi, include a separate Word document with notes. If using PowerPoint, include speaker notes.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%)
Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Scientific Background[SCI-200-04]
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response expertly balances necessary detail with brevity
Provides brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and explains how issue relates to natural sciences
Provides brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and explains how issue relates to natural sciences, but with gaps in detail or clarity
Does not provide brief overview of scientific background of issue and question, and does not explain how issue relates to natural sciences
15.8
Audience
[SCI-200-04]
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates sophisticated understanding of relationship between issue and audience
Explains how issue impacts audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation
Explains how issue impacts audience but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support
Does not explain how issue impacts audience
15.8
Empirical Evidence
[SCI-200-04]
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates strong understanding of how to use empirical evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary scientific issues

Your assignment this week is to write a four to five page literature review. Writing a literature review, like writing in APA style, is a new way of writing for most people. It can be like learning a new language. Different rules apply. Things like “person” – (first person – “I”), second person (you), third person – “According to Jones”(2016) matter. The reason for the “person” issue is that the literature review is exactly that – a review of what others have written on the topic of interest to the author. The author of the review is constructing an argument/point of view using the work of others as the building blocks for the argument/point of view. Normally, using “I”, “I think” or “in my experience” are words that indicate an individual’s thoughts, not what the literature has to say on a topic.

For this case study, I took the postion as being FOR the adoption of Common CCore Standards to all states. The articles chosen should align with that position. I have also included an assignment from last week to display my writting. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding the assignment. THank you !

Here is a resource used in this past week’s dicussion that may be benefical. Buzick, T., Rhoad-Drogalis, A., Laitusis, C., & King, T.
(2019). Teachers’ views of their practices
related to common core state standards-aligned assessment. ETS Report Series, 2019(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12277

Title page.
Abstract: An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper, including your conclusion and recommendation. Review the resource section of this module for additional information on how to write an abstract.
Introduction: A brief overview of what you are researching, why, and an overview of your research process (including the main topics you will review). This should be approximately one paragraph. Include any previous recommendations or comments from your instructor.
Background: Describe what led to the problem, explain the extent of the problem, and why it is necessary to research and resolve the problem. This should be 2-3 paragraphs. Include any previous recommendations or comments from your instructor.
Literature Review: Provide historical background on the area you are researching, provide a contemporary context in which your research is situated, identify any trends in the literature related to your problem, identifies gaps in the literature, draw conclusions based on the literature (what we know about the problem). This should be 2-3 pages. Include any previous recommendations or comments from your instructor.
Data Analysis and Results: Through the analysis of data, state your findings. This should be approximately one page. Include any previous recommendations or comments from your instructor.
Conclusions: Based on the results of your data, interpret what they mean in the context of your problem and from an industry perspective. This should be 2-3 paragraphs. Include any previous recommendations or comments from your instructor.
Recommendation: Based on the results and conclusions, state your recommendation to address the problem. This should be 2-3 paragraphs. Include any previous recommendations or comments from your instructor.