Best Writer

Writing a 12th grade essay, the prompt is to write an analytical essay in which you analyze and evaluate the techniques used in World War 2.

Hello. I have been asked to provide a detailed outline on a research paper I’m having to write. My topic is the new permit less carry law that will come into effect September 1st. in Texas. House bill 1927. It should include the *intro
* how I will set the context?
*why is this main idea important?
*what is the thesis? ( I am pro permit less carry)
*three body paragraphs ( from reading your bio you know exactly how to write a paragraph:)
*rebuttal section with the opponents argument then my position, then my refutation.
*conclusion

Also I have made my annotated bibliography and referenced articles from the Dallas morning news in May 2021. Thank you so much for your help. This is so nerve wracking for me. The teacher also states to consider my approach based on the Rogerian style of argument. This only has to be a research detailed outline. I will hopefully be able to write my final draft off of the outline you create… Thanks again! 🙂 My contact information is
jlhowell1984@gmail.com

This assignment requires you to choose a market failure within the air transportation industry that has been caused or exacerbated by regulation (action or inaction). Prepare an executive summary that describes the regulation, its impact, your remedy, and resulting expected impacts on the market.

Market Failure in the Air Transportation Industry
Pretend you are a government consultant to the President charged with ensuring the aviation industry is/remains a globally competitive industry. Describe the regulation, the impact, your remedy, and resulting impacts on the market. Be sure to address intended or unintended consequences, stakeholders, consumers, suppliers, costs, and externalities.
The information you will need is not all here or in the readings. There are times in the workplace where you will be performing or asked to perform tasks that require some learning/teaching/research yourself. This assignment will require you to do that.

Writing-Walmart Bad for America
1. What as happened with American companies like Rubbermaid?
2. What happened to the TV Company?
3. Does Walmart control inventory and prices?
4. When negotiations are taking place, how much price is there for the wiggle room?
5. What role does China play in Walmart’s success?

Writing-Diamonds Diamond

1. What is Debeers?
2. Is it an open Market?
3. Do Sight Holders have the power to negotiate prices?
4. Why can’t Debeer’s Operate in the USA
5. What is the connection between GE and Debeers? Did they make a deal?
6. What is one thing about diamonds most people do not know?

Writing-5 First Stock Market Crash
Tulip Crisis

1. What happened to start this crisis?
2. What year did it happen?
3. What was the item everyone wanted?
4. Where there winners in the crisis?
5. What was the result of the crisis?
6. Have you ever heard of this before?

Briefing a Case: Please (1) Identify the plaintiff and the defendant, (2) The legal Issue, (3) A paragraph summarizing the facts, (4) The court’s legal conclusion and (5) A summary of our chapter learning as applied to this case.

Post a brief explanation of the differences between the types of diabetes, including type 1, type 2, gestational, and juvenile diabetes. Describe one type of drug used to treat the type of diabetes you selected, including proper preparation and administration of this drug. Be sure to include dietary considerations related to treatment. Then, explain the short-term and long-term impact of this type of diabetes on patients. including effects of drug treatments. Be specific and provide examples.

Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3
N/A
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
N/A
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. .

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6521_Week5_Discussion_Rubric

Copy each sentence of personal importance and identify its page and line reference.
For a 32-page chapter like Chapter 6, “Listening, Feedback, and Critical Thinking”, for example, you need identify only 4 “excerpts representing personal value to you.” One such insight must be identified within every 8-page sequence in each chapter. In chapters whose page total is not evenly divisible by 4, subtract one skill. E.g., in a 27-page chapter, extract 3 excerpts.

“Test response” should be more than 10-12 words in length, whether a direct quotation or your paraphrase.

Read the Johnson article first and then the Sitler article and answer the following questions:
1) What is Johnson’s opinion on the term and concept “syncretic” or “syncretism”? (50-word minimum)
2) Where are the religions Johnson describes practiced?
3) What are the extensions these religions are undergoing according to Johnson? (150-word minimum)
4)How are indigeneity and authenticity negotiated objects and positions? Using Johnson’s claims as a taking-off point discuss the ways that modern notions of indigeneity and authenticity are harnessed in native, nativistic, identity-based religions, and “New Age” spiritual practice and Revitalization movements. Apply Johnson’s argument to Sitler’s article. (150 words)

This paper is about somking in seminole county and the interventions, this is the second paper and it is a follow up from the first paper that i did on community assessment and my topic was comparing smoking in seminole county to the state of florida and to the top
pereformers.
I am going to upload the instractions and if you would prefer I will upload the first paper also.1. Review the Evidence-Based Interventions Paper Overview & Instructions
download
for detailed instructions and guidelines. This is a formal paper. You will use APA formatting and the paper should be a minimum of 3 pages and a maximum of 4 pages (not including title or reference page).
3. Review the Evidence-Based Interventions Paper Rubric_Update Summer 2021.pdf
download
for grading criteria.
4. Please record the Turnitin score obtained in this link in the “add a comment” of the assignment when submitting.
5. Example community assessment paper: UPDATED Evidence-Based Interventions Paper Format 2_updated Summer 2021.pdf
download

Scan “Persuasive Speaking,” 407-437
”Practice Tips for Evaluating the Persuasive Speech*” 435
After recording your speech on your smartphone or other recording device for one of the final times and reviewing your effort, identify its three (3) greatest weaknesses from among the ten (10) criteria on this persuasive speech checklist. Then explain in a minimum of 50 words for each of the three (3) weaknesses what you will do to correct the failing. By the submission deadline, i.e., on the Tuesday of the Final Week, upload your speech to YouTube and submit your revised speech as one of your Course Assignments.
Quiz response, a minimum of one (1) quotation from the chapter