Best Writer

Follow the instructions in the Signature Assignment Introduction page in the Introduction & Resources module. Submit all parts of your Signature Assignment.
All three parts of the Signature Assignment will be graded using the SPH205 Signature Assignment Rubric.
Student Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
The students will be able to draft an essay supported by specific details and examples.
The students will be able to outline information to organize, select, and relate ideas.
The students will be able to write a paragraph that contains a topic sentence, at least three supporting sentences, and a concluding sentence.
The students will be able to write an essay with a three-part structure (introduction, body, and conclusion) that develops a main idea.
The students will be able to support general statements with specific details and examples.
The students will be able to use proofreading strategies to edit content and mechanics.
The students will be able to integrate sources in their writing.
The students will be able to correct grammatical patterns of error and revise accordingly.
SPCH205 Signature Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Interview Dialogue
125 to >75.0 pts
Full Marks
1. The interviewer comments and questions are specific and appropriate for your field. (-2 points per question or comment that lacks specificity or appropriateness)
75 to >38.0 pts
2. Your response to each comment or question is appropriate and provides information that will make you stand apart from other candidates. (-3 points per question or comment that is not appropriate or that does not highlight your qualifications)
38 to >0.0 pts
3. Complete sentences are used with correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and so on. This includes quotation marks around each piece of dialogue. (-1 point for each error) Note:For the PowerPoint option, there will be a 1 -point deduction for each missing APA PowerPoint criterion. Please see * below the rubric.
0 pts
No Marks
No Effort
125 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Interview Etiquette
45 to >27.0 pts
Full Marks
1. Each of the three areas has five suggestions that will benefit the interviewee. (-1 point for each missing suggestion or suggestion that is not appropriate)
27 to >0.0 pts
2. Complete sentences are used with correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and so on. This includes quotation marks around each piece of dialogue. (-1 point for each error) Note: For the PowerPoint option, there will be a 1-point deduction for each missing APA PowerPoint criterion. Please see * below the rubric.
0 pts
No Marks
No Effort
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Interview Follow – up Letter
45 to >36.0 pts
Full Marks
1. The letter provides a thank you for the opportunity to interview. (-4 points for missing criteria)
36 to >27.0 pts
2. The letter conveys the interviewee’s level of interest in the position. (-4 points for missing criteria)
27 to >26.0 pts
3. The letter communicates why the interviewee is a good fit for the position. (-4 points for missing criteria)
26 to >25.0 pts
4. The letter contains a closing statement that the interviewee looks forward to hearing from the interviewer. (-4 points for missing criteria)
25 to >0.0 pts
5. The letter uses APA criteria:block format, readable font such as Times New Roman 12, correct spelling, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and so on. (-2 points for each area) Note: For the PowerPoint option, there will be a 1-point deduction for each missing APA PowerPoint criterion. Please see *below the rubric. For the PowerPoint option, there will be a 1-point deduction for each missing APA PowerPoint criterion.
0 pts
No Marks
No Effort
45 pts
Total Points: 215
Previous
Next

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read The United States of America and the International Criminal Court
(Links to an external site.)
, Between cosmopolitan and American democracy: Understanding US opposition to the International Criminal Court, and pages 477-480 and 483 of the Routledge Handbook of Critical Criminology
(Links to an external site.)
.
The United States has refused to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) since its inception. The issue of the United States’ reluctance to join the ICC continues to be a matter of international debate. This week’s assignment requires you to take a position on whether or not the United States should formally join, and accept the jurisdiction of, the International Criminal Court. Avoid notions of jingoism, and examine the international community and the responsibilities of the United States as an international actor in both civilian and military affairs. Make sure to explain the consequences of not joining or a decision to join the ICC.
In your paper,
Assess the purpose and function of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Explain why the United States has not joined the ICC.
Examine the pros and cons for the United States to be a member of the ICC.
Construct an argument proposing the United States should join or continue to not be a part of the ICC.
Provide sound reasoning for your opinions.
Examine not just the United States’ reasons for not joining the ICC, but also various international perspectives about the leading military power in the world’s decision not to join this criminal law court.
Explain the ramifications of the opinion that you advance to the United States and the international community.
The International Criminal Law paper:
Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (750 words of content minimum, not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center’s APA Style
(Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted

Compare and/or contrast the way in which Washington Irving, Cullen Bryant, and David Thoreau used nature in their writing. Include Direct sources for analysis and support

Reading: Reelection, Continuity and Hyper-Presidentialism in Latin America by Daniel Zovatto
(attached file)

Read the embedded readings, and answer the questions below. Remember to reference readings (e.g. Zovatto, p. 2). Do not quote article, rather put it in your own words.
What are the issues of allowing presidential re-election?
On balance, what effect has presidential re-election had on the quality of democracy in the region?
Total: 275 words

Please see detailed instructions. This must be a research paper on the company AT&T which needs to be at least two to three pages long in APA formatting. NO PLAGARISM or grammer mistakes. A powerpoint presetation with talking points for a video presentation to contain the information of the research paper. Cite all sources in APA format.
You will complete a research paper on an assigned organization. You will provide a detailed history of the organization. You will provide details on the type of leadership that the organization has. You will provide an overview on the products and services that the organization offers. You will identify what has been the affect on the organization due to COVID19. Identify what are they doing differently since being in a pandemic to continue to serve their customers. What is the organizations outlook after COVID19 has ended. Share with us something about the organization that you were not aware of. Your paper should be a full two to three pages. You are to use APA formatting. You will create a PowerPoint presentation from the information in your paper. The attached contains information you can use in rewriting the paper. Feel free to add or delete any information necessary. Make sure to cite all Sources.

Overview: As a communications professional, you will be required to establish a variety of communication responses to real-world scenarios. The ability to align
specific communication responses with preferred mass media formats will ensure that you are able to respond to an array of situations within different
workplace environments.

Prompt: Create a draft outline in support of Final Project II: Presentation in Module Ten. Your outline needs to present the following critical elements:
– Presents a content outline that addresses strategic communication best practices and brand identity.
– Clearly organizes topics.
– Uses APA mechanics for organization.

Guidelines for Submission: The submission should be about 1 page in length. It should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch
margins. Use APA style for citations.

Assignment:
Putting It All Together
Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least two (2) sources and the textbook using APA citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to cite the sources using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the Signature Assignment rubric criteria for this assignment.
This week, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation reviewing the theories from each module. Please select one theory from each module (1-8) and answer the following questions. You should have 2-4 slides per theory with a total of 8 theories discussed.
Describe the theory
Provide 3 examples of how the theory applies to current practice
Provide 3 positive patient outcomes resulting from utilizing the theory
Explain 3 benefits to nursing satisfaction when utilizing the theory
Describe two barriers to using the theory in practice and at least one method for overcoming each barrier (support methods with sources)
Support from literature clearly noted throughout
The PowerPoint presentation should include at least two outside references and the textbook. The presentation should contain 2 to 4 slides per theory, for a total of 16 to 32 slides.
Total Point Value of Assignment: 500 points
Assignment Expectations:
Length: 2 to 4 slides per theory, for a total of 16-32 slides
Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format. Title/Objective/Reference slides do not count towards the minimum slide count for this assignment.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) outside scholarly sources and the textbook are required for this assignment.
Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level. You cannot pass this class without passing this assignment.
Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PPT document (.pptx) or a PDF document (.pdf)
File name: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the assignment number (for example, “RHall Assignment 1.docx”)Module 1: Research and Nightingale
Module 2: Peplau, Henderson, and Orem
Module 3: Johnson, Orlando, and the 1950’s to 1960’s
Module 4: King and Rogers
Module 5: Roy, Neuman, and the 1970’s
Module 6: Leininger, Newman, and Watson
Module 7: Parse, Erickson, Tomlin & Swain
Module 8: Theories of the 1980’s and 1990’s, Self-Reflection

Research paper on mandatory minimum sentencing in the United States. Paper must be 5 pages long and included atleast 5 credible sources, APA format. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. Must must be 12pt Times New Roman font, double spaced. Research paper should include information on why mandatory minimum sentencing was implemented, what crimes it typically applies to, it’s effectiveness, and any possible alternatives.

Professor prefers sources found from Jstor. Needs a work cited page and needs in text citations. She knows Shakespeare VERY WELL and can tell when a student is not trying. Also very strict on plagarism, of course. Please email me if you have any questions. This is my only grade for this class and I cannot fail. Thank you

Assignment 12: Chapter 12
1. Imagine you test the hypothesis:
H1: Tall people are more apt to like basketball than are short people.
To do so, you acquire a random sample from a questionnaire of American adults that asked 1) each person his or her height, and 2) whether he or she likes basketball.
Your initial results look like this:
Tall Short
Likes Basketball 65% 45%
Does Not Like Basketball 35% 55%
Total 100% 100%
Using the table above, answer the following questions.
a) Do these results support your hypothesis? Explain.
b) Should you be concerned about spuriousness? What variable might create a spurious association between height and liking basketball? Explain.
2. Assume that you control for the extraneous antecedent variable that you identified in (b). Use the following table to come up with hypothetical data distributions that would support your claim.
These need to be variables that are logically related to height that indicate that the original relationship is spurious due to the variable you identified.
Note: Your percentages need not be perfectly calculated across table, but they should equal 100% as in the original example. You can use the tables below but be sure to replace “Antecedent Variable” and “Category A/B” with the variable and categories you identified in part (b):
Antecedent Variable Height
Category A Category B Category A Category B
Likes Basketball
Tall
Does Not Like Basketball
Short
100%
100%
100%
100%
c) Now draw a diagram that shows the spurious relationship based on the antecedent variable that you identified. If you do not know how to use Word art, you can draw it by hand and use your phone to insert a picture.