Overview
In this course, much of your research and reading focuses on a topic of interest to you, with the goal of drawing upon that research to develop an in-depth Final Project. The creation of an annotated bibliography will help you organize and evaluate the many references you acquire throughout the course.
What is the Annotated Bibliography?
An annotated bibliography is a list of sources you will use in your research for class. It can contain articles, books, websites, and other sources that inform your work.
Why is the Annotated Bibliography Necessary?
A well-done annotated bibliography will save you time by allowing you to organize and evaluate your sources. You will use many sources over the semester and the annotated bibliography will keep them organized so that you can easily make decisions about which sources are useful for a given assignment.
Summarizing the sources will provide you the opportunity to practice and develop your ability to write about scientific sources accurately, in your own words. Do not use direct quotes from the source in your summary or evaluation.
Evaluating the sources will give you the opportunity to practice applying many of the concepts we are focusing on in class, such as
identifying the source as primary, secondary, or tertiary,
specifying the study design or methods, and
applying critical analysis to make decisions about the strengths and weaknesses of the source overall and in relation to your specific needs for assignments.
As your annotated bibliography grows over the semester, you will also be able to use it as a tool to make connections and comparisons between your sources, which will contribute to your ability to synthesize the research you read throughout the course into a cohesive body of knowledge.
What is Included in the Annotated Bibliography?
A citation for each source in APA format, listed alphabetically.
An annotation for the source.
What is Included in the Annotation?
First, the annotation should identify the source as a primary research article, a secondary research article, a tertiary source, or another type of source (such as a textbook, reference website, etc.)
Next, each annotation should have:
a summary portion and
an evaluation portion
What is included in each summary and evaluation portion will vary slightly depending on the type of source. Some annotations may also include:
a brief comparison to other sources in the bibliography
a description of how the source is connected or related to other sources in the bibliography
For Primary Research Articles
The annotation summary should specify what was being studied, the methods and design, the study sample, and the main outcomes.
The annotation evaluation should specify the strengths and weaknesses of the study, the relevance of the main conclusions, any unique aspects of the research, and why this source is relevant to your research interests. If possible, identify the specific BBH topics addressed in this source and note which assignments this source could be relevant to.
If applicable, note how the results compare or are related to other sources/articles in your bibliography.
The length of the annotation should be approximately 300 words.
For Secondary Research Articles
The annotation summary should specify what was being studied, type of article (literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, or something else), the methods used to conduct the review, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the main findings.
The annotation evaluation should specify the strengths and weaknesses of the methods, the relevance of the main conclusions, any unique aspects of the research, and why this source is relevant to your research interests. If possible, identify the specific BBH topics addressed in this source and note which assignments this source could be relevant to.
If applicable, note how the results compare or are related to other sources/articles in your bibliography.
The length of the annotation should be approximately 300 words.
For Tertiary Sources
The annotation summary should describe the source and its purpose, any unique features of the source, and its intended audience (public, patients, clinicians, researchers, policy makers, etc.).
The annotation evaluation should specify the strengths and weaknesses of the source and why this source is relevant to your research interests. If possible, identify the specific BBH topics addressed in this source and note which assignments this source could be relevant to.
If applicable, note how the results compare or are related to other sources/articles in your bibliography.
The length of the annotation should be no less than 150 words.
How to Format the Annotation
Title a new page: Annotated Bibliography 1
List the sources in APA format (by last name of author)
Under each reference write the annotation
You must use Hanging Indents. The first line of the citation starts at the left margin, and subsequent lines of the citation are indented 5 spaces.
The whole annotation is indented 5 spaces.
The length of the citation will vary by source.
The Importance of Academic Integrity
Remember to use your own words to summarize and evaluate your sources. Part of the annotated bibliography assignment is to strengthen your ability to write about scientific sources, therefore, plagiarism software will be used to check your submission. Points will be deducted for summaries and evaluations that match the source too closely.
Assignment Requirements
This assignment provides an opportunity to compile an annotated bibliography of at least four (4) references related to your overall BBH topic of interest for the course. Please note that you will complete a second annotated bibliography with additional references later in the course, therefore, if you currently have more than six relevant references, you are not required to include them all in this submission. For this assignment, you need to complete the following steps:
Step 1: Choose at least four (4) references to relevant sources. You may include references from your prior course work, including discussions and short papers. Only one reference may be for a website.
Step 2: Create a reference for each source in APA format.
Step 3: Create an annotation according to the guidelines, listed in these assignment instructions, for each reference.
Step 4: Write a short reflection (3-5 sentences) noting any challenges you experienced in completing this assignment and/or something new that you learned throughout this process.
Format Directions
Prepare your response in a word-processing document.
The length of the completed annotated bibliography will vary but should include at least four (4) distinct sources. You will complete a second annotated bibliography with additional references later in the course. Therefore, if you currently have more than six sources, you are not required to include them all in this submission.
Each annotation should include the following sections:
Identify source as Primary Research, Secondary, or Tertiary
Summary
Evaluation
Comparison Statement
Conclude the assignment with a short reflection statement.
Submission
You must submit your paper to Turnitin, using this drop box. Please be aware that your paper will be checked for plagiarism through Turnitin. Thus, make sure everything is in your own words and that anything you paraphrase has been paraphrased appropriately. Make sure that you submit the correct file(s). Contact the HelpDesk or your instructor if you have questions.
Best Writer
Drama as social commentary
The professor gave these instructions:
Trifles was written during a time when women were considered their husband’s property. Explain the irony of the title Trifles. What events cause the women to unite and ultimately hide the evidence they found from the men? What message do you think Glaspell delivered to her female readers? Add a separate paragraph at the end of your paper explaining how you think Mr. Wright was murdered.
Use quotations and examples from the novel to clarify and support your argument.
Introduce the author and the play. Include the story as a reference. Use MLA format and college reading and writing skills. Double space, please. Include word count. ASSIGNMENTS WILL BE CHECKED FOR PLAGIARISM USING SAFE ASSIGN.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————
A pdf of the play can be found here http://www.uobabylon.edu.iq/eprints/publication_3_10984_471.pdf
and audio here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBAMcE-sHvM
and a lecture about it if needed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5FsUJDDrUs
—————————————————————————————————————————————————
The essay can be written in this format too with the starting sentence if you want Susan Glaspell’s Trifles is a play about the effect of gender differences on perceptions of duty, law, and justice:
Section 1: Introduction
Topic sentence
Brief summary of the story
Significance of the title of the story
Section 2: Historical look at gender differences during the setting of the story
Section 3: How men and women view duty differently
Use specific examples from the story as supporting details
Section 4: How men and women view law differently
Use specific examples from the story as supporting details
Section 5: : How men and women view justice differently
Use specific examples from the story as supporting details
Section 6: Conclusion
Use the conclusion to restate the main ideas of the essay
References
How you think Mr. Wright was killed
—————————————————————————————————————————————————
Conduct the experiment in the Final Lab Manual. Fill out the questions in the lab manual to guide your experiment and organize your results and conclusions.
Final Lab Report
Conduct the experiment in the Final Lab Manual. Fill out the questions in the lab manual to guide your experiment and organize your results and conclusions. Take pictures of your experiment prior to beginning once you have all of your equipment set up, in the middle of the experiment and at the end of the experiment. For each lab, create a “Student Information Card” to be pictured in each photo with:
· the name of the lab
· the date you are performing the lab
· your full name and signature
This card should be the approximate size of half of an 8×10 piece of paper, so that all information is clearly visible in your photo. This card should be displayed in each of the lab specific photos. If you do not include this card, you will receive 0 points on the lab report.
Record your detailed observations and results throughout the experiment. Once you have conducted the experiment and completed the Lab Report, write a 3 page lab report in essay format (MLA) summarizing the experiment, results and conclusions. See below for the grading rubric.
Detailed Instructions and Grading Rubric Midterm & Final Lab Reports
· Minimum length of 3 pages of text, double-spaced, not including pictures and figures. 20 points
· Lab Report must include the following sections (separated by bold headers corresponding to those below) 5 points
· Introduction: 2-3 paragraphs introducing the biological concepts covered in the lab, including references to sources. Last paragraph of introduction should contain 2-3 sentences introducing the lab design. 50 points.
· Methods: 2-3 paragraphs detailing the methods that you used to perform the lab. Do not cut and copy these from the lab manual. Write these in sentence form and do not use numbers or bullet pointed lists. Include every detail you performed so that the reader would be able to perform the lab exactly as you did if they were trying to repeat it. Include pictures/diagrams where necessary. 50 points.
· Results: 2-3 paragraphs summarizing the results of the experiment. Use the Lab manual as a guide for the type of information to include here. Create figures (bar plots, scatterplots, etc) in Microsoft Excel from the completed tables from the Lab manual. Do not insert the tables from the Lab manual into the document, as I expect further synthesis of these results. Insert pictures of the completed experiment. 50 points.
· Discussion & Conclusion: 2-3 paragraphs discussing the results of the experiment, what the results mean, and how they relate to the biological concept under study. Reference outside sources where appropriate. Discuss 2-3 errors while avoiding the term human error. (Random Error and Systematic Error) Include a paragraph on your experience and impressions of the lab and what you learned. 50 points.
· References: Include MLA properly formatted references and in-text citations. A minimum of three sources are required. (See Purdue OWL). 25 points.
Click on the “Week Four Final Lab Report” link in Blackboard to submit your assignment, as well as to get more information regarding the due date and grading rubric.
Argumentative Essay ROUGH DRAFT ONLY (Sources Provided)
Argumentative essay rough draft pertaining to my research question (4 to 5 pages). I have already created an outline for the essay and found all of the required sources. I have attached PDF files for each scholarly source needed for my essay. Please write the essay according to my outline and use the sources I provided. I have also included a word document template that is already formated for APA.
Did the officer conduct an illegal interrogation of Mayo? Discuss why.
Attached is the investigation report completed by the police officer called to the scene of the crime. Also, attached is a signed confession by Mayo. Using the investigation report, the signed confession and the facts from week 1 discussion #2, answer the following questions:
1) Is this a valid confession made by Mayo? Discuss why.
2) What will the court look at to determine if this confession will be admitted into evidence at trial?
3) Did the officer conduct an illegal interrogation of Mayo? Discuss why.
Please read all three Docs
(3) page Reflection Paper on a Book called: Views from the Streets
Read the book: (The Gang’s All Queer: The Lives of Gay Gang Members)
I will provide a link, username, and password for the e-book), then write a reflection paper of (3) pages in length (not including a cover and reference page).
In the reflection paper, you must explain 1) what you learned from the book 2) are there any critiques you have of the book 3) What questions does the book raises for you, and 4) If you could speak to the author what would you ask?
Social stratification is the structured inequality between different groups of people. Karl Marx provided one of the earliest explanations of the conditions of social stratification within societies. His explanations focused on an economic analysis of capitalism as a primary reason for social stratification. Marx identified the conflict between social classes as one of the major reasons for social stratification.
Social stratification is the structured inequality between different groups of people. Karl Marx provided one of the earliest explanations of the conditions of social stratification within societies. His explanations focused on an economic analysis of capitalism as a primary reason for social stratification. Marx identified the conflict between social classes as one of the major reasons for social stratification.
The class system is one of the four systems of stratification that have existed in societies around the world. Think about the other systems of stratification that sociologists have identified.
Write an essay in which you identify and define the remaining systems of stratification. Next, discuss the major components of Karl Marx’s view of social stratification.
Implementing Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Ethically
Paper Expectations:
Research – 3-4 double-spaced pages describing the selected issue using current literature. This component must be well-researched and follow APA citation guidelines.
Analysis – 1-2 double spaced pages discussing the implications of the selected issue for the field of health informatics. This section should be supported by the research component of the paper; however, the focus is on your personal analysis of the significance of, potential impact of, and possible mitigating solutions for the identified issue on the field of health informatics.
References – in APA format
Evaluation Criteria:
Addresses assignment objectives.
Shows evidence of research. Number of references will vary depending on the topic, but a minimum of 3 is a good rule of thumb. References must be relevant, current, and reputable.
Demonstrates a comprehension of the issue and implications for the field of health informatics.
Shows appropriate organization and synthesis of research findings.
Adheres to all appropriate professional writing conventions, including grammar and structure. Adheres to APA citation style.
Submitted by the published due date.
Adheres to criteria in assignment grading rubric.
Analytical Memo
Please write a two-page analytical memo synthesizing the following readings:
Chapter 12 – Emerging Theoretical Perspectives on Student Experiences and Identities
Chapter 17 – Student Affairs Educators as Partners in Using Student Development Theory
Chapter 18 – Implications and Future Directions
Additional information:
Double-spaced
12 point font
Times New Roman
Word document
The writing should be a reflective piece that should help make sense of the reading, discussing, and seeing as one participates in higher education.
The readings for Chapters 12, 17, and 18 are attached from the textbook, Student Development in College, Lori D. Patton, Kristen A. Renn, Florence M. Guido, Stephen John Quaye, 3rd Edition, 2016, Published by Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
Please use APA format for references used and for the textbooks.
Statistical Tools for Financial Research Presentation
Assignment Content
Obtain the public financial records for at least 3 years for 1 domestic and 1 global organization selected in Week 3.
Analyze the current and expected performance of each organization using financial tools, such as:
A ratio analysis
A common-size analysis
Create a 10- to 15-slide presentation that discusses the key decisions based on your analysis.
Include at least 6 charts or tables in your report to show the performance of the organizations so you can depict some of the trends in the financial factors.
Include the limitations of your decisions for a multidivisional organization and a multinational organization.
Address the following questions:
What are the limitations of your analysis if the organization has launched new products in the past few years?
How would your inference change if the firm has not launched new products in the past several years?
Include an APA-formatted reference slide.