Best Writer

Read “Can One ‘Get Out’? The Aesthetics of Afro-Pessimism” by Ryan Poll (posted on Blackboard) and “Monstrous Beginnings” by W. Scott Poole (Blackboard).
PROMPT:
1) What is Afro-Pessimism? What examples does Poll use to illustrate this in his article?
2) Answer any of the questions in the end of Scott Poole’s article. (Pick 1…type the question out and then answer)

Read “Ethical Aliens: The Challenge of Extreme Perpetrators in Humanism” by William Andrew Myers.

PROMPT:

1) Choose and answer 2 of the questions at the end of the essay. Write the questions out and answer each.

2) How do you see this essay’s ideas on “extreme perpetrators” and the film PRECIOUS? Give specific examples from both the text and the film.

Week 8: Benchmark Assignment – Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guideline
Web Page
Points: 300 | Due Date: Week 8, Day 7 | CLO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | Grade Category: Assignments
Assignment Prompt
The purpose of this assignment is to identify a clinical practice guideline in your specialty area. You will be challenged to evaluate this guideline and discuss its use in clinical practice. This assignment is due at the end of Week 8 but can be completed anytime during this course. This assignment requires a considerable amount of time for completion. Do not wait until week 8 to begin this assignment.
Choose a health problem that you may commonly see in primary care nurse practitioner practice. Describe the health problem and recommended medical management for it. Research published clinical practice guidelines and evaluate the practice guideline you have selected based on the components listed in the Clinical Practice Guideline Template below.
Clinical Practice Guideline Prompts:
HEALTHCARE PROBLEM IDENTIFIED: Briefly describe the health problem you have identified. Include a discussion of morbidity, mortality, epidemiology and pathophysiology related to this health problem
PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Describe the clinical practice guideline used for this problem. Reflect on the questions included. Expand on your answer using support from evidence
Does the clinical practice guideline adequately address the health problem? Describe.
Is this practice guideline based on current evidence (within 5 years)? What is the strength of this evidence?
Does this clinical practice guideline adequately direct the healthcare provider in the management of a patient with this problem?
How effective is this clinical guideline in the management of patients with this healthcare problem? Think about how you would assess the effectiveness of patient management.
ANALYSIS: Think about future healthcare needs of patients with this problem, changing demographics, and changes in healthcare policies. Address these questions.
Does this clinical practice guideline need revision(s)? Please explain your answer in detail.
If you were going to revise this clinical practice guideline, what would you change? What evidence would you use to base your changes on?
How might changes in US demographics and healthcare reform affect this clinical practice guideline?
What strategies would you use to increase the likelihood that a new or modified clinical practice guideline would be adopted and used in clinical practice?
EVALUATION How would you determine its effectiveness of this revised clinical practice guideline in directing care for patients with the identified health problem? Outline the steps you might employ.
LEARNING POINTS (3-5 bullet points outlining key learning in this case.)
REFERENCES (APA formatting, current within past 5 years.)
Expectations
Due: Monday, 11:59 pm PT
Length: 8 pages minimum, 12 pages maximum not including the title page, abstract, and reference pages
Format: APA formatted paper – you can opt to use the prompts or a version of the prompt for headers, but do not copy the prompts directly into your paper
Research: APA formatting, current within past 5 years.
See USU NUR Research Paper Rubric for additional details and point weighting.

SCIENCE BLOG!!!
2 examples are in attachments “science blog examples”. follow them as a guide.

Full assignment: Read your selected paper carefully. (“leher singh paper” in attachments). Write a “science blog” written for a general audience about your selected paper. Be sure that your blog summarizes the purpose, independent variables, dependent variables, results, and implications of the study.

You must also:
(1) connect these findings to one of the four overarching themes (Continuity and discontinuity, Nature and Nurture, Active Children, The Holistic Nature of Development)
(2) engage your reader by linking the findings to real-world implications. This component of the blog should reflect a deep understanding of the material.

Please also include the full APA reference for your selected paper at the end of your assignment, and one in-text citation within the blog post. Also give your blog an interesting title. A cover page is not necessary.

Word count: 400 to 500 words, double spaced (gain easy marks by keeping it in this range!)
* Note: Word count includes the in-text citation, but does not include title or reference section.

ONLY use the paper in the attachments as a source, no outside sources.

assignment rubric in attachments “rubric science blog.pdf”

This essay shall follow APA format. I am not sure if it is the 6th or 7th edition so I’m attaching the study guide. the attachments also have the rubric for the essay and the instructions.

Post a 150 word reflection of part 1 of what you were surprised to discover and how this issue impacts public health.

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning in Everyday Life. Describe arguments and decisions that you have made, or regularly make in your everyday life (outside of work) that employ deductive and inductive reasoning. Write these arguments out so the premises and conclusions are clear. Discuss the strength and weakness of your inductive reasoning and the soundness and validity of your deductive reasoning. Also, post any questions you might have on the self-assessment ungraded quiz questions

The attached Word files are the original essay and the requirements for it.

This is the new requirement:
“Please rewrite assignment 3 using the grading tables provided with the assignments. Please include the original version of the assignment, your edited version below it, and a summary (250- 500 words) of how you improved your assignment through editing. ”

Important:
Please focus on structure, transition words, vocabularies and logical expression
Please see the criteria table in the Instruction file to make sure all the requirements satisfied.

I don’t need a full page. It can be 250 words
1. Based on our discussion today, find a story about a major sport, athlete, university, brand, conference or other sports entity that you believe was a result of an earned media opportunity, meaning content that was pitched and placed through public relations efforts (not an ad). Provide a specific example to back this up via a link to a story or video. If you can, try and find a positive story! Finding good news is not required, but we could all use good doses of good news! Note: I am not looking for story about the result of a game. Here is an example: https://www.si.com/soccer/2021/02/17/chelsea-clinton-jenna-bush-hager-washington-spirit-stakes
2. Along the same lines, in your opinion, which sport do you think has done the best job of staying in the public eye during the COVID-19 pandemic and why? Provide other story links and/or personal anecdotes.
Answer both of these questions in one post.
Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Friday, February 19 and your response to at least one other student in class must be posted by 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 23.
Your post should be between 250-350 words
I am reviewing and grading for error-free writing in terms of grammar, style, spelling and punctuation. I will take off a half-point for each of these errors, so proof your work carefully. I am also reviewing the depth of your content and for original thought. Please note that you will have to make an initial post before you can see posts from other students and any outside resources/links must be properly cited (minus 3 if resources are not cited).

Research Paper: Narcissistic Leadership Research
Assignment Overview
Some say that narcissistic leaders and
narcissistic leadership, albeit annoying to subordinates, gets the work of the
organization done. Others say that the damage done by narcissistic leaders and
leadership creates an unethical environment that is virtually irreparable. Here
are some things to consider. What is narcissistic leadership? What are a
narcissistic leader’s traits? What are the organizational benefits and pitfalls
of a narcissistic leader? Study covenant leadership. What is covenant leadership?
What are the traits of a covenant leader?
For this research paper, compare and contrast the traits of a
narcissistic leader with that of a covenant leader.
·
What is the organizational impact of a narcissistic leader and a
covenant leader?
o Imagine that you were a
recently appointed chief of police in a large local police organization where
the former police chief was not only a narcissistic leader but also promulgated
narcissistic leadership qualities throughout all levels of leadership within
the department.

·
Develop a change plan in order to develop your organization with
covenant leadership principles.
o Specifically, how would
you do this in a police organization? Detail changes in the organization’s mission,
small changes you may make, large changes you may make, and the potential
pitfalls and successes you may realize.
Write a research paper on this subject that is not less than 8–10 pages in current APA
format. The page count does not include the title page, abstract, reference
section, or any extra material. In order to incorporate a solid Christian
worldview, you must use 10–15 sources with at least 1 source being the Holy
Bible.
Acceptable sources include course textbooks and
scholarly articles published within the last five years from the Jerry Falwell
Library.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality
via the SafeAssign plagiarism tool.