Best Writer

What is the point of studying the odd beliefs of cultures that have long since disappeared from the face of the earth? Is there a point? (Maybe not…after all, we professors have to have something to do.) Is there any benefit you think you can derive from doing this, other than punching another ticket on the way to your degree?

Identify examples of personification in “Building With Its Face Blown Off” by Billy Collins. What is the effect of that figurative language?

Read the following case and compose a negative letter in which you respond to it. Be sure that you utilize the negative message delivery studied in class.
CASE
You are the office manager for Ducray Bookkeeping Inc. Three weeks ago, you ordered new office chairs for your staff of 28 bookkeepers. Since your bookkeepers spend long hours sitting at their desks, you wanted chairs that were both durable and comfortable.
Calvin Daniels, a salesperson at Grayson Office Furniture Inc., promised you Grayson’s “trustworthy” chairs were strong and offered excellent back support. Three weeks after you bought 28 chairs at $1,200.00 apiece, the arms are falling off the chairs and your staff are complaining of sore backs.
You want to return the chairs to your supplier. You have looked at Grayson’s catalogue, and think that another of their chairs the –EzeeSit- would be a good choice. Since each EzeeSit costs $1,400, however, you want to be sure that they meet your needs before you order any.
ASSIGNMENT
Write a letter to Calvin Daniels, complaining about the poor performance of the “Trustworthy” chairs and suggesting a remedy. (In your letter remember to utilize the negative message delivery studied in class). Send a copy of the letter to Megan Brighton, president of Grayson Office Furniture. Imagine you are writing the letter on your company letterhead (Ducray Bookkeeping Inc.)
INCLUSIONS FOR YOUR LETTER
 Your company letterhead with the complete name, address, email, phone number Ducray Bookkeeping Inc., 567 Cameron Blvd, Toronto, ON, M4P 1S2, 416- 423- 1234
 Date
 Inside address to Calvin Daniels (provide the company name as shown above, the
address, you need to make up the address)
 A copy of the letter should also be sent to the president of his company (Megan
Brighton)

What is your reaction to the definition of myth used in this course? Does it differ from your own idea of what myth is? If so, in what way(s)? What is your reaction to the stress on metaphor? Do you agree that metaphor/poetry can still be “true”? Are sacred texts truly written in metaphor and not fact? What are the implications of that idea?

Leaders seek opportunities to be a change agent whenever the intent for change is required, needed, or desired.
Innovation, critical thinking, and evidence-based research study findings (not articles or editorials)
are key to
impact change within an organization.

This assignment is designed to help you look at aspects of your professional practice to become an agent of
change in the organization. Use your current or past experience to identify a change that should be
initiated.

Review nursing research study attacached below to find possible solutions.

Format as a 1/2 -3/4 double-spaced page paper (cover and reference page not included) with four APA
headings that are bolded and centered, so as to maintain the focus of each section:

Change to be Initiated and Setting
Stakeholders
Change Topic Evidence
Application of Evidence

Under the Change to be Initiated and Setting heading: Present the change with rationale that you intend to
initiate and the specific setting, department or unit where the change will be initiated (e.g. acute, medical ICU;
skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation department, public health,
insurance department, etc.) (one paragraph)

Under the Stakeholders heading: Identify all stakeholders who would
be affected by the change (one sentence)

Under the Change Topic Evidence heading: Summarize how the research study addresses the topic of the
change you want to initiate

Under the Application of Evidence heading: Explain how the findings of the study could be used to assist in the
change you intend to initiate

Correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, APA headings and format, 1/2 -3/4 doubles-paced
page [10]

In Chapters 1-3, the focus is on designing instruction by first determining what students will be able to know and do at the end of the instructional lesson and/or unit. Through this instructional design method, you determine what the demonstrated student learning will look like and the measures to help share that determination with your students. Objectives are statements of what students will know and be able to do after they have learned what we intend them to learn.

In the Discussion this week, you will discuss the importance of the learning objective selection, how to unpack the learning objective in order to determine performance outcomes, and identification of performance levels demonstrating student mastery.

In the Discussion, respond to the following questions:

How do you select a learning objective for your weekly instruction?
Identify a content standard from the Common Core Standards for your class or area of study.
How do you unpack the learning objective or content standard (steps, stages, strategies)?
What are important factors in identifying student performance outcomes for the content standard?
How do you determine the smaller learning objectives (subtasks) inside a larger one?
What steps do you take to make sure all portions of the learning objectives are included in the daily or weekly plans?
How do you communicate the learning objective or content standard to your students?
How do you know that students have mastered the learning objective or content standard?
Respond to your classmates’ posts and offer suggestions on different ways they could adjust their learning objectives to make certain they are student-centered and thinking-centered objectives.

Points and Rubric
This discussion is worth 30 points. Refer to your Discussion Rubric for specific grading criteria. The deadline for your initial post and additional responses is Tuesday night at 11:59 p.m. ET; however, you must participate over multiple days throughout the unit to earn full credit.

Remember that your goal for discussion is three-fold:

To participate actively over multiple days throughout the unit.
To contribute in a way that adds to the discussion and moves it forward in an original fashion.
To use the course content to inform your posts and responses.
Keep in mind that when you post, you should always reference items

(The readings are uploaded)

Please type in the link and read the article carefully and stated examples in your own words of what the questions is are asking. Please make sure you everything is lined up with the rubric and please type the questions please.

OBJECTIVES
Primary Discussion Response is due by Friday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Tuesday (11:59:59pm Central).
Read the cases of State v. Bolarinho, 850 A.2d 907 (R.I. 2004) and State v. Flemming, 19 S.W.3d 195 (Tenn. 2000). Use your analysis of these cases to inform you in your discussion of the following questions:
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas:
Assuming that an assault does not involve physical contact, and batterydoes in this jurisdiction, in your own words, define the crimes of assault and battery.
Can a person’s hands, fists, or feet be considered dangerous weapons? Why or why not?
Would the use of hands, fists, or feet be considered mitigating or aggravating factors with regard to assault or battery? Explain.
What do you think makes an object a dangerous weapon? Explain.
What case law could you use to support your arguments? Identify and describe your examples.
Why do you think these cases are relevant to the discussion?
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:
What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
OTHER INFORMATIONThere is no additional information to display at this time.NEED HELP?
FACULTY
Stephen Ruddick
Looking for tutoring?
Free, online, 24/7 tutoring on a variety of subjects.
Go to Smarthinking >>

Describe specifically the information agents Elliott and Haas got from Kyllo’s house.
Describe exactly how the officers got the information.
Summarize the arguments the majority makes to support its conclusion that getting and recording thermal images constitute searches and seizures.
Summarize the arguments the dissent makes to support its conclusions that they aren’t searches and seizures.
Justice Stevens distinguishes “through-the-wall” from “off-the-wall” surveillance.
What does he mean by this, and does he have a point? Do you agree that it should make a difference?
Chapter 4 – Navarette v. California
List all the facts and circumstances relevant to deciding whether the CHP officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette.
Summarize the majority’s decision that reasonable suspicion supported the stop.
Summarize the dissent’s decision that the stop lacked reasonable suspicion to back it up.
In your opinion, is the majority, dissent, or neither more consistent with the balancing ideal? Defend your answer.
lesson 3
Chapter 5 – Graham v. Connor
List all the specific uses of force by the officers.
State the standard that the Court adopted for determining whether the use of force violated the Fourth Amendment.
How does the Court’s standard differ from the test that the Court of Appeals applied in the case?
Why did the Court change the standard? Which test do you favor? Explain your answer.
If you were applying the tests to the facts of this case, what decision would you reach? Defend your answer.
Chapter 6 – Young v. City of Radcliff
List all the facts and circumstances relevant to interrogating whether law enforcement officers violated Young’s idea of privacy in his home.
Summarize the court’s interrogating and in applying of the individual privacy/ public safety ideals balance.
In your opinion, was Stephen Young “innocent”? Defend you
lesson 4
Chapter 7 – State v. Ellis
List all the actions taken by the resident assistants and the Central State Police Department officers
that invaded Ellis’s Fourth Amendment right of privacy in his dorm room.
Explain why the court’s interrogation of resident assistants’ actions was consistent with reasonable Fourth Amendment searches but the police officers’ actions were unreasonable. Do you agree? Defend your answer.
Interrogate Ellis’s Fourth Amendment privacy ideal from his standpoint. Back up your answer.
As they relate to the special needs/privacy ideal, should it matter whether the resident assistants, campus police, or city police conducted the search? Defend your answer.
Chapter 8 – Miranda v. Arizona
According to SCOTUS, what do the words “custody” and “interrogation” mean?
Why is custodial interrogation “inherently coercive,” according to the majority?
Identify and explain the criteria for waiving the right against self-incrimination in custodial interrogation.
On what grounds do the dissenters disagree with the majority’s decision? What interests are in conflict, according to the Court?
How do the majority and the dissent explain the balance of interests established by the Constitution?
Which is more consistent with the relevant criminal procedures ideals regarding the law of police interrogation, the majority’s bright-line rule, requiring warnings, or the dissent’s due process test, weighing the totality of circumstances on a case-by-case basis? Defend your answer.
lesson 5
Chapter 9 – Perry v. New Hampshire
Was the show-up accidental? Explain your answer.
Summarize the majority opinions arguments supporting its decision that the
Manson two-prong test does not apply to the show-up.
Summarize Justice Sotomayor’s arguments that the Manson test should apply.
In your opinion should the Manson two-prong test apply to the show-up? Back up your answer with arguments from the facts and SCOTUS opinion(s).
How does SCOTUS address the innocence and evidence-based decision-making ideals? Explain your answer.
Chapter 10 – Hudson v. Michigan
List the relevant facts regarding the police entry into Booker T. Hudson’s home.
Summarize the majority’s reasons for creating the “knock-and-announce” exception.
Summarize the dissent’s reasons for opposing the “knock-and-announce” exception.
Summarize Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion. What is the significance of his opinion? Explain.
In your opinion, who has the better argument? Defend your answer.

How do you mitigate institutional inequality?
This article explains how design decisions for transportation projects ‘baked in’ inequality in terms of housing, economic development, etc. Your challenge is to discuss how inequalities (racial, economic, class) may be present in current insitutions that affect your problem area… and discuss how to mitigate them
Archer, Deborah N. n.d. “‘White Men’s Roads Through Black Men’s Homes’*: Advancing Racial Equity Through Highway Reconstruction.” VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 73: 72. link
263671
a minute ago
https://atlantaregional.org/top-10-challenges/improving-third-grade-reading-skills/

Review the four types of listening styles in the textbook and assignment for the module. Reflect on your own listening life style/styles. What has worked well and what could be improved upon. Describe a time when your listening style proved effective , or ineffective. Wrtie a 3-5 page paper.