Best Writer

Please Research articles concerning the Gender Fluidity and
Transgender Movements in our current society. Write an essay defining
the issue and providing information on the impact on society as the
movement goes forward. The essay must be 3-4 pages in length (not
including the cover page and the reference page). Please use at
least two articles as references.

Include the Following Questions
Describe your reaction to the Documentary “I am They” – What
ethical implications are there to the new phenomena of gender fluidity
in our society?
Is it ethical for parents to allow their children to “choose” their sex? Why or why not?
Is it ethical for doctors to perform sex changes on children?
Is it ethical for Doctors to prescribe medication delaying puberty?
Explain.
Is it ethical for parents to encourage children to act in a manner that coincides with the sex of their birth?
IS it unethical to refer to someone as the sex and gender of their biology rather than what they identify as?

Explain and explore major differences between men and women. Do not use 2nd person pronouns (you, your); do not use contractions (can’t, don’t); do not write in 1st person pronouns saying such expressions as, “I think, I feel, I believe.” You must type in 12-inch font, Times New Roman, Double space, and save using Microsoft office software, indent paragraphs. Cite your sources using MLA style.

4 different assingments 300 words per assignment

1) Why did the Articles of Confederation fail? What reasons might explain why someone would prefer the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution? What were the biggest benefits of the Constitution over the Articles of Confederation?
2) Many participants at the U.S. Constitutional Convention had something at stake in the formation of the Constitution. Focus specifically on the Three-Fifths Compromise. Which groups had things at stake in this compromise, what did they have at stake, and how did each try to get what they wanted?

Assignment 2
For this assignment, choose ONE of the writing prompts and write a minimum 300 word essay. For more detailed instructions, review the Instructions for Lesson Writing Assignments.
1) Read the discussion of “descriptive representation” in Chapter 4. Then, review how Congress has changed over time with respect to race and ethnicity, women and veterans in the Pew Research article “The changing face of Congress in 6 charts.” Discuss the different trends in Congress and what do you think it means for the future? Does it matter if members of Congress look like most Americans? What are the advantages and disadvantages of descriptive representation?
2) Chapter 10 discusses many aspects of domestic and foreign policy in the United States. Review public attitudes towards both the size of government and government spending in the Pew Research article “Little Public Support for Reductions in Federal Spending.” According to the survey data, where are people who identify as Republican or Lean Republican more interested in increasing spending? Where are people who identify as Democrats or Lean Democratic more interested in increasing spending? What does the Pew Research Center survey suggest concerning the public’s interest in cutting government spending? Looking at the results of the surveys, what do you think are the prospects for reducing government spending? Why?
3) Both the president and Congress play a role in decisions regarding the use of military force. What are the president’s powers in this area? What are the powers of Congress in this area? Read the article “ New Legislation Offers Opportunity to Address 2001 Authorization for Use of Force, Amid Fears of War with Iran .” Why do you think members of Congress have been willing not to vote on the use of force and to allow modern presidents (such as Bush, Obama and Trump) to take the lead in this area? Do you think Congress should play a larger role in decisions regarding the use of military force?

Assignment 3
For this assignment, choose ONE of the writing prompts and write a minimum 300 word essay. For more detailed instructions, review the Instructions for Lesson Writing Assignments
1) Read the Pew Research article, “Americans feel the tensions between privacy and security concerns.” How should the government balance the tensions between privacy and national security concerns? Is the Constitution clear about potential conflicts between privacy and national security? How much privacy should Americans expect in an age where information about people is so readily available?
2) Chapter 6 briefly discusses judicial interpretivists and strict constructionists. For more discussion on the issue read “How does the Supreme Court decide what the Constitution means?” How does a strict constructionist (originalist) interpret the Constitution compared to a judicial interpretivist (non-originalist)? Do you think the Constitution should be interpreted literally or is it an evolving document that needs to be interpreted differently over time? Why?
Assignment 4
For this assignment, choose ONE of the writing prompts and write a minimum 300 word essay. For more detailed instructions, review the Instructions for Lesson Writing Assignments.
1) Read the Gallup report on attitudes towards third parties. How do Americans view third parties? Why is it so difficult for third party candidates to win in the United States? How would having more than two competitive political parties change American politics?
2) Review the Pew Research articles “U.S. trails most developed countries in voter turnout” and “Weekday elections set the U.S. apart from many other advanced democracies.” Specifically, how does voter turnout in the U.S. compare with voter turnout in other advanced democracies? What are some of the causes for the low voter turnout between the United States and other advanced democracies? What are the pros and cons of changing election day to a holiday or a weekend?
3) Look at Table 9.1 of AmGov and read the Pew Research article “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2018.” Discuss where people get their news? What are some of the demographic differences that influence where people get their news? Where do you prefer to get your news (social media, print, television, radio) and why? Do you rely on only one news source? How do you judge the credibility of your news source(s)?

https://www.sparknotes.com/nofear/shakespeare/msnd/page_2/ read the act from the play midnight summer dream
Step I: Find two articles on a play by William Shakespeare that we have read this semester.
Step II: Complete the following Reflective Annotated Bibliography (RAB)
Introduction (300 words)
Discuss the play and author you choose to research further. Briefly introduce your two articles and why they interested you.
Alphabetical list of both sources, each with a bibliographic entry (300 words each)
Summary of source content
2-3 key quotes (include citation info) that are representative of major ideas (these do not count toward the word count total)
Your reflection on the source, including your opinion on the content (here you distinguish your own ideas from those of the author/artist) and why you chose to include it
Conclusion (300 words)
Reflect on the sources you have identified and brought together, and explain how your own thinking or approach to the topic has expanded or changed
Address why this new knowledge is important
Step III: Write a brief essay, drawing from these sources, to further elucidate the play.

The complexities of the philosophy of nursing and how it’s influenced by nursing’s social policy statement, thinking, values and beliefs. APA 7th Edition – at least 1 source (from articles provided)

ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED IN ESSAY:
What is the value of formulating a personal nursing philosophy ?
Briefly describe how the four principle domains of nursing (person, environment, health, and nursing) might influence your nursing philosophy and your future practice?
posts should show evidence of thoughtful consideration of reading assignments and illustrate critical thinking. Sharing relevant personal and professional experiences and how they have influenced your thoughts are welcome additions to the posts. Please do not leave non-substantive posts. For example, if you agree with a classmate, instead of just posting “I agree”, respond by elaborating on why you agree, provide additional resources or ask questions to further the conversation.
– I take a holistic veiw in treating my patients
– Important to be personable in order to connect with patients due to the professions need for trust and bond
– may expand on these thoughts and others alike
– I have provided notes I would like to be used/discussed in paper
– Please follow rubric

Using the terms metabolism, catabolism, and anabolism, describe the energy pathways in anaerobic and aerobic metabolism. What are the results of each?

English Composition II
Response Essay
Rationale
The purpose of a response is to enter into a conversation with texts or authors about which you have become knowledgeable. This is an opportunity for you to explain to your reader what you think about a proposed issue or argument.
You can approach the response in a number of ways—agreeing, disagreeing, or both—but you should consider that this assignment will build on the summary and rhetorical analysis skills that you developed in previous assignments.
In this paper, you will present a claim about the topic below; you will present reasons and evidence for your claim, and explain your claim’s relationship to the author(s)’s argument(s) with whom you’ve decided to interact.
The Topic
Your essay will pose some answer to this question: What is the value, if any, of a college education in a democracy?
You will present an original argument; your argument, evidence, and rebuttals will be comprised of any of the readings 1-8 in the module “Reading and Understanding Arguments”, the Readings in Democracy from the “Begin Here” module, or the Achenbach and Cohen articles from “Responding to Arguments” module. A minimum of two sources is required.
You are not required to use the articles you used for your academic precis or CCRA, though you may find it more convenient to do so. If you do choose to write a response to the articles you used for your previous assignments, you may use some elements of the summary or analysis you wrote to help introduce the article to your reader, but it should be well adapted to this project, rather than copied and pasted wholesale into your paper.
How do I respond?
While the choice of how you respond to your chosen essay is fully your own, I expect that you will use the conventions of responding to conversations that you read about the “Responding to Arguments” module.
You should also consider what we have learned about strong thesis statements and paragraphs organized by topic sentences.
Remember that you are writing to your own audience, so you should give them context of your argument before/as you articulate your thesis statement. Give them a “So what?”—why is does this topic matter? Why should they invest in reading through your argument?
You are required to incorporate material from the articles to which you are responding. You are welcome to incorporate other secondary research into this essay if you find it will help you make an effective argument, but it is not required for this paper.
Avoid logical fallacies (discussed in Module 8), or use logical fallacies in other arguments as a way “in” to the conversation.
Guidelines
Aim for a length of 1000-1200 words, double-spaced, TNR 12-point font. Any paper that falls below 1000 words will not be eligible for a B or an A grade. (Your Works Cited page is not included in the word count.)
Your essay should have an effective introduction that includes a clear thesis statement, as well as an effective conclusion that leaves the reader with a strong final impression of your argument.
Organize your essay clearly, and around topic sentences directly related to your thesis, so that it flows smoothly from one paragraph to the next.
Make sure your reader understands the difference between your words and ideas and those presented in the texts you choose to write about.
Use the MLA online handbook to help you properly cite, summarize, paraphrase, and quote the texts you choose to write about.
A minimum of two sources are required for this paper and they should come from readings you’ve been assigned in previous modules (see above).
Format
Your essay should adhere to MLA manuscript format. Any texts or other sources that you quote, summarize, or paraphrase should be cited.

What is the exclusionary rule and the arguments for and against it?

Cite: Criminal Procesure
John L. Worrall,2018
Pearson
ISBN. 13: 978-0-134-54865-4

Read the article “Ad Campaigns Aim to Counter Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/ad-campaigns-aim-to-counter-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-11614229261

Answer must be related to the content of chapter 11-13 from the slides and this book: https://open.lib.umn.edu/principlesmarketing/front-matter/publisher-information/
In your groups, discuss how the information presented in the article relates to what you are learning in Unit 4. Specifically, consider questions such as:
Who are the target audiences of these campaigns?
What message strategy would you suggest for reaching these audiences? What would your message theme be? Why?
What combination of at least 3 advertising appeals might be used in these campaigns? Why do you think these would be the most effective?
Are there any advertising appeals that marketers implementing these campaigns should probably avoid? If so, which ones? If not, why not?
Given the target audiences, what recommendations would you make for spokespeople for these ads? Why?
Be sure that, in addition to answering the questions above, you fulfill the requirements outlined in the Syllabus and Rubric:
Make ties between what we are learning and (1) the real-world application of marketing and (2) marketing’s impact on society
Be sure to use correct terminology from class
Attempt not only to speak into the ether but to write in a way that fosters conversation
Adhere to the rules of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization).
Finally: Please make sure that your posts do not violate the Course’s Rules of Engagement (see the Syllabus). I am aware that people have differing opinions on Covid-19 and the vaccines. However:
I have chosen these articles to help you translate what you’re learning via the lens of a current event.
You will soon graduate from college; you should be able to have polite and professional conversations with people who see the world differently from you.
These posts are not about your personal opinions or beliefs; they are about how well you can utilize what you’ve learned to assess a given topic.
To that end, please attempt to stick to the content of the course as much as possible and always be respectful of other people. Students that make offensive, derogatory, or inflammatory posts will be removed from their group, forfeiting the Discussion points, and might be removed from the class completely.

Overview
The final project for this course is the creation of an analysis and recommendations paper. Contemporary public health issues addressed by the social and
behavioral sciences include the prevention and treatment of alcohol and drug abuse, tobacco control, injury control, mental health, domestic violence, prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and HIV, adolescent health, communications, and grassroots political and community organizing. Effective solutions to widespread public health problems require the ability to plan, implement, and administer programs that take into account the actual factors that influence individual behaviors and reduce existing disparities. Both quantitative and qualitative research is used to inform program planning and evaluation.
For this project, you will analyze a public health issue that affects a community or population of your choice. You will also analyze the social and behavioral factors associated with the issue and make recommendations for specific changes in social and behavioral factors that will help improve the issue. You will use social or behavioral theories, concepts, or models to substantiate your claims.
The project is divided into four milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules One, Two, Four, and Five. The final project submission occurs in Module Seven.
This assignment will address the following course outcomes:
PHE-340-01: Analyze the impact of social and behavioral factors on individual and population health for improving overall population health
PHE-340-02: Analyze the impact of community interventions on population health in identifying the efficacy of health programs
PHE-340-03: Apply appropriate public health theories, concepts, or models in examining behavioral, social, and cultural factors associated with health
issues
PHE-340-04: Recommend evidence-based strategies for effecting changes in social and behavioral issues
Prompt
For this assignment, consider yourself an employee of an actual healthcare organization of your choosing, in which your role is to research the social and behavioral aspects of public health issues and make recommendations about changes in social and behavioral factors that will lead to a decrease in public health issues. You will choose a public health issue with your instructor’s approval for the basis of this project, analyze the issue for its social and behavioral factors, and make specific recommendations for changes that will lead to a measurable improvement of that issue.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction
Summarize your public health issue with respect to the community or state to which it is pertinent.
Discuss why it is considered a public health issue. Be sure to support your claims with research.
C. Identify the population that is most at risk for this issue. Be sure to support your claims with research.
Analysis
Describe the social, behavioral, and cultural factors associated with this public health issue. Be sure to substantiate your claims with relevant
evidence-based research.
Assess the impact of local initiatives that may exist on your selected issue. In other words, what has been done in the community, including
organizational support, initiatives, or programs, in response to this issue? Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific examples and
research.
Assess the impact of state-sponsored programs or interventions that may exist to address your selected public health issue. Be sure to
substantiate your claims with specific examples and research.
Analyze the efficacy of local and state initiatives and programs that address your selected public health issue. In other words, are those
initiatives or programs working? Be sure to justify your reasoning with relevant evidence-based research.
Bearing in mind that there may be several, identify a healthcare disparity (that is, a gap in care that is typically experienced by an underserved
population) associated with this public health issue.
What efforts have been made toward reducing the disparity you identified? Be sure to substantiate your claims with relevant evidence-based
research.
Theoretical Support
Bearing in mind that there may be several, choose a social, behavioral, or cultural factor associated with your selected public health issue that
needs to change in order to improve the issue. Be sure to explain why you chose this particular factor.
Select the public health theory, model, or concept that most appropriately applies to the social, behavioral, or cultural factor you chose in the
above step.
Describe the strengths of the theory, model, or concept you selected for addressing your chosen social, behavioral, or cultural factor. Be sure to
substantiate your claims with specific examples and research.
Describe the weaknesses of the theory, model, or concept you selected for addressing your chosen social, behavioral, or cultural factor. Be sure
to substantiate your claims with specific examples and research.
Recommendations
Make specific evidence-based recommendations for community-level stakeholders for positively impacting the social, behavioral, or cultural
factor you selected. Be sure to justify the rationale behind your recommendations.
Make specific evidence-based recommendations for the relevant state agency (or agencies) for promoting positive change in your selected
factor. Be sure to justify the rationale behind your recommendations.
Make specific evidence-based recommendations for reducing the healthcare disparity you previously identified. Be sure to justify the rationale
behind your recommendations.
Make general recommendations for improving the overall public health issue you selected. Be sure to justify the rationale behind your
recommendations.
V. Reflection
Summarize the public health issue you selected and the social, behavioral, or cultural changes that would need to be made to bring about
improvement.
Discuss how your recommendations would support such change. Be sure to substantiate your claims with evidence.
Milestones
Milestone One: Topic Approval and Draft of Introduction
In Module One, you will submit your final project topic for approval and include a draft of the introduction portion of the final project (Section I). This assignment should contain an overview of the public health issue and target population you will be addressing in your final project. You should frame the impact that your selected public health issue had (or is having) on your target populations at a national and/or international level. At least two sources should be used for this assignment. This milestone provides the foundation for your entire final project. With future milestones, you will build upon the work you submit in this milestone. This milestone is graded with the Milestone One Rubric.
Milestone Two: Draft of Analysis
In Module Two, you will submit a draft of the analysis portion of the final project (Section II). This milestone requires you to expand your understanding of the public health issue you have chosen for your final project. You will demonstrate your deepened understanding of the issue by considering the cultural factors, local initiatives, state initiatives, and healthcare disparities associated with your topic. The milestone will help you establish a strong background of the issue so you can assess the theoretical framework that you will use as the basis for the rest of your final project work. It will also help you prepare for Milestone Three. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Milestone Three: Draft of Theoretical Support
In Module Four, you will submit a draft of the theoretical support portion of the final project (Section III). This assignment builds on the work you did in Milestone Two, as you will choose the theoretical framework you will use to guide the recommendations and reflection sections of the final project. In this milestone, you will determine and justify a factor to be considered for your analysis and recommendations. You will rationalize your choice by pulling in other research and support. In addition, you will address both the strengths and limitations of your chosen theory as it pertains to the issue you chose. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.
Milestone Four: Draft of Recommendations and Reflection
In Module Five, you will submit your draft of the recommendations and reflection portions of the final project (Sections IV and V). This assignment allows you to advocate for the health disparities you discovered in your analysis by providing a potential solution for the issue you discovered. The recommendations you put forth in this milestone will be substantiated with solid evidence. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Four Rubric.
Final Project Submission: Analysis and Recommendations Paper
In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission is graded using the Final Project Rubric.
Milestone
Deliverable
Deliverables Module Due
One Two Four Five Seven
Grading
Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric
Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric Graded separately; Milestone Four Rubric Graded separately; Final Project Rubric
1 Topic Approval and Draft of Introduction
2 Draft of Analysis
3 Draft of Theoretical Support
4 Draft of Recommendations and Reflection
Final Project Submission: Analysis and Recommendations Paper
Final Project Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be 8–10 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New
Roman font, and one-inch margins. Include at least three sources, which should be cited according to APA style.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Introduction
Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses industry-specific language to establish expertise
Comprehensively introduces public health issue and supports claims with research
Introduces public health issue but with gaps in detail, or does not support claims with research
Does not introduce public health issue
3
Analysis: Factors
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides an in-depth, detailed overview of factors associated with chosen public health issue
Accurately describes social, behavioral, and cultural factors associated with chosen public health issue and substantiates claims with relevant, evidence- based research
Describes social, behavioral, and cultural factors associated with chosen public health issue but with gaps in accuracy, or research is not relevant or evidence-based
Does not describe social, behavioral, and cultural factors associated with chosen public health issue
6
Analysis: Local Initiatives
Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced, well-informed connections between concepts
Comprehensively assesses impact of local initiatives on selected issue and substantiates claims with specific examples and research
Assesses impact of local initiatives on selected issue but with gaps in detail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples and research
Does not assess impact of local initiatives on selected issue
6
Analysis: State- Sponsored Programs or Interventions
Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced, well-informed connections between concepts
Comprehensively assesses impact of state-sponsored programs or interventions on selected issue and substantiates claims with specific examples and research
Assesses impact of state- sponsored programs or interventions on selected issue but with gaps in detail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples and research
Does not assess impact of state- sponsored programs or interventions on selected issue
6
Analysis: Efficacy
Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced, well-informed connections between concepts
Accurately analyzes efficacy of local and state initiatives and programs that address selected issue and justifies reasoning with relevant, evidence-based research
Analyzes efficacy of local and state initiatives and programs but without regard to selected issue, or research is not relevant or evidence-based
Does not discuss efficacy of local and state initiatives and programs
6
Analysis: Disparity
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description evidences keen consideration of social responsibility
Accurately identifies a healthcare disparity associated with chosen public health issue
Identifies a healthcare disparity that is not associated with chosen public health issue, or there are gaps in accuracy
Does not describe a healthcare disparity associated with chosen public health issue
6
Analysis: Reducing the Disparity
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description evidences keen consideration of social responsibility
Describes efforts that have been made to reduce identified disparity and substantiates claims with specific examples and research
Describes efforts that have been made to reduce disparities but not the identified disparity, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples and research
Does not describe efforts that have been made to reduce identified disparity
6
Theoretical Support: Choice
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and articulation is exceptionally clear and logical
Chooses a social, behavioral, or cultural factor associated with chosen issue that needs to change to improve the issue, and explains why the factor was chosen
Chooses a social, behavioral, or cultural factor that is not associated with the chosen issue or that does not need to be changed to improve the issue, or does not explain why the factor was chosen
Does not choose a social, behavioral, or cultural factor
6
Theoretical Support: Theory
Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced, well-informed connections between concepts
Selects the theory, model, or concept that most appropriately applies to the chosen social, behavioral, or cultural factor
Selects a theory, model, or concept that is not appropriately applied to the chosen social, behavioral, or cultural factor
Does not select a theory, model, or concept to apply to the chosen social, behavioral, or cultural factor
6
Theoretical Support: Strengths
Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced, well-informed connections between concepts
Accurately describes the strengths of the theory, model, or concept and substantiates claims with specific examples and research
Describes the strengths of the theory, model, or concept but with gaps in accuracy, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples and research
Does not describe the strengths of the theory, model, or concept
6
Theoretical Support: Weaknesses
Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced, well-informed connections between concepts
Accurately describes the weaknesses of the theory, model, or concept and substantiates claims with specific examples and research
Describes the weaknesses of the theory, model, or concept but with gaps in accuracy, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples and research
Does not describe the weaknesses of the theory, model, or concept
6
Recommendations: Community-Level Stakeholders
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations integrate relevant theories and research
Makes appropriate evidence- based recommendations for community-level stakeholders and justifies rationale behind recommendations
Makes recommendations that are not appropriate or are not evidence-based for community- level stakeholders, or does not justify rationale behind recommendations
Does not make evidence-based recommendations for community-level stakeholders
6
Recommendations: State Agency
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations integrate relevant theories and research
Makes appropriate evidence- based recommendations for state agency or agencies and justifies rationale behind recommendations
Makes recommendations that are not appropriate or are not evidence-based for state agency or agencies, or does not justify rationale behind recommendations
Does not make evidence-based recommendations for state agency
6
Recommendations: Reducing the Healthcare Disparity
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations integrate relevant theories and research
Makes appropriate evidence- based recommendations for reducing identified healthcare disparity, and justifies rationale behind recommendations
Makes recommendations that are not appropriate or are not evidence-based for reducing identified healthcare disparity, or does not justify rationale behind recommendations
Does not make evidence-based recommendations for reducing identified healthcare disparity
6
Recommendations: Overall Public Health Issue
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations integrate relevant theories and research
Makes appropriate general recommendations for improving overall public health issue and justifies rationale behind recommendations
Makes recommendations that are not appropriate for improving overall public health issue, or does not justify rationale behind recommendations
Does not make recommendations for improving overall public health issue
6
Reflection: Summarize
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and summary is exceptionally clear and concise
Summarizes selected public health issue and social, behavioral, or cultural changes required for improving issue
Summarizes selected public health issue but does not address social, behavioral, or cultural changes required for improving issue, or changes noted are not appropriate for improving issue
Does not summarize selected public health issue
3
Reflection: Support
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides detailed examples of how recommendations fill gaps in current initiatives and programs
Accurately discusses how recommendations would support change and substantiates claims with evidence
Discusses how recommendations might support change, but with gaps in accuracy, or does not substantiate claims with evidence
Does not discuss how recommendations would support change
6
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
4
Earned Total 100