IT Security Legal and Ethical Issues

CYT145: IT Security Legal and Ethical Issues.
Youve been assigned the task of writing a simplified incident response plan for an
organization. You are to pick an organization, preferably Canadian, from any industry, and
prepare a cybersecurity incident response plan for that organization.
The objective of the assignment will be to understand how to prepare a basic incident response
plan.
As a part of assignment you have to conduct research online and pick an industry
standard framework for your incident response (NIST Incident Response Framework
(SP800-61r2) is recommended.)

BLOG ESSAY

source: https://virtualpsychcentre.com/paul-ekman-and-the-study-of-micro-expressions/
Read textbook chapter 6
Watch fascinating TED Talk by world-renown neuroscientist and psychologist Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett, “You are not at the Mercy of your Emotions- Your Bain Creates Them” https://www.ted.com/talks/lisa_feldman_barrett_you_aren_t_at_the_mercy_of_your_emotions_your_brain_creates_them?language=en
~500-word blog: Write your reaction to chapter 6 on emotions across cultures and connect it to the research of Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett. Structure your blog into strong paragraphs: intro (context of exploration), connection (background information), focus (concepts from the textbook in relation to TED talk), dilemma (define the problem and provide examples), solution (describe solutions), conclusion (evaluate and synthesize your ideas based on various perspectives), and finally, future direction (pose one critical question). Your writing should be understandable by someone who has not read the chapter or heard about the neuroscience and psychology of human emotions.

Nuestras Hijas de Regreso a Casa (May Our Daughters Return Home) anti-femicide grassroots organization of Mexico and transnational feminism

This is a Feminist Activism paper that should not exceed 7 pages or 1750 words. Further Instructions and the required sources are in the attachment FenibistPaper below. The paper has to talk about Mexican anti-femicide grassroots organization started by two mothers Norma and Marisela that started NHRC. The paper must also talk about transnational feminism and neoliberalism. There also needs to be an explanation about how this organization is situated in intersectionality developed by Kimberle Crenshaw. The explanation in the instructions is more clear so please see attached document for better information. Thank you.

The following criteria will be used when assessing your Feminist Activism Paper:
Introduction / Purpose (10%)
Introduction establishes country and theme specific context for the feminist grassroot analysis. Key objectives outlined, with thesis statement clearly stated. Logical framework outlined and context of key points presented.
Background Context (25%)
Presentation demonstrates a thorough, insightful and relevant understanding of context and theoretical background.
Application (40%)
Demonstration of clear & succinct use of arguments & examples to back up discussion about the feminist group/movement. The discussion is concise and demonstrates an understanding of the key findings, observations and subsequent arguments that are presented.
Presentation (layout etc) (15%)
The flow between the introduction, main body of the paper, and conclusion is smooth. Arguments are concisely stated without repetition of ideas. Use of appropriate graphs/figures and references to buttress the main argument. The conclusion clearly summarizes the main argument of the paper for the reader.
Style (5%)
Clear attention paid to grammar, spelling, written style throughout analysis paper, with few errors.
Style (5%)
Sources are credible, current, relevant, and cited consistently in the appropriate style.

According to the memo

This is a technical writing course Assignment.
Please complete the exercise Attached. All the typical formal requirements of writing a memo should be present in your document. Please proofread for grammar and style errors. Each paragraph should have a title and choose a title for the memo too. You can use any source as long as it is cited in the memo.
This is a role-playing assignment, where you play the role of the first female-identifying hire in an all-male-identifying workplace. before beginning your written response, make yourself familiar with the meaning of diversity and inclusion.

child obesity

Paper Option #1 Nature/Nurture
Developmental science focuses on the various contributions to development, and whether they lean toward the genetic side of things (nature) or environmental (nurture). Choose from one of the following topics discussed in the modules:
child obesity
eating disorders
adolescent depression
For this paper, review the module material on your specific topic. Then, write a paper describing in detail the nature (primarily genetic, inherited) contributions to this condition as well as the nurture contributions. You will need to conduct Internet research and cite the sources to obtain additional information on your topic. For example, explaining the inherited reasons for a child to be obese will require that you visit, read, summarize, and cite medical sites on the Internet. It is crucial that you rephrase material in your own words and cite it or put phrases from the sources in quotation marks and cite them. No more than a few sentences should be directly quoted in order for you to receive credit for writing this paper (in other words, no credit is given for a paper that is a string of other peoples quotes). As a general rule of thumb, at least 1.5 pages should focus on “nature” contributions to the issue at hand and at least 1.5 pages should focus on “nurture” contributions.

Your research must include at least two journal articles or books. Websites can be very helpful and informative, but your final paper must include full, published research articles or books on the topic. Sources should be reputable and consistent with what you learned in the module as well as other sources. GoogleScholar and PDF articles from the Internet can be helpful resources. Make sure you use good search terms when trying to find articles. You may want to start broad (for example, bystander effect), and then narrow to your particular area. This paper requirement means that you need to include at least two primary sources in your paper; articles from the Internet can be included, but they would be in addition to the two minimum primary sources. Primary sources are firsthand accounts; thus, they involve the author writing about his or her own work.
It is recommended that you spend at least a page and a half discussing nature for this topic and a page and at least a half discussing nurture. Finally, conclude the paper by indicating which side (nature, nurture) gives the strongest contribution to this condition or whether they are both needed. For example, for child obesity, is genetics alone a sufficient cause for a child to be obese, or are poor eating habits necessary along with a genetic predisposition? The paper should follow the following format:

I. Introduction. Introduce your topic.
II. Description and research on nature components
III. Description and research on nurture components
IV. Evaluation: which side (nature, nurture) most strongly contributes

“Give an example of something that you find boring or uninteresting and explain why other people find it exciting and engaging.”

The question I must answer in the essay is: “Give an example of something that you find boring or uninteresting and explain why other people find it exciting and engaging.”

My answer is “getting/receiving flower”

reasons:
1. Flowers are beautiful but when you cut them they die.
2. Flowers represent death to me. When someone dies, you send flowers (I’m not a dead person yet)
3. People spend so much money on flowers but what they don’t know is there is a significant environmental impact associated with the intensive farming of fresh flowers. large inputs of energy are required to grow the flowers on a huge scale-required by the consumer demands.
4. The carbon cost of transportation of flowers around the world.

read and watch : https://www.bbc.com/future/bespoke/made-on-earth/the-new-roots-of-the-flower-trade/

Innovation Case Study Project

This assignment consists of two parts. Part 1 consists of a series of innovation-related questions applied to the Nespresso case. Where applicable, please detail and answer each question using the major innovation concepts and/or tools that we worked with throughout this course. Part 2 requires you to conduct a traditional business case analysis leading to your well-reasoned, professional recommendation as to what NCS must do to reach its growth targets.

Part 1: Innovation-Related Questions
What innovation theory and/or framework of analysis best explains Nestles approach to innovation and the historical development of Nespresso?

What made Nespresso and NCS innovative? Be sure to consider and address this innovation relative to the product, industry, market, and Nestle.

Describe and explain the nature of the Nestle business model relative to Nespresso. Was/is this the best choice for Nestle to create and capture value with Nespresso? Please explain and justify your opinion.

Describe and explain Nestles efforts to create a climate of innovation at the company and in support of the Nespresso product. Please be sure to address the important issues of culture, leadership, and company organization (especially organization efforts relative to Nespresso).

Apply Keeleys Ten Type innovation analysis to this case. Identify and describe the type(s) that you believe best explains Nestles innovation efforts relative to Nespresso. If applicable, identify and describe a Keeley innovation play at work in this case (see Keeley, Chapter 20). If no Keeley innovation play example readily applies to this case, then develop and explain an innovation play (using Keeleys model) that best explains this Nespresso case.

What lessons could be learned about innovation and renovation from the Nespresso story?

Part 2: Traditional Case Analysis & Business Recommendation
Please provide a written analysis of the Nespresso case according to the following outline and guidelines:
Problem case question: What must NCS do now to reach its ambitious growth targets?

Introduction (no more than one page): basic facts regarding the company and the product

Explanation and summary of the current situation (no more than two pages)
A clearly defined problem supported by the facts and an identification of all the major issues that may relate to any of the following: Nestle, strategy, customers, marketing, industry, competition, and other
Development and explanation of three feasible solutions to the problem (no more than three pages)
What could be done? Be sure to identify and explain potential challenges, benefits, limitations, and likelihood of success for each solution.
Your professional recommendation (no more than two pages)
What course of action? Why? Provide a persuasive argument for your chosen option. Be sure to detail the potential challenges, limitations, and expected benefits from pursuing your recommended solution.
Identify and describe the steps necessary to implement this solution identify and define the activities that must be performed
Be sure to address any/all the major functional areas impacted by your solutions (i.e., management, sales, marketing, operations, HR, etc.)
What are your expected outcomes and expectations regarding likelihood of success?

Parameters: Part 1: one to two pages per question (six to 12 pages total); Part 2: total of no more than eight pages. (Case study total: 14 to 20 pages.)

Conduct research in the Hinds Library online databases -instructions and videos in previous content pages – to find sources that will help you backup the traits

For this essay, you will choose one of the characters, Montresor or Fortunato, to write about. Then you will write about three of his character traits – each trait will be in a body paragraph.
Once you have named a trait, you need to write in detail about the trait – using supporting statements from the story text and from the other sources that you find. You may use 1 direct quote from the story, which you will cite in the text of the paragraph, AND you must use evidence from at least two different sources you have found. You must paraphrase and cited this evidence. When you provide the evidence from the sources, you need to discuss/explain that evidence.
SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS FOR ESSAY:
This essay should be about 3-4 full pages of text ( 5 paragraphs: introduction, 3 body and conclusion) plus the WC page – the WC MUST be the last page/pages of the document – DO NOT SUBMIT WC as a SEPARATE DOCUMENT
USE MLA general format and format for citations
Choose to write about either Montresor or Fortunato – only one – then, use the character trait chart for that character and the traits you listed there
Conduct research in the Hinds Library online databases -instructions and videos in previous content pages – to find sources that will help you backup the traits
when you use these sources, you will paraphrase the evidence AND cite it – giving credit to the source, and then provide discussion of the evidence – you ARE REQUIRED to use 2 different sources in each body paragraph
You are Required to use 5 sources plus the short story – the citation for the story is on the content page “The Cask of Amontillado” in WEEK 1
What to include in each paragraph:
Introduction:
hook statement
connection of hook to story/character
name of the story and author
1-3 sentence summary of the short story
general information on the importance of characters
name of the character writing about
thesis statement
BP1, BP2, BP3:
topic sentence – needs to clearly state the trait
introduce the quote
1 direct quote and cite from the short story as evidence of the trait
discuss the quote
introduction of evidence 1 from another source
paraphrase and cite evidence
discuss evidence
introduction of evidence 2 from another source
paraphrase and cite evidence
discuss evidence
wrap up and transition to next paragraph
Conclusion:
restate thesis
reiterate supporting points
make connection between opening and closing statements – again importance of characters
provide insight – this is the “so what” about the topic
You are REQUIRED to use 1 direct quote from the story in each body paragraph – here is how to use Direct Quotes:
How to Cite Direct Quotes:
1. WORD for WORD from the narrative text of a work, you must put the work in quotation marks and cited the work for example: for me, as for others, the internet is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind. (Carr 790) NOTICE that you do not have to use an entire sentence it can be part of a sentence REMEMBER the quote that you use should not be longer than 2 full lines of text of the paragraph
2. DIALOGUE is quoted a bit differently in the text dialogue is shown by using quotation marks, you need to use them for this type of quote but you need to add single quotation marks too, for example: Roxane Gay writes They think they know the why of my body. They do not. (Green 823) NOTICE that you use the quotation marks then a single quote mark, the dialogue, and close with the single quote mark and then the regular quotation marks
EXAMPLE ESSAY – here is an example of an essay – you need to read it so that you can see the overall format, how the student included the direct quotes from the story and the evidence from other sources, and the Works Cited page. IMPORTANT: this example was from a class and had different requirements from yours – yours should be 3-4 pages long (does not include the WC) and have a minimum of two different sources plus the direct quote from the story in each body paragraph, and you are to have 5 sources total.

Explain and document your reasoning using scholarly and peer reviewed journal articles and/or texts.

For each forum, you are required to create a thread of at least 350 words.

Explain and document your reasoning using scholarly and peer reviewed journal articles and/or texts.
Discussion to talk about:

What do you believe is the single most influential force in today’s society that sets the tone for an individual’s personal values and why? Does this force affect Christians positively or negatively? What is your advice regarding this influential force?

find a current events news article and write a critical analysis review. summarize the article and explain the economic concepts that are related then you will critique how the author uses positive and normative analysis and their use of economic theory.

1. Final an article
– It should be from a mainstream news publication (i.e. the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, etc.) in 2021. Article must either address or illustrate one of the themes of economics
– You must choose a current event news article with an identified author or authors (i.e. it should say by: someones name)
2. your review:
– Your article review should include the following components. You dont have to answer each question directly, but this is to give you guidance on what to think about and they types of things to include in each paragraph/section.
Introduction and Article summary: Identify your target article (author, title, date of publication, newspaper name). Briefly explain what the article is about. Give a summary of the overall premise and conclusions of the article.
Economic Application: Explain the economic concepts that apply to this article. For instance, if you are writing about the toilet paper shortage, you might discuss supply and demand theory, market structure (competitive vs. monopoly), elasticity of supply/demand.
Critique: Does the author correctly use economic theory? Are they persuasive in their arguments (discuss positive and normative analysis)? This is the most challenging section and will require you to dig deeper and go beyond the text of the article. You will not likely find the authors explicitly discussing economic theory and instead you will look at the evidence they offer and the conclusions they present to see if it lines up with what the economic theories say. This section does not need to be negative. You can also have a positive critique where you discuss things the author did well.
Here is what I am looking for when I grade this review.
Was the article chosen related to the course content?
Was the article recent and from a mainstream news source?
Did the analysis and critique reflect deep understanding of the theory/content?
Were there errors made in applying economic theory?
Were the economic theories chosen simple or complex?
Was there only one simple theory applied vs multiple theories or complex theories?
Were all formatting requirements met?