Best Writer

Part of having a professional online presence is creating professional content for peers to engage with and to share your expertise.

Imagine that as a member of the executive team working on the strategic plan of the recent merger between the hospital and medical center, you are asked about the strategies you use to forge growing professional relationships with internal and external stakeholders.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that discusses developing strategic alliances with key internal and external stakeholders, and how to network effectively within the health care sector in which you work.
Describe the health care sector in which you work.
Identify key internal and external stakeholders.
Describe strategies used to develop relationships with internal and external stakeholders.
Provide guidelines on networking through different venues such as online events, conferences, social media, professional meetings, or social events.

Cite MORE than 3 reputable references to support your assignment (i.e., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).

Include a citation of your article in your assignment as the author of the article. An APA-formatted citation should be included in the body of the article and referenced at the end of the article.

Publish the article on your LinkedIn account.

Essay based on William Davenant, Salmacida Spolia (1640) and Richard Brome, A Jovial Crew (1641).
Secondary readings: Richard Cust, ‘The Collapse of Royal Power in England, 1637-1642’ in Michael Braddick ed. The Oxford Handbook of the English Revolution (OUP, 2015), pp. 60-75.

We worked on the two following portraits as well – Pre-Civil War Courtly Aesthetics
– Portraits of Charles and Henrietta Maria by Van Dyck
What messages about the political power of the monarchy do you think the portraits communicate? How do they compare / contrast?

Do you think we have a reasonable chance of bringing about a sustainability revolution within your lifetime? Why or why not?

The key question is only a “draft” and can be refined and more precise
Essay based on
Aimé Césaire, Notebook of a Return to the Native Land
Ayi Kwei Armah, The Beautyful Ones Are Not Yet Born

Write a 3- to 5-page paper describing the role of a national assessment system. Your paper should rely extensively on a synthesis and critical analysis of the background readings. Reading: https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/4pillars.html.

Please do not accept if you are not willing to write the pages in their entirety.

Submit a position paper on the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786 case. The position paper should have an opinion in how it dealt with forensic science evidence admissibility. Regardless of the position you take, the paper must include reasoning for choosing the opinion. In essence you will pick a side and argue that side. You will argue for or against the admissibility of the forensic evidence and or technique used to describe/ analyze the evidence.

Abstract required

3 references need to be peer reviewed

Some background information
My fiance is a disabled vetern whom was undergoing various types of procedures and treatmentsat the Veterns affairs hospital for approximatly four months late febuary to early May, three to four times a week.
Note that he has a six year old daughter from previous marriage, I pretty much consider her as my own and take care of her.
During this time her school had lots non attendance, we did not have a strong support network of family who would help out when needed as well as late start time in school, no after school care or activities to keep her occupied. Her school would go from 9am to 3pm everyday
The hospital did not allow children becuase of covid meaning I had to stay home and look after the child on days she did not have school. Her school calender and mines we usually a week or a few days off, for example the week I had classes she had off for holidays or non attendance days. Between looking after a six year old with behavioral issues and work it became difficult to complete assignments and exams. I ended up falling behind in class resulting in failing math.
The other situation that affected my academic success was that my grandmother had passed away. On April 28th 2022 My grandmother had a stroke and was hospitalized for 6 weeks on life support. Doctors announced her as brain dead and said that the chances of her being able to function again was zero to none. My family did not want her to suffer so they decided it would be best to let her go because she was a good christian woman and would be in a better place. Unfortunately due to money issues I could not fly to California to see my grandmother one last time before pulling the plug. This caused me much sadness and I fell into depression.
Since then I have taken steps to help with my success at Oakton. I will be able to focus my attention better on the coursework as his daughter us registered for the right at school program that works with the elementary school itself, before and after which means child care is taken care of from 7am to 5:45pm thus giving enough time to finish assignments and such for class. I’ve also met with my advisor who recommended I seek tutoring when needed and only enroll in the amount of courses I could really finish.

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 13
Lesson
Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)
Introduction
At the very end of Chapter 13, there is a Group Exercise that asks: What ideals would you go to war to defend? We are not going to ask you to go to war, but we are going to ask you to think about what ideals or values you believe would be worth defending – even to the point of risking your life in their defense.
When Nazi Germany overtook Europe in the early 20th Century, resistance movements sprung up in the occupied countries, and many civilians risked – and lost – their lives against Nazisim. Today, in Saudi Arabia, women who protested restrictions on the rights of women imposed by that country have been jailed, and remain jailed, even after some of the rights they asked for have been granted.
Initial Post For the initial post, address the following:
What core values would you risk your life and freedom to defend?
Could a nation going to war be appropriate in certain circumstances – or is war never an appropriate response?
This is not a group exercise – post your thoughts, considering the scenarios proposed in the text or any others you find important. Be sure to give your reasons for your answer.
Notice that this exercise requires deductive reasoning. You are stating a position and supporting it with “top down” reasoning. Be sure to review Three Features of Ideological Reasoning. Apply these concepts as you create your own arguments and evaluate those of your peers.
Remember that you are using ideological reasoning here. Is your post structured like an ideological argument, beginning with a general idea (opinion, belief, or principle) and moving down from these abstractions to their specific applications?
The text warns us that ideological arguments often fail the test of Truthfulness of the Premises. Have you tested the truth of your premises?
Note
You will be writing here about what you value highly. Others may not share your values. Indeed, you may find that someone will write something that is entirely opposed to your values. As critical thinkers and reasoners, we do not take offense because someone disagrees with us. Critical thinkers examine their own argument, and the arguments of others, objectively, rationally, and logically. Critical thinkers and reasoners do not find the opinions of others “right” or “wrong” – they find them well-supported or not well-supported.
Respect the opinion of your classmates. If you feel the need to disagree, do so respectfully and acknowledge the valid points in your classmate’s argument.
Do not write anything that sounds angry or sarcastic even as a joke, because without hearing your tone of voice, your peers might not realize you are joking.
The real objective here is discovering what values and beliefs are important to you and whether or not you have a sound basis for those beliefs.
Follow-Up Post Respond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.
Do you agree with their answers?
Would you join them in going to war for the reasons they advance, or do you disagree with their reasons? Explain why.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)
APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Grading
This activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:
Link (webpage): Discussion Guidelines
(Links to an external site.)
Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 4, 6
Due Date for Initial Post: By 11:59 p.m. MT Recommended by Wednesday
Due Date for Follow-Up Posts: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

1- How often do you engage with or witness death in your work? How has this experience or the lack of it shaped your view of death? Has it gotten easier or harder for
you to accept the fact of death? As you explain, include your clinical specialty.

2- Reflect on the analysis of the sin of suicide and, thus, euthanasia from the topic readings. Do you agree? Why or why not? Refer to the lecture and topic readings in your response.

https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/4
https://search-credoreference-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/content/entry/galegnaah/euthanasia/0?institutionId=5865

Answer to those 2 discussion questions with 275 words and 2 sources each.

-S&T, Chapter 7, Who said that?
-Baugh, Earwitness testimony
-McMenamin, Forensic stylistics
S&T Chapter 2 (28-32)
Watch:Forensic files-Sign here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuNnxHZrhh8