Retention Strategies in the Hotel Industry Post-Pandemic?
Best Writer
Discuss on Continuous Improvement for Systems In Healthcare 9
Discuss on Continuous Improvement for Systems In Healthcare 9
Write a paper on the Exponential and Logarithmic Functions.
Write a paper on the Exponential and Logarithmic Functions.
Discuss on Benford’s Law isn’t actually a statistical principle, but it has significant statistical components, implications, and rationale.
Discuss on Benford’s Law isn’t actually a statistical principle, but it
has significant statistical components, implications,
and rationale. Conduct some basic research into this
law and consider some situations in which engineering
might deal with naturally occurring datasets that could
be evaluated or described using it. Think about what
you’ve learned about probability and how it can help
explain why data behaves as described by Benford.
Write and submit an essay that uses the principles
of probability covered in this class to explain the
basic observations enabled by Benford’s Law. Offer
some suggestions for how Benford’s Law might be
useful in one or more engineering situations, and
why you think so. (Hint: Think in terms of an
engineering application where you might want to
validate that arriving data is real.)
To earn credit with this assignment, the submitted
essay must be well-written, original, cleanly
presented, and offer a complete discussion of the
topic. It should be engagingly written at a serious
junior undergraduate academic level. Every year I
reject one or two.
Write a discussion paper on Female Composers in the 20th-21st Centuries.
Write a discussion paper on Female Composers in the 20th-21st Centuries.
As a social worker of faith, how do you think you can navigate this area of confusion with others and promote more civil dialogue with individuals or in a community context?
Getting Started
27 Just then his disciples returned and were surprised to find him talking with a woman. But no one asked, “What do you want?” or “Why are you talking with her?”
John 4:27
8 Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them: “Rulers and elders of the people! 9 If we are being called to account today for an act of kindness shown to a man who was lame and are being asked how he was healed, 10 then know this, you and all the people of Israel: It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead, that this man stands before you healed. 11 Jesus is ‘the stone you builders rejected, which has become the cornerstone.’ 12 Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” 13 When they saw the courage of Peter and John and realized that they were unschooled, ordinary men, they were astonished and they took note that these men had been with Jesus.
Acts 4: 8-13
22 Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: “People of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. 23 For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: to an unknown god. So you are ignorant of the very thing you worship—and this is what I am going to proclaim to you. 24 “The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by human hands.25 And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else.26 From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. 27 God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. 28 ‘For in him we live and move and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘We are his offspring.’ 29 “Therefore since we are God’s offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone—an image made by human design and skill. 30 In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. 31 For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.”
Acts 17: 22-31
Resources
Bible
Video: 10 Commandments for Difficult Conversations
Article: Values, dissonance, and rainbows: Practice tips for Christian social workers in a polarized world.
Background Information
Being a social worker requires having difficult conversations. Whether with individual clients, organizational leaders or in community meetings, differing opinions, values and beliefs are often at the center of decisions and debates. Frequent hot topics social workers encounter include issues regarding politics, sexuality, abortion, drugs, guns and racial concerns to name a few. If you are a Christian social worker you may have different views on some of these issues compared to the population you serve, your agency or even other social workers. When difficult issues arise, many people choose to stay silent, but as social workers and Christians it is vital that we learn to engage in healthy conversations with others even around difficult issues. Jesus calls his followers to be salt and light in the world and to help others understand his grace and truth for both the glory of God and human flourishing. Jesus, Peter and Paul all engaged in difficult conversations with people of other belief systems in loving yet bold ways as noted in the scripture references above. All ideas have consequences and bad ideas have victims and we must consider our role as social workers of faith in advocating for truth in conversations at the individual, local, state and national level.
Social workers believe it is important to not impose or force beliefs on others and yet more and more we live in a culture where certain groups are seeking to impose their beliefs on people of faith. Denying what we believe, giving up our convictions or our rights to freedom of speech or thought is not the answer because the ability to respectfully exchange ideas is vital to our democracy and our social work values of dignity and worth and self-determination (NASW, 2017). Instead we must learn to respectfully invite others into dialogue and conversations that explore ideas and their merits as we work together to address problems. The question is not if we as Christians or people of faith should engage in difficult topics at times, but how. God may just be calling us to such a time as this to stand for truth that brings freedom to others and positive change to our culture.
Finally, when considering difficult conversations, remember the importance of understanding terms and what you or others mean when you use them. For example, the word love is a term used broadly in both Christian and other cultural contexts. If you are talking with someone and want to emphasize the importance of love as an ethical idea, you must first determine a couple of important things. 1) What kind of love is being referred to? (love an object, a friend, romantic love, etc.) 2) Even then, what does love mean to the person or in the context in which it is being considered? Does love mean approving of an action or behavior? Does love mean I have to agree with you or does love mean accepting you where you are but being willing to be honest with you, discuss uncomfortable things at times or even set limits or impose consequences if needed? If I fail to clarify my definition of love and why I define it the way I do, or fail to understand your definition, we will not understand one another and it will be difficult at best to make decisions. The definition of what is loving and the difference between acceptance and approval is often a key area of tension when it comes to discussing what is loving or compassionate and what is not and is often at the heart of many conversations about how to respond to many difficult issues.
For this week’s devotional you will reflect on ideas for responding to difficult issues by watching a short video and reflecting on your response. Also, you will read about additional ideas for managing difficult issues with clients in a journal article.
Prayer
Father, I confess that I do not like conflict or confrontation. I prefer love over truth and yet I know that I cannot separate these things. Grant me the grace to be full of love and truth like you and the wisdom to know when and how you may want to use me to influence others and the world for your sake. Help me to know how to bring your good news to others in a way that they see as good. In Jesus name I pray. Amen.
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Watch 10 Commandments for Difficult Conversations.
Read the article: Values, dissonance, and rainbows: Practice tips for Christian social workers in a polarized world.
Navigate to the threaded discussion and respond to one or more of the following prompts:
Identify and explain two key ideas from the resources regarding how Christians can best respond to difficult topics.
Then, describe how you can use these two ideas or approaches specifically in an agency or community context. Also, give an example of how you might apply each approach you identify to an issue or interaction with a client or in an agency or community conversation.
How do you see the current culture confusing acceptance and affirmation as described in the devotional content? Where, when and with what issues might this most happen? As a social worker of faith, how do you think you can navigate this area of confusion with others and promote more civil dialogue with individuals or in a community context?
Watch 10 Commandments for Difficult Conversations.
Please read the articles that i have attached to the order to complete the assignment……….
cite and reference through out the paper………………… sub headings………………..
How does the air around smell to you? Is it clean? How do you know? Can you see any pollution? How do you know if your air quality is safe?
SHANGHAI (AP) — Shanghai authorities ordered schoolchildren indoors and halted all construction Friday as China’s financial hub suffered one of its worst bouts of air pollution, bringing visibility down to a few dozen meters, delaying flights and obscuring the city’s spectacular skyline.
The financial district was shrouded in a yellow haze, and noticeably fewer people walked the city’s streets. Vehicle traffic also was thinner, as authorities pulled 30 percent of government vehicles from the roads. They also banned fireworks and public sporting events.
Shanghai’s concentration of tiny, harmful PM 2.5 particles reached 602.5 micrograms per cubic meter Friday afternoon, an extremely hazardous level that was the highest since the city began recording such data last December. That compares with the World Health Organization’s safety guideline of 25 micrograms.
The dirty air that has gripped Shanghai and its neighboring provinces for days is attributed to coal burning, car exhaust, factory pollution and weather patterns, and is a stark reminder that pollution is a serious challenge in China. Beijing, the capital, has seen extremely heavy smog several times over the past year. In the far northeastern city of Harbin, some monitoring sites reported PM 2.5 rates up to 1,000 micrograms per cubic meter in October, when the winter heating season kicked off.
The environmental group Greenpeace said slow-moving and low-hanging air masses had carried factory emissions from Jiangsu, Anhui and Shandong provinces to Shanghai. But it said the root problem lies with the excessive industrial emissions in the region, including Zhejiang province to the south.
“Both Jiangsu and Zhejiang should act as soon as possible to set goals to reduce their coal consumption so that the Yantze River Delta will again be green with fresh air,” Huang Wei, a Greenpeace project manager, said in a statement. Watch in the video below, how a Chinese watchdog group is protecting the environment
“Environmental Watchdog Group Monitors Pollution in China | PBS NewsHour” eMediaVA.org. Version 3.105.0. eMediaVA, 7 Dec. 2015. Web. 1 Jan. 2021.
Case Study- US-
Great progress has been made in achieving national air quality standards, which EPA originally established in 1971 and updates periodically based on the latest science. One sign of this progress is that visible air pollution is less frequent and widespread than it was in the 1970s.However, air pollution can be harmful even when it is not visible. Newer scientific studies have shown that some pollutants can harm public health and welfare even at very low levels. EPA in recent years revised standards for five of the six common pollutants subject to national air quality standards. EPA made the standards more protective because new, peer-reviewed scientific studies showed that existing standards were not adequate to protect public health and the environment.
Today, pollution levels in many areas of the United States exceed national air quality standards. Despite dramatic progress cleaning the air since 1970, air pollution in the United States continues to harm people’s health and the environment. Under the Clean Air Act, EPA continues to work with state, local and tribal governments, other federal agencies, and stakeholders to reduce air pollution and the damage that it causes.
Conduct some research, learn about two kinds of “smog,” photochemical smog and industrial smog.
For this lab, write a report ( include all components of the report) explaining in the results section:
Part A: How does the air around smell to you? Is it clean? How do you know? Can you see any pollution? How do you know if your air quality is safe?
Discussion Section:
Part B: Describe three different reasons why smog could be a pollution problem? Don’t just say, “it causes pollution,” instead explain what problems it causes for animals and/or plants.
Part C: Based on the Environmental Watchdog Group Monitors video- Suggest one way you will consider protecting the air quality.
Part D- At the link below, locate and post the air quality stat for the county. city you reside in.
https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-cities-and-counties
Check-out these websites for information about the causes.
Industrial smog: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=873954
(Links to an external site.)
Photochemical smog: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5400950
(Links to an external site.)
Describe what kind of narrative your visualization conveys to which segment of your target audience (define this too) and why you expect it would work.
2. Read the FT article on [“Covid-19 vaccine tracker: the global race to vaccinate.”](https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker/?areas=gbr&areas=isr&areas=usa&areas=eue&areas=are&areas=chn&areas=chl&cumulative=1&doses=total&populationAdjusted=1)
3. Programming: Visualize how the vaccination rate varies at the subnational level (state or even lower) in a particular country of your choice.
4. Information: Explain what kind of statistical elements are included in your plot(s).
5. Communication: Describe what kind of narrative your visualization conveys to which segment of your target audience (define this too) and why you expect it would work
Write and submit an essay that uses the principles of probability covered in this class to explain the basic observations enabled by Benford’s Law.
Benford’s Law isn’t actually a statistical principle, but it
has significant statistical components, implications,
and rationale. Conduct some basic research into this
law and consider some situations in which engineering
might deal with naturally occurring datasets that could
be evaluated or described using it. Think about what
you’ve learned about probability and how it can help
explain why data behaves as described by Benford.
Write and submit an essay that uses the principles
of probability covered in this class to explain the
basic observations enabled by Benford’s Law. Offer
some suggestions for how Benford’s Law might be
useful in one or more engineering situations, and
why you think so. (Hint: Think in terms of an
engineering application where you might want to
validate that arriving data is real.)
To earn credit with this assignment, the submitted
essay must be well-written, original, cleanly
presented, and offer a complete discussion of the
topic. It should be engagingly written at a serious
junior undergraduate academic level. Every year I
reject one or two.
Write a literature review on one or two sociolinguistic variables and analyse the *discourse in a film or television programme from a sociolinguistic perspective.
Write a literature review on one or two sociolinguistic
variables and analyse the *discourse in a film or television programme
from a sociolinguistic perspective.
Language varies according
to age, gender, social status, and geography. Choose one or two of these sociolinguistic
variables and complete a literature review of up to seven key research
studies on your chosen variables and use this to discuss the *discourse of the
film. Also include key unit sources in your discussion.
Choose a two films or episodes from a tv series in which your
chosen sociolinguistic variables are evident and post your choices here (Links to an external site.) for
approval by your lecturer. The film/episode should be mainly in English. If you
are using any parts not in English, please provide a translation.
In your paper include an
analysis of at least one scene as well as examples from throughout the film to
illustrate your analysis.
Introduce the movie and the
key characters. Focus on a representative scene and contextualise the scene and
the speakers and analyse the scene in depth.
The excerpt should involve
two or more speakers interacting to illustrate and support your analysis and
discussion of the chosen sociolinguistic variable(s). It should be between 3 to
5 minutes long. Include the timing in your transcription. Label each speaker and
number each turn so you can refer to them in your analysis. Use the following
transcription guide from Holmes to transcribe the excerpt (Holmes, 2013). See
example transcription provided.