Respond to the following prompts in an essay format using the paper thats uploaded

1. Discuss three self-leadership approaches your selected president may need to improve or whose behavior shows mastery. Explain why you came to this conclusion for each of the three selected self-leadership approaches.

2. Describe a scenario when one of the presidents selected depicted good or bad emotional intelligence. You may review public videos of the president or read articles to evaluate behaviors. Include a reference of each source evaluated. Explain how this good or bad behavior would weaken or strengthen your motivation to work for this president.

3. Discuss a decision this president made that indicates either strong or weak decision-making, and explain how emotional intelligence may have contributed.

ABA based intervention

Write out a complete thesis statement that relates to ASD (autism spectrum disorder) and ABA (applied behavioranalysis)
Identify 1-2 questions that you will attempt to answer with your paper.

Transgender Athletes: Fair to Compete. Does transgenders have a performance advantage? How does being transgender performance differ?

I need about two slides for google docs, with bullet points, pictures, and presentation notes for a total of one minute and 30 sec. tops for presentation. Based on performance with transgender athletes on how it is fair for them to compete in sports of their identifying gender. Does being trans advance their performance with research to back it up. I need 2 sources/references for the research of the topic.
Needs factual content.

Interpreting John’s Writings

You are allowed to choose a passage of your preference from anywhere in 1 John. Your passage should contain a complete idea or story. You should not start in the middle of something or cut a unit off early. Generally, your selection should be at least 3 verses long but no longer than 10 verses.
Once you have chosen your passage. You will want to read it closely, attending to its overall flow, the structure of sentences, key nouns, key verbs, and any important descriptive elements. Then you will want to consider the four contexts (immediate, literary, cultural-historical, and canonical) and see how they may inform your understanding of the passage. Remember that you can draw on the videos on “Literary Styles in the Bible,” “Cultures in and of the Bible,” and “The Story of the Bible” to help provide some material for these various contexts.
A brief introduction that identifies your passage and explains why you chose it (approximately 50-75 words).
A section that explores the details of the passage’s flow, sentence structure, nouns, verbs, and descriptors (approximately 250-300 words).
A section that explains the passage more fully by using two of the following contexts with connections to details in the passage: immediate, literary, historical-cultural, and canonical (approximately 250-300 words).
A short conclusion that states your main takeaway from your interpretive work and how that point may apply to our time and place (approximately 100-150 words).You are allowed to choose a passage of your preference from anywhere in 1 John. Your passage should contain a complete idea or story. You should not start in the middle of something or cut a unit off early. Generally, your selection should be at least 3 verses long but no longer than 10 verses.
Once you have chosen your passage. You will want to read it closely, attending to its overall flow, the structure of sentences, key nouns, key verbs, and any important descriptive elements. Then you will want to consider the four contexts (immediate, literary, cultural-historical, and canonical) and see how they may inform your understanding of the passage. Remember that you can draw on the videos on “Literary Styles in the Bible,” “Cultures in and of the Bible,” and “The Story of the Bible” to help provide some material for these various contexts.
A brief introduction that identifies your passage and explains why you chose it (approximately 50-75 words).
A section that explores the details of the passage’s flow, sentence structure, nouns, verbs, and descriptors (approximately 250-300 words).
A section that explains the passage more fully by using two of the following contexts with connections to details in the passage: immediate, literary, historical-cultural, and canonical (approximately 250-300 words).
A short conclusion that states your main takeaway from your interpretive work and how that point may apply to our time and place (approximately 100-150 words).

Aging

Research article dissection
You will find a published, scholarly research article (from a peer-reviewed journal) that examines aging. This article cannot be an article that just summarizes the literature on aging, nor a meta-analysis. The article must contain a Data and Methods and a Findings section, as well as a Literature Review and some Theory. The article must be published in English, not another language. The article must be a social science article. The article must have been published in the year 2018 or later.
From that article, you must identify and discuss the following things:
(a) Research question addressed
(b) Theory/explanation used
(c) Hypotheses tested
(d) Data sources used
(e) Method of data collection
(f) If they used a survey, description of the survey
(g) Sample used
(h) Variables used
(i) Measurements of each variable
(j) Analysis techniques used
(k) Findings
(l) Findings versus what was hypothesized
(m) Limitations
(n) Any policy implications
From items a-n, you will write a single spaced paper. The paper must be typed in 12 font and have 1 inch margins. The first page of your paper must be a title page, with your name and course number on it. The last item in the paper will be your reference, containing the full citation of the article you used for this paper (authors, year, name of article, journal name, volume, pages).Research article dissection

Analyze the case of SeaWorld of Florida v. Perez, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6660 (D.C. Cir.) located in your textbook on pp. 559-564, including the opinion of Judge Rodgers as well as the dissenting opinion of Judge (now-Supreme Court Justice) Brett Kavanaugh.

Write a case study review of the court’s opinion that answers the questions below. Support your review with analysis and evidence from the unit reading and outside sources.
What are the legal issues enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSH
A) and presented in this case? How did the plaintiff establish a valid violation under the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act? Explain how the elements of a valid claim were satisfied under the OSH Act.
How does OSHA enforce workplace safety and health standards?
Do you agree with the court’s decision? Should or could SeaWorld have done more to abate the hazard? Support your position.
Your paper should be a minimum of two pages, not including the title and reference pages. You are required to use a minimum of three sources, one of which may be your textbook as reference material for your case study. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.Write a case study review of the court’s opinion that answers the questions below. Support your review with analysis and evidence from the unit reading and outside sources.
What are the legal issues enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and presented in this case? How did the plaintiff establish a valid violation under the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act? Explain how the elements of a valid claim were satisfied under the OSH Act.
How does OSHA enforce workplace safety and health standards?
Do you agree with the court’s decision? Should or could SeaWorld have done more to abate the hazard? Support your position.
Your paper should be a minimum of two pages, not including the title and reference pages. You are required to use a minimum of three sources, one of which may be your textbook as reference material for your case study. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.

Sassanian Culture Essay

TOPIC

For my term paper I would like to further analyze Sassanian culture through the research of cultural aspects
historically depicted within their society. I will complete an analysis and research process of forms such as
characteristics that make up the Sassanian identity, cultural aspects such as language, communication,
technology, architecture, religion, art, fashion, and sociocultural morality, norms, and customs.

* Your bibliography should have no less than 5 outside sources. These must be scholarly works,
from reputable sources.

* The period covered by the paper must be between c.200 to c.650. The area must be regions directly affected by the Sasanians. Other areas may be acceptable but you should talk to me first.

* The paper should have four distinct sections: 1) Introduction in which you explain the subject and what you intend to do and present a question for analysis (about 1 page). 2) Background survey of events important to your topic, i.e. the “setting” for your topic (2 pages). 3) Analysis (the bulk of the paper) in which you present the evidence and make the arguments. 3) Conclusion in which you summarize your analysis and answer the question raised in the introduction (1 page).

* Paper should include footnotes or endnotes and a bibliography with proper citation methods. Unlike the short essays, grammar, structure and spelling will matter.

white collar

Find a true example of people being arrested for a White Collar crime, a political crime, and a crime committed by someone in organized crime. In 750-1,000 words, explain the following:

Briefly describe each of the crimes (who was involved, what the crime was, who the victim was, etc.)
Explain the outcome of each case, including the punishment and sentence given for each crime.
Explain if you feel the punishments for each of the crime were justified. Were the punishments for any of the crimes not fitting the seriousness of the crime? Why are these three types of crimes punished in the ways they are?
Use three to four scholarly resources to support your explanations.

“Small Change” (Malcolm Gladwell)

Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
For this essay, you will write a rhetorical analysis of one of the assigned texts. A rhetorical analysis focuses on HOW a text presents an argument. Essentially you are analyzing the choices an author makes and judging the effectiveness of those choices.
Basic Requirements:
The essay should be at least 900 words in length.
Make sure that you have a strong, argumentative thesis statement that clearly lays out what you will discuss in your paper.
Use the scholarly tone for writing a formal paper.
Support your argument with evidence from the text.
Include proper MLA in-text citations and Work(s) Cited page. Written using MLA format for a formal essay.
Note: All work submitted must be original. If you need help understanding plagiarism, please check out some of the material under content or ask me directly. You can not submit work that has previously been submitted for another class.
Texts for Rhetorical Analysis:
Choose one of the texts from our assigned reading list:
“This is Water” (David Foster Wallace)
“Small Change” (Malcolm Gladwell)
“Letter from Birmingham Jail” (Martin Luther King Jr.)
“Remarks by the President in Eulogy for the Honorable Reverend Clementa Pinckney”
“Remarks by President Trump at National Prayer Breakfast”
“Watching TV Makes You Smarter” (Steven Johnson)
“Alt-Right” (Southern Poverty Law Center)
“The Logic of Stupid Poor People” (Cottom)
“I’ve Stayed Silent for Way Too Long” (Holiday)
Using one of the above texts, construct an argument concerning whether or not the author is successful in presenting his/her message. To do this, the first point you must establish is what you consider the purpose of the text. (You will likely include this in your introduction) Then decide if the text is successful in presenting its message. Why or why not? What rhetorical techniques does the author use to achieve their goal? What choices does the author/speaker make in order to reach the audience.