Best Writer

For this presentation, we will utilize the PESTEL analysis and Strategic Group Mapping you completed in module 2. Then, we will research and add the Five Strategic Competitive Strategies to complete a 8-10 minutes presentation.
Please research and share the findings from your research regarding:
Utilize your PESTEL analysis from module 2 to share your findings.
Utilize your Strategic Group Map from module 2 to share your findings.
Five Strategic Competitive Strategies:
Which one of the five generic competitive strategies can best be utilized to compete successfully for the organization you have selected (please utilize the contrasting features in table 5.1 to assist you).
Select a competitor from the strategic group map and determine if they have employed a low-cost strategy, differentiation strategy, or best-cost strategy? Explain.
What recommendation or recommendations do you have to achieve or maintain a competitive advantage over this competitor?
Draw a conclusion: After putting information together from these three components what strategic conclusion(s) and/or action step(s) are necessary?
The assignment is set up as a discussion allowing students to be able to view other presentations. For full credit, students are required to view and reply to 2 classmates.
Presentation Directions:
Time: 8-10 minutes. Students will be docked points for going shorter or longer. Students will record their videos in Canvas. If you are not familiar with how to do this, please review the link below. Keep in mind, it takes time to save your recording in Canvas.
Please begin your presentation with an introduction, the organization you are researching, and your connection to the organization.
How to record in Canvas
We may also utilize an application like PowerPoint, Canva, Prezi, etc. to upload as our presentation. Please note that if we use an application that we must have the video feature turned-on.
Make sure to demonstrate critical thinking and analysis. Be creative and ensure the information flows logically. Also, be professional in tone and capture the interest of the audience.
Grading Criteria: 25 points total
Content: 10 points (Student addresses the required information and demonstrates an understanding of the information in the Goodson text)
Time: 5 points (Student stays within the required time 8-10 minutes)
Tone, flow & organization: 5 points (Presentation is organized and keeps the interest of the audience)

Book summary,
Prior to receiving this assignment did you know anything about the subject matter?
Do you think that the outcome and the subsequent change to US law was a step in the right direction? Why or Why not?
If you or someone you loved were to be charged with a crime what factors do you believed would have influenced the outcome of the case prior to Gideon’s Trumpet? What factors do you believed would influenc the outcome of the case post Gideon’s Trumpet?
Do you think that much has changed as a result of the case?
Do you agree/disagree that there was a need for a constitutional amendment? Why? Why not?
A systemic problem is the large case loads of many public defenders, making it difficult for them to provide the same kind of quality representation to their clients that their counterparts in private practice can provide to their clients. Speak to these societal issues and give me your thoughts on how meaningful changes may be implemented.

Please include speaker notes. The topic that should be discussed is HIPAA This is a team assignment and MY ONLY PORTION IS:
Identify and discuss the emerging issues and trends surrounding the policy.

Business Law I
Course Project
Part I
On February 27, 2019, American Legion et al v. American Humanist Assn. et al was argued before the United States Supreme Court. The case was decided on June 20, 2019. The case involves the 40 foot tall cross in Bladensburg, Maryland. Your tasks are to read the materials, discuss them, and apply legal concepts learned throughout the first several weeks of this semester.
READ
The complete case, a slip opinion*, can be found below. This is an 87 page document. Focus on pages 1-7. The remaining pages are details on the Court’s opinion, concurring and dissenting opinions. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1717_4f14.pdf.
Another place to find this case is: American Legion, et al v. American Humanist Assn.
To put the case in simpler words, go here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2018/17-1717
Review what liberal media outlets said about this case by going here: https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-allows-40-foot-cross-to-remain-in-highway-median-11561040530 OR https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/20/scotus-towering-cross-on-public-land-does-not-violate-constitution.html OR https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/20/us/politics/maryland-peace-cross-supreme-court.html
Review what conservative media outlets said about this case by going here: https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/ruling-in-bladensburg-cross-case/
DISCUSS
Using the materials above, you will prepare a Power Point presentation to discuss and apply the concepts in this case to the ones you’ve learned over during this semester. You may use additional sources, if desired. Here are the parameters for the assignment:
Prepare a Power Point presentation as if you were giving a lecture.
Slide 1 is your title slide with your name and project title (Project #1-Bladensburg Cross Case).
Use 2-3 slides to explain the case. Include: Facts (substantive and procedural); Issue(s) presented; Rule (used to make the decision); Holding (what the Court decided); Analysis (why the Court decided what it did) Conclusion (what did the Court do; what happened procedurally). HINT: Each part must be clearly identified.
Use 1 slide to explain the liberal viewpoint and use 1 slide to explain the conservative viewpoint. This is where you would use the news articles from The New York Times and The National Review.
Use 1 slide each to discuss the following items. You will need to refer to the case and its commentary to complete these. Notice-these are concepts from each chapter we have discussed thus far (except Ch. 29):
Ethical considerations of this case. For full credit, discuss a theory or theories from our text.
Relevant common law or statutory laws that may help support or refute the outcome. For full credit, properly state case names or applicable statutes.
Constitutional provision(s) or applications that concern this case. Properly identify and discuss.
Other ways this case could have been resolved (mediation, arbitration, negotiation). HINT: Do not merely list them; instead, discuss. State why they would or would not work.
Based on the facts or outcome of the case, could there be any criminal acts that may relate to this? (Think about people’s reaction and response to this case…) Discuss them here.
Use 1-2 slides to critique the case. Answer three questions:
In considering the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment (see below), do you believe the Court made the right decision? Make sure your answer applies law to fact. This is not a subjective opinion question. Be objective in your response.
Based on your understanding of the case and of the Establishment Clause, why did the Court make the decision it did?
What is your opinion of this case? This is your time to express your thoughts in a subjective manner. Explain why you personally think the Court got it right or why the Court got it wrong.
The First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Use 1 slide to conclude your presentation with a summary. HINT: The critique is not your conclusion. Sum it all up effectively.
Use 1 slide for references. Use APA format. You can use http://www.citationmachine.net/apa/cite-a-website to assist you in doing it properly.
FORMAT
You will prepare this project as any other Power Point. The choice of design, use of animations, and font are entirely up to you. These are the items to provide and consider.
Include citations. When you refer to sources (either the ones given in the assignment or ones you find yourself), you should put the citation in the note portion of each slide. These are on the bottom of each page. ONLY put the citations in the notes portion of your presentation.
You need to be objective. In every slide, unless you are asked for your opinion, be objective in your response.
Make sure your responses apply fact to law. You are asked to apply concepts from Chapters 1, 2 and 4-7. An example is that for Chapter 3, you could look and see what law/test the Court refers to (and says doesn’t apply) that came from case law. Your explanations should be factual, using the laws discussed in your book and lectures. NOTE: You will apply a concept from every chapter.
The PowerPoint should be a synopsis. Use bullets; short points and excerpts. Do not write in an essay format. If you want to add additional content, add it to the note portion of the slide.
The slide counts are the minimum. If you want to do more, you may add more.
SUBMISSION
You will submit this using the Assignment tool, uploading your PowerPoint Presentation as an attachment. No other submission format will be accepted. To submit your project, click on the link or go to the Assessments tab at the top of your screen. You will need to find and click on “Course Project Part I.” In the subject line, write your name and “Course Project Part I.” It should appear as “First Name Last Name Course Project Part I.” You will be able to add the PowerPoint as an attachment. There is dialog below the text box that says, “Add Attachments.” Make sure the PowerPoint uploads.
Your assignment will be graded via a rubric.
Course Project I is worth 100 points.
DUE DATES
See your module, myCalendar, and the Course Schedule for your due dates.
To be successful, you should work on this each week as you complete the chapter modules.
*A slip opinion is the opinion that was published before its final draft was completed, which means there may be errors in grammar or format. This opinion has a syllabus of the Court with it. Slip opinions are the first version of the Court’s opinion. There are no official citations with this version of the opinion.

I need a property development expert who can understand and follow instuctions such as reading the constuction plans and layouts and many more. The insturction is uploaded above to follow. The address of the property is (No. 4) BOSANQUET AVENUE, NEWTOWN, victoria, austrlia

Need someone that is familiar with multiple regression and moderated multiple regression. Also, they need to know how to use the software SPSS in order to analyze the data. Data and instructions are included in the uploaded files. Please include calculations and graphs.

Here is the format of your research study proposal.

Chapter I…THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

Subparts are:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework of Study
3.Conceptual Framework
4. Statement of the Problem
5. Significance of the Study
6. Scope and Limitation
7. Definition of Terms

Chapter II… REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Chapter III… RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Subparts are:

1. Research Design
2.Respondents of the Study
3. Locale of the Study
4.Instrument and It’s Validity
5. Sampling
6. Data Gathering Procedures
7. Research Ethics
8. Statistical Treatment to be Used

Bibliographical Reference

Note:
1. Your thesis title is all capitalized, centered with inverted V form
———————————-
Format of title page

Ex. TITLE

Submitted to the Faculty of Senior High Department
HINAPLANON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bgy. Cabugason, Iligan City

Researcher’s name: Arvie A. Quarteros

April, 2022
———————————–

2. Use Book Antiqua as theme, 12 font size; left corner of the paper is 1.5 while 1.0 in the right column; and should be double space

CLASS: EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE

Please include this book be as a referenced cite and TWO ADDITIONAL SCHOLARLY SOURCES FROM THE LAST 5 YEARS.

Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

WEEK 5 PROJECT: The analysis of postpartum depression treatments!

Give one example of a data collection method used in one of the studies identified in your Week 5 project. What variable was this method used to measure?

you need to write a Character Analysis Paper with 6 complete paragraphs. You will also need to include a Works Cited Page. You are asked to include at least four quotes total, two quotes for two characters while also including in-text citations.
Character Analysis Requirements
– Clear critique of how two characters’ traits/characteristics evolved from the start to the end of the novel.
– The two characters examined can focus on the same trait/characteristic or they can be different.
-Apart from the direct quotes from the novel, only your thoughts and words are needed for this analysis (no external sources, research, or analysis are required or permitted).

I had this character outline done with another site but they plagiarized and didn’t even use the correct version of pride and prejudice
also i am including an out line pleaes complete that to so that i can make sure your doing it right

pleases use Evelyn Attwood adapted version of Pride and Prejudice,
here are the notes that i got back
You will need to replace your evidence with quotes from that version. From the adapted text, you need to find actual quotes, two for each of your main points: one quote that supports how the character was at the beginning of the novel, and one that shows what the character was like at the end. Do this for both Elizabeth and Darcy and you’ll have 4 quotes total. Lastly, a portion of your paper was found to be copied from internet sources. Including parts of other people’s work in your paper without citing it, even if some or all of it is rewritten in your own words, is plagiarism. I have highlighted and commented on the plagiarized portions in your document.

How have world events in the last couple of years changed your career path.