Best Writer

This week, you had an opportunity to consider the importance of ensuring learning experiences that are developmentally appropriate, as well as challenging, and to discuss strategies that special educators can use to ensure these types of learning experiences occur. In this assignment, you will assume the role of the special educator working with Mr. Franklin. You will provide feedback for a developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experience for the class. Your feedback will also consider the specific needs of Manual, a special education student who was first introduced in ESE610. Specific details for Manual’s needs are available for your reference in the Instructor Guidance.
Using support from your assigned reading, the Instructor Guidance, and the discussions, submit the following for evaluation. Use the below guidelines for creating your written assignment. If you have questions about the assignment or the rubric, please contact your instructor before the due date.
Instructions: Compose an email response to Mr. Franklin’s original email requesting your assistance. Include the following components in the response and use support from at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook. Before submitting, review your assignment to be sure it meets the expectations of performance in the Grading Rubric. If you have questions concerning the expectations for this assignment, please contact the instructor before the due date.
Dear Special Educator,
I am very excited for our upcoming unit on geometry. I recently sat in on a webinar on place-based and project-based learning. They called it PBL2. Sounds interesting, right? Since we work in the inner city, and most of our students live in apartments with very little green space, I thought it would be cool to create a garden based on the concepts we have introduced in geometry. I think Manual will appreciate this because, just last week, he was telling me that he was annoyed that there were not any parks in his neighborhood where he could take his little sister to play.
Please see my description of the lesson below. I would love your feedback. Since you are the expert in the field of special education, I left the differentiation section blank and would like you to fill it in based on Manual’s needs and those students who have Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals in the classroom. I just finished my last period prep time and I am ready for the weekend. I wanted to talk to you before the weekend, but we must have missed each other. As we will be teaching this on Monday, I wanted you to have the attached lesson plan.
Thanks for the help,
Mr. Franklin
Content Expectations:
Introduction (1 point): In one paragraph, thank Mr. Franklin for asking you to review the lesson plan. Be sure to applaud him for recognizing the importance of your role in helping to ensure that Manual’s learning experiences are relevant, developmentally appropriate, and challenging. Include a description of why you feel it is important to work together in providing support to Manual and other students with learning challenges.
Feedback (3 points): In two to three paragraphs, use the Feedback Sandwich method, described in this week’s guidance to provide specific and timely feedback on the lesson itself. At a minimum, provide a strength, an area of need, and encouragement for future planning. Based on the week’s learning outcomes, provide feedback on the lesson, focusing specifically on developmentally appropriate practice and challenging material.
Strategies (3 points): In a bulleted list, identify at least five strategies for differentiating the lesson
Download lesson
Minimize File Preview
. At least three of your strategies must be geared toward Manual’s specific needs and identified with his name. The remaining strategies may be general, in order to meet the needs of a diverse classroom. In one to two paragraphs, provide a rationale for each of your strategies.
Closing (0.5 point): In one short paragraph, close the reply to Mr. Franklin with a positive message about your ability to co-create lessons that meet the needs of all students in the classroom.
Written Communication Expectations:
Length Requirement (0.25 points): Two to three pages, not including the title and references pages.
Syntax and Mechanics (0.25 points): Display meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.
Source Requirement (0.25 points): At least two outside sources, in addition to the course text. All sources on the references page need to be used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
APA Formatting (0.25 points): Use APA 6th edition formatting consistently throughout the assignment.
Next Steps: Review and Submit the Assignment
Review your assignment, utilizing the Grading Rubric, to ensure you have achieved the distinguished levels of performance for each criterion. Next, submit your document no later than Day 7.
Recommendation:
The MASE program provides you with the opportunity to create an online portfolio that can be used in your career development and professional practice. Throughout the program, you will have various assessments that can be included in this e-portfolio and will be finalized in the last course of the MASE program, ESE699. You may select this assignment and subsequent coursework to be included as artifacts. Therefore, it is strongly encouraged you save your coursework on a flash-drive (e.g., a USB removable drive) or store in a cloud-based option, such as Dropbox, Google Drive, or other similar applications.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric
(Links to an external site.)
for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Waypoint Assignment Submission

Write a persuasive essay that argues whether Macbeth is a HERO, TRAGIC HERO, or VILLAIN. You must support your thesis with character traits (two villainous character traits if you are arguing he is a villain OR two heroic traits if you are arguing that he is a hero OR a trait to show that he is honorable and a trait associated with his tragic flaw if you are arguing he is tragic hero). Additionally, you must include a counterclaim and rebuttal.
You may use your outlines, books, and note packets.
You should include a total of FOUR quote (two in each paragraph), with a total of FOUR paragraphs (intro, support for thesis, counterclaim/rebuttal, and conclusion).

For this task, you will need to identify 8 new quantitative research articles from the NCU library. First, choose four from the following six variables: Mood, Motivation, Performance, Happiness, Leadership, Anxiety. Then, locate at least two quantitative original research articles for each variable and examine how the variable has been operationalized. For each variable, note the references of the papers you have found and briefly explain how the variable was operationalized (e.g., Mood was assessed by …). Next, explain how well you think each variable has been assessed in the papers you have chosen. In your evaluation, consider how the authors in each article explain why the way they defined and measured each variable was appropriate. You can use as many references as you want to support your responses. Length: 4-6 pages, not including title and reference pages

Please place your bids. There are two parts to this essay: 1: Translate the following: Omnibus sancte matris ecclesie filiis Herebertus de Bolebek salutem. Sciatis quod Alexander de Kenebelle consilio et assensu meo dedit et concessit deo et ecclesie Sancte Marie de Messendene et canonicis ibidem deo seruientibus in perpetuam elemosinam duos hammos prati in Hertwella et vj acras terre. Reddendo inde annuatim ipsi et heredibus suis duos denarios ad Pentecosten. Et prefatus Alexander et heredes sui acquietabunt predicta tenementa de omnibus forinsecis seruiciis consuetudinibus et exaccionibus. Ut autem hec donacio et confirmacio rata sit et stabilis in perpetuum ego eam presenti carta mea confirmaui. Testibus Waltero de Hertwelle, Simone de Sancto Claro, Roberto de Bracy, Willelmo de Clouille. Et aliis. [Cartulary of Missenden, no. 545] 2) Write a commentary of up to 1000 words on the following charter: Carta Lucie de Brintona de tota terra quam Godwinus filius Leurich Carta Hugonis de Gurnay et Mileseint sponse sue de tota tenura Dominis suis omnibus Hugonis de Gurnay et amicis et hominibus francis et anglis salutem. Sciatis quod ego et Mileseint sponsa mea et Hugo filius meus concedimus canonicis de Messend` et carta nostra confirmauimus et garantizamus totam tenuram suam de Browton` quam de Roberto Mansello tenebant cum omnibus appendiciis suis in bosco et plano et cunctis aliis rebus ad feudum illud pertinentibus ad tenendum de nobis et heredibus nostris et nominatim de uxore mea Mileseint cui in dote uillam illam dedimus ad tenendum insuper libere et quiete et hereditarie in perpetuam elemosinam per idem seruicium quod inde Roberto Mansel faciebant. Scilicet reddendo annuatim pro omnibus seruiciis vi marcas ad Pascha quas canonici vi marcas solebant reddere Roberto ad duos terminos scilicet Pasche Sancti Michaelis sed amodo reddentur simul ad Pascha et statuent unum canonicorum in ecclesia sua omnibus diebus pro salute nostra et antecessorum et successorum nostrorum. Et si ad eos de aliquo grauidi negotio nostro breue nostrum miserimus abbas aut aliquis de canonicis ibit pro nobis ad regem sine ad episcopum infra Angliam quin etiam ut omnis calumnia et querele heredum predicti Roberti tollantur. Sciant omnes amici nostri presentes et futuri nos pari assensu et concessione dedisse Stephano heredi predicti Roberti escambias in socha de Cheneborlay nominatim in Carlinton` iiii marcatas terre illo in manu mea supradictam Brottone liberam dimittente et de escambiis mihi et Hugonis filio meo hominem suum faciente. Vt autem de hiis qui in presenti carta continentur nulla sit in posteris dubietas sigillum meum et sigillum sponse mee Milesent hic apponuntur. Testibus Nicholas Estoteuilla, Iohanne de Hosdeng, Willelmo de Sancto Luciano, Willelmo de Bossoncort, Hugone Heusart, Willelmo de Marteneio, Garnero Hosdent, Hugone de Braimoster, Reynardo de Mereuill, Radulfo de Ogia, Galtero thesaurio de Auesnes, Rogero capellano qui hanc cartam scripsit. Hec facta sunt apud Gornaium anno dominice incarnacionis MC sexagesimo vii pridie Nonarum Aprilis. [Missenden Cartulary, no. 556; some spellings amended]

In this course you have learned about many relevant biology issues from the past and in the present that have ethical implications. While most of us have an idea what ethics is, here is a summary:
Ethics, or moral philosophy, is a branch of philosophy that involves using critical thinking and rational reflection to understand and evaluate moral principles and systems of moral valuation within cultures, communities, and social groups. Ethical concerns deal with issues of right and wrong or with what is what is beneficial to the well-being of individuals as well as society in general.
________________________________________________________
This assignment asks you to reflect on the ethical aspects of a topic related to biology. You may use the topic you did your research on or any other topic that interests you in the course so far that lends itself to ethical analysis. Your reflection may be from the perspective of the individual, a particular social group or community, or society as a whole. Some questions that come up in such a reflection might focus on:
What are the basic rights and responsibilities as members of society and how do they apply to the situation at hand?
What counts as right or wrong, and why? Who decides?
What is the best way for people to behave toward others as well as oneself? What constitutes a life of human flourishing and well-being?
There are no simple answers to these questions because, among other reasons, our concepts of ethics have been derived from a variety of religious, philosophical, or cultural traditions or milieus and may be very different for different individuals. In this assignment, there is no particular right or wrong answer; the idea here is to simply reflect on some aspect of human endeavor within the biological sciences that has moral relevance and could be subject to ethical analysis. Consider in particular the ideas, concepts, principles, and theories we study in this course,
Please watch the following video, “Ethical Reasoning in Action,” (14.43 minutes):
which lays out eight “key questions” that we might use to evaluate the ethical dimensions of a situation. After reading the brief account of ethics as a branch of philosophy above and viewing the video, write a personal reflection essay of around 500 words (minimum) on a biology-related topic of your choice.
The areas of ethical concern discussed in the video are:
Fairness
Outcomes
Responsibilities
Character
Liberty
Empathy
Authority
Rights
Pick one or more of these areas of ethical concern as a way to begin probing and pondering your selected topic.
First, reflect on why the topic you selected presents an ethical issue, a problem of right or wrong, or relates to a morally questionable circumstance or situation. How might different people or groups see the issue or problem? Why might your topic generate moral controversy? Is there a way to judge between competing or opposing views?
Please note, your task is to identify an ethical issue or concern within the topic you’ve selected and then to consider different ethical viewpoints on the issue, not to necessarily take a stand or decide what is right or wrong in an absolute sense. You may express your personal beliefs on the topic and explain their origin within your own learning and experience.
*This is a personal reflection and will not be shared with your classmates.
Due Date
May 22, 2022 11:59 PM

Please apply if you have access to the readings. Continue writing your a journal of insights/reflections related to this Unit. What resonates? What to you disagree with? What causes an emotional reaction? (Anxiety, anger, frustration, joy, relief. Any emotion). Why do you suppose that is? Be honest with yourself and your reactions and reflections. For this Unit, you will have been enrolled in a group that represents one of three world views. This editorial provides an overview of the special issue of Systemic Practice and Action Research (SPAR). The editorial over some of the features shared by both the Vanguard Method and other forms of systems thinking, including those of Taichi Ohno and W. Edwards Deming. O`Donovan, B. (2014). Editorial for special issue of SPAR: The vanguard method in a systems thinking context. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(1), 1-20. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9247-7. Sixty-eight stores of a retail chain were used for testing a model in which perceived authentic leadership (AL) predicts stores` sales achievement through the mediating role of perceived store virtuousness and perceived store potency. Rego, A., Reis Junior, D., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2015). Authentic Leaders Promoting Store Performance: The Mediating Roles of Virtuousness and Potency. Journal Of Business Ethics, 128(3), 617. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2125-8. This study examined the relationship between CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility by focusing on the mediating role of organizational ethical culture and the moderating role of managerial discretion (i.e., CEO founder status and firm size). Wu, L., Kwan, H., Yim, F., Chiu, R., & He, X. (2015). CEO Ethical Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 819. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2108-9 Watch Video Peter Senge Introduction to Systems Thinking User: Kristina Wile – Added: 8/5/14 YouTube URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXdzKBWDraM Peter Senge, the author of The Fifth Discipline, discusses the concept of Systems Thinking and relates it to leadership in a complex and rapidly changing world. Watch Video A Systems Story (Systems Thinking) User: BEE Environmental Communication – Added: 7/27/14 YouTube URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDxOyJxgJeA This short video introduces the key concepts of Systems Thinking in a charming and completely accessible way. It`s not related to business or leadership directly; that`s what makes it more universally understandable. **I focused on systems thinking from the perspective of Lee Bolman & Terrence Deal.** Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, & Leadership (5th Edition) This important work looks at both management and leadership in various types of organizations from four frames: the Structural Frame, the Human Resources Frame, the Political Frame, and the Symbolic Frame.

Hello, I want a superb and outstanding acknowledgment for my completed dissertation . To include and thank God,( without whom l will not be able to complete my studies let alone my dissertation ,etc My supervisor ( Support, patience guidance etc) My Personal Tutor ( Care and always believing in me etc) My Academic Tutor ( getting the best out of me, etc CAMHS Services ( during my placement for helping me gain the required experience and competency skills for the care of children and young people and key to my writing this dissertation etc Entire Staff of my university for their prompt response and service etc & My Family for their unconditional love, understanding and support etc. You should construct and use wordings that are appropriate and stand out to include the people mentioned above. Please l want the acknowledgment to be very good so that it is among the ones chosen ( there is a competition for this in my school.) Font Size 12 1.5 spacing 2.5cm margins

Must post first.
Part 1:
Please do further research on your topic. Tell us what you learned. (250 words) (30 pts)
Here are some suggestions for additional information to include in this post
If a disease, what is its cause, how does it manifest, how common is it, risk factors, prevention, treatment etc.
If a type of organism, what are its classification, characteristics, habitat, role in the ecosystem, importance to humans
If a substance, what is its chemical nature, what are its properties, where is it obtained from (or how is it made)
If a procedure, what is it used for, how common is it, how risky is it
Provide 2 references. (5 pts)
Provide one pic. (5 pts)
Part 2: Peer responses
Comment on 2 other students’ posts. (100 words each) (10 pts total) Specifically tell us: 1) something that you found interesting about their topic and 2) something that you would like more information on
You must start a thread before you can read and reply to other threads

Background information (dont write anything about this, its only for your info): We are writing a business project about Royal Canin and their supply chain procedure. Today, they are implementing a new way of working – D2C (shipping products direct to consumer) from their warehouse to Sweden from France. They do not have any return process, and we will provide them with a recommendation, based on theories, qualitative interview etc. If we are satisfied, we will come back to you with more pages. The interview we have performed is 2, qualitative interview with the D2C Manager at Royal Canin. Instructions: We want you to do following: 1. Litteratur review (two articles that you find) about returns management. 2 pages. Please also include conclusion of the two articles. 2. Methodology: 2.1 Research approach (we will use abductive approach) – 0,5 pages 2.2 Reliability and validity (we will use a qualitative interview). 0,5 pages 2.3 Limitations of data (Qualitative interview) – 0,5 pages 2.4 Ethics (qualitative interview) – 0,5 pages Theoretical framework about Returns Management in supply chain. Try to use as much as possible from the attached article – 2 pages

i need a essay write for tomorrow at 12
A changing business climate has led many organizations to embrace ethical and social responsibility; however, managerial roles and responsibilities in organizations have not been clearly defined Discuss? Write a 2-3 page double spaced paper using a 12 point font. Students must use research from 2 Journal Articles for your response and APA 6th edition format.