Explain briefly how you narrowed down your topic.s

Explain briefly how you narrowed down your topic.
Why is it important to you?
Include mention of any plans, programs, policies, and/or models that have influenced your decision.
Include, if any, references to the latest attacks and the impact upon the people, community, or region.
Identify at least 15 references pertinent to your topic. You can locate sources by using TUI Library Portal, Background Information, and Google. For five (5) of the references, provide a brief annotation for the reference (i.e., a brief summary analysis of the reference).

Remember that it is always a good idea to use primary sources rather than secondary sources. Therefore, it is best to avoid sources such as from syndicated news sources (e.g., CNN, ABC, FOX, and the like). Also, lay sites such as Wikipedia are handy for general information but not for an academic paper.

Briefly summarize how the move will fundamentally shift the playing field to the company’s advantage and beat the competition.

Our focus this week is on choosing a strategic direction that will set your organization apart from competitors in a way that enables you to stand out from everyone else. Jack refers to this as “changing the game.” Sherman refers to it as “breaking away from the pack” (Chapter 11).

Using the company you selected for your course project,

(Thompson Reuters) identify a potential game-changing move that you believe will create a sustainable competitive advantage. This move should derive from one of the seven common moves first introduced in last week’s lecture notes.

This potential move should represent a possible new move the company should consider for creating even more competitive differentiation. In other words, it should not be a specific move that the company has or is currently implementing.

Briefly summarize how the move will fundamentally shift the playing field to the company’s advantage and beat the competition.

Explain which of the four positioning categories described by Sherman (Breakaway, Reverse Positioning, Blue Ocean or Disruptive Innovation) best describes the move, and why.

What is it exactly that interests you about your discipline/career (be sure to be as specific as possible and include specific concepts, topics, methods, or perspectives of interest).

For this assignment, reflect on your life as a thinker and learner. Throughout this course you will be representing your own view points and those of your discipline. This essay is an opportunity for you to reflect on the events and circumstances that brought you to choose your major/discipline/career and to help others understand why you find your discipline a compelling framework for understanding the world.

It’s not possible for you to sum up your life in 2-3 pages. Therefore, you must select what is most important for your ultimate aim—and for the purposes of this assignment, your aim is to tell a story with a particular message. The message you want to tell is that you have had a life that inclines you toward a certain disciplinary view of the world. Accordingly, you need to include the following:

Why you chose your area(s) of study
The key events, situations, and influences that lead to your disciplinary/career interests
What is it exactly that interests you about your discipline/career (be sure to be as specific as possible and include specific concepts, topics, methods, or perspectives of interest)
Your values, skills, and strengths (and if relevant, weaknesses)
What disciplinary problems you are interested in
How you plan to use your disciplinary knowledge and skills in your future, especially in your future career plans or goals
This will require you to “dig deep”. Be brutally honest with yourself. Expressing weaknesses will not be held against you. Nor is there a need to tell your deepest darkest secrets. Our course reading tells us that the best leaders know their strengths and weaknesses, and know how to surround themselves with people who supplement or compliment them in some way. Your goal is to help other people understand what disciplinary perspectives guide the way you make sense of the world and how you came to adopt those perspectives.

Here are some additional rule-of-thumb guidelines.

Assume a general reader who does not know you personally
Do not dwell on the negative. If you find yourself wanting to discuss some major negative event, such as an accident or illness, try to emphasize what you learned from the experience rather than the disappointments or shortcomings it may have caused
How you structure this intellectual autobiography is up to you. There is no one right way to go about it. You might write it as a personal narrative. You might write it as a reflection on your goals in your profession or more broadly in your life. You might write in first person (so, yes, you can use “I” in this paper!) You might write it in third person, as if you’re profiling someone else. The truly adventurous among you may find a way to make it work in second person. You may decide to write in one smooth linear narrative, in a chronological but fragmented style, or in a way that jumps around in time and space. Have fun with it!

(Much of the phrasing and structure of this assignment has been taken verbatim from Chapter Five of Tanya Augsburg’s Becoming Interdisciplinary: An Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies)

What approach does the editorial take—Toulmin, Rogerian, something else?

C‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌omplete a written evaluation of your chosen argumentative essay. Your essay should be 500-700 words long. Use of sources is required; all papers must be cited and written in APA format. Detailed Instructions: Public Texts: Editorials in periodicals are often brief arguments. Find, read, and analyze an editorial on an issue that interests you: https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2022/02/17/covid-omicron-normal-masks-242404 A. Introduction. Tell the reader what article you will be discussing and why. Then, the last sentence should be the thesis, that tells the reader what the essay is about and why it is important. B. Body Paragraph: Group the first two answers together for the first paragraph. What approach does the editorial take—Toulmin, Rogerian, something else? How does the editorial present and address opposing points of view. C. Body Paragraph:‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ Group the third and fourth answers together for the second paragraph since they discuss logos, ethos, and pathos. In what ways does the editorial appeal to ethos? How does it build credibility? In its appeals to pathos, does the editorial connect with needs and values? D. Body Paragraph: Group the fifth and sixth, and seventh answers together for the third paragraph since they’re both about logic and evidence. What is the editorial’s main claim? Is it a claim of truth, value, or policy? What arguments does the editorial offer to support that claim? Is the reasoning logical? Are the warrants behind the reasoning sound? What types of evidence does the writer provide to support his or her reasoning? Is the evidence valid, sufficient, current, and accurate? E. Conclusion: Summary of thesis and/or main points. How would you characterize the overall success or failure of this argu‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ment?

What is it that might motivate individuals to associate with these types of groups?

h‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si4vbISz9D4 https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map/by-state https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map https://www.learningforjustice.org/ Prior to beginning work on this discussion, watch Inside USA – Rise of hate, Part 1 (Links to an external site.) and read Number of U.S. Hate Groups is Rising, Report Says (Links to an external site.). Were you aware of the number and range of recognized hate groups in these states? This video helps us learn about hate groups in the United States. In addition, please visit the Teaching Tolera‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌nce (Links to an external site.) website and view the Interactive Hate Map (Links to an external site.) or Hap Map by State (Links to an external site.). Please review the maps or list for the state in which you live, or a state of your choice. Respond to each of the following questions: What is it that might motivate individuals to associate with these types of groups? As you have now learned, most individuals are a target of these groups in one way or another. How does this targeting turn to hate crime? How has identifying hate crimes and prosecuting them evolv‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ed?

Compare and contrast the two primary crime data sources used in the United States, i.e., the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

1‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌. After conducting your own research regarding the theories (such as Strain Theory, Learning Theory, Classical Criminology, Positivist Criminology, etc) which do you more closely subscribe to and sp‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ecifically, why? 2. Compare and contrast the two primary crime data sources used in the United States, i.e., the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

Describe the roles of the nurses in disaster planning and actual disasters.

Y‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ou are a nurse manager in charge of developing a disaster plan for your unit. As the manager, you will need to include the influential agencies, stakeholders and the roles of the nurses in disasters. Identify the influential agencies and stakeholders you would include in your plan. Describe the roles of the nurses in disaster planning and actual disasters. How wou‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ld you ensure the nurses on the unit understand their roles in the disaster plan? RUBRIC TO FOLLOW Initial post includes comprehensive explanation with detailed examples and supporting evidence. Response to peers offers substantial contributions and detailed suggestions with supporting evidence. ***Please Do Not Copy & Paste from Course Hero or Chegg**‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌*