Best Writer

equirements for the analytical essay on Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. In a five-to-seven paragraph analytical essay, include the following:The TitleThe Introductory Paragraph should include: 1) A statement with interesting language that attracts readers’ attention; 2) The author’s name (or in this case, address his anonymity); 3) The title either underlined or italicized; 4) A general account of the piece; 5) Minimal background information about the literary piece’s subject, and 6) The thesis statement.The Body (3 to 5 paragraphs) should include: 1) Specific examples of evidence; 2) An analysis of how quotations, passages, descriiptions, and comparisons support the thesis statement. The quotations should include the opinion of other literary critics, the writings of biographers, and the author’s personal comments or letters. With these items, you should answer the question,

Instructions as given: Upload here your 4-5-page paper in which you analyze texts through close reading, and demonstrate an understanding of the texts’ historical, social, political, and cultural contexts (when relevant), in order to come up with an original thesis statement and a well-elaborated defense of your argument. The thesis and paper may engage with questions and/or texts covered in any part of the course. The thesis should identify the question to be addressed, explain what is at stake and why it is important, and take a stand on the question. The specific topic is up to you, with the requirement that you focus on a significant Marian issue, have a clear thesis statement, and make a distinct, well organized, and well-demonstrated argument.

WEBSITE USED FOR DISCUSSION:
https://www.city-journal.org/html/case-cannibalism-10040.html
POST BEING ANALYZED
In reading “The Case for Cannibalism”, what the author argues is that “If everything is permissible between consenting adults, why not?” He throws this out there sort of a way to have an open mind while reading the rest of his argument. He goes on by giving us some facts and using professionals to help with his argument. The use of including a psychiatrist to show that they had come across a man by the name of Armin Meiwes who was the one who killed Bernd Brandes and then ate at least 44 pounds of his flesh. Throughout the text there’s a lot of evidence that has found in this case to mainly focus on the odd relationship that they state Meiwes and Brandes had. With all the evidence that are given, he shows how many may obviously argue otherwise and not agree with what is being said. He does many great examples of how many would disagree like for example that people are more than capable of making their own mistakes even though Brandes was mad at the time he wanted somebody to eat him. On of his big arguments is that even though us as humans have “emotional problems” we still should be able to make our own choices because if we weren’t than none of us would be self-determining in the eyes of the law, except those who are opposite and have no emotions to have problems with. In my opinion I strongly agree that everyone has the right to make their own choices in life and live their life the way they wanna live it. But I also do not understand how people eat other human’s flesh. At the end of the day some of us humans do have mental problems and sometimes don’t know how to think fully and that’s why sometimes they find ways to make it seem like we aren’t capable of making our own choices but I believe that no matter what we should always do things on our own even if it’s not the right choice we need to learn the hard way sometimes. As for this essay on cannibalism I thought the author had a great argument to introduce cannibalism and as well understand his point of view.

Chapters 7 and 8 describe many techniques for reducing anxiety. Now that you’ve considered all these methods, which one do you believe is the most effective, and why?

In your answer, be sure to address your understanding of the theory that suggests your particular anxiety reduction technique. That is, if you believe VMBR would be the most effective, make sure to include your understanding of cognitive learning techniques, specifically imagery training.

textbook: LeUnes, A. (2008). Sport Psychology (4th edition). Psychology Press.

Choose an important goal in your life that you’re willing to discuss here. It may be a goal you’ve already achieved or a goal you’re still working toward.

Using one of the theories of motivation from your textbook (e.g., Need Achievement Theory, Attribution Theory, Locus of Control, etc), describe how and why you remain motivated to achieve this goal.

Remember to describe your motivation using the terms associated with the theory you choose!

**My goal: to obtain my bachelors***

textbook for the class :LeUnes, A. (2008). Sport Psychology (4th edition). Psychology Press.

One article I read is https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/30/investing/tesla-stock-rally/index.html which talks about Tesla catching on fire.
This an argumentative essay and I need citations of the sources and in-text citations (MLA format)
It can’t be in first person.
Thank you, you are a life saver!

Have you ever watched Let’s Make a Deal? One of the games is based on a famous problem in probability. The game goes like this:

You have three doors. Under one door is a car and under two doors is a gag prize (known as a Zoink!)
You can choose one of the three doors (A, B, C).
Once you choose one of the three doors, the host (who knows where the prize is) closes one of the doors that does not contain the prize (so if you choose A, the host might close B if he/she knows the prize isn’t there).
You are prompted to keep the first door or switch to the remaining door?
Which option do you pick? How does this relate to conditional probability?

Individual Innovation Report (4,000 words)
I had inserted some lines, pictures, tables and ppt slides in the word doc for your reference, plz do not use the exactly same information as I provided. You could refer to the information and slides I provided, do not copy!! You have to generate new ideas.

As an innovator, you will need to conduct further research on this innovative product: Delivery locker and delivery robot

1. You should firstly figure out a NAME for the product.
In order to fully explain and detail its purpose and design, its potential customer market, its potential revenue, costs, capital investment / loans / funding required, where and how it will be designed, manufactured and distributed, plus its industry, competitors, and rivals.

Using a wide range of managing innovation theory, concepts, models, and techniques you learnt from class (see the attached slides) – and combined with your primary and secondary research – write an innovation report (+/- 4,000-words), explaining how this new innovative product (or business, or process) can be fully commercialised, managed, and developed for the future.

Your innovation report (+/- 4,000 words) should be written in a professional structure and style, be fully referenced, using Harvard-style referencing, and should be fully supported with managing innovation theory, concepts, models and techniques from books and journal articles from your reading list, closely applied and used.

Using the template I give you and fill in information.

In using an ANOVA test two areas need to be considered—a random-effects model and a fixed-effects model.

In this module’s discussion, identify the difference(s) between the two models and the pros and cons of using each model in calculation.

Use appropriate citations to support your argument.

One five-page research paper will be due at the end of the semester. This paper will examine a philosophical issue selected by the student. The paper should be typewritten, double spaced, using 11 or 12-point font and standard Modern Language Association format. This research paper will constitute 10% of the course grade. work cited included.

Grading of Written Work

An “A” paper is substantial, well developed and effectively organized and presented. It demonstrates original or thoughtful engagement with content and sensitivity to diction, tone and style. Its sentences are clear, precise, and well structured. The paper is appropriately formatted and virtually error-free.

A “B” paper contains a number of the strengths of an A paper, but it typically lacks the thoughtfulness, originality, and sensitivity of the superior paper. It is also virtually error-free.

A “C” paper fulfills the assignment and is adequately organized. The writer communicates ideas and develops a thesis, although supporting evidence may be minimal and organization rather mechanical. The writing is not marred by habitual or serious grammatical errors. Thought and expression are competent.

A “D” paper typically is marked by failure to focus on a thesis, poor organization, lack of development, or recurrent mechanical errors.