Identify the main ethical concerns at stake in the case, and argue on behalf of one side or the other of the debate.

Writing Assignment Sheet: Final Paper (1800-2100 words)

Paper Due: Wednesday, May 11

Select a case study from Spinello, chapters 3-6 (limit yourself to only one case study).
Identify the main ethical concerns at stake in the case, and argue on behalf of one side or the other of the debate. Be sure to consider possible objections to your argument and
respond to them.

The purpose of the final paper is to refine students’ abilities for philosophical reading and argument explanation as well as critical analysis. This assignment requires students to not only identify the main arguments from a text, but also to assess those arguments as to their overall plausibility. Theses for the long papers must therefore stake a claim as to the strengths or weaknesses of the given philosophical perspective. This will require, in addition to an exegetical account of the thinker’s view on the question: (1) some critical explanation of the strengths or weaknesses of the view; (2) consideration of potential responses by the thinker to accommodate those suggestions from (1); (3)
an overall assessment of the view in light of the potential responses by the thinker (i.e. one that supports the student’s thesis). It should be noted that though the task is one of critical analysis, this does not mean that students need to argue against the thinker’s view. The paper might seek, for example, defend the thinker against potential critiques, or else to interpret the thinker’s view in a way that avoids some problem. With this said, of course, a critical piece that argues against a certain view is certainly permitted. As with the short papers, I will not be concerned with what is argued (as
long as it is relevant, of course) but will rather focus on how the argument proceeds.
Of central importance to the long papers will therefore be:
1. A clear thesis that identifies the position that the student will defend with respect to the
philosopher and to the question.
2. An introduction that in gives some indication of how the paper will go about defending the thesis.
3. Development of the argument that proceeds in some logical order, where the direction of the
paper is clear and any new point introduced is at once related to the overall concerns of the paper
and supported with evidence from the text.
4. Some critical treatment of the philosopher’s view.
5. Some consideration of how the philosopher might respond to the criticism.
6. Some overall assessment of the philosopher’s view in light of the potential response7. A conclusion which need not summarize all the points of the paper (indeed it is preferable if it does not), but recalls the general thrust of overall discussion and the thesis that has been defended, and brings some closure to the paper.
8. Academic writing style. Papers to be 1800-2100 words, typed, double-spaced in something readable like Times New Roman
or Garamond font, size 12.

Write a series of 6-8 journal entries in the perspective as the best friend of Cleopatra.

Your assignment is to imagine that you are living during one of the time periods we are studying during the semester, and also that you are a close friend/relative/associate of a historical figure. You can choose to be one of the following:
• A close friend of Socrates
• A Macedonian soldier traveling with Alexander the Great
• Cleopatra’s best friend
• A Senator living during Emperor Nero’s reign
• Clotilde, the second wife of King Clovis
• One of Charlemagne’s daughters
You will write a series of diary entries (6-8 entries in all) in the first-person in which you reflect upon your friend/relative/associate. Your diary entries should discuss, but not necessarily be limited to the following:
• The political situation surrounding the friend/relative/associate
• How your friend/relative/associate reacts to various situations, including obstacles and victories.
• General characteristics of the personality of your friend/relative/associate
• How other people feel about your friend/relative/associate.(Are they feared? Loved? Respected? Hated? Do they incite any other strong emotions? What causes the feelings about them you have highlighted?
Please remember that the diary entries need to reflect the mores and culture of the time, rather than those of the twentieth-first century.
So where should you begin? Start by looking up facts about the character you will be writing about in the online textbook. Then, go Wikipedia. Check out general information about your friend/relative/associate as well as the time period during which he or she lived. You can also check out other websites to get additional information.
There is a lot of room for creativity, so use your imagination along with the research you do!
Requirements:Papers must be at least 900 words long.
The paper must include at least 4 sources (internet or print)
Bibliography (Chicago/Turabian style) or Works Cited page (MLA style) must be included.
Review the Grammar Guide that is attached with the assignment instructions, so that you do not make basic grammar errors.
Essay must be uploaded into Blackboard.

Explain the Developmental Theory of your selected theorist.

Part 3: Research Paper 2-3 pages: (APA format)
After reading Chapter 9 in your textbook, and using Library Resources:
Select ONE of the following developmental theorists:
Piaget
Vygotsky
Kohlberg
Erikson
Explain the Developmental Theory of your selected theorist. Provide a complete and thorough explanation of the theory.
Use your textbook and your identified resources (ie: scholarly peer reviewed articles for support in your written answers. Be sure to properly cite and reference your resources.

What matters most is that you’re practicing and showcasing your ability to assess and compare sources of information.

Part of studying conflict and acquiring information literacy is getting into the habit of following particular conflicts on a consistent basis. Over the first few weeks, you’ll zero in on a current, ongoing conflict and then follow it. Most blog posts will consist of the following:
Briefly summarize recent events and any noteworthy people using the terminology we practice in class. Quotes are optional.
All blog posts are going to be visible to your classmates. Assume that they’ll be reading them.
Analyze and compare several sources per post. Perform synthesis.
Since you’ll be studying active conflicts, you do not need to worry about these sources being scholarly, unbiased, or even reliable. You are allowed to skim-read. What matters most is that you’re practicing and showcasing your ability to assess and compare sources of information.
Yes, that means you can dunk on a source so long as you’ve got something or someone more reliable to compare it to, including sources from a previous post.
Be sure to actually cite your sources according to one of the big three style guides (APA, MLA, Chicago). Links can be included at the bottom but a bibliography is not expected.
Occasionally, blog posts will have more specific instructions provided in class, via email, and/or Blackboard. Always be sure to check the current week under Blackboard –> Outline to see if there are any additional instructions.

Explain the Developmental Theory of your selected theorist. Provide a complete and thorough explanation of the theory.

Part 3: Research Paper 2-3 pages: (APA format)
After reading Chapter 9 in your textbook, and using Library Resources:
Select ONE of the following developmental theorists:
Piaget
Vygotsky
Kohlberg
Erikson
Explain the Developmental Theory of your selected theorist. Provide a complete and thorough explanation of the theory.
Use your textbook and your identified resources (ie: scholarly peer reviewed articles for support in your written answers. Be sure to properly cite and reference your resources.

What is the most interesting thing you have learned about the idea of happiness, how has that idea informed your perception of your own happiness?

What is the most interesting thing you have learned about the idea of happiness, how has that idea informed your perception of your own happiness?
The only necessary citations are from “The Happiness Hypothesis”, but other citations are welcome if appropriate.
The paper should be completed in MLA format with appropriate heading, header, title, spacing, citations, and works cited page.
Prompt:
This entire semester has revolved around the idea of happiness. Based on your research of the topic and having read “The Happiness Hypothesis”, what is the most interesting thing you have learned about the idea of happiness, how has that idea informed your perception of your own happiness, and what, if anything, will you consider doing differently going forward to pursue, and perhaps achieve, happiness in your life?

Identify the healthcare funding system dominant in the countries selected and provide the most contemporary data relating to per cent of Gross Domestic Product spent on healthcare for each country with commentary on any movement over the last 3 financial years.

Assessment Item – Video Recorded Powerpoint Presentation

BACKGROUND TO THIS ASSESSMENT
Health Leaders are often interested to see how our national experiences of health and health care compare on an international scale. These comparisons create a broader perspective for researchers, policymakers and the general public. Being aware of the successes and setbacks of other countries may inform how new policies, health interventions or preventative measures are developed and implemented in one’s own country. International health comparisons can help make valid comparisons of health across different countries; however, a comparison must be possible, valid and reliable. This task requires preparing a PowerPoint slide set and recording your presentation as required in the task instructions provided below.
The recorded PowerPoint presentation that you submit for assessment will require careful consideration and the use of international comparisons. If the data and methods that underlie these correlations have significant gaps (as in years of non-collection), there could be invalidity or unreliability of the results of such analysis. There are methodological issues to consider when assessing data availability and quality and deciding which countries to compare.
You should ensure that you discuss any decisions about the data used, and the countries selected should provide adequate rationale providing the limitations and assumptions are clear and duly considered. These decisions can influence the differences observed between countries and the conclusions reached. The following checklist will assist in the preparation of the required evidence to undertake this comparison.

CHECKLIST FOR COMPARATIVE INFORMATION:
Consider the following points when presenting or interpreting an international comparison of health-related data.
Data quality
Consistency- are the data defined consistently across countries?
Methodology – do all countries use the same method to collect the data?
Coverage – does the data cover similar parts of the population?
Time Period – do the data refer to the same period?
Choice of countries
Comparability – are countries sufficiently similar to support comparison?
Presentation and interpretation
Presentation – are the data presented appropriately?
Explanation – is the variation between countries adequately explained?
Underlying differentials – are differences within countries considered?
Context – can the data be used outside of an international comparison?
You must indicate where no data is available on the individual measure. However, you must be sure that you carefully research and that this is, in fact, the case.
IMPORTANT: Your recorded presentation must document EACH of the six (6) areas of comparison listed below.

THE TASK
You are to research and analyse healthcare performance data in at least two countries, one of which must be Australia and prepare a recorded PowerPoint presentation that shows the results and analysis of data from both countries broken down into the six (6) areas listed below.
Record a voice-over presentation using the PowerPoint slides lodged in the final portal.
The video presentation must be no less than 13 minutes and not more than 15 minutes. Marking of your presentation will cease after 15 minutes have elapsed, and marking penalties will be applied for presentations less than 13 minutes.
Set your PowerPoint slides to “Notes” (an option at the bottom right-hand side of the screen) and save them as a PDF. You can find the instructions for saving the PowerPoint slide set as a PDF can be found at the Microsoft support pages Save PowerPoint presentations as PDF files. Upload this file to SafeAssign Assessment Item 2 Final Portal for marking.
With the Powerpoint slides that you used to create the PDF, you must create a video and use voice over PowerPoint slides to create an MP4 video file. For instructions on how to achieve this, go to Microsoft support pages. Turn your presentation into a video. Remember, when you finish recording, you must save this as an MP4 video which is an option in the “save as” menu. Upload the MP4 video file to the SafeAssign Item 2 Final Portal for marking.
Prepare and lodge your PowerPoint presentation in the final portal as one uploaded document and the recorded PowerPoint presentation in MP4 format in the final portal for marking.
The video presentation must be no less than 13 minutes and not more than 15 minutes. Please note that marking of your presentation will cease after 15 minutes have elapsed, and your presentation will be marked on material covered during the 15 minutes maximum period. There is also marking penalties that will be applied for presentations less than 13 minutes.
IMPORTANT:
Please ensure that you have saved the files with the correct file extensions so that SafeAssign can accept them.
Additionally, ensure that you upload the PDF and the MP4 file in one session.
If you press submit before uploading both files, you will not be able to upload the second file, as the Final portal is set to allow only one submission episode with multiple files allowed within that session.
Please do not attempt to upload your work using your mobile phone as a hotspot. The video may take quite a long time to upload, depending on your internet connection speed. Almost invariably, mobile phone hot-spotting will cause a timeout unless you are connected to the internet with a reliable wi-fi connection.
If you are experiencing issues with uploading, you should contact IT Support, who are trained and have the tools to remote into your computer to see what is happening. While you can certainly inform the course convenor of your issues, support must be sourced from the IT Helpdesk.
The marking criteria for the video presentation are shown below.
(Be careful to pick the comparable country with the data quality required to complete the comparison).
1. Healthcare System Classification
Classify the health system of Australia and the other country (UK, US or Singapore) that you have selected to compare for this assessment task. You must use the classification system referred to in the course in topic 1. DO NOT USE ANY OTHER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THIS ASSESSMENT ITEM. You must also state the reason for classifying the healthcare system of both countries.
2. Funding
Identify the healthcare funding system dominant in the countries selected and provide the most contemporary data relating to per cent of Gross Domestic Product spent on healthcare for each country with commentary on any movement over the last 3 financial years.
3. The healthcare system governance arrangements in the country (i.e. who is responsible for what)
4. Population Health Indicators – you must compare and contrast the following population health indicators with commentary on the reasons for the results.
4.1 Maternal Mortality Rate;
4.2 Infant Mortality Rate;
4.3 Life Expectancy at Birth
5. Health System Performance Indicators:
Incidence/prevalence of:
5.1 Low birth weight infants
5.2 Obesity
5.3 Diabetes
5.4 Asthma
5.5 Rates of Ischaemic Heart Disease
4.6 Cancer rates including any available data on survival rates
6. Management of Quality and Safety in the Health System
Specifically comment on national systems for monitoring quality and safety in healthcare, third-party accreditation options for health services, and healthcare professionals’ regulation.

Please include references at the final slides.

Marking Criteria attached in the file.

Briefly summarize recent events and any noteworthy people using the terminology we practice in class.

Part of studying conflict and acquiring information literacy is getting into the habit of following particular conflicts on a consistent basis. Over the first few weeks, you’ll zero in on a current, ongoing conflict and then follow it. Most blog posts will consist of the following:
Briefly summarize recent events and any noteworthy people using the terminology we practice in class. Quotes are optional.
All blog posts are going to be visible to your classmates. Assume that they’ll be reading them.
Analyze and compare several sources per post. Perform synthesis.
Since you’ll be studying active conflicts, you do not need to worry about these sources being scholarly, unbiased, or even reliable. You are allowed to skim-read. What matters most is that you’re practicing and showcasing your ability to assess and compare sources of information.
Yes, that means you can dunk on a source so long as you’ve got something or someone more reliable to compare it to, including sources from a previous post.
Be sure to actually cite your sources according to one of the big three style guides (APA, MLA, Chicago). Links can be included at the bottom but a bibliography is not expected.
Occasionally, blog posts will have more specific instructions provided in class, via email, and/or Blackboard. Always be sure to check the current week under Blackboard –> Outline to see if there are any additional instructions.