Best Writer

write a paper comparing and contrasting your personal values with the values contained in the Code. You should critically evaluate your own values and thoughtfully give examples of areas of compatibility with your own values as well as areas on incompatibility. Double Spaced.

You are to write a 6-page essay on genetics/molecular biology for non-specialists, with a focus on one of the Nobel Prize topics TRANSCRIPTION IN EUKARYOTES. . Then, you should provide an update on research in that scientific field by highlighting the work of at least 5 other related, primary-research papers from the last 5 years (not including review articles). you should describe the newer papers in sufficient detail that the reader can understand how the key results were obtained, and how they related back to or build on the background work. The connections between the newer papers should also be highlighted, to create a synthesized summary of the recent work. Finally, you will provide a “look to the future” and discuss 2-3 types of experiments, projects, or applications of the work that you think will be interesting next steps for researchers to take and that will advance the field.
Project details. The content should be in the style of a Scientific American or New York Times article, clearly state the importance of the work, and be interesting and understandable to a college-educated, general audience; however, it must also include some experimental detail on the newest data. You must cite the original work in the text in (author, date) format, and you should avoid using review articles or textbooks as references. In addition to the 6-pages (single-spaced, 12 pt font, 1 inch margins (or, 12 pages double-spaced).

TRANSCRIPTION IN EUKARYOTES

Discussion Question:
Topic: “Religion as Salvation or Trickery

I have long argued that not every student comes to a class to learn. This is because education is usually a difficult (painful) process that requires a student to think for themselves and take full, personal responsibility to move from darkness (ignorance) to light (enlightenment). So, instead, many students take a class only to earn a grade (preferably an “A”) and will blame the professor, their circumstance, or everyone else for their failure.
The movement from darkness to light is addressed in Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave.”

Your assignment is to watch this brief video and respond to the following questions:

1. Why is it usually difficult to convince people that sometimes what they think they know about religion (for or against it) is caused not by their free will but by mere trickery (or illusion) caused by others?
2. So far, what have you learned in this course that would support the notion that human beings are sometimes manipulated by “puppet masters” (religious leaders, pastors, preachers, politicians, movie makers, musicians, etc.)?
3. How much have you learned about yourself and what could be happening to your mind (or way of thinking)?
4. What should a person do to avoid being tricked?

Video
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave – Alex Gendler

Report Format: double-spaced, one-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font.

1) Write a summary of your company and include:
a) A link to the firm’s annual report/financial statements for the latest fiscal year from the firms’ website.
b) a brief historical summary of the company
c) recent developments within the company and the industry
d) the company’s position within the industry
e) the company’s recent stock chart
f) a list of competitors
g) other items of significance to the company, including any trends in operations or capital resources

Insert the following building blocks for your analysis for the firm. Complete this in an Excel workbook, with each part in a separate tab. You must upload the Excel file.

2) Insert the ratio analysis (see further below for the specific ratios) for the last four years for each firm. Round to 4 decimal places. If a ratio does not apply, write N/A.

3) Insert the horizontal analysis (see further below for the specifics) using dollar and percent change for the following items for the last four years: (use the following columns: two years ago (A), last year (B), current year (C), $ change (C-B), $ change (B-A), $ change (C-A), % change (C-B), % change (B-A), and % change (C-A).
a) Cash
b) Total Current Assets
c) Total Assets
d) Total Current Liabilities
e) Total Liabilities
f) Retained Earnings
g) Total Stockholders’ Equity
h) Number of Shares Outstanding
i) Net Sales/Revenues
j) Cost of Goods Sold
k) Gross Margin
l) Operating Expenses
m) Operating Margin
n) Interest Expense
o) Net Income
p) Earnings Per Share
q) Executive Compensation

4) Insert the trend analysis for items in #3 for the last four years using the earliest year as the base.

5) Insert the vertical analysis for the last four years’ balance sheets and income statements.

For the next part, integrate your conclusions from the analyses above. The analysis, however, is not to be your only source of information. You may use news articles or financial analyst reports about the company to support your viewpoints. Provide a citation list for any sources used.

6) Complete a financial statement analysis of the firm. Evaluate the horizontal, vertical, and trend results. Discuss the ratios, addressing the profitability and total asset management, liquidity, solvency and financial risk, efficiency and operating asset management, and market strength. Highlight any significant changes, including whether the company’s situation has deteriorated or improved for the various categories. Comment on the company’s relative performance to other companies in the industry. To conduct the broader industry analysis, use the industry statistics reported on http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=JPM (search for the ticker of your firm). Use the ratios to answer the following questions with explanations. Integrate them into a written piece rather than answering each question in a list.

a) Is the company paying its accounts payable more or less rapidly over time? Is the company’s use of accounts payable decreasing or increasing?
b) Is the company collecting its accounts receivable more or less rapidly over time? Is the company’s investment in accounts receivable decreasing or increasing?
c) Is the company converting its inventory more or less rapidly over time? Is the company’s investment in inventory decreasing or increasing?
d) Is the company converting its resource inputs into cash flows more or less rapidly over time? Is the company’s cash position decreasing or increasing?
e) Is the company’s investment in fixed assets increasing or decreasing?
f) Is the company managing its assets efficiently? Is it managing them more or less efficiently?
g) Is the company’s use of long-term debt increasing or decreasing?
h) Is the company utilizing its debt efficiently? Is it utilizing it more or less efficiently?
i) Is the stockholder’s investment becoming more or less profitable?
j) Did the dollar amount/percentage of operating revenues increase or decrease over time?
k) Did the dollar amount/percentage of operating expenses increase or decrease over time?
l) Did the market capitalization increase or decrease significantly over time?
m) Did the times interest earned increase or decrease over time?
n) Did the dividend yield and dividend payout increase or decrease over time?
o) Did the effective tax rate increase or decrease over time?
p) Did the estimated interest rate increase or decrease over time?
q) Did the free cash flow increase or decrease over time?
r) Did the earnings per share increase or decrease over time?
s) Did the book value per share increase or decrease over time?
t) Did the price-earnings ratio increase or decrease over time?
u) What are the trends in the various ratios of firm profitability?
v) What are the trends in the various ratios of firm liquidity?
w) What are the trends in the various ratios of firm efficiency (activity)?
x) What are the trends in the various ratios of firm solvency (coverage)?
y) What are the trends in the various market ratios?
z) Are there differences in accounting to consider when comparing the firm to the industry?

7) Short-Term Credit Decision: In no more than two typed pages, provide a statement of your decision to lend or not lend to the firm based on your interpretation of their short-term prospects. Analyze this as you would if you were considering lending $1 billion of your own money to the firm to be repaid in 90 days. Essentially, you are answering whether you believe the firm can meet current obligations and use current assets efficiently to produce profits. Comment on their success in employing operating leverage. Make sure to address the following: short-term viability, short-term growth, cash flow, working capital, efficiency, and liquidity.

8) Long Term Credit Decision: In no more than two typed pages, provide a statement of your decision to lend or not lend to the firm based on your interpretation of their long-term prospects. Analyze this as you would if you were considering lending $10 billion of your own money to the firm to be repaid in 10 years. Essentially, you are answering whether you believe the firm can meet long-term liabilities, use long-term debt and stockholder’s equity effectively without jeopardizing the firm’s future, and manage long-term assets in a way that will maximize revenues. Comment on their success in employing financial leverage. Make sure to address the following: long-term viability, long-term growth, the need for future financing, the sources for payment of interest and principal, the cushion the firm has in earnings and cash flows to pay interest and principal, the volatility (unpredictability) in the firm’s earnings and cash flows, the likelihood the company will file for bankruptcy, and the financial strength to pay debts in a period of poor profitability.

9) Investment Decision: In no more than two typed pages, provide a statement of your decision to invest in the firm’s stock based on your interpretation of its long-term prospects. Analyze this as you would if you were considering investing $500 million of your own money in the stock. Address the following: the company’s future business prospects, the company’s future market prospects, the company’s competitive strengths and weaknesses, the company’s strategic initiatives in response to business opportunities and threats, the company’s current earnings performance, the company’s future earnings potential and the sustainability of its current earnings, the company’s current financial condition, the risks and rewards of the company’s financing structure, the company’s vulnerability to earnings variability, and the company’s financial strength to overcome a period of poor profitability.

10) Consulting Decision: In no more than two typed pages, provide a statement as if you were a hired consultant presenting to the CEO of your future strategies, goals, and objectives for this company and how would you reflect these through the preparation of the annual operating budget? (Scope: 2 years )

Unit 3 – Discussion Board
View Assignment Details for Unit 3 – Discussion Boardas PDF
Assignment Overview
Type:
Discussion Board
Unit:
Public Administration Budgeting and Finance
Due Date:
Thu,4/28/22
Grading Type:
Numeric
Points Possible:
75
Points Earned:
Points Earnednot available
Deliverable Length:
See assignment details
View objectives for this assignment
Go To:
Assignment Details
Learning Materials
Reading Assignment
My Work:
Online Deliverables:
Discussion Board
Looking for tutoring? Go to Smarthinking
Assignment Details
Assignment Description
Primary Response is due by Thursday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Saturday (11:59:59pm Central).
Primary Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 200–250 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
For this Discussion Board, please complete the following:
Within public organizations, there are various types of budgets that can be utilized.
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 200-250 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas:
Select and briefly explain 1 of the following budget types that appeals to you, and explain why it appeals to you:
Capital budget
Operating budget
General budget
Special budget
Fixed budget
Flexible budget
Executive budget
Legislative budget
What are the strengths and weaknesses of your selected budget type?
Understanding Public Budgeting
Review the following video for assistance on your assignment (Gregg Learning, 2018):
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 50–100-word reply about their Primary Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following question:
What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Discussion Board Rubric
Expectation Points Possible Points Earned Comments
Application of Learning Material Content: Post demonstrates understanding of Learning Material content.
20
Application of Course Knowledge: Post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from discipline.
20
DB Responses: Responds substantively to two posts. Responses encourage interaction in the Discussion Board and classroom community.
20
Organization: Post presents information logically and is clearly relevant to discussion topic.
8
Professional Language: Posts contain accurate grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few or no errors. (APA formatting is not required.)
7
Total Points
75
Total Points Earned
View a downloadable version of the Discussion Board Grading Rubric.
Reference
Gregg Learning. (2018, April 22). Understanding public budgeting [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdDQGzMHzjs

Discuss at least 2 stereotypes she foregrounds in the play.
The following is a quote from Fasthorse’s casting notes for the play:
Casting Note: All ages are open and actors that “look white” may be played by POC passing as white
(Links to an external site.)
.
This is an unusual casting note – why do you think Fasthorse included this? What is she saying about the casting of plays, films, in general?
Did you enjoy the play – why or why not?
Reference: From the play “the thanksgiving play”

In paragraph 1, answer: what is redlining and what are three major problems/disadvantages it has caused Black and Brown folks?
In paragraphs 2-?, respond, in several well-developed paragraphs, to the play A Raisin in the Sun. Consider addressing one or more of the following:
How does Hansberry build dramatic tension throughout the play?
How does the dialogue forward the plot and/or tell us about the characters?
How does the structure of the play affect your experience of comprehending it?

Instructions:

“No added steps are needed this time. Just a completed final draft with a fully formatted Work Cited.

Note: Your Work Cited needs more than just the name and author of the story — it needs to include the rest of the information for your specific source for the story — if online, the website name and url. — if a pdf, look at the first and last page of the document”

DISCUSS THE HISTORY AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MOTHER’S DAY.

THE LOST NORSE: OVERVIEW AND ASSIGNMENT
This unit involves one of the greatest mysteries of history: what happened to the Greenland Norse? Here is an overview:
Once upon a long ago, there lived a people who dwelt at what seemed (to many Europeans) to be the very edge of the world. They lived at the south-western verge of a polar ice cap, populated by polar bears and seals and wild wheeling falcons. It was the largest island of the world, and most of it was ice. In the far north where Thules or Skraelings (the Norse term for these people) lived, forests grew only to the height of grass. In the unpopulated south, the winds were bitter, and only the lands along the fjords offered any space for cultivation. For months at a time, the island lay in darkness, lit only by the strange fire of the northern lights and a dim waver at the horizon where the sun almost, but never quite, arose in the dark.
These settlers came to this island from Iceland, and Norway before that, Vikings with a hunger for new lands and a free life. They settled in the peninsulas of the southwest, where currents were warmer and there were arable fields at the foot of icy mountains. Here Erik the Red (who was exiled from Iceland for murder) and Herjolf made homes in this forbidding place they called Greenland to attract other settlers. And come the settlers did, bringing wives and servants and thralls from other lands.
From these settlements, Bjarni Herjólfsson, the son of Herjólf, would set sail and be blown off course until he sighted the coasts of what we now call America. Erik’s son Leif later followed Bjarni’s voyage west and named the places he found along the coast Helluland, land of flat rocks; Markland, land replete with forests; and Vinland, land of lush wheat-fields and rich clustering grapes. But the people already living there were hostile to these (not always friendly) strangers, and the Vikings did not stay in America long.
It is with Herjolf Bardson and Erik the Red back in Greenland, however, that our story begins. In a few years they gathered to them men and women with much skill in farming and building and weaving, and they soon learned to craft a thick wool twill they called vaðmál to keep out the wind and snow. There in the warmer peninsulas of the island, they flourished for centuries. They kept farms, hunted polar animals and sea life, and traded walrus tusks and wool cloth for other goods with men who sailed to the island from time to time to trade. Often these sailors would spend the winter in the mead halls drinking and swapping lore and goods with the Greenlanders. Soon after settling the lands, the Greenlanders turned aside from their Norse gods and converted to Christianity.
So the settlers continued for hundreds of years, making a new culture in this frozen island. They endured strife with Thules and land eroded by extreme weather; they built sturdy farms of turf and stone, fragments of which remain today. And then when the weather turned colder in what we now call a Little Ice Age, they began hunting seals and fish for most of their food. It became increasingly more difficult for ships to come visit Greenland, so wide and treacherous was the ice encasing the peninsulas. For many decades, the Greenland settlements had no contact with the outside world, and no one in Europe knew how these hardy people fared.
Some thought they must have turned back to their heathen ways as the years passed. Others wondered how they made do without a Bishop. Once, a German sailor blown wildly off course sighted the shores of Greenland and beheld a strange thing: a solitary man on the beach, clad in Viking vaðmál and sealskin, face down in the icy mud. Beside him lay a knife.
Why had he no one to bury him? And where were his family and community? In a few years when boats could once again land safely in Greenland, sailors ventured onto the shores of the south-west, to the great church and fish-houses and farms and villages, and found no one there at all. The homes were neat and doors secured, but empty. After flourishing for almost five hundred years, all the Norse Greenlanders had disappeared. No one knows why.
THEORIES
Some speculate that pirates killed or enslaved them, or that the Thules or “skraelings” (as the Norse called the Inuit peoples who lived in the north) burned their villages down, and, indeed, there are Inuit tales of such events–but no archeological evidence of widespread fires, and no mass graves or evidence of widespread pirate abduction.
Others believe that the Norse damaged the land with over-cultivation and died, or left due to climate change–but there were no forests to cut down for boats, and no evidence of widespread migration or mass graves. And recent archeological research suggests that the Norse actually carefully preserved and improved their soil.
Some argue that the Norse failed to adapt to the climate and clung to Icelandic dress and diet that were not suited to this new land, but others have found evidence that seems to refute this claim, such as a prevalence of seal bones that suggest up to 80% of their diet was marine-based by the end.
Some believe the plague wiped out the population (but again, no mass graves) or that they emigrated to America or to Iceland and Norway to claim abandoned farms (but recall the lack of boats, trees for timber, or record of them landing anywhere. Also, recall from the documentary we viewed the hapless figure of Asmund Kastanrassi, who ventured to Iceland in 1189 in a scrappy boat made entirely of Greenlandic materials but ended up foundering in the icy wastes when his ship fell apart because of lack of iron reinforcements).
Other scholars have argued that the culture’s collapse was due to decimating the walrus population; recently, new evidence has come to light that while the climate did not grow markedly colder over time, Greenland did grow critically drier. Ultimately, however, no one knows for sure, or what happened to them or where (if anywhere) they went.
YOUR TASK
Your task is as follows: First, evaluate the reliability, currency, relevance, persuasiveness, and evidence of the research materials provided (and any you find on your own, if you choose to supplement) to formulate your own answer to what happened to the lost Norse civilization in Greenland. The class bibliography on this subject contains articles from science magazines and The Smithsonian as well as scholarly books, journal articles, documentaries on YouTube, and conference papers. Which of these sources do you find the most trustworthy? Which are the most persuasive? Keep a log of our class readings and viewings (see separate assignment sheet) and evaluate them for their currency, reliability, persuasiveness, and so forth. This first part is due on the 13th.
Then, write a paper using these sources in which you give your theory about what happened to the Greenland Norse. Be as specific and detailed as possible, citing evidence, quoting from texts, and providing specifics. Use the following format:
Structure your essay as follows (Due 4/27):
1) Introduction:
a) Introduce your topic; give background, history, and context.
b) Give a critical review of the topic (i.e., What smart people whose credentials we can trust have said about this topic).
c) Give a concession / acknowledgement and then a “Turn” and state your thesis: (i.e., These smart people have some valid points—and say why—but then give your point of view and why you think YOU are right, giving us your thesis).
d) Your thesis: what you think happened to the Greenlandic Norse and three reasons why you think this is so (reasons A, B, & C).
2) Reason A: In your explanation, quote from / refer to sources
3) Reason B: In your explanation, quote from / refer to sources
4) Reason C: In your explanation, quote from / refer to sources
5) Conclusion: Perhaps indicate why this still remains a mystery and what kinds of evidence we would need to know for sure. You could also say something about why there is an urgency to this unsolved mystery: the archaeological record is disintegrating.