Write a review paper on law sentencing assignment- difficults.

Write a review paper on law sentencing assignment- difficults.

instructions are labeled as: Final Exam.pdf and Final Exam W22.pdf

part one of assignment: SENTENCING DECISION
– max 1250 words
– choose one of the options given in the outline and write a sentencing decision that related back to the readings and resources provided
– also relate back to sentencing theory
– focus on the readings that are attached, draw evidence from those to support arguments
– option A: R V. Scarn
– option B: R v. Geller (2019)
– the powerpoint has additional details on the assignment

part two of the assignment: ESSAY ANSWER
– max 1000 words
– CREATE A STRONG THESIS
– sentencing theory notes are provided, if referencing the notes please use citation (puddister, 2022)
– Do OPTION B that is on the outline
– option B HAS TWO MINIMUM REQUIRED READINGS they are included in the materials given (Murphy and Grant, choi, parkes)
– answer to the essay question must have a thesis and conclusion
– please see powerpoint for further details
– the outline pdf has the essay question (OPTION B)

2 case links are attached. please feel free to review them throughout the assignment: there are also notes in one of the PDFs on the cases

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-104.ZS.html

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1632.ZS.html

What surprised you, or was of particular interest to you, and why?

In a 5-7 page written assessment, determine how health care technology, coordination of care, and community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined. In addition, plan to spend approximately 2 direct practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group you’ve chosen to work with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form. Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

Introduction
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you’ll be positioned to maximize the use of technology to achieve positive patient outcomes and improve organizational effectiveness. Providing holistic coordination of patient care across the entire health care continuum and leveraging community resource services can lead both to positive patient outcomes and to organizational improvements.

Preparation
In this assessment, you’ll determine how health care technology, coordination of care, and community resources can be applied to address the health problem you’ve defined. Plan to spend at least 2 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts.
To prepare for the assessment:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.
Conduct sufficient research of the scholarly and professional literature to inform your assessment and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.
Review the Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 3 [PDF], which provides guidance for conducting this portion of your practicum.

Complete this assessment in two parts.
Part 1
Determine how health care technology, the coordination of care, and the use of community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form. Use the Practicum Focus Sheet: Assessment 3 [PDF] provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions.
Part 2
Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.
Whom did you meet with?
What did you learn from them?
Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites you reviewed.
What did you learn from that review?
Share the process and experience of exploring the effect of the problem on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.
Did your plan to address the problem change, based upon your experiences?
What surprised you, or was of particular interest to you, and why?
Requirements
The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Analyze the impact of health care technology on the patient, family, or population problem.
Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the advantages and disadvantages of specific technologies, including research studies that present opposing views.
Determine whether the evidence is consistent with technology use you see in your nursing practice.
Identify potential barriers and costs associated with the use of specific technologies and how those technologies are applied within the context of this problem.
Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address the patient, family, or population problem.
Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the benefits of care coordination and the utilization of community resources, including research studies that present opposing views.
Determine whether the evidence is consistent with how you see care coordination and community resources used in your nursing practice.
Identify barriers to the use of care coordination and community resources in the context of this problem.
Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health care technology, care coordination, and community resources and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form.
Explain how these standards or policies will guide your actions in applying technology, care coordination, and community resources to address care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.
Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context of technology, care coordination, and community resources.
Explain how nursing ethics will inform your approach to addressing the problem through the use of applied technology, care coordination, and community resources.
Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
Additional Requirements
Format: Format your paper using APA style. APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:
A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
Appropriate section headings.
Length: Your paper should be approximately 5-7 pages in length, not including the reference page.
Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.
Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.
Analyze the impact of health care technology on a patient, family, or population problem.
Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.
Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies associated with health technology, care coordination, and community resources and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form.
Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.
Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community resources can be used to address a patient, family, or population problem.
Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Demonstrate your understanding of the case and its impact on LRE by paraphrasing what you have reviewed. For quoted and paraphrased information, be sure that you provide proper citations.

Like many topics in special education, LRE must be determined by a team with the guidance provided by IDEA. There is not always a clear cut answer. As such, the field’s knowledge and understanding of LRE continue to develop. One major avenue to clarification is through the court system and legal findings. Decisions by Circuit, appellate, even the Supreme Court have regularly shifted the special education world. All educators must stay up-to-date on what the courts are saying regarding students’ rights under IDEA.

Based on the information you have learned regarding Least Restrictive Environment, research and identify three court cases that have helped to shape the field’s understanding of LRE (there are far more than three). Each court case analysis should include the following information — identification of the case, background information regarding the parties involved, the findings of the court, and the effect of the field’s understanding of LRE as a result. As you are sharing this information, be sure to not just copy-paste the information or to turn in an assignment where the majority of your submission is directly quoted. Demonstrate your understanding of the case and its impact on LRE by paraphrasing what you have reviewed. For quoted and paraphrased information, be sure that you provide proper citations.

Please be mindful of grammar, spelling, and punctuation as you write. Be sure to use your own words to report what you find.

Research and Report Rubric

https://egcc.instructure.com/courses/27837/files/7106792?verifier=ZWKCu2ZuNxIpcrppNlleqkz257BBjKP5ueCxTcXs&wrap=1

Explain the corporate structure and provide a review of its business portfolio.

Managing the multi-business corporation to meet high performance expectations is problematic. Research a company in KSA that manages multiple businesses:
Questions:
Explain the corporate structure and provide a review of its business portfolio.
What advice would you provide on the use of portfolio matrices and which portfolio matrix would you recommend: the GE McKinsey, BCG, or Ashridge matrix? Why?
Apply your recommended portfolio matrix and provide a portfolio analysis.
How does diversification create value through the linkages between businesses?
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Be 6-7 pages in length, which does not include the title page or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the Turnitin Originality Check before submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check—Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

Look back to what you wrote (or think back to what you thought): how has your understanding of sound studies changed over the term?

For your week 1 post, you were invited to offer a starting definition of sound studies. Look back to what you wrote (or think back to what you thought): how has your understanding of sound studies changed over the term? How would you now explain “sound studies” to a curious roommate or family member?

sources:
Sonic Lessons of the Covid-19 Soundscape

ps: using direct quotes and cite page/paragraph numbers, thank you!

SA #2Discuss on Footnotes, end notes, and a bibliography are not required. Parenthetical citations will be used for direct quotes or paraphrasing.

Discuss on Footnotes, end notes, and a bibliography are not required. Parenthetical citations will be used for direct quotes or paraphrasing.
Be sure to provide references for ALL of your answers and be sure to answer all parts of each question, as many of them have multiple parts embedded.

Please list the reference and the page number where the answer was found at the end of each question. For example (reading 1_4_2, page 5). This is critical as the professor will deduct points if this is not done.

What are the independent variables (co-variates)?

The files are attatched below. you DO NOT have to do everything. Look at number 4 on the outline page in the ” project” file ( copied it down for you below.) As well as the MVR Sqft and SLR inventory tabs in the “group project” excel file. Those should the only two tabs you’re analyzing. Wording should be simple and not too complex

Methods: discuss your modelling approach
What are the independent variables (co-variates)?
What is the dependent variable?
Provide as much detail about the various models you have in your
study.
Did you need to transform any variables?
How well do the variables fit the model?
How well do the variables describe the model?