Explain how the annotated Bibliography – Identities on the Periphery.

Explain how the annotated Bibliography – Identities on the Periphery.Writing Project Four: Annotated Bibliography – Identities on the Periphery (20% of Overall Grade)
-Research document, not standard research paper (normally a preview to a larger research paper: for this project, you are just doing the bibliography)
-The way that you write, the way you discuss your research sources, and the way the paper is presented are different than a typical research paper (such as Writing Project Three)
Objective: To demonstrate knowledge of the effectiveness of varied research sources and their relevance to contemporary American society. Therefore, you will give your audience a glimpse into a life or an issue with which they may not be familiar, so you have to fully inform them on any necessary information to understand your subject. Give us your interpretation of the significance of the subject or issue of your paper. What is the importance of this marginalized/peripheral identity in America, 2022? The annotated bibliography is practice, allowing you to immerse yourself in research to prepare for a future annotated bibliography and major research project work, should you have to do so in Comp. II or future classes.
Annotated Bibliography: In the bibliography you will provide a short overview of your topic and your sources. You will provide 2 paragraphs in an intro. page, which overview your topic and some of the issues/perspectives upon it from your research sources. This annotated bibliography should be approximately 4 pages minimum (no more than 6 pages). Beyond the introductory page paragraphs, you will list your sources. There should be four sources (although you may include more if needed to reach four full pages). You will detail the Works Cited entry, a summary paragraph of the source, and a discussion paragraph (evaluative) of its significance to your research (imagining you had to use it for an eventual major research paper). The format for the bibliography is covered in The Norton Field Guide, and we will overview it in the coming weeks through lecture videos, process work, weekly activities, etc.
Schedule:
– 04/13: Submit Writing Project Four Inventory
– 04/29: Submit Writing Project Four Final Draft to Turnitin
– 05/07: Submit Writing Project Four Presentation Videos to Blackboard – 05/10: Submit Writing Project Four Revision Draft to Blackboard
Canter 1
Questions to Consider: -Who is your topic?
-What does your audience already know about your subject or your issue? What do they need to be informed about?
-The audience may not know much (start researching for sources which will define and explain this group, such as a quick video overview on a Google search).
-What are the best outlets of information? Consider what is going to persuade or inform your audience in our current society. Will a YouTube video be convincing, given your topic or does your paper require an authoritative tone of CNN, The Washington Post, etc.
-Match topic to type of sources which will give you relevant information.
-You have a lot of control over the topic and direction you take here.
-What is the best way to present my work? Your efforts should match your presentation, so carefully review (Annotated Bibliographies) in The Norton Field Guide and focus upon the example reviewed in class. Work must mirror example bibliography in every aspect of formatting!
-What is my Rhetorical Situation? Always, always, take detailed notes on the Purpose (Informative, Argumentative, Cause/Effect, Problem/Solution, etc.), Audience, Genre (Bibliography has very specific formatting requirements), Stance, and Media of your project. You will target all of these areas from the beginning to end of the project.
What Sources Not to Use:
-Wikipedia or any online dictionaries/encyclopedia, etc. (although you can often find great sources
from a Wikipedia reference page)
-Any source including many advertisements, actively seeking revenue, and/or approaching the
topic from a gossip perspective
-Any review or summary of the topic. Each source should be presenting a distinct perspective or stance
-Any generic source (heavy advertising, poor design, lack of thorough information, obscure publication, etc.)
Canter 2
What I Expect:
-Formality: This is a formal, calculated assignment. I expect you to spend time reviewing MLA and Annotated Bibliography conventions, and you will be graded heavily on the polish of your presentation.
-Introduction: Your approach to the paper should be fully thought out by this point. You have to show your audience that you have fully looked at a variety of perspectives on your topic. The intro page is limited to the first full page of the bibliography, two paragraphs (review example and video lecture)
-Source Mastery: Works Cited entry. Then tell me in two paragraphs, what the summary of the source is, and what the source has to offer to your finished project in an evaluative paragraph (with brief quote, properly cited).
-1,500 word minimum.
-General MLA conventions in all aspects.
-One quote in your discussion of each source in proper format.
– Work must mirror example bibliography in every aspect of formatting!

Describe what is Environment 360.

Describe what is Environment 360.We are all
used to throwing away items that we no longer need, want, or are broken.
Many of us may be familiar with Recycling (a topic for a later chapter
-18), such as Paper, Plastic, Aluminum Cans, even Electronics. But
have you ever thought about the Textiles / Clothing / Shoes that you may
discard? Here’s an article from a website titled “Environment 360”
(published by the School of Forestry and Environmental Science, Yale
University – yes that Yale) that discussed this issue.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/pressure_mounts_reform_throw-away_clothing_culture_hm_recycling

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10442745/Britain-responsibility-Chiles-vast-fast-fashion-mountains.html

Discuss and demonstrate knowledge of writing as a process, including consideration of peer and instructor feedback, from initial draft to final revision.

Writing Project 2 – Research Proposal
Length Requirement: 3 Pages (500 words)
Dates
Feb 21 – Feb 25
First Draft due for Writing Center Feedback. This should include your research question (highlighted in bold) and 200 words of your actual proposal.

At some point during this week you will work with a Writing Center tutor to receive feedback on your progress. This can be done synchronously or asynchronously. Be mindful that asynchronous feedback may take up to 48 hours to be returned to you. You have this entire week to schedule and participate in a Writing Center appointment. You will also be required to submit this draft to BB at the BEGINNING of this week, by 11:59pm on Monday Feb 21.
March 2
Complete Final Draft (this should be the most refined and polished version of your WP); submit via BB by 11:59 pm
Student Learning Outcomes
1. Conduct academic research drawing from multiple sources in multiple media.
2. Read texts in a variety of disciplines and genres, using critical reading strategies.
5. Discuss and demonstrate knowledge of writing as a process, including consideration of peer and instructor feedback, from initial draft to final revision.
6. Demonstrate sentence-level correctness.
Purpose
At this point you have read and annotated a variety of sources on a specific topic related to social inequalities and you have begun to analyze the role that media construction and consumption play with regards to social structures. You are now prepared to propose a research project of your own. Through this WP you will join the conversation surrounding one specific instance of social inequality and how it overlaps with popular media depictions/ constructions/ consumption. The primary role of this proposal is to ask a critical question regarding your chosen topic and to imagine a framework that will help you answer the question with a critical claim. Although it is assumed that your project will continue to evolve as you read and write more about your topic, this proposal will require you to commit to an area of research and it will help your instructor work with you to negotiate a plan for the rest of the semester. In order to successfully complete all future Writing Projects, you MUST include a research question in this proposal. Failure to include a research question in WP 2 will result in an incomplete grade for the assignment.
For this assignment, you will write a three-paragraph proposal for your academic research and include a list of sources that you may use. At this point, your topic of inquiry may be somewhat broad, but at minimum you will identify an issue relating to societal inequality/disparity that you find dire or interesting, and one that you feel comfortable using as a topic for extended research. You will also be required to make a preliminary mention of the way(s) in which you have observed ONE type of popular media play a role in this social issue. You may choose to explore topics that have come up in class, or you may wish to research a related topic that holds more personal relevance to you, the option is yours. Consider the material that we have read so far, and think about how you can use them to foster your own thinking in a research project of your own.
Use the following template to organize your proposal (about 2 double-spaced pages):
Paragraph 1: This paragraph should introduce your topic and your specific research question. Start by briefly introducing what you know about both your selection of social inequality AND the aspect of popular media that you will be researching. How/why have you drawn a connection between the two? What are some historical connections between the two? What other context do we need to know in order to understand your research question? Once you have done this, pose your research question. This question will serve as a guide not only for this proposal, but also for your ongoing 161 research. While formulating this question, think about what you want to learn more about. This is, after all, an inquiry-driven course. You should not pose a question to which you already have an answer to. You should also explain why you find the question to be interesting or useful for ongoing research purposes. You MUST highlight your research question by making the font bold.
Paragraph 2: Explain how your question fits into an existing academic or public conversation. Who is writing about this issue now and what are they saying? Discuss the major points of consensus and disagreement. What are the stakes for this research: how might it affect individuals, communities, public policy, or other interests? This paragraph should also explain how you imagine an audience for your project – who would have a stake in this type of research?
Paragraph 3: Briefly report on the research you have already conducted and your strategy for future research. Which sources that you have already identified will be most important for your project? What additional kinds of research will you need to answer the question that you have posed? Where will you look for resources? Name a few authors that you think offer some relevant perspectives.

Final Page:
The final page of this WP should include a list of at least five NEW sources that might be useful for your project. These should be a combination of popular and scholarly sources (at least one of each) and they should be cited in MLA style and arranged like a Works Cited page.

NOTE: this list of sources is different from the annotated bibliography of WP1, it is not necessary to annotate the sources for this assignment.
Formatting
Your entire Writing Project 2 should use standard MLA format: typed, double-spaced, one-inch margins, 12-point Times font, etc.

Evaluation
A successful Research Proposal will:
introduce your topic and the connection between one popular media and one issue of social inequality that you will research
propose a specific research question in interrogative styling (paragraph 1)
explain the academic and/or public context for your project (paragraph 2)
report on your research and outline future research plans (paragraph 3)
be clear, concise, well-organized, free of grammatical errors, and avoid plagiarism
include a MLA-style list of at least five new sources

Describe the Potential triggers or risk factors

You are required to provide a post in response to the provided prompt for this discussion forum. Your initial post to the discussion forum must be 200-300 words in length and demonstrate course-related knowledge with a scholarly reference in APA format at the bottom of the discussion response. In addition to your initial posting, you are required to reply to 2 other classmates’ responses. Each reply must be 150-200 words in length and be substantive in content, adding to the discussion another student began in his/her original post. Be sure to post your initial response and responses to other students by the due dates.
Prompt:
Which of the following disorders would you rather treat—factitious disorder, conversion and somatic symptom disorder, illness anxiety disorder, psychophysiological disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa or binge-eating disorder? In your discussion, be sure to include:
General features of the disorder
Symptoms in the DSM-5 that might be problematic for the disorder of your choice
Causes
Interaction of faith with the disorder
Describe the Potential triggers or risk factors
Biological, cognitive, and physical factors
Specific Assessment/s for the disorder
Theories and treatment/s (including drug therapy) for the disorder
Textbooks:
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (5th
ed). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association. ISBN: 978-0890425558
Comer, R., & Comer, J. (2018). Abnormal Psychology (10th ed). New York, NY: MacMillan.
ISBN: 978-1319066949
Oltmans, T., Martin, M., Neale, J., Davison, G. (2015). Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology.
Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118836293

Discuss how each thinker thought that the challenges of the new rapid changes could be met.

Papers must be:
submitted in doc or doc x format. DO NOT SUBMIT IN PAGES OR PDF FORMAT. I WILL TAKE FIVE POINTS OFF YOUR GRADE IF YOU DO NOT SUBMIT (1) TO THE SITE AND (2) IN DOC OR DOCX FORMAT!!!
proofread carefully. Read your paper aloud to hear grammatical errors and sentence fragments.
written in such a way that clear paragraphs contribute to the overall flow of the argument that you want to make.
written in a way such that they show evidence that you read the text and not just my lecture notes
4 pages in length
double-spaced
formatted with margins of one inch on each side
without a cover page (Put your name on the first page)
written in 12 point font
Good answers will be proofread both for spelling and for grammar. (Poorly-written papers will receive low grades.)
Good answers will clearly state what each theory/argument entails
I prefer that you not use outside sources, but, if you do, cite them parenthetically or in footnotes.
After the Civil War ended, the United States went through a great number of radical changes very quickly. The country changed both in terms of its people and its economy.
The c0untry changed demographically: freed slaves and a large wave of immigrants from Europe joined the American political community. In addition, the country’s economy went through an industrial revolution and made an abrupt transition from being primarily agricultural to being primarily industrial.
Your assignment for this essay is to pick three thinkers from the list below and discuss how each thinker thought that the challenges of the new rapid changes could be met. Focus on one or two arguments made by each thinker and support your interpretation with well-chosen quotes from the text. Do not provide unnecessary background biographical information in this short essay.
Jane Addams
Booker T. Washington
W.E.B. Du Bois
William Graham Sumner
Andrew Carnegie
William Jennings Bryan
Emma Goldman
Eugene Debs
Herbert Croly

In what way does identifying it when it is not present harm patients?

The purpose of the Reflective Journal entries is for you to reflect on the reading and study material and assignments in the assigned modules to determine if you are experiencing difficulty with any of the content or have learned something that has made a significant impact in your learning experience. Each Reflective Journal Entry must be at least 200 words to ensure adequate depth of reflection.
In the Oltmanns et al. text, what experiences from Meredith’s childhood were important in leading to her somatic symptom disorder? In what way does not identifying somatic symptom disorder when it is present harm patients? In what way does identifying it when it is not present harm patients? How do patients with somatic symptom disorder cause special difficulty for primary-care physicians? What makes them especially hard to treat?

Textbooks:
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (5th
ed). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association. ISBN: 978-0890425558
Comer, R., & Comer, J. (2018). Abnormal Psychology (10th ed). New York, NY: MacMillan.
ISBN: 978-1319066949
Oltmans, T., Martin, M., Neale, J., Davison, G. (2015). Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology.
Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118836293

explore current events that are impacting your community country and world.

Now that you have learned a variety of critical thinking tools used to evalute sources its time to put theory into practice, information is presented daily in the media and it takes practice and diligence to evaluate information for relevance and credibility now you will be putting these
skills to work as we explore current events that are impacting your community country and world.
find a recent news article related to sexual orientation and inequality on the internet, newspaper, or news magazine

analyze your findings using the outline attached

Which of the following disorders would you rather treat—factitious disorder, conversion and somatic symptom disorder, illness anxiety disorder, psychophysiological disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa or binge-eating disorder?

Which of the following disorders would you rather treat—factitious disorder, conversion and somatic symptom disorder, illness anxiety disorder, psychophysiological disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa or binge-eating disorder? In your discussion, be sure to include:
General features of the disorder
Symptoms in the DSM-5 that might be problematic for the disorder of your choice
Causes
Interaction of faith with the disorder
Potential triggers or risk factors
Biological, cognitive, and physical factors
Specific Assessment/s for the disorder
Theories and treatment/s (including drug therapy) for the disorder
Textbooks:
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (5th
ed). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association. ISBN: 978-0890425558
Comer, R., & Comer, J. (2018). Abnormal Psychology (10th ed). New York, NY: MacMillan.
ISBN: 978-1319066949
Oltmans, T., Martin, M., Neale, J., Davison, G. (2015). Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology.
Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118836293