Best Writer

Dr. Steven Weine said, “terrorism is a global problem, but it is also a local one. Individual terrorists, particularly lone wolves, are often linked to their communities in terms of their resentments, ambitions, and targets. Not surprisingly, making local communities comfortable with law enforcement is a vital part of counterterrorism. Programs to encourage this, however, are often underdeveloped and under-researched” and this can be true for sure.
In this course, we talked extensively about community policing and problem-oriented policing, the role of patrol in its application, and proactive versus reactive policing. Would you agree or disagree with Dr. Weine? Can the various programs we discussed help prevent terrorism and counter violent extremism and radicalization that lead to terrorism in our communities?
A quality answer will be at least 3 pages in length. A cover page and references are required. Be sure to cite all references in APA.

Please read the comments provided in the paper; it is in red. The comments in red is what needs to be worked on in this paper when rewriting.

Please carefully read through the instructions provided. Be sure to follow intructions clearly. The only sources that be used is from the article provided only. Write clealy and in great detail.

6-10 pages about social history focusing on the life a grand parent. Grama born in 1950 in Waterbury Conn/ Had kids at 20 worked in at Mary’s hospital history of what life was like at the time

Description: This assignment is worth 25% of total grade. Students will incorporate learning of sociological theory and concepts to understand social issues in our society. Students will select a topic of social, economic, and political issue relevant to covid-19 impact on Canadian society and analyze the issue critically by applying sociological concepts and theory.

Make a 2 page-written report based on two topics only; chose 1 only from either the industrial revolution or the French Revolution. No more Robespierre papers so pick someone else or pick inventors and their inventions and how it revolutionized that particular industry, for example, cotton, coal or steam or any other invention during the Industrial Revolution.

Refine the draft document that you submitted last week. Your job is to implement the changes and revisions suggested by your Professor. You are to further flesh out this document by adding the following components:
The name of your firm ( DJL Consulting LLC)
An appropriate listing of who ordered this document as a work for hire
Removal of any and all colloquialisms or hyperbolic language. Also, remove all business jargon and terms that mean nothing such as “state of the art”. While these terms sound good, they mean very little and should not be included in professional documents.
*Note: Avoid first person verbiage and write in third person, no direct quotes, and do not give possession to in-text citations or inanimate objects

DELIVERABLE: Write a brief statement (3-4 pages or multimodal equivalent) on what you believe constitutes a good argument.

REVIEW the following required and optional readings for aid and support for this assignment:
Crowley and Hawhee’s chapters on “kairos,” “stasis,” and “topics/enthemymes”
Krista Ratcliffe’s Rhetorical listening
CONSIDER how Sharon Crowley describes belief in Toward a Civil Discourse:
“… beliefs and belief systems are social, taken as true or relevant on the basis of trust and confidence in an other, be that other an individual, a group, an institution or a tradition. Given the social character of belief, it seems accurate to say that many beliefs are commonplaces. In ancient rhetorics the defining characteristic of a commonplace was not its truth value but the frequency of its use; that is, the chief mark of a commonplace is its wide dispersal among members of a community” (70).
CONSIDER that our goal here is to not just state your beliefs but to consider them in increasingly complex ways. One approach to this task is to answer questions like those I’ve listed below. When you attempt to answer them, don’t think about writing your statement. Think about answering the questions precisely and directly. Then, once you’ve answered these questions, begin to arrange them in a way that helps others understand your perspective and why it matters.
What is a good argument?
What are your beliefs about what constitutes a good argument?
How did you acquire these beliefs on good argument?
What is possible with a good argument?
What is the purpsoe of a good argument?
What enabled by a good argument?
What are the limits of your beliefs on what consitutes a good argument?
These are questions to consider and their answers should be drafted. You should take time to refine your answers over the course of this stage in our class. Don’t lose sight of the fact that your purpose is to offer knoweldge about good argument.
The forum of your statement is up to you. You are welcome to compose a multimodal essay that includes images, sound, or movement. Your goal is not just to reveal something about yourself to others but to make a case about good argument and its function.
REQUIREMENTS:
These are the things that you should do as you compose your State of Belief
You should reference and cite Crowley & Hawhee and Ratcliffe when and where necessary.
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ AND USE THESE TEXTS they are attached in assignment
You should draft and revise for readability, concision, precise language use, and creativity.
You should include works cited or reference page (MLA or APA style, respectively) for those works you cite in your statement.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION:
Your work will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Excellent/Strong: Your work reveals strong, audience-aware writing skills and a deep understanding of rhetorical principles; exceptional content knowledge, research, and preparedness; the need for only a very few, minor editorial adjustments.
Good: Your work reveals acceptable, moderately audience-aware writing skills and a basic understanding of rhetorical principles; good content knowledge, research, and preparedness; the need for several minor editorial adjustments.
Not Adequate: Your work revelas less than adequate audience awareness, writing skills, and/or difficulities understanding and applying rhetorical pricinples; occasional evidence of inadequate or inconsistent content knoweldge, research, preparedness; emajor editorial problems.
Poor: Your work reveals significant problems in terms of audience awareness, writing ability, and/or major misunderstandings of rhetorical principles; frequent evidence of inadequate or inconsistent content knoweldge, research, preparedness; profound editorial problems throughout.

All the links in order within the image:

1. https://adcybulski.com/posts/2021/03/2021-03-15-hacker-reading-lists-hacktivism/

2. https://adcybulski.com/posts/2021/03/2021-03-15-hacker-reading-lists-hackers-and-IP/

3. https://adcybulski.com/posts/2021/03/2021-03-11-hacker-reading-lists-labour/

4. https://adcybulski.com/posts/2020/03/Hacker-Reading-List-Intro/

5. https://adcybulski.com/posts/2012/08/2020-03-11-hacker-reading-lists-history/

Your biographical assessment should include specific facts of the artist’s life (birth, education, training, etc.) as well as any personal and cultural concerns that may have impacted on the artist and his work. Cast your net wide in this regard, considering the time period during which the artist worked, associations with other artists that may have influenced your artist’s oeuvre, other works of art that your artist created that reflected (or influenced) your specific work of art. In your reading there has been reference to the psychoanalytic approach to analyzing works of art; i.e., critiquing a work of art on the basis of what is known about an artist’s personality and background. You might want to consider whether aspects of the life and character of your artist can be reflected in your artist’s work, keeping in mind, though, that the psychoanalytic approach has its limitations.
Biography on Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres and his work, The Turkish Bath. Focus on orientalism and this artwork.

Question can be approached by appealing to neuroscience, comparative
psychology, evolutionary theory, religion,
university education, popular culture, psychedelics, technology,
art, literature, music or cinema, to name a few.
MUST focus on one or several of the topics in the course
that are related to minds, including: consciousness,
artificial intelligence, programming, evolution, illusions,
the problem of change, identity, loops, self-reference, abstraction, the unknown, observation, theory, science
vs. religion, art, what does it mean to be human,
the hypothetical nature of reality, or the conjectural nature
of knowledge
questions to think about:
what shapes your understanding about psychology in general and
minds in particular