project 1: news event

Case Scenario:
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic required Americans to shelter in place thus causing the U.S. economy to freeze-up, resulting in millions of lost jobs. The U.S. Congress passed legislation to try and limit the economic damage. Included in the legislation was a stimulus package that would give $1,200 to single tax filers making $75,000 or less and $2,400 to married couples making $150,000 or less. The purpose of the payment was to give people emergency funds and to stimulate the economy. Also included was the CARES Act that provided the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The PPP was a program administered by the Small Business Administration that was targeted at small businesses. It provided for a government loan that was forgivable if used to pay employees’ salaries and benefits, mortgages, rent, and utilities. According to the SBA website, “[t]he Paycheck Protection Program is a loan designed to provide a direct incentive for small businesses to keep their workers on the payroll.”
USAA is a member-owned organization that provided insurance and financial services exclusively to current and former members of the military as well as their family members. USAA has an excellent reputation as a well-run organization and for giving its members good service. Many USAA members maintain checking accounts with it. Some of those members who have checking accounts had overdrawn their balances and had a negative balance in their accounts. When the $1,200 or $2,400 stimulus check was deposited, USAA used those amounts to offset the negative balances in some of its members’ accounts. Members were not informed in advance that this would be the case. This resulted in some USAA members not having any access to the stimulus money. The action USAA took in crediting the funds to existing account deficits was perfectly legal.
Shake Shack is a corporation that owns and licenses restaurants selling traditional American fare like hamburgers and milk shakes. It currently operates 124 locations in the U.S. and overseas. As of May 4, 2020, the company had a market capitalization of $2.06 billion. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. In 2019, Shake Shack’s CEO received $2.3 million in compensation. Shake Shack applied for and received a loan of $10 million under PPP. The loan was permissible under a provision in PPP that allows restaurant chains to apply when each location has fewer than 500 employees. Shortly after Shake Shack received the loan, the PPP ran out of funds and many small businesses did not receive loans.
Small Business Administration. (2020) Retrieved from
How to Set Up the Paper
Create a Word or Rich Text Format (RTF) document that is double-spaced, 12-point font. The final product will be between 5-8 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page. Write clearly and concisely.
Create a title page with a title, the course number and section, the instructor’s name and your name.
Instructions:
Course Material
For this project, you are required to use only the case scenario facts and the course material. What actually happened is not to be considered. External sources are not permitted. You are not researching on the Internet or using resources from outside the course. You are expected to answer the requirements identified below showing the connection between the case scenario facts and the course material. Using course material goes beyond defining terms and are used to explain the ‘why and how’ of a situation. Avoid merely making statements but close the loop of the discussion by explaining how something happens or why something happens, which focuses on importance and impact. In closing the loop, you will demonstrate the ability to think clearly and rationally showing an understanding of the logical connections between the ideas presented in a case scenario, the course material and the question(s) being asked. Using one or two in-text citations from the course material throughout the entire paper will not earn many points on an assignment. The use of a variety of course material is expected consistently supporting what is presented. The support must be relevant and applicable to the topic being discussed. Points are not earned for mentioning a term or concept but by clearly and thoroughly explaining or discussing the question at hand.

Project Requirements

Introduction

Write an Introduction paragraph. The Introduction paragraph is the first paragraph of the paper and will be used to describe to the reader the intent of the paper explaining the main points covered in the paper. This intent should be understood prior to reading the remainder of the paper so the reader knows exactly what is being covered in the paper.
Consider writing the introduction last to ensure that all of the main points are covered.
Ethical Issue(s)

Identify and discuss the ethical issue(s) related to USAA and Shake Shack.
Stakeholders Implications

Identify the stakeholders involved in the actions of both companies.
Discuss the potential implications of the company’s actions on each stakeholder or stakeholder group. Give examples.
Utilitarianism Viewpoint

Explain how a utilitarian would view USAA and Shake Shack’s actions.
Rights and Duties Viewpoint

Explain how the actions of both USAA and Shake Shack would be viewed under the theory of Rights and Duties.
Fairness and Justice Viewpoint

Explain how the actions of both USAA and Shake Shack would be viewed under the theory of Fairness and Justice
Recommended Actions

Regardless of what these companies actually did, recommend the actions that you think they ethically should take going forward. This is not about what they should have done in the past, but rather speak to actions they should take now having done what they did. There is no right or wrong action, but rather it is about supporting the actions you choose from your ethical arguments.
Conclusion

Write a concluding paragraph that is brief and summarizes the main points. Provide specific information related to the major topics discussed in the paper.

Review of literature on volleyball shoulder spike

Mini-Review of Literature Guidelines

You will select the most relevant articles that provide data and/or insight on a particular question or
theme related to your area of interest in the field of Kinesiology. These should be the references that
you have been gathering as you have completed the weekly assignments (i.e., a minimum of 15-20
sources). You will combine the separate pieces of information from each research article into a coherent
whole (i.e., synthesize, evaluate, and interpret the information) to develop your mini-review of
literature. This paper is meant to help you gain an understanding of what is know about the topic of
interest, identify gaps in knowledge, and build rationale for and develop a research question. This paper
will include a brief introduction, a review of relevant literature and a brief conclusion. A descriiption of
how your paper should be completed follows.

Introduction – Statement of the Problem
1. This includes your “research” question and importance of the question. Why might the reader
want to know about the topic you have chosen?

B. Review of Relevant Literature
1. This section will comprise the majority of your paper.
2. Synthesize the current evidence on the topic. This means combing results from different
studies. Assessing the similarity and differences between the findings of these papers.
Interpreting the findings you are presenting. What do these findings mean in terms of
movement safety, skill, or specificity?
3. Review and assess the current evidence (expert opinion, research, and conceptual or
theoretical) relevant to your question.
4. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence.
a. For example, there is ample evidence regarding men, however, evidence regarding women is lacking?

C. Conclusion – Expected Findings
1. What is the “take home” message based on your research? What are the main points you are
walking away with after doing all this research and reading?
2. Based on what biomechanists (and you) already know about this topic what do you think the
next question is? What are we missing on this topic
3. Why will this information be valuable?
4. This section will likely be 2-3 paragraphs

Pride and prejudice by Jane Austen

– Research paper will have a body of four to six pages
– paper must have an outline
– paper must have a Work Cited page
– 4 to 6 cited sources
– MLA 8th edition format and documentation
– use direct quotations sparingly (no more than 25% of the paper)
– be sure topic is sufficiently limited
– write paper on a literary topic related to Pride and prejudice in some way
-you may choose to address standard fiction elements such as theme, characterization, symbolism, allegory, irony, realism, or settings.

The Death of Ivan Ilych is

Week 4 Discussion

Background

In working with literature, one of the most important activities is arguing for a theme for the literary work. The most common error that people make in choosing a theme is confusing a topic and a theme, so please be sure to review the lecture on theme to get an overview on the difference between these.

Discussion Question

For this discussion board, indicate what you feel the the theme of The Death of Ivan Ilych is. Bring in evidence from the story to support this. There is no one “right” theme. A literary work can have many themes, but the theme must fit in with the details of the literary work. Don’t base the theme on a small portion of the work, then, and ignore how other aspects of the work don’t fit it.

Don’t do secondary research for this. I’m looking to see your own interpretation.

Social Disorganization Theory

r‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ewrite of order # 82651893 10 pgs + 1 reference pg = 11 pas. APA 7th formate double spaced Times Roman 12 pt font. Must incorporate the feedback into the current paper. Paper needs to give credit to Park and Burgess with the theory of concentric zones. There needs to be more citations provided in text and associated with the correct statements. Need to mention Sampson and Groves (1989) which is a fundamental work for social disorganization with the introduction of collective efficacy. Need to remove the information about Arkansas rates at a county level. The unit of analyses for social disorganization is neighborhoods and not counties. Use another example with neighborhoods preferably in Texas. The feed back states that there is a disjuncture between the response provided and how the theory should be applied. The current paper reflects important points but with some glar‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ing omissions. Paper mentioned several studies but did not tell the reader what those studies were. Paper mentions criticisms of the theory but provided no sources. Paper mentions other studies but provides no references. Almost all references in the paper come from the same source. Needs more support from contemporary studies peer related. The feedback states that the current paper relies on quotations to the point of losing structural integrity of the writing. Paper needs more references through tracing the history of the theory. Feed back states poor writing, grammatical errors throughout the current paper and graduate level of sophistication. Needs to be Master level quality. Reliance on quotations points to a lack of understanding and the writers voice does not come through at all. Please have the writer contact me if they have any questions about these instructions‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

The eventisation of festivals

Festivals increasingly want to create a world of experience. Aspects like Community of shared experience, identification, self-experience and self-staging, emotional dimension, mix of offers, personalised experiences become more and more relevant.A new world is created as an escape from everyday life.The assignment should also include Customer Relationship Management.I would be grateful if those aspects could be analysed using a festival as an example.

Interviews as a Data Collection Tool

One of the main methods for data gathering when doing a qualitative study is through interviews. When writing a research proposal for a study that requires interviews, the researcher will write up an interview protocol that includes how the researcher will interact with the participant during the interview. The main part of the protocol involves what the interview questions are and whether the interview will be open-ended, structured, or semi-structured. So, for this discussion you will be critiquing interview protocols and developing some interview questions of your own.Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum,Read Writing Interview Protocols and Conducting Interviews: Tips for Students New to the Field of Qualitative Research (Links to an external site.).Find two studies in the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Links to an external site.) database that are related to your research topic for this course and that include an interview protocol as one of the Appendixes in the dissertation.Download and save your two articles as PDF files.In your initial discussion forum post,Attach the two dissertations or ADPs you found to your discussion post.You may need to reply to your initial post with the second attached article.Critique the interview protocols that you found. In your critique, write about the following in regard to the interview protocols:Discuss at least three aspects that surprised you, but you found beneficial, in the interview protocols.Explain what two or three aspects from the interview protocols that you would improve upon (and how) or justify why do they do not need improvement.Construct two interview questions that are appropriate for your selected research topic.Be sure to support your response using information from your readings.