Best Writer

Write a reaction paper to the below YouTube lectures about neuropsychology on BPD and its treatment and implications.

No references needes. No need to do APA style.

https://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/dont-bring-extinct-creatures-back-life
Please use the above website/page for this critical summary. There is more info on this page in links you can use too. Make sure you also include a Works Cited page too please. If you have question feel free to send me a message.

Please follow the instructions carefully and add extra points and/or information. This instructor is very particular about following directions.
Once you have selected a debater’s argument to summarize and analyze, you should review Barnet, et al, pages 67-76, for instructions on how to write a critical summary. You will find an explanation–and a very helpful visual guide (69)–of critical summary steps on pages 67-70, and a fuller example on page 75.

And, new this time around (Critical Summary #2), I’d like to see more analysis of the argument and its parts. You can find lots of helpful instruction on argument analysis in Chapter 5 of your Barnet textbook (177-198). And, please take a careful look at this old sample of a Critical Summary and Analysis essay.

As mentioned in the textbook, your critical summary should include a concise summary of the article’s argument. This should involve introducing, explaining, and exemplifying the argument.

Your explaining and exemplifying should briefly give the argument’s major claim (thesis), minor supporting claims (reasons), notable pieces of evidence, and other relevant elements of the argument.

The critical summary should also analyze, respond, and evaluate the argument. In other words, it should problematize and extend the argument, including some of the following:

Write an evaluation of how key terms and language are used (definitions stipulated? ambiguous?),
identification and evaluation of appeals used (ethos, pathos, logos),
identification and evaluation of unstated assumptions,
identification and evaluation of important evidence or omitted evidence,
identification and evaluation of potential fallacies.
These may also be partially treated in the explaining and exemplifying steps of the critical summary.

Writing Guidelines
You need to write a thesis statement for your critical summary. Your thesis should state, in one sentence, whether or not (or to what extent) the author’s argument is convincing or effective, and why or why not. Your thesis should sum up your review and analysis, your critical summary of the argument.
Your critical summary should support your thesis statement. Your critical summary and analysis should be unified and organic (according to Merriam-Webster, “having systematic coordination of parts” ).
Your critical summary should be concise, between 350 and 450 words. Get right to the point; leave out unnecessary or unimportant material.
Please list an MLA Works Cited entry for your article at the end of the critical summary. This is not included in the word count.
Use MLA format, 12 point Times New Roman font, double spacing throughout, etc. These formatting guidelines apply for all essays and critical summaries in this course.

Write an Apical Dominance Experiment Report.

I need a lab report for an experiment on the apical dominance of the plant Phaseolus vulgaris L. i need to demonstrate understanding of the apical dominance mechanism and the role of the plant hormone Auxin amoungst other hormones,

Wordcount is 2500 equivalent, this is including the 2 statistical graphs and doesn’t include titles and references.

The 2 graphs produced by either Rstudio or Minitab need to be statistically analysed and discussed. I have attached a sample paper that will give you a solid guideline for the paper, need it similar but worded differently with different references to avoid plagiarism. The data can also be found at the bottom of the sample paper.

Writing your work as a scientific paper: example of headings
• Title: A brief and suitable title
• Abstract: very brief, where you outline the purpose of the experiment carried out, brief summary of what the experiment entailed and the key finding(s) of the work. Abstracts do NOT contain references
• Introduction: Provide a good context of hormones, such as auxin cytokinin and strigolactones and how they influence bud growth along with growth promoting factors.
• Equipment, materials and method: write a summary of the method, using past and passive.
• Results: explain did you observe with different treatments, use graphs with error bars, ANOVA tables etc.
• Discussion and conclusion: Discuss your results with reference to previous findings (please refer to the sample paper). A good discussion must contain references.
• References (in the Harvard format).
• Supplemental information (if needed): Additional figures, ANOVA results etc.
.

need between 10-20 references

Sue has been referred to you since you have expertise working with troubled adolescents. She is 15 years old. She is rumored to be engaging in oral sex with multiple boys in the school and she is developing a negative reputation among her classmates. She comes from a middle-class family. Her parents recently divorced. She is a smart student, but her academic performance has declined over the past year. She feels that she does not fit in with the other girls and her weight gain over the past year has affected her self-esteem. She has come to see you because she recognizes she has a problem and wants you to help her.

Develop a six-week health counseling intervention plan to help Sue (7-10 pages). Your plan should include the following:

1) How you will assess the problem/s.
a) Briefly identify behaviors that might compromise and promote Sue’s health or safety.
b) Identify the key components of one behavior change model and explain how you will use this model to assess Sue’s problem/s.

2) How you will motivate Sue to change her behavior/s.
a) Give an overview of “motivational interviewing” and describe how you will implement this counseling approach with Sue.
b) Describe how you will determine priorities, set goals, collect data, infer needs from data obtained, and measure behavior change.
c) Describe how you will assess the impact of your intervention on her behavior.

3) Describe counseling strategies that you will use to help her.
a) Briefly describe five counseling skills that you feel will be most useful in helping Sue develop insight into her problem/s.

4) Discuss how you will collaborate with other professionals to assist Sue.

Write a paper about the “Communicator”- and helps us to understand how and why we are persuaded by influential others.

To explore this content you will be watching a short YouTube presentation by Dr. Mark Edwards- a central figure in the public advocacy and awareness efforts regarding the Flint Water Crisis.

Based on your understanding of the readings analyze the ‘communicators” involved in the Flint Water crisis case and evaluate 1 or more using contents from the chapter.

This week we are covering Chapter 8- which is all about the “Communicator”- and helps us to understand how and why we are persuaded by influential others.

To explore this content you will be watching a short YouTube presentation by Dr. Mark Edwards- a central figure in the public advocacy and awareness efforts regarding the Flint Water Crisis.

Write an essay based on your understanding of the readings analyze the ‘communicators” involved in the Flint Water crisis case and evaluate 1 or more using contents from the chapter.

What are the finding of The Impact of COVID-19 on economies and low-income countries

Write a Literature Review and Matrix (goes along with Picot and Practice Question Assignment)

The literature review is part of the final EBP project proposal.
The literature review summary must not exceed three double spaced pages. The literature matrix is not counted in this page length requirement.
The purpose of the literature review is to analyze the literature to identify the best evidence/s to make a practice change.
Follow the grading rubric and the literature review matrix for this assignment. Combine your revised practice concern/PICOT question with the literature review and matrix.

In this unit, we are almost to the end of the course, and you have learned quite a bit about research in criminal justice. In this presentation, which will serve as a summative assessment of your knowledge to date, you will assume the role of a new criminal justice researcher for a city, state, or federal agency (your choice).
Since research is not always welcomed by criminal justice agencies for a variety of reasons, you have been tasked with preparing a PowerPoint presentation to explain and validate your researcher role. In your explanation, you will not only want to identify yourself and your position, but you will also want to focus on the benefits of research, the types of research, and how evaluation research can benefit your agency.
Consequently, you will want to include the sections below in your presentation.
Include an introduction.
List your name.
Include your title.
Identify the agency in which you work, and provide a short explanation of its goals and history.
Include background information about criminal justice research.
What is research?
Why is it important to the field of criminal justice?
Detail research methodologies.
Include quantitative information.
Explanation
Steps
Provide qualitative information.
Explanation
Steps
Include mixed-methods information.
Explanation
Steps
Provide a comparison of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research.
Include evaluation research.
Explain how this type of research could specifically benefit your agency.

(Form to fill out is attached)
In the first step, research and define each legal term placing the definition and the legal authority (primary sources or secondary sources supported by a primary source) in the first column. A legal authority must support the legal term as a primary source citation. The legal authority must demonstrate how the precedent definition is applied (constitutional provisions, legislative statutes, state laws, ordinances, or legal cases). Limit secondary source citations (encyclopedias, textbooks, attorney legal publications, and law school references) to identify the source leading to the primary source. When a secondary source quotes a definition, search for the primary source (i.e., the case; statute) within the secondary source’s material. Define each term, study the term’s application to the case studies, and critical “issues” that determine a case’s outcome.
Once you have identified and defined a legal term, identify a case that applied the precedent term’s Rule of Law decision. Analyze the case and briefly outline the facts and issues related to the case’s Rule of Law. Insert the case information into column two on the chart.
The third column tracks the element requirements of the Rule of Law. Elements are the crucial parts of evidence that must be established in a court to prove a legal claim. Before deciding that a precedent applies to a case, the court must compare the facts, issues, and the precedent’s elements to determine whether the facts align with the Rule of Law. In a lawsuit, the parties argue the following elements:
The defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty.
The defendant breached that duty.
Plaintiff suffered an injury.
Evidence that the defendant’s breach caused the injury.
When the facts and issues align with the elements, the legal precedent will determine the outcome. If there is no alignment with the Rule of Law elements, the parties will litigate the case to determine the outcome on other legal principles.

Submission Instructions
Upload the following document:

Applying Legal Concepts Analysis Form

Include a title page with the following information: assignment number, assignment name, your name, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, BUSW 390 Business Law, instructor’s name, and date.