Best Writer

B‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ACKGROUND INFORMATION Your organization, Sustainable Goods, is U.S. based and privately owned. Sustainable Goods is a big box retailer that specializes in products which are sustainable. Your organization has been cited by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (Links to an external site.) (UNCTAD) as the leading organization for the sales and distribution of sustainable products. You are the newly appointed Chief Operating Officer of the international branch of the organization. Sustainable Goods is considering which countries to expand into first. The President of the organization has tasked you with selecting one developed and one developing country to expand into as a pilot project. PROMPT Before completing this assignment, review the final deliverable. Background information found in the final deliverable applies to Milestones One through Three. As you analyze the two countries where Sustainable Goods is considering opening stores, you should understand the internal and external factors which could influence the success of the new stores. A typical way for an organization to analyze these factors is using a Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis. Feel free to use the Research Guide (Links to an external site.) in the library to help you with your project. TASKS For this milestone, you will complete the following: After reviewing the video SWOT Analysis (Links to an external site.) [Video File, 6 minutes 16 seconds], use the template provided (MS Excel file) to conduct a SWOT analysis for EACH of your two countries (developed and developing). Your SWOT analysis should be thorough, incorporate sch‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌olarly research, and potentially some quantitative analysis (. – a projection of foreign currency exchange rates). Your deliverables include: 1. SWOT analysis matrix [XLSX, File Size 10KB]for EACH of your two countries using the template provided. 2. Written justification for each factor you included in your matrix. Justification should be supported by scholarly evidence (. – peer-reviewed journal articles). For criteria that could include data as evidence, calculations should be incorporated into your analysis write-up (. – you did a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the likelihood that gas prices would rise in the future, and you used this value as a potential threat – results of Monte Carlo simulation should be included in your write-up). You will provide a SWOT analysis for both countries. (MS Word document, 3–5 pages total APA formatted). Submit only one document for both SWOTs. SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Compose your work in a .doc or .docx file type using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word, etc.) and save it frequently to your computer. For those assignments that are not written essays and require uploading images or PowerPoint slides, please follow uploading guidelines provided by your instructor. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to submit your work, click “Upload Submission.” Enter the submission title and then click on “Select a file to upload.” Browse your computer, and select your file. Click “Open” and verify the correct file name has appeared next to Submission File. Click on “Continue.” Confirm submission is correct and then click on “A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ccept Submission & Save.”

Need to respond to the following student led discussion and the professor also as that “we keep in mind the objective for this week is to: Compare and contrast the frameworks for the Magnet Recognition Program, Pathways to Excellence Program and Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Awards and their impact on creating quality organizations using theory and evidence not limited to systems thinking, organizational and behavioral theories and Donabedian’s framework of structure, process and outcomes.” The questions are also listed below under the students summary and discussion. Must be US based information.
Health care organizations seek certifications and awards externally to validate or influence the institution by procuring motivation, ambition, and commitment around those ideals. Not only do these external awards make the organizations more competitive, but also motivate improving performance around quality and safety (Weirich, 2017). For example, public reporting of the consumer experience of healthcare in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (HCAHPS) are correlated with the Baldrige Award, Magnet Designation, and Pathway to Excellence (PTE) certifications that include indicators such as communication with providers, hospital environment, patient and family engagement, and discharge information (Weirich, 2017). Furthermore, these align with financial incentives designed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that attached value-based care by stating it would no longer pay for hospital acquired conditions that are preventable and avoidable (CMS, 2021). Each of these recognitions are incredibly motivational for organizational inspiration and change.

The awards are external recognitions for internal excellence that produce positive outcomes. All these certifications recognize quality and safety by gauging improvement measures. If we reflect on the organizational theories we have learned, we can see the direct correlation of these theories to the external awards that validate the internal quality. The criteria and framework amongst these quality theories revolve around organizational systems thinking in complex adaptive environments (Crowell & Boynton, 2020) (Watkins et al., 2017). For example, how multiple parts make up the whole and how each influences the others. Our hearts are amazing machines capable of sustaining the flow of oxygen and nutrients out to our bodies. But the heart needs the arteries, capillaries, and veins to get it to our organs to keep them perfused and capable of processing digestion, waste, thought, breath, and physicality. They are all a part of the same whole and yet they are uniquely different.

The Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award, Magnet Designation, and PTE all reflect influence and carry with them a sense of accomplishment and influence for an organization while being rooted in these quality theories and systems thinking. Each framework represents what is best in service of the patient. Baldrige evaluates organizations in seven areas that involve everyone in the system. For example, leadership, strategy, customers (patients), measurement, analysis and knowledge management, workforce, process, and results (NIST, 2021). Conversely, Magnet Designation and PTE focus solely on the quality of the nursing workforce and share a focus on the professional practice environment to procure structural empowerment for nurses (Harolds & Miller, 2020). None of these certifications are easy to attain and require a level of commitment in terms of years. Moreover, only two hospitals (both in New Jersey) have received the Baldrige award, whereas zero hospitals in New York, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania have been awarded (Baldrige, 2019). Considering this information and the relative readings, please answer the following questions:

Name at least two organizational system theories that are focused on quality improvement and how they relate to external recognitions, designations, and certifications.
How does complex adaptive science and leadership relate to quality and improvement?
Which designation has your institution received? If you have not received, is the organization exploring them in anyway? If so, how is it affecting the culture of your organization? If they are not considering these certifications, what do you believe is the reasoning and do you think they should?
Compare and contrast Baldrige and Magnet and relate it to patient outcomes? Is there a difference? OR Compare and contrast Magnet and PTE. Is PTE just a less intense version of Magnet or a way for smaller organizations to get a quality certification?

References

Baldrige award recipients listing. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. (2019, August 27). Retrieved March 16, 2022, from

Crowell, D. M., & Boynton, B. (2020). Complexity Leadership: Nursing’s role in health-care delivery. F.A. Davis Company.

Harolds, J. A., & Miller, L. B. (2020). Quality and safety in healthcare, part LXXV. Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 47(2).

National Institutes of Standards & Technology (NIST). (2021). Baldrige Excellence Builder; 2021-2022. Washington, DC.

Watkin, D., Earnhardt, M., Pittenger, L., Roberts, R., Rietsema, K., & Cosman-Ross, J. (2017). Thriving in complexity: A Framework for Leadership Education. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(4), 148–163.

Weirich, B. (2017). Healthcare Quality Excellence: A Comparison of Malcolm Baldrige and Magnet Designation Recipients (dissertation). MUSC Theses and Dissertations, Charleston, SC. ; (Links to an external site.)

Wilson, M., Sleutel, M., Newcomb, P., Behan, D., Walsh, J., Wells, J. N., & Baldwin, K. M. (2015). Empowering nurses with evidence-based Practice Environments: Surveying magnet®, pathway to excellence®, and Non-Magnet facilities in one healthcare system. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 12(1), 12–21.

a‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌) Introduction that includes: ? Clear Opening Statement ? Definition of Key Terms/Concepts ? Background Information ? Thesis Statement [Claim + Warrants] b) At least 3 main body paragraphs that: ? Have clear Topic Sentences ? Use Point Proof or another recognized paragraph structure ? Integrate multiple sources using APA in-text citations‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ ? Analyse the sources and relate them back to your thesis and topic sentences ? Transition between paragraphs c) Conclusion: ? Clear Closing Statement ? Summarizes Main Points and/or Delivers a Call to Action ? Has a clear finishing statement d) APA Formatting ? APA Formatted Coverpage ? In-text citations ? APA formatted Reference Lis‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌t

Resource: Supervision and Instructional Leadership
• In this assignment, you are to try and match which 10 behaviors from the Supervisory Behavior Continuum that would be most appropriate for the described situations.
• Your choices are found in the text’s first few chapters (114-115 in 8e). Not all of the behaviors will be used and none are used more than once.
• Provide a 2-3-sentence explanation as to why you chose that particular behavior.

See Page 112 in your text – Supervisory Behavior Continuum

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌art 1: Referring to peer reviewed sources, your CLD 101-103 course pack and media reports, describe some of the possible advantages and disadvantages of school closures in the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically discuss implications for school-aged children and their families in terms of child development domains and sociocultural context: a. children’s physical development and health, (3 marks) b. cognitive development and (3 marks) c. psychosocial development. (3 marks) Part 2: Referring to peer reviewed sources, your CLD 101-103 course pack and media reports, ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌describe how the COVID-19 pandemic might be impacting children and their families across the three periods of development discussed in CLD103 and include a few ideas about how families can assist their children further. Note: The division of our lifespan into periods of development is a social construction as outlined in your textbook and in class. For this assignment we will conceptualize: a. early childhood, as from 3-6 years of age, (3 marks) b. middle childhood, as from 6-11 years of age, and (3 marks) c. adolescence, as from 11-20 years of age. (3 marks‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌)

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ssemble your complete program evaluation. Your completed evaluation should include revisions based on feedback from your instructor. Your evaluation should include: A table of contents The Purpose and Scope The Research Method Th‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌e Communication Plan Policy Memo In addition to your components completed during the course, you will have a policy brief as a part of the appendix. The policy brief should be concise and recommend a course of action for shareholders‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

This is Opposition Essay Paper. Must use this website for my topic to source for my topic:
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=OVIC&sw=w&u=lincclin_pbcc&v=2.1&pg=BasicSearch&it=static&sid=bookmark-OVIC
When on the website scroll down and you’ll see “Fake News on Social Media” click on it and find a source that represent an opposing viewpoint to my topic.

Module 8 Knowledge Check
online-course-icons_icon-learning objectives.png Purpose
This quiz provides you with an opportunity to monitor your learning progress and to assess your understanding of module concepts.

Directions
There are 7 questions in this knowledge check.
You can attempt the knowledge check multiple times.
You have 30 minutes for each attempt.
The highest score will be included in your course grade.
Submission
Complete your Knowledge Check by Sunday 11:59 p.m. US Eastern Time.

Grading

Note: this is a timed quiz. You may check the remaining time you have at any point while taking the quiz by pressing the keyboard combination SHIFT, ALT, and T… Again: SHIFT, ALT, and T…

Flag question: Question 1
Question 11 pts
You are in a disagreement with a group member about what is the best way to structure a meeting about an upcoming decision. What type of conflict are you in?

Group of answer choices

Relational Conflict

Process Conflict

Situational Conflict

Task Conflict

Flag question: Question 2
Question 21 pts
You and your colleagues disagree on what is the work ahead, but you are having a cordial conversation. What type of conflict are you in?
Group of answer choices

Relational Conflict

Process Conflict

Situational Conflict

Task Conflict

Flag question: Question 3
Question 31 pts
You decide you cannot take it anymore. The conflict in the group is too much. You are going to take action. You decide are going to use a destructive, but active form of conflict resolution you will use which response type below?
Group of answer choices

Exit

Loyalty

Voice

Neglect

Flag question: Question 4
Question 41 pts
The group is not working together well and there is a lot of personal disagreement. You decide you want to use an active and constructive form of conflict resolution, you will which response type below?
Group of answer choices

Exit

Loyalty

Voice

Neglect

Flag question: Question 5
Question 51 pts
The Abilene Paradox is a good case of which of the following concepts?
Group of answer choices

Groupthink

Conflict Avoidance

Polarization

Conflict Management

Common Knowledge Effect

Flag question: Question 6
Question 61 pts
Your group is very good at changing when you get asked to adjust to shifting expectations. One might say your group has good:
Group of answer choices

Groupthink

Conflict Avoidance

Absorptive Capacity

Polarization

Adaptive Capacity

Flag question: Question 7
Question 75 pts
Match the correct type of power to what that power is based on:
Group of answer choices
Legitimate Power

[ Choose ]
Coercive Power

[ Choose ]
Expert Power

[ Choose ]
Informational Power

[ Choose ]
Network Power

[ Choose ]

Module 8: Groups – Collaboration and Conflict
Overview
This module will continue the discussion of group interaction with a focus on collaboration and conflict. The module provides background on the benefits of collaboration and how to drive collaboration amongst a group. Additionally, this module explores the challenges inherent in collaborative settings, such as groupthink and conflict.

Learning Objectives
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:

Summarize the role of collaboration in groups.
Analyze the impact of power in decision-making processes.
Describe the challenges and risks of groupthink.
Compare tactics for managing conflict.
Analyze effective collaboration techniques within a current work or school situation.
Key Concepts
This module focuses on the following major topics:

Collaboration
Group Decision-Making
The Role of Power
Group Pressures
Managing Conflict
Summary of Module Learning Activities
This section outlines the activities that you will complete in this module. It is recommended that you complete the readings in the module prior to submitting the assignments.

Read
Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors (Links to an external site.). Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080–1109.

Harvey, J. (1974). The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement (Links to an external site.). Organizational Dynamics, 3(1), 63–80.

Robbins, S. P. (1978). “Conflict Management” and “Conflict Resolution” are not synonymous terms (Links to an external site.). California Management Review, 21(2), 67–75.

Thompson, L. L. (2000). Appendix 1. Managing Meetings: A Toolkit. In Making the team: a guide for managers (Links to an external site.). Prentice Hall. Note: You will have to scroll down to this section of the book.

Harvard Business Review Articles

Shapiro, M. (2015, September 8). Help your team agree on how they’ll collaborate. Harvard Business Review. [In Coursepack]

Weiss, J. & Hughes, J. (2005, March). Want collaboration? Accept—and actively manage—conflict. Harvard Business Review. [In Coursepack]. Available at GU Library.

Note: You can access the GU Library article using the following instructions:

According to our (GU Library) agreement with EBSCO, we cannot add hyperlinks to any article in Harvard Business Review in Canvas. Please go to the GU Library website to access and download the Harvard Business Review article. Use your GU NetID and password when prompted for login credentials. Download Instructions to Access HBR article. Download Download Instructions to Access HBR article.

Additional Resources
Charan, R. (2001, April). Conquering a culture of indecision. Harvard Business Review.

Cross, R., Davenport, T. H. & Gray, P. (2019, September 10). Collaborate smarter, not harder. MIT Sloan Review.

Deiglmayr, A., & Spada, H. (2010). Collaborative problem-solving with distributed information: The role of inferences from interdependent information. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(3), 361–378. Available at GU Library (Links to an external site.).

Ibarra, H. & Hansen, M. T. (2011, July -August). Are you a collaborative leader? Harvard Business Review.

Pisano, G. P. & Verganti, R. (2008, December). Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Harvard Business Review.

Rusbult, C., Farrell, D., Rogers, G. & Mainous, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 599-627. Available at GU Library (Links to an external site.).

Shaw, M. (1981). Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, 3rd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

1.Summarize one chapter of the textbook. What themes in Mexican History does it discuss (Politics , economics,society, environment)?
2.identify the purpose of the essay. What does it add to Mexican history?does it challenge or reinforce previous ideas about Mexican history?
3.what did you learn about Mexican history ?was the essay interesting? We’re there things about the essay you liked or didn’t?

Essay proposal: between 200 and 500 words.

Annotated bibliography: 3 scholarly citations that I will use to support my thesis, with brief (50-150 word) explanations of the main ideas of each of those citations. All 3 sources must be peer-reviewed article or book.

Rubric and example of the assignment are in the attached file.