Best Writer

Please see below attched my eassy.I did not pass my exam with it.Please see the comens and the feedback from my assessor.
Thank you for your summative assignment Silviya, please find below your feedback and grading information, as per the MSc module marking criteria. You can also review the Rubric link.

Unfortunately, your work is not of the required standard to pass on this occasion. You have been offered a resit opportunity. Please review all this feedback and contact me for tutorial support prior to re-submission.

What you have done well:

– I can see you have tried to follow a reflective cycle as discussed in your formative feedback and tutorial

– Your work demonstrates knowledge on your topic area and highlights your experience and drive for patient safety frequently.

– You have clearly acknowledged and reflected on your thoughts and feelings.

– You have made some evaluative assessments of your practice for the case study and outcome.

– You have shown responsibility and independence for planning, conducting and evaluating your work, participating in the formative and tutorial.

What could be improved:

– The paper lacks adequate structure and organisation, with a lack of technical writing skills, and I find it difficult to grasp the argument you are making.

– Referencing and cross referencing is inaccurate, with errors notable

– Theoretical concepts have not been explored in relation to current evidence in your discussion.

– It is not written in a manner that clearly identifies what themes you intend to critically analysis

– You could have offered more analysis of your own limitations in practice and discussed these; this gives insight in to good rounded self-reflection and professional development

– At no point did you discuss how the other participants were feeling, or acknowledge how their experience, values, diversities or anxieties were impacting the incident you were reflecting on.

– Even when reflecting for our own personal development, we must consider how we come across to others, and how internal or external factors may be influencing a situation and our interactions.

– Be mindful of making sweeping value judgements in future assignments, I have highlighted a couple of these in your paper

– For further marks, discussion around any personal limitations that you may have, would have been good to see explored (some personal self reflection thoughts on your communication skills etc)

– As mentioned in my comments on your paper, this work is largely descriptive rather than critical analysis, and does not adequately address debatable view points.

– This work presents a slightly narrow range of views and evidence, and does not adequately explore alternative understandings or approaches.

– Your conclusions are not really reflective on your content, it reads almost as if you had made your conclusions before undertaking the reflection and any critical analysis of the evidence.

– I gave some feedback in the formative paper that has not been obviously adopted in this final summative paper, as the work remains largely descriptive, with structural issues for readability and referencing issues.

– There are some scattered spelling and grammar errors, but please know that these have not impacted your mark significantly. I did advise that you asked a friend of colleague to proof read your assignment for you after your formative submission, and I would strongly advise this again for any resit, perhaps someone who had undertaken academic writing/modules previously, in order to develop your MSc writing skills.

General Comments:

Lastly, in summary please note – through reading this I have a good sense that you are trying to reflect on your practice, and that this process will aid your professional development – so well done.

As mentioned in the comments, I have NO concerns on your clinical practice, I absolutely think you did the right thing and made the right decision, but this assignment is about achieving a level of academic critical thinking and evidence analysis, and you are going to need to further develop your academic MSc writing skills to achieve this.

Please don’t be disheartened, give this another go, I am happy to meet with you to go through the feedback and support you for a resit submission next semester.

Presentation and Product (3/10):
Knowledge and Perception (10/25):
Diversity (4/10):
Critical Analysis (9/25):
Creativity (8/20):
Evidence of Learning (4/10):

1st Marker:
= 38/100 marks
= 38% Resit
CLAIRE OSBORNE
Senior Lecturer – OBU
19/12/2021
Second Marker Vicky MacArthur

The issue: the national demand for Nurse Practitioners to fill the existing voids of physicians’ shortage.
The Assignment (4-5 pages):
Developing Organizational Policies and Practices
Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following:
Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.
Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you with quality feedback.

How the jorunal entry should be : The journal entries should be one page focussed essays (300-500 words), with a thesis statement and developed position, outlining the main argument of the article that you choose. They should display a full understanding of the ideas of the reading. Even though you will be giving an account of a philosopher’s perspective, be sure to focus on the rationale that the philosopher provides for his or her position. The articles you are reading are position papers. You need only show that yoiu have competently understood the perspective. For the essays, ask yourself what the philosophers major point is. Then consicer what evidence he or she provides to support that point. Do multiple drafts before submitting the essay. Keep in mind the formal issues of grammar, sentence structure, formatting. Organize your short essay around a thesis and find a red thread to connect all of your ideas into a coherent short essay. The journal is due one day before the presentation topic is to be covered in class.
Finally, don’t plagiarize and don’t over-quoate. A quote is acceptable now and then. But put it in quotation marks. Everything else needs to be in your own words. Plagiarism will result in a failing grade on the assignment and may result in your being withdrawn from or failing the course.

INSTRUCTION : Write a 300-500 word summary of ONE of the following articles from Chapter 12: (1) Peter Singer’s “All Animals are Equal” (2) Tom Regan’s “The Case for Animal Rights,” (3) Mary Anne Warren’s “Difficulties with the Strong Animal Rights Position,” (4) Carl Cohen’s “The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research,” (5) Tristram McPherson’s “How to Argue for (and Against) Ethical Veganism.”
Link for the book : https://p300.zlibcdn.com/dtoken/9c9e95a57529fb2e54a754067e37326f
Pages : 384- 418
To have acess to the book you will need to have it downloaded on your computer.

Course Content Topic for Reflection: Sociological Perspectives on Social Norms
Prompt:
Read the following peer-reviewed journal article. Summarize the main points in the article. Analyze what the authors found and relate it to the course material and your future career.
Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2020). Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(2), 407-422.
Access the article here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9566.13008

APA format please.

Instructions: there is 3 articles and 3 powerpoint in the file. read 3 aricles and you can use 3 power point (each power point involves main informations, learnings from each articles) to create a blog post.

write a 1000-1500 words of blogpost using the knowledge and learnings from 3 artilces, It is best to relate each articles together with any examples or cases.

Dividing up Health Care Resources
Your main goal is to demonstrate your understanding of the material from Chapter 11 on pages 743-762. You should do this by discussing one of the three “Cases for Evaluation” on pages 759-762, or another case of your own choosing.
You get credit for originality and just repeating points already made by others means you get less credit.

Website to access book: https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780190903282/epubcfi/6/44%5B%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dnav_22%5D!/4

Will upload login to username once assignments is assigned to someone

It is often a good idea to also discuss some other resources, such as those at the Useful Links in Medical Ethics page or ones that you have found on your own. For any resource you mention, explain what it is, and who made it.

Link for USEFUL LINKS IN MEDICAL ETHICS :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q4oS3a8Sw1ghtJl1G9tvTQ5jOUqAmo7xNbyyWtmV8sE/mobilebasic

1. Is the character Dr. Frankenstein a critique of Enlightenment rationality or Romantic values? In other words, doesFrankenstein critique the idea that human beings are objective, non-biased, and in control of their emotions, or does it critique the Romantic ideal that humans can be “whole and balanced” by synthesizing feeling with reason, by letting emotion flow freely? Does the novel suggest that science and technology are inherently dangerous enterprises due to human irrationality? Provide at least three examples to support your view.
2. While the Enlightenment ideal of beauty is defined by rationality, symmetry, control, and order, the Romantic ideal is defined by an act of empathy that powers an ability to perceive individual beauty (“uniqueness”) even if it is marred by flaws or imperfections. Does Dr. Frankenstein’s repulsion and rejection of his creation based on its physical appearance suggest that he holds an Enlightenment or Romantic ideology of beauty? In other words, does the Dr. lack the empathy to perceive the individual beauty of his creation, or is his creation objectively disturbing, i.e., ugly? Provide at least three examples to support your view.
3. Describe how point-of-view works in Frankenstein. Who is the main narrator? In what form does the narrator tell their story? If there is more than one narrator, explain who they are and what effect is created by having multiple narrators. Is more or less empathy created for the characters by having them narrate their own experiences? Do you feel more empathy for one character than another? If so, why? Provide at least three examples to support your views.

Please effectively analyse and evaluate the two sources that I have attached in the instructions in detail in terms of their origin and purpose, whilst also recognising their values and limitations. Make sure to use several pieces of evidence from the sources when doing the OPVL. I have attached an example of how the OPVL should look like and what structure the writing should follow.

Please write two separate documents that are 500 words each.

Here are the sources:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanielparishflannery/2019/06/27/mexico-city-needs-to-address-its-urban-mobility-problems/?sh=359339111480

https://www.webuildvalue.com/en/global-economy-sustainability/mexico-city-transportation-system.html

Research Paper: Choose two alternative health treatments.
A. Discuss the origins of the alternative health treatments
B. Discuss the potential benefits, and the potential harm of the treatment. Summarize the pros and cons of the treatment.
C. Discuss how their pros and cons will affect transcultural nursing.

Submission Instructions:
The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The paper should be formatted per current APA and 3-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Complete and submit the assignment before 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

Format and Requirements
The following information is a listing of both the requirements for your exam essays and sumissionand of recommendations for writing in the exam format. READ THIS SECTION before taking the exam and review it as needed.
Each of your four essays must…
• Be a minimum of 500 words of original text (original means your voice, not restating the question as your thesis and not using full titles from the readings)
• This one ESSAY BEING A MINIMUM OF 500 WORDS.
• Answer the question that is asked (respond to the question with an opinion that you argue and then fully discuss)
• Use the course materials as evidence in support of your argument
• You may use only course materials (lecture notes and assigned readings provided in our Week-by-Week folders)