Best Writer

Based o the readings we have discussed so far and other relevant sources, write (5 to 7 doubled space pages) your assessment on the current immigration discussion. can America continue to be a nation of immigrants or has it reach a limit? Compare the current administration (Biden) to the previous (Trump) approach towards immigrants. what do you think should be done in terms of immigration reform?
Use the two texbooks( Aviva Chomsky: they take our jobs! and 20 other myths about immigration, and David A. Gerber: American Immigration A very short Introduction )
please include a list of references (cited work) at the end of the paper.

Read:
Ambler, J. L. (2015, August 8). An introduction to ancient Roman architecture. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/roman-architecture/
Ambler, J. L. (2015, August 8). An introduction to ancient Roman art. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/introduction-to-ancient-roman-art/
Watch the video: Smarthistory. (2018, April 28). Rome’s history in four faces at The Met [Video]. YouTube.
Watch the video: Concerning Reality. (2019, January 2). The impressive engineering of the Roman arch [Video]. YouTube.

For the paper:
Compare the Roman purposes of sculptures and paintings in public and private use.

Be sure to use in-text citation and provide references for your sources, including textbooks.

Identify the contentious issue in one of the following exchanges and address it by
using the intellectual resources provided by the course literature..
There is one central problem that each politician identifies in their respective
statements. Use the course readings to (1) explain and clarify that problem and (2)
critique or defend the solution(s) hinted at by the politician quoted in the statement of
your choice.

I
Jagmeet Singh: “A report published Monday by the Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives revealed that by 11 a.m. on Jan. 2, Canada’s top- paid CEOs have already
earned what the average Canadian earns in a year. In other words, the top-paid
Canadian CEOs earn more in a day and a half than millions of hard-working Canadians
will take home in a full year.
The wages of CEOs have increased by an incredible 8 per cent over the past year, while
the wage growth of most Canadians languished at half of 1 per cent. For the first time,
the average for Canada’s top-paid CEO’s is more than 200 times that of the average
Canadian.
The top 20 per cent of Canadians in 2016 owned 67 per cent of all wealth or net worth in
Canada, while the bottom 40 per cent collectively owned just 2.3 per cent of all net
worth. And the two richest people in Canada have more wealth than 11 million
Canadians, combined.
Increasingly, we’re seeing two worlds in Canada. The world for most Canadians is
increasingly unaffordable, involves more precarious work, and is a harder place in
which to get by. The second world is an exclusive club for the wealthy and wellconnected who get special access and are exempt from rules the rest of us play by.
This is both unfair and damaging to the country’s economy.
It will take strong political will to reverse the trend of rising inequality, which began
decades ago and has continued under both Conservative and Liberal governments.
Tax avoidance and evasion by the rich undermine democracy by starving social
programs and public services. They also send a message to ordinary citizens that the
rules of the economic game are rigged against them.”

2. Your essay should be based on a close reading of one or two texts from the syllabus.
The use of additional sources is neither required nor recommended.
3. The word limit is 1200 words, which does not include the references/bibliography.
4. Plagiarism is a serious offence! The plagiarism software is very sophisticated and
extremely successful at detecting plagiarism!
5. Avoid direct quotes as much as possible. You may quote directly from a text only
when paraphrasing the text could result in a loss of meaning. At all other times, you
should paraphrase, and reformulate arguments in your own words.
6. Remember, paraphrasing an argument does not make you the ‘rightful owner’ of
that argument – you must include a reference to the passage that is being paraphrased.
7. You should use the in-text (or parenthetical) style of author-date references from the
Chicago Manual of Style.
8. All in-text references should include exact page numbers for the passages being
discussed.

Identify two entities in the data entry form in Figure 5-28. What attributes are shown for each? What do you think are the identifiers?
—————————————————————————————————————————-
Consider the relationship between Adviser and Student in Figure 5-21. Explain what it means if the maximum cardinality of this relationship is:
N:1
1:1
5:1
1:5
Identify two entities in the data entry form in Figure 5-28. What attributes are shown for each? What do you think are the identifiers?
Discussion Directions:
After you type your initial post, read through the other entries and reply directly to at least two classmates; otherwise, you will only get partial credit. When you reply, please type the name of the classmate you are responding to, provide a welcome message to that person, and type your name at the bottom of the message. Make sure to use proper grammar, capitalization, (I instead of i) and punctuation in this college level course in all correspondence. Please avoid “text” or “twitter speak” when corresponding. For further guidance and rules on posting to the discussion board, please visit the Online Class Discussion page.

Write a paper on Judicial Lawmaking and Judicial Interpretation.

Write a Comprehensive Sex Education For Youths and Adolescents.

Discussion 3 – The Mission Myth
This discussion assignment asks you to reflect upon Part Two of the book California Exposures by Richard White.
For this and future discussions, you are encouraged to respond multiple times—indeed, you are required to do so if you wish to earn maximum points. This assignment is worth 15 possible points, and your contributions will be scored according to the following rubric:
up to 3 points for posting early to this discussion (3 for posting at least once prior to Thursday night, 2 for first posting something on Friday or Saturday, 1 for otherwise posting before the deadline)
up to 5 points for the overall quality of your initial post
up to 5 points for the overall quality of your subsequent posts, including responses to what your classmates have to say
up to 2 points for, at some point during the discussion, commenting on at least one of the photographs in the book and how the photos are used to further White’s thinking
Introduction
In Part Two (chapters 5–7), White describes the turn-of-the-twentieth-century mythology that emerged around the romanticization of the old Spanish missions in California—especially Southern California—led by writers such as Charles Fletcher Lummis.
Here are a few highlighted quotes:
“The mission myth would have been little more than nostalgia, a story of paradise lost, if it had not made Protestant Americans the unlikely successors of the Franciscans. … Modern Americans became the true successors of Spanish padres.” (40–41)
“The myth’s purpose was less about a past reality than a future one. It arose from a modern mixture of commerce, culture, and regional rivalry—in this case between Northern and Southern California. … Lummis sold something far grander: a vision of California that turned Spanish California into a template for a progressive American future.” (41)
“The mission myth created an ideological balance within California. Drake’s landing and the gold rush focused on Northern California, and for much of the nineteenth century, California meant San Francisco. In the twentieth century, California would mean Southern California, Lummis’s Mediterranean ‘Land of Sunshine.’” (46)
“Catholics welcomed Lummis’s celebration of the missions as an antidote to the ‘black legend’ that emphasized Spanish cruelty and persecution of the Indians. They created a white legend as unnuanced as the account it opposed.” (46)

Directions
This is another open-ended discussion assignment, following closely in format last week’s discussion.
Read Part Two of the book.
Post your initial summary and reaction to White’s discussion of the mission myth, highlighting one or more of his ideas that you find most compelling. Do not feel obligated to try to summarize all three of the chapters in Part Two. Instead, pick one of the quotes above, or perhaps take another quote you find interesting, and describe what you think White is trying to say. One or two thoughtful paragraphs would be sufficient for your initial response.
Engage your classmates in a reflective conversation. As you read and re-read more of the book, and also your classmates’ comments, add to your original ideas.
You will not be able to see your classmates’ posts until you have posted something yourself, nor will you be allowed to edit your responses. Your initial response is the most heavily weighted for your score, so spend some extra time in preparing it. But also realize that you are welcome to add to and otherwise change your thinking with subsequent posts.

You have been tasked with coordinating a risk-based
estimate workshop for the attached RFP (request for proposal ). Describe the workshop tangible
outcomes, workshop steps, preworkshop activities, workshop team participants and their roles
and responsibilities, and an explanation of how you will condition the participants, and finally
the workshop objectives.

Write a research paper about health care delivery systems.

Reducing Resistance to Change
Organizational transformation is difficult. In today’s world, change is the only constant that surrounds us. In business, it’s no different. For employees, this can be difficult to manage and upsetting. When striving for a successful transformation we must consider the different perceptions of those initiating change, implementing it, and being impacted by it.
This assignment will focus on the psychological aspects of change, and how to reduce resistance.
Your paper shall include a cover page and a references section, with 4-5 pages, double spaced, to answer the following questions:
Most resistance to change comes from self-interest. The first question often asked is, “what’s in it for me?”. How do you ensure that your change effort addresses a wide range of self-interests?
Misunderstanding and lack of trust are other drivers of resistance. How do you increase the level of trust in you during change?
How do you deal with powerful, negative stakeholders, that may be trying to actively derail your change effort?
What are ways to be more persuasive when communicating your change effort?