Best Writer

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌n the current prolonged health and economic crisis, it has become apparent that some companies have done much better than others, within their own industry sector. For example, some restaurants have done much better than other restaurants. Additionally, some businesses took the best practices from completely different businesses, and replicated those strategies within their own organizations. The current success of such companies has been directly due to the quick thinking strategies employed by the leadership, and followed through by the organization. At present, in many ways, we are looking to a gradual end to the pandemic, due to vaccinations, hygiene care, and other precautions. With that understanding, review the current phase, and then the future strategies for businesses that have survived through the last two years of disruptions: 1. Returning to normalcy: As sickness has ebbed either through medical progress, or as people have taken commonsense steps for safety, economic activity has started to resume, due to growing confidence, and sheer necessity. Share examples of companies that are currently getting out of the issues of the past, and are creating new strategies to survive in the near term. 2. Future plans and strategies: As both B2C and B2B behaviors have seen lasting change, the nature of competition for many c‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ompanies has shifted for years to come. Share how companies are planning their strategies for the future. Review the present situation, and then the future plans for businesses, based on national and international issues, and create an assignment about what strategic lessons can be learned from the current issues and challenges, and plan a risk assessment strategy for the next 2-3 years. Share the economic, financial, global and other challenges going forward. You can pick any industry you like, whether retail, healthcare, hospitality, airlines, distribution or logistics and distribution sectors. Remember though that many industries do intersect with each other, and you can show their relationships and dependencies on each other. Additionally, academic learning, examples and implications must be shown with good data backing your considerations. Your submission should apply several academic principles from Strategic Management. Review key concepts of stages of strategic management, SWOT, external assessment, internal assessment and strategies in action. The submission should be 1500 words, using APA guidelines, and must be written without ‘cut and paste’. In-text citations, strong research and analysis, and proper formatting. Additionally, you must have the following: 1. Cover Page 2. Abstract well written conclusio‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌n

a Comparative examination of the classical thinkers of our course, whose theories of conflict and change played a decisive role in the formation of contemporary culture, art, and politics. As much as their methods vary, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud meet in a shared critique (or, “hermeneutics of suspicion”) of self, value and society. But they also diverge in their analytical categories, critical methods, and theoretical vocabulary: historical materialism, post-metaphysical philosophy, and theory of the unconscious, respectively. In your paper, therefore, you are expected to articulate points of contrast as well as convergence in their writings from a specific lens. Your paper should critically discuss the value and limits of each of these thinkers’ methods of critique, and their respective diagnoses of modern culture and society. You must identify your specific topic, submit an outline

–> I need a thesis, an outline that can help catalyze a 1300 word essay.

Discuss the behavioral and psychological issues of incarceration for adults and the impact of these issues on correctional officers. Please‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ add an abstract page and please use “Introduction to Psychology” by Bartol and Bartol 6th edition and refer to chapter 12 for more information‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

Link for video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh3Yz3PiXZw

After watching the video, “Alternative Math”, answer the following questions:

What is the writer/director’s goal in making this film?
What is the tone of the piece? Who do think is the intended audience?
Describe your reaction to the piece. Not whether you liked it or not, but whether you agree or disagree with the premise. Does it have any relationship to current affairs? If so how?
How do you know if a source is reliable?

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌nstructions In a 1-2 page document, write the following proposed components of your ethnographic paper: The research question (1 or 2 questions MAX) In this section, please include the question you will seek to answer with your interview protocol and overall your ethnographic paper. Try to be as specific as possible including in your question, the name of the culture you plan to examine (ex. Chinese, Jamaican, Jewish, Military, etc.) and the number/unit size (ex. one Chinese family or one Jamaican woman). Please do add in any other relevant gender or socioeconomic identifiers into the question as well. Note: It should be apparent from the research question which culture you are examining, who you will talk to, and about what. You will examine only one member of your culture of interest, so make sure your research question about them matches this narrow focus. If you don’t know the specific social identities of your participant or if it may matter to your study now, feel free to write it as if you did. Remember, this is only a proposal. It is subject to change. Your research question should be answered to some degree by your interview protocol, so if they do not match, please revise one or both of them. Interview protocol (~10 interview questions) Please list here about 10 questions you intend to ask your participant. Make sure these questions are taping into your main research question. The answers from these questions should uncover two to three themes that should directly answer your research question. Again, if they do not match, one or both need to be revised. Note: Your question should not be biased toward any particular answer, but open to whatever the participant’s response could be. Ask open-ended, non-priming questions! Reference list (5-7 studies) Please include a list of 5-7 empirical articles that may give insight on your culture, specific participant, and/or research topic of interest. Please write the references in APA format.‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ These studies could be quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and/or conceptual in nature. Information from these studies will inform your literature review for the ethnographic paper, as well as guide your thinking about the culture and participants’ potential responses. These studies will also help you get a sense of what is already out there and known about this culture and topic and how your study could fit or add to existing literature. Note: You do not have to read any of the studies included in your reference list at the point of the proposal. You just have to read the abstract to know if it is relevant. ——— Here is an example of a research question, interview protocol, and reference list study for a sample ethnographic paper: RQ: How did a Catholic upbringing influence one Lesbian woman’s notions of marriage and motherhood? It is apparent here that the following study will be about the Catholic culture, and that the researcher will be interviewing one Lesbian woman from that culture, about her ideas about marriage and having or raising children. Interview Protocol: 1. How was it like to grow up Catholic in your household? 2. What messages did you receive from your parents (priests, etc) about what it means to be Catholic? 3. What messages did you get early on about marriage and motherhood? Who told you these messages? 4. How was your experience coming out as Lesbian to your Catholic family? (if they said they did come out) 5. Have your ideas about marriage and motherhood changed now that you came out? Why or why not? Reference list: Francis, T. (2020). The influence of parental religious values on adolescents’ religious identity. Fake Journal, 14, 3-7. Jim, B. (2007). Notions of marriage in Catholism. Fake Journal, 14, 3-7. Doe, J. (2019). Coming Out, But Staying Catholic. Fake Journal, 14, 3-7. I made all these up, but you get the point. Studies should support your RQ and inform your protocol questions‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

1) Describe a respiratory disease or disorder. Why did you choose this disorder?

2) Include a video link related to this disorder that your peers can click on to get a clear understanding of the disorder you picked.

Discuss about alternative energy equipment.

I attached my actual dissertation paper please read it so that you understand my topic. Also, use the references from my dissertation paper along with others of your choice for the literature review. I added a few extras in the attachments.

Writing a Literature Review

What is a literature review?
A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources that provides an overview of a particular topic. Literature reviews are a collection of the most relevant and significant publications regarding that topic in order to provide a comprehensive look at what has been said on the topic and by whom. The basic components of a literature review include:
• a descriiption of the publication;
• a summary of the publication’s main points;
• a discussion of gaps in research;
• an evaluation of the publication’s contribution to the topic.
What is the difference between a literature review and an annotated bibliography?
An annotated bibliography is a list of your references with a summary of the content and the publication’s relationship to your research question. A literature review is an overview of the topic, an explanation of how publications differ from one another, and an examination of how each publication contributes to the discussion and understanding of the topic.
What is the purpose of a literature review?
The purpose of a literature review is to provide a review of writings on the given topic in order to establish the reviewer’s own position in the existing field of scholarship on that topic. A literature review provides a reader with a comprehensive look at previous discussions prior to the one the reviewer will be making in his/her own research paper, thesis, or dissertation. In short, a literature review shows readers where the reviewer is entering the academic conversation on a particular topic in the context of existing scholarship.
How do I create a literature review?
The length and depth of your literature review depends on the length of your project. If you are writing a 10-page argument paper, you may have room to include 5-6 sources to review, because you will also be establishing your argument as well, but there’s no hard equation for how many or how much. Use your judgment and most importantly, consult your instructor about expectations.
Here is a step-by-step approach to drafting your literature review:
1. Define Your Goal
If you are writing an argument paper, create a thesis statement with a clear position. If you are evaluating scientific theories, develop a hypothesis to examine. If you are providing a self-contained review of writings on a topic, state your project’s purpose. At the beginning of any paper, define your paper’s purpose so that the literature review will be anchored to a specific point of view.
2. Do Your Research
Review a number of texts that most closely pertain to your topic and position, and are written by relevant scholars. Understand who the top voices are in your topic’s academic field, and be sure to include the most pertinent publications by those scholars.
3. Ground Summary in Relevance
As you summarize each publication, provide the context for that publication’s importance by tying its main points to your thesis, hypothesis, or project statement. How does it relate? Establish its relevance to the discussion.
4. Develop Review Logically
Think of your literature review as a development of an argument—what were the earliest ideas on the topic and how did they grow and evolve in the academic conversation of these publications? First things first.
5. Include References/Works Cited List
As you are writing the literature review you will mention the author names and the publication years in your text, but you will still need to compile comprehensive citations for each entry at the end of your review. Follow APA 7 as your course requires.

6. In general, Chapter II is 40 to 60 pages long, but the exact length will be determined by the amount of existing published research.

7. The literature review needs to be comprehensive, and it should show an appropriate breadth and scope of knowledge on the related research topics.

8. Chapter II is written in the past tense. Keep this in mind when synthesizing the literature.

1. Identify what this picture is about

2. It is a propeller rudder mechanism of a drill ship in a dry dock

3. What is wrong with it
Can it be fixed
4. What needs to be changed
Describe with scatchees to the best of your ability
You may use sketches drawings from internet

S‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌TUDENT AFFAIRS ISSUE PROJECT: ARTICLE CRITIQUE The purpose of the Student Affairs Issue Project is to assist the PhD candidate with formulating his or her thoughts around a very important issue in today’s higher education culture. You will learn how to investigate issues and determine best practices for possible resolutions to the issue by articulating possible solutions. From the professional associations’ websites or the higher education news agencies, choose a current student affairs issue being discussed (i.e., free speech, gender, racial equity, student debt). Develop a research question, narrowed to investigate a particular issue pertaining to student affairs. Submit your research question/topic with your rough draft and article critique. Research question details: In developing a research question, be sure to do a thorough review various higher education news agencies, and course material. Be sure you have a narrow student affairs issue with plenty of research material. You can determine the type (quantitative or qualitative) of research question and scope. The purpose of the Student Affairs Issue Project: Article Critique Assignment is to assist the candidate with researching current literature. Being able to research current literature on a given topic will be very beneficial to any educational leader. Just as important as researching on a topic is the ability to fully understand what others have written on the topic, critiquing their findings, and appreciating how their work may be beneficial to your research. You are required to submit a critique (1,000–1,250 words, not including title, abstract, and reference pages) of an article related to your research question/topic. The article critiqu‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌e must be written in current APA format (including a title, abstract, reference pages), include 3 Level 1 headings (Background of the Study, Critique of the Study and Conclusion), and incorporate a minimum of 10 scholarly citations. Student Affairs Issue Project: Article Critique Assignment page to find peer-reviewed journal articles. The article that you choose must be scholarly, empirical (research-based), and written within the last 5 years. The article must be at least 5–10 pages and be considered empirical; the article must clearly include specific sections that describe the study (., method of research, quantitative or qualitative, participants, data collection, and findings). Include the following elements in your critique: Introduction (no header) A. Inform the reader about your own research question/topic B. Provide the article title and author C. Offer insight into why the article was chosen Background of the Study A. Description of how the researchers attempted to answer the question: a. Methodology b. Population studied c. Unique features of the study B. Description of the research findings. Critique of the Study A. Do you have confidence in the researcher findings? (., Were there flaws in the study design, questions, etc.?) B. Does the study give an explanation to other people that were not the subject of the research (application of results to other locations, people, or groups—transferability)? C. What does the study mean in the big picture and how does the study apply to your own research question/topic? D. What ways could your biblical worldview fit into the contents of the article? Conclusion Format the critique in current APA format and see the grading rubric for specific gradin‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌g criteria.