Best Writer

Full Essay Question:
What was the seventeenth century mechanical philosophy as developed by René Descartes? In what ways was the Cartesian mechanical philosophy a modern scientific theory? To what degree, if at all, was it an expression of its social and cultural moment, the mercantile culture of seventeenth-century Dutch Republic?

The essay is a discussion paper. All the materials needed will be under files, DO NOT use web sources.

Write the essay using the PowerPoint and the three readings attached as the four sources required. No web sources are allowed.

For this assignment, write and submit the Income Statement Analysis for the organinzation Paychex.
Please use Yahoo Finance and reference to only 2 years, ( 2021,2020)

Only include the section asked for in this assignment.
Your assignment must follow all the formatting guidelines laid out in the final project (such as including APA formatted title page, references, and in-text citations).

Income Statement Analysis:
In this section, answer the following for the trend analysis: What are the total revenue, total costs of revenue, and net income for each year? How have these numbers changed over the three years, and what could be some reasons why these numbers have changed the way they have? In addition, pick at least one appropriate (for this statement) ratio or financial in addition to what is provided and calculate that and explain it.
(Refer to the ratios your previously calculated.)

The Industry Ratios can be found here: https://www.readyratios.com/sec/

*** Ive attached my two prior papers that are part of this research project for reference)***

Define and describe the various persepctives in Psychology
Define and discuss the finding in twin studies
We watched a movie called Phineas gage was a railroad foreman in the mid 1800s.What controversies surrounded this case ? what can we learn from this case study ? what were the problems ? what were the possiblities that gage developed these problems

Discuss about something interesting in todays society.

Discuss about negative cognitive styles and negative attributions. It suggests that when we think negatively, it influences our mood in a negative way. Alternatively, it also makes suggestions that when we are depressed, we have a tendency to think in a negative way.
Which do you think comes first? In other words, do you think that a negative cognitive style precedes depression, causes it or is a combination?
Based on the chapter reading, give your opinion on the research that is presented there. Feel free to bring in other pieces of information, from your own experiences and what you learned in this course, that support your opinion.

I will sent the instructions and copy of the book chapters to support to forward to you.
the book is
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5rh ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(I will send a version prior to that but it has the information for the questions)

There are also samples for each Chapter assignment which I will try to send to support to send you.

For you please to start, I am sending you Chapter 4 Assignment questions, and will send the other Chapter Assignment question and exples as soon as I can (so you will have questions for Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 4, and Chapter 5.

QUESTIONS FOR CHAPTER 4
CHAPTER 4 Assignment:
I want you to identify a topic or issue related to your career or potential career that you would like to further explore.

You will:
– Identify one research article that addresses your topic,
– Provide an APA reference,
– Provide a link to the full article in your Google Drive,
– Explain what type of research it is and why you believe that (why is it quantitative, qual., etc.),
– Briefly summarize and critique the literature review and discussion sections based on your prior learning in this class,
– Discuss relevant ethical considerations, as per this week’s reading.
– I would prefer this be no longer than 1-2 pages (double-spaced).
– Don’t forget to practice APA formatted in-text citation and to run spelling/grammar check!

Please review my example document below, but please NOTE – I am building on my last example (i.e., using the same article from Chapter 2 assignment example), you must use a new article for this assignment, however this is only for exemplar purposes. There was no Chapter 3 Assignment.

FROM ME TO THE WRITER:
I AM INTERESTED IN INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN THE USA HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS – ANXIETY AND SELF REGULATION IN LEARNING.
Most articles focuses on Chinese students
I do not want articles about Chinese experience , but international students from Europe, scandinavia, and Brazil etc.
thank you

I will send the remaining questions for Chapters 1, 2, and 5 to support to forward to you, copy of of the book chapters, and copy of samples for you to finish working on the questions.

many thanks

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.

Due Day 3
Let’s face it: any organization’s system and information are at risk. Integrated risk management is about protecting what’s important to the organization. Reliable decision-making is as much about long-term planning as it is about incident response.
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Discuss the differences between software and hardware vulnerabilities. What threats would likely exploit these vulnerabilities? What impact might these vulnerabilities have on a business, and how might they be prevented or mitigated through risk management?
Due Day 7
Post 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Be constructive and professional.

Reply 1 (Jamar Carter):

Hello Class, The difference between software and hardware vulnerabilities are that the different types have various vulnerabilities and risk that may arise in dealing with creating the correct outcome. Some threats may come to a software project that may not have but the slightest effect on a hardware process of the completion destination. When dealing with software, the majority of the world may be at risk of becoming victims of threats. Each human in the world has an identity; thus having a chance that a criminal can gain access to that person through the internet. Organization’s, businesses, and companies that are large and small needs to watch out for cyber threats. Fire walls, access controls, and training of staff on how to combat cyber threats may be crucial for software venerability protection. Otherwise, hardware will not have as many problems as the vast world of software. Problems with hardware may include the risk of keeping older hardware that is obsolete in service before balancing the cost versus the reward for purchasing new hardware that may become useful.

Reply 2 (Michael Nelson): Good evening class,
When we are talking about vulnerabilities between hardware and software there are a few things to note the differences between the two and also some overlap as well. The Software side of the vulnerabilities can be short-term to a long-term issue, but more times than not they can be patched once they are discovered to become more secure. This is why software updates are important as long as you have a backup just in case the update breaks something. One exploit that has used a software vulnerability would be ransomware. This would encrypt your files and in exchange for the key to unlock them, it would usually be some sort of cryptocurrency. When we talk about hardware vulnerabilities, these can cost the company time and money just like the software but more in the area of possibly having to obtain new equipment. One of the recent hardware vulnerabilities that have been seen on the news is would be meltdown and specter. These type of issues may not be patched as easily as a software vulnerability. One of the ways they can overlap is the use of the microphone and speakers to send a virus to other computers in the same room. This is why some installations are now taking precautions for this type of attack that can happen even if your laptop is not connected to a network at all. All of these types of vulnerabilities can and do cost companies millions of dollars and thousands of hours of time to investigate. These also hurt the customer’s trust and willingness to do business with a company as well.

the question is : please not plagiarism , add some atricle and cite from the reading
1)In “My Confession”, Leo Tolstoy admits going through a mid-life crisis at age 50. Explain the background and source of this crisis, showing how he uses a story to highlight his sense of loss, and the emptiness of traditional solutions. How does Tolstoy resolve his existential crisis of loss of meaning and overcome his earlier problems? What sort of questions might an atheist raise to challenge Tolstoy’s claim that “without faith, one cannot live.” (p14, “The Meaning of Life: A Reader, ed. Klemke and Cahn). Do you agree with Tolstoy’s theistic claim that only faith in God can enable humans to escape from the specter of meaninglessness? Why or why not?

Instructions: is

Tips in Writing Good Philosophy Papers
The following suggestions should be kept in mind as you write your paper; they are all items I consider in grading.
NOTE: Rule #1: every paper suggests its own pattern and every author has her/his own style and any rule may be disregarded
when the situation so demands (i.e. a person may choose to write the paper as a dialogue). Generally, however, the following
suggestions are a handy guide and safe bet.
You should plan out your paper before you write it. Do this long before the deadline of the paper. Do not rely on your ability to
churn out a great paper the night before it is due. Read around the topic you are considering; develop the main claim that you will
want to make; discuss it with others to see if it makes sense to them. Then sit down and work out a structure for the paper.
This involves clearly distinguished points in support of your position. They should be in separate paragraphs. You should not try
to squeeze more than one distinct point into a paragraph. That is, it should have no more than one basic claim. This claim should
be supported by the rest of the paragraphs, and you should try to eliminate any sentences that do not relate to this claim. When
you have them written, then lay out your introduction and conclusion.
The introduction really should suggest what you are going to do in the paper. The conclusion should claim no more than you
succeeded in establishing in the body of the paper.
When making a claim, you must argue for it unless it is a matter of common knowledge. Would it only be accepted by people who
already agree with you? If so, then you need offer some further support for your position.
Many of these points are captured in Orwell‟s five rules for writers (as quoted by Richard Nordquist). They are suitable for
adoption for novelists, students, and technical writers alike:
1. Never use a metaphor, simile or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
Orwell offers an important sixth rule to the effect that any and all of these should be broken rather than writing something
barbarous.
The following are useful tips that may strengthen your writing style also.
1. Try to avoid overusing the word „feel‟. More often than not, it is inappropriately used and it weakens rather than strengthens
your position. Your paper is concerned with your thoughts, reflections, arguments, claims, conclusions etc. Your feelings
should rarely impact your position in a written paper.
2. Never say marmalade when you can say jam instead. That is, complex ideas should be expressed in the most simple language
possible. If someone reading your paper could not understand what you are claiming, then it is likely that you should
rephrase your contentions.
3. Make sure your spelling and punctuation are correct. Do not rely on the squiggly red or green lines on your screen to ensure
that your writing is flawless.
4. Make sure your grammar and word usage are correct. Take special care to avoid sentence fragments and run on sentences.
Also avoid using words with which you are unfamiliar. While you should not use a term repetitively, it is not a good idea to
reach for the thesaurus with faith that it will make your paper better.
5. Use the active voice whenever possible in your paper. It will move the action forward. Use “George Orwell uses five rules for
writers” instead of “five rules for writers are used by Orwell.” The latter is the passive voice, which should be avoided.
6. When you are writing about a text, you should use quotations to support your points. Quite often, a good paper begins by
trawling the text for sections and quotations that buttress your case. If they are not there, then it is likely that your overall
thesis will not stand. At the same time, your paper should not be a series of quotations. This is your paper. The ideas of
others should be used solely to support your positions. Do not include quotations unless they are relevant to the point you
are making in a paragraph. Do not dump a quotation into your paper without providing a context in which it makes sense.
Most often, this will involve having to comment directly on why you are citing this quotation.
7. Be sure your paper answers all the questions asked.
8. Don‟t merely agree with an author. Show your understanding of the author by accurately presenting his or views on the topic
at hand in your own words. Don‟t assume that what the author says is self-evident, without need of exposition. Show an
interest in getting to the bottom of what a text claims.
9. On the other hand, don‟t simply disagree with the author‟s conclusion; identify faults in his/her argument.
10. Don‟t make the author out to be an idiot–give him/her the strongest position he/she might reasonably be interpreted as
having. Stand in for the author in debate; imagine, based on passages in the text how he/she might respond to your
comments.
11. Press one significant argument (or a few closely related arguments) carefully and persistently rather than devoting just one
paragraph to each of several unrelated issues. When arguing for a position, you cannot settle for proving that your
conclusion is possible (for instance, that O.J. could have done it), but that your conclusion is probable (he could have done it,
he had reason for doing it, and nobody else could have done it!)
12. When there is a diversity of opinion on a topic, do not assume that this variety of views proves that there is no truth that can
be established. For instance, some people believe that there is no link between the HIV virus and AIDS. This difference of
opinion from the established medical community does not put in question the social policies and medical treatment across the
globe.
13. Provide adequate references. All references to works and ideas that are not your own must be cited properly.
14. Discuss and read your topic with others. Discussion with others helps to clarify in your mind exactly what the author is
saying and the relevant issues involved.
15. Re-read your paper slowly and carefully. Does it say what you want it to say? Put it away for a day, and then come back to
read it. Does it still say what you want it to?
15. Three essential elements to all writing assignments:
a) Comprehension. If you understand the topic and the assigned readings, then you have the basis for reflection
and for writing a paper that makes sense.
b) Argumentation. You must be able to argue for your position. This is more than simply stating your position in
strong language or giving striking examples.
c) Presentation. Present your arguments clearly.

This assignment is worth 60% of the total grade. One entry is due for each Lesson. Entries will consist of your written reflections on certain questions, problems, or ideas that students will themselves discover existing within and across the readings for that lesson. The lesson outlines and introductions will give important clues about the most relevant questions, problems, or ideas in that Lesson, but the Lesson will not provide specific questions that must be answered. When reading, of course, students will always want to ask themselves questions like: What did I learn from the assigned readings this week? What are the major themes of the week’s readings? If the readings disagree with one another, what are the major disagreements; which side has the stronger argument; and why? Can I support my opinion with arguments and evidence from the assigned readings? (“Support” means pointing to specific arguments or passages in the readings and citing them, using parentical citations.)
These entries should engage with the “primary source” readings (which is everything assigned in this course beside the Young textbook.) (Textbooks are “secondary sources.” They provide context for the other readings. Do not write about the Young textbook chapters alone.)
Your Journal entries must be a minimum of 500 words long. There is no maximum, but it should not be necessary to go beyond 1000 words per entry. By the end of the course, you will have written several thousand words.
Writing is mental exercise, and so the purpose of this assignment is to exercise your mind through exercising your ability to read and write. Another purpose is to show evidence that you have indeed read the material and have learned something from it. Learning is not the same thing as always agreeing with it. In fact, because most of these readings are records of disputed political questions, it is mostly impossible to simply agree or disagree with them. The most important thing is understand the nature of the dispute, the character of the different arguments being made, and the influence they have had on the creation and development of our political institutions. Therefore, students’ agreement or disagreement is not terribly relevant to this assignment and should never overshadow the quest to understand what they think–“they” being the important political thinkers, actors, and documents which have contributed to the shape of our political institutions.
Here are some examples of what you should avoid in this assignment.
Summarization: Do not summarize. I do not need you to tell me what the readings say. I need to know what they make you think.
Emoting: I want to hear what you think, not what you “feel.” There is a difference. Anyone who begins a sentence with “I feel that . . .” is starting off on the wrong foot.
Outside sources: Remember what was in the syllabus about this: Outside sources are not allowed.
Long or excessive quotations: Paraphrase (i.e. put into your own words) as much as possible. When you do quote, it should never be longer than a few words. Here’s an example of an acceptable quote: James Madison argued in Federalist 51 that “ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” Also, do not string together a number of quotations and think that counts as your own thoughts. Quotations are means to support your argument, not a way to avoid making an argument.
Plagiarism – Remember what was said in syllabus about this.

The Midterm Exam is based
on all readings and material covered through Weeks 1-4. You must make
connections to and properly cite the textbook in each of your answers.
Answers must be paraphrased (restated in your own words with no quoting
permitted), properly APA format source credited – including within-answer
citations and a list of references included at the end of each answer – and at
least 300 words each per question, not counting source citations and
references. Answers should be succinct, thorough, articulated in well-organized
paragraphs (lists, sentence fragments and bulleted items are not permitted),
and more substantive than just definitions of terms, procedures, or
issue
Question
1 (20
points)
Explain
the inadequacies of the various historical perspectives on psychopathology, and
explain why the concept of a multidimensional integrative approach to
psychopathology appears to be the most logical choice to understanding mental
disorders
Question
2 (20
points)
What
are some of the main strengths and limitations of using an atheoretical,
categorical approach as found in the DSM-5?

Question
3 (20
points)
What
lifestyle and behavioral variables correlate with a greater chance of suicide
attempts and completion?
Question
4 (20
points)
What
is the defining difference between making a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder
versus Bipolar Disorder? What variables are associated with a better treatment
outcome? A poorer treatment outcome?
Question
5 (20
points)
Discuss
the gender differences found in personality disorders. Give specific examples
of disorders where gender differences occur. Do the disparities indicate
differences between men and women in certain basic experiences that are
genetic, sociocultural, or both, or do they represent biases on the part of the
clinicians who make the diagnoses?