Best Writer

1. Economic growth around the world
The following table reports real income per person for several different economies in the years 1960 and 2010. It also gives each economy’s average annual growth rate during this period. For example, real income per person in the Central African Republic was $1,010 in 1960, and it actually declined to $628 by 2010. The Central African Republic’s average annual growth rate during this period was -0.95%, and it was the poorest economy in the table in the year 2010.
The real income-per-person figures are denominated in U.S. dollars with a base year of 2005. The following exercises will help you to understand the different growth experiences of these economies.
Economy
Real Income per Person in 1960
Real Income per Person in 2010
Annual Growth Rate
(Dollars)
(Dollars)
(Percent)
Australia 13,817 37,338 2.01 Finland 8,837 31,601 2.58 Thailand 772 8,467 4.91 Ireland 7,807 41,558 3.40 Pakistan 717 2,477 2.51 Central African Republic 1,010 628 -0.95
Indicate which economy satisfies each of the following statements.
Statement
Australia
Central African Republic
Finland
Ireland
Pakistan
Thailand
This economy experienced the fastest rate of growth in real income per person from 1960 to 2010. This economy had the highest level of real income per person in the year 2010.
Consider the following list of four economies. Which economy began with a level of real income per person in 1960 that was below that of Finland and grew fast enough to catch up with and surpass Finland’s real income per person by 2010?
Australia
Central African Republic
Ireland
Thailand

2. The determinants of productivity
Consider a simple economy whose only industry is fishing. In this industry, productivity—the amount of goods and services a worker can produce per hour—is measured by the number of fish one fisherman catches per hour.
In the following table, match each example to the productivity determinant it represents.
Examples
Human Capital per Worker
Natural Resources per Worker
Physical Capital per Worker
Technological Knowledge
The boats in the fishing fleet The fertile waters in which the fish feed and breed The skills workers develop through training before working on and piloting boats An advanced mapping system that determines the likelihood of finding fish schools in different depths and locations

3. The catch-up effect
Consider the economies of Hermes and Tralfamadore, both of which produce gaggles of gop using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 30 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 4 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same.
Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2018 and 2048.
Year
Hermes
Physical Capital
Labor Force
Output
Productivity
(Tools per worker)
(Workers)
(Gaggles of gop)
(Gaggles per worker)
2018 7 30 3,000 2048 11 30 3,600
Year
Tralfamadore
Physical Capital
Labor Force
Output
Productivity
(Tools per worker)
(Workers)
(Gaggles of gop)
(Gaggles per worker)
2018 4 30 2,400 2048 8 30 3,600
Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Tralfamadore. From 2018 to 2048, capital per worker rises by 4 units in each country. The 4-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by a amount than productivity in Tralfamadore. This illustrates the effect.
648767
2 hours ago
Homework (Ch 12) Macroeconomic

Reading from your Exploring Philosophy textbook “Meditations on the First Philosophy”, First Meditation, Rene
Descartes:
Meditations on the First Philosophy”, Second Meditation, Rene Descartes
In Meditation 1, Descartes engages in the method of doubt. He examines all of his beliefs, and rejects any belief
that may be false. If it is possible to doubt the truth of a belief, he gets rid of it. The goal is to be left with only those
beliefs that are absolutely certain. In Meditation 2, Descartes continues doubting all of his beliefs, but he reaches a
conclusion about the one thing he cannot doubt and about which he is absolutely certain.
Which of the beliefs does Descartes question in Meditation 1? Can you explain why those beliefs are subject to
doubt? What is he certain about in Meditation 2, the one belief he can be sure is true?

As you reflect on this week’s readings, which specific topic or issue resonates the most with you? Why? (Note: Ensure your selected topic or issue is pertinent to this week’s topic.)
What primary question remains unanswered? The question can be about something that you want more information about, or it can be something that takes the conversation in an entirely different direction.
What did you gain from reading these articles?

Write a paper focused on original topic with an extended overview of topic.

What effect the anonymity of the author has on your experience and appreciation of the book? Does it subtract or does it enhance the authenticity of the narrations?
Rape and sexual violence are the core of the book. How does the portrayal of sexual violence evolve throughout the narration? Provide two examples
What are the dynamics of female solidarity as illustrated by the story? In which way does the author employ humor to illustrate the atrocities and hardships she is subjected to along with other women? Provide two examples.
In which way does the author portray the defeatism and emasculation of the once brave and heroic German superman when faced with the mass rape of German women and the moral collapse of an entire nation? Provide two examples.
Overall., what is your personal reaction to the book?
You should address all the questions. You are allowed to quote from the book to substantiate your statements and analysis but do it sparingly and when appropriate. For citations use APA style.
Length of essay, 1500 words ,typed singe spaced .

Write soap note about primary hypertension without complication.

In what ways were Vietnamese reactions to the French medical polices demonstrations of resistance to colonial rule?
Why was Hanoi such as important symbol for the French colonial empire?
What changes does colonialism bring (in terms of power, gender, economy)? What limitations are there on such changes? What are the legacies of colonialism?
How was Hanoi a classic dual city? What were the structural inequalities of the colonial urban environment?
What sources do we have to help us understand life of the colonized? What are the limitations of such sources?

Topic Proposal needed by February 23rd.

Argument/Persuasion with Drama
Research Essay Assignment Sheet
Task:
You will write a research paper analyzing a literary element from ONE of the following plays:
Trifles by Susan Glaspell
POOF! by Lynn Nottage.
Read/listen to the plays first, review the course content, then begin your research and drafting.
Submit a research proposal before writing your essay.
Use the basic outline provided as the skeleton for your essay.
Criteria:
To address the task, choose only ONE prompt below – don’t mix and match. (You don’t have to answer all the questions; they are just there to get you thinking.)
Identify and analyze symbolic objects in the play.
What larger meaning do they represent? What should the reader learn from these symbols? What do you think the author was trying to convey?
Explore and analyze the irony of the situation.
Argue how the play’s title, circumstances, clues, etc. are ironic by citing specific actions/decisions that were carried out — perhaps you’ll focus on what might be found as evidence in an investigation.
Analyze the setting.
How does the setting contribute to the main character(s)’ situation? Why might the author have made these choices as the foundation for where the story takes place?
Analyze the theme of freedom (or lack thereof) in the play.
What happens to the characters to restrict freedom or to give it back? What choices do the characters make to ensure their personal freedom?
Research: find and integrate, using the library databases, four secondary sources of literary criticism to support your own arguments/analysis of the play.
Body paragraphs need to be about theme, characterization, plot, symbol, etc.
Body paragraphs should not be paragraph 1=source 1, paragraph 2=source 2
Paragraphs should not be controlled by the research material.
Notes on Research: As you’re researching, you may find articles that simply summarize the play. These are not appropriate for use in an extended essay like this one. You need to find articles that analyze the play.
(Also, Susan Glaspell wrote a short story called “A Jury of Her Peers” that has nearly the same content. You may use source material based on the story, but understand that there may be differences in presentation between the play and the short story.)
You may obtain additional sources from the databases, books/ebooks, journals, or reliable websites (do not use general references like Wikipedia, encyclopedias, etc.). The Explicator is a journal that summarizes, not analyzes, so don’t use that as a source.
Purpose:
Meeting several course objectives (from the syllabus)
Thinking critically
Forming a coherent analysis
Crafting a valid argument
Supporting stance/claims with credible evidence from primary and secondary sources
Conducting scholarly research
Utilizing resources, practicing search techniques
Drafting, revising, editing/proofreading, and refining one’s writing
Managing time while executing tasks
Learning how literature and writing offer a larger message beyond the classroom
Checklist: Does your essay have…
an introduction with the thesis as the last sentence?
body paragraphs that equally cite quotes from the play and quotes from your research?
body paragraphs with clear topic and concluding sentences that directly relate back to the thesis?
four secondary sources cited within the essay – at least two of which are from the library’s databases?
at least 70% of the writing that is your words and thoughts, not source material.
a formed and defended a clear message for your reader. Don’t “ride the fence.” Take a clear stance.
a polished “appearance?”
Avoid first and second person pronouns.
Avoid contractions.
Avoid unanswered rhetorical questions.
a creative title
in-text citations: each quote (from the play and research) is appropriately introduced and cited afterward.
a conclusion that recaps your evidence, restates your thesis (not verbatim), etc.
an MLA header (your name, my name, the course title, and the paper’s due date), top right: your last name, insert page numbers
Double-spacing
12-point Times New Roman font
One-inch margins (Don’t bother adjusting these, your computer should automatically be set here.)
a Works Cited page in MLA format
a minimum of 1000 words.
Remember, there is no upper limit, but make sure your paper is focused and concise.
Note: any plagiarized material will cause you to fail the course. If you are unsure of a source, how to cite a source, how to use a source, or how to set up with Works Cited page, ask me! There is no penalty for asking questions.
Reference the rubric to double check that you’re meeting the essay requirements!

Instructions:
This week, students explored the roles and responsibilities of a leader when managing or preparing for emergent situations. This might include dangerous weather, active shooters, threats, bombs, pandemics, or dozens of other situations. Consider your reading and personal experiences and answer the following questions.
What are the major roles in emergency management and the responsibilities of each? How might that differ depending on type or size of the organization?
As a nurse leader, what steps would you take to make certain all members in your department are trained on current practices and remain compliant year over year?
Have you or someone you know been involved in or responsible for managing an emergency in the workplace? If you were responsible for managing that situation today, how might you handle it differently based on what you have learned this week?
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Welcome to week three discussion. Nightingale’s philosophy and thinking directed nursing science, epidemiology, environment construct and application in practice, and much more. When you study her theory, what points do you take out of it as critical for practice?

In what ways do you think Nightingale’s ideas about nursing seemed radical when she first proposed them? Review the 11 Assumptions that summarize Nightingale’s philosophy of nursing. Of these 11 Assumptions, which points have resonance for you? Provide a rationale.