Best Writer

For the purpose of this discussion, please leave politics in the parking lot.
Just think about the marketing aspects.
In both of President Obama’s campaigns (2008 and 2012) he made unprecedented use of grassroots channels to generate support, encourage voter turnout and raise funds with savvy use of the Internet to support his campaigns. He was the first presidential candidate to extensively use the Internet for campaign purposes. The Internet and social media for campaigning became mainstream in the 2016 elections.
There is a great deal of material written about this subject. Research this topic and find an article that describes what was done during the 2008, 2012 or 2016 campaigns, and what was accomplished. Please avoid blogs and commentaries unless they are from well-known sources, such as the NY Times, WSJ, Time Magazine, etc. (in other words, do not use sources of “alternative facts”).
The below discussion is about marketing, not politics!
Discussion Board Question (200+ words) – from what you now know about Web 2.0, depending upon which year you are discussing:
What did then Obama do right, why was it right, and what audience was targeted by those items? Is there anything that he could have done better, or didn’t do well at all?
OR
What did Trump do right, why was it right, and what audience was targeted by those items? Is there anything that he could have done better, or didn’t do well at all

Write a paper on successful community problem solving.
Identify a specific problem in your community that has been solved through a law enforcement initiative. If possible, base your paper on an interview you conduct with the person or persons responsible for creating and administering the program.

Discuss what you are learning about mental health diagnoses, the diagnostic process, and infusing counseling principles into diagnosis. Accordingly, you will analyze cases and engage in the diagnostic process for each. Arriving at the correct diagnosis is not necessarily the key in this assignment; rather, the process of thinking through each case is what this assignment is about. To that end, be thorough in your analysis of each case.

Case Study #1: Listen to episode #36, “Being Brave with Jennifer Marshall,” on The Dark Place podcast: http://www.joelkutz.com/darkplace-episodes (Links to an external site.).

Analyze each case in an 9-page (minimum) paper. You do not need a cover page or references, and strict adherence to APA style is not necessary. You can also use first person language as needed.

But your paper should have clear headings for each of the sections below that address the following topics (minimum 1 double-spaced page per section):
Relevant symptoms: What psychological, emotional, social, or biological/physiological symptoms do you observe while listening to the case? In this section, don’t just list symptoms; you need to cluster symptoms according to DSM-5 disorder criteria (think criterion A for various disorders). Also make sure to be specific; for example, “anxiety” and “feeling anxious” are not symptoms, but feeling on edge, worrying, shaking, etc. might be. Finally, discuss any relevant cultural considerations/issues that could be impacting the case.
Substance/medical etiology: Discuss any relevant substances, medications, or medical conditions that could explain the symptoms from the previous section. If possible, rule out any substance/medication-related or medical diagnoses and clearly explain why you would rule them out. If these diagnoses cannot be ruled out, justify why this is the case.
Stressors/Clinical History: Identify any potential stressors that occurred in relation to symptomology; if there are any, do they explain the symptoms and why/why not? Discuss the timeline of symptoms to the extent possible, including when the symptoms began, how long they last, and the frequency at which they come and go. Note that timelines may vary for different sets of symptoms. If there are gaps in the clinical history, note them as well.
Diagnostic impression: Offer a DSM-5 diagnosis (you can offer more than 1), including DSM-5 code numbers, relevant subtypes and/or specifiers. Also include the ICD code numbers and the impact of utilizing the DSM version compared to the ICD version on billing and epidemiological disease monitoring. Clearly justify your diagnoses by linking the symptoms to the DSM-5 criteria and to the clinical history. Make sure to address clinically significant distress and/or functional impairment caused by symptoms for each diagnosis offered.
Rule Outs and Differential Diagnosis: What are potential competing mental health diagnoses for this client that you can definitely rule out based on what you observed? What are potential mental health diagnoses for this client that you cannot yet rule out, but would need to rule out if you continued working with this client? Make sure to justify both in the context of the symptoms you listed and what remains missing from the clinical picture.
Case conceptualization: How is it that this person came to have these particular problems? What prevention efforts might have mitigated these problems? Where are these problems stemming from (e.g., intrapsychic issues, early relationships, learned behaviors, faulty cognitions)? What cultural factors are relevant to this person’s problems? What ethical and legal considerations specific to clinical mental health counseling might be at play here? What are this person’s strengths? You are encouraged to utilize counseling theory to inform this section.
Treatment recommendations: What type of intervention/treatment would you implement with the client? What crisis intervention models would have been helpful and when? If you were working with this client, what would be your treatment goals be? Which counseling theories would you draw upon to help this client? Why? Would the person benefit from psychotropic medications? Why or why not?
Prevention, Crisis Intervention, and Medication Approaches: MAKE SURE THIS IS A UNIQUE AND SEPARATE SECTION OF YOUR PAPER. What prevention measures would you employ to assist this client (name at least 1)? What crisis intervention models would you use to assist this client (name at least 1)? Would the person benefit from psychotropic medications? Why or why not? Name the medication strategies that are found effective in the treatment of this disorder and are reasonably connected to the diagnoses and symptoms.
Personal reactions: What are your personal reactions to this case? What was it like for you to try to diagnose this case? What was easy for you and what was more of a struggle with this case study? Moving forward, what can you do to get stronger with diagnosis?
258959
24 minutes ago
PLEASE REVIEW INSRUCTIONS AND RUBRIC CLOSELY

I have done half of the paper but now i need help in doing other half which requires collected data analysis, findings , discussion and conclusion etc . i have uploaded the Unfinshed draft with the prposed template ( need to follow the full template).

Data collection could be school student online survey,or interview (made up)

This project is Applied Research, which means you are looking for a practical way (intervention) to solve a problem or issue using a scientific process.

Reserch Questions:
1. Quantitative: What impact does (your intervention) have on (behavior, motivation, engagement, achievement, etc.) when applied over (period of time)?
• What is the impact of a learning management system (LMS) on ill-equipped school s tudents (have limited access to technology and equipments)?
2. Qualitative: What is the perspective of (stakeholders, teachers, students, parents, etc) regarding (your intervention)?
• What are students’ and teachers perspectives on the recently introduced LMS in s chools die to covid 19 pandemic ?
( you could edit and improve the questions )

For this assignment, you will write your applied research paper Project ,

Download and use the Applied Research Template to develop your proposal and replace the existing information for each section with your research findings.

Data collection could be student online survey, quetionaries , interview

use descriptive statistics for this project in the process of analyzing your data.

this course uses American Psychological Association Seventh Edition (APA 7th ed.)
701957
23 minutes ago
Reserch Questions:
1. Quantitative: What impact does (your intervention) have on (behavior, motivation, engagement, achievement, etc.) when applied over (period of time)?
• What is the impact of a learning management system (LMS) on ill-equipped school s tudents (have limited access to technology and equipments)?
2. Qualitative: What is the perspective of (stakeholders, teachers, students, parents, etc) regarding (your intervention)?
• What are students’ and teachers perspectives on the recently introduced LMS in s chools due to covid 19 pandemic ?
( you could edit and improve the questions )

Describe the connection between the theoretical question at stake and the experimental design; clearly and concisely describe the methods of the experiment (CogLab); summarize both your individual results and the global pattern of responses; craft a well-written discussion section connecting the outcome of the study to the theoretical framework. More details regarding the type of information that should be in each of these sections is included in the Guidelines below.

A thorough lab report is typically between 2-3 pages.

Guidelines

Readable font, double-spaced, 1” margins
Use APA Style for all references, section headings, and other formatting (here’s a really helpful resource!)
The lab report should be written in your own words. You need to summarize any of the papers you read/write about and the information from the lab. Absolutely no quotations are allowed
Sections

Introduction:
While the CogLab website for each experiment lists some rudimentary background, this will not be enough to complete your introduction
Find at least one additional article (though you may need more) that discusses the theory underpinning the CogLab hypothesis.
Be careful not to plagiarize or quote unnecessarily.
Method:
ONLY methods of the CogLab experiment that you participated in. Not the methods from the original study being replicated or one that you read.
You do not need to include a Participant section but you should include Materials and Procedure
Results:
This section does not require you to perform any statistical analyses comparing your individual data to the global data reported by CogLab; rather you should describe (in words) the pattern of results for your individual data, the group data, and the global data.
Please insert figures from the CogLab website as needed; it is easiest to describe results when referring to a figure
ONLY results of the CogLab experiment that you participated in. Not the results from the original study being replicated.
Discussion:
Evaluate your results and put them in a broader framework of research
Do the results support the research hypothesis?
Who cares, what does it mean, why should I be excited by these findings?
How do the results affect the theories you discussed in the introduction? Do they confirm, disagree?
Reference listed in APA format

Discuss American attitudes, minority treatment, and/or historical events that could contribute to this potential systemic issue.
Section 2:
Create a Planned Change Model for that imaginary person with the “private problem”. Remember to address each of the following points of that model (in the readings at the beginning of this unit, if you need to refer to them).
Engagement: Assuming you’ve had no prior knowledge of a person who’s been referred to you with this issue, what would this type of communication look like with a person with this “private problem”?
Assessment: Examine the private problem through the micro, macro, and mezzo sociological lenses.
Planning: Once you’ve assessed the situation, how would you go about planning remedies/solutions?
Implementation: How do you make sure that solutions are implemented? Do you rely on the person who has the “private problem” or do you do it yourself?
Evaluation: What controlled environment could you use to evaluate the effectiveness of how well your plans addressed the “private problem”? What does that communication sound like? How do you deal with an issue that was NOT resolved by a potential solution?
Termination: At what point do you, as a social worker or other professional, decide that your imaginary person’s “private problem” is solved? What are two to three indicators that your imaginary client has felt empowered and learned the skills to achieve social/economic justice?
Follow-up: How often do you think this should happen? What does this look like?
Please use standard APA format for headings and citations to address the following writing prompt. Your response should be a minimum of five pages, but no more than eight pages (unless you have instructor approval).
Please use academic journals, course text, and/or scholarly articles to support your claim.

Explain how we prevent sexual assaults on college campuses?
What resources do you plan to use to support your topic?
What do you think the topic is appropriate for your audience?
Will you be including a PowerPoint in your delivery? Why or why not?

Discuss why you think the industry might be vulnerable to attack, i.e.: what can a criminal gain or what damage might a criminal do to a company.
3. Whether the industry is considered a part of the U.S. critical infrastructure and why.
4. The cybersecurity laws and regulations that apply specifically to that industry, both in the U.S. and globally, if applicable.
5. Whether there are any pending laws, regulations, and new legislation proposals pending in Congress.
6. The security policies you would recommend to be implemented in companies based on the cybersecurity incidents that have occurred in the business sector.
7. A SETA program that you would implement to gain compliance of the security policies that were recommended above.

Use all available resources to write the report. You will find the industry-wise security breaches on page 38 (Figure 29) of the 2015 Verizon report. This can help to determine the attacks that occurred in the pertinent industries.

Why you will be successful as a health care provider in your prospective field of study.
Why do you wish to attend Clarkson College?
Describe what professionalism means to you and why it is important to your role as a health care professional.

Write an analysis of theoretical models and their use in developing global teams and resolving conflicts in diverse workplaces.
1: Analyze aspects of leading and working in global and diverse environments.
Describe the cultural intelligence (CQ) framework.
Competency 2: Apply practices for leading and following in diverse environments.
Compare and contrast how two of these models could be used to develop effective global teams or resolve conflicts in diverse workplaces.
Analyze personal learning for all of these tools and models.
Competency 3: Analyze ways in which leaders and followers make personal and professional adjustments as they work in complex environments.
Analyze the role of cultural intelligence in leading effectively in a cross-cultural context.
Assess the potential application of cultural frameworks and process tools for global organizations.
Describe the cultural intelligence (CQ) framework.
Analyze the role of cultural intelligence in leading effectively in a cross-cultural context.
Assess the potential application of cultural frameworks and process tools for global organizations.
What application might tools such as Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the DAE or MBI models have for someone about to start working in another culture?
Compare and contrast how two of these models could be used to develop effective global teams or resolve conflicts in diverse workplaces.
Provide a workplace example of how you could use the two selected models.
Analyze personal learning for all of these tools and models, including the model’s potential key results and benefits, your personal levels of comfort with them, the strengths or gaps in your own practice, and areas for further practice.
Your analysis should be supported with theory and research as well as your own experiences. It should be written coherently to support a central idea, in appropriate APA format throughout, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional.
Submission Requirements
References: Support your analysis with at least five scholarly resources from the Capella library.
Length: 5–7 full pages, in addition to the references list.
Written communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills through concise communication of thoughts that convey the overall goals of the analysis and do not detract from the message.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.