Best Writer

2. The definition of the sublime experience is a combination of joy and fear. The Romantics including Keats saw the sublime as the ultimate living experience. As a result a poem like “La Belle Dame Sans Merci” represents love as a sublime experience.
Explain this theme in his poem “La Belle Dame Sans Merci.” Also explain the use of imagery and diction in this poem and its support of the sublime experience. (Write one paragraph on each of these elements).

Grading rubric

Essay analyzes theme, imagery, and diction and gives sufficient specific examples.
-Essay is carefully MLA formatted and documented.
-Essay is carefully edited i.e. it is free of grammar and syntax errors.

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 10 in your textbook. Patents are granted for 20 years, but pharmaceutical companies cannot use their patent-guaranteed monopoly powers for anywhere near this long because it takes several years to acquire Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of drugs.
In your initial post, respond to the following:
What purposes do barriers to entry created by the government serve?
What are other barriers to entry in the pharmaceutical industry?
Should drug patents be extended to 20 years after FDA approval?
Explain the potential costs and benefits from this extension.

300-500 words
Please submit via electronic attachment a personal statement of no more than two typed, double-spaced pages in which you may bring to the attention of the Admissions Committee anything about yourself that you believe to be relevant to the admissions decision. Your statement should include any factors that you deem important to the Committee’s evaluation of your candidacy, including for instance, personal and family matters; educational background, talents and experiences; or reasons for applying to law school as they may relate to your personal or professional goals.
heres the prompt

Exam Content
1.

Best
practices for health care sustainability must be examined from both
environmental and financial contexts. A matrix is a sound method for such an
examination.

The top management of your organization has requested that
you prepare a matrix analysis of both environmental and
financial contexts for your proposed sustainability initiative.

Part I: Matrix analysis
Organize and include the
following in your matrix:
o Estimated
current costs involved in your sustainability initiative’s processes (e.g.,
staffing, facility, operating, products, services)
o Estimated
cost to implement initiatives (e.g., new equipment, new contracts, or staff)
o Cost
projections after implementation
o Social
and environmental costs
o Benefits
o Cost
savings, immediate or over time
o Benefits
over time (1 year, 5 years, 10 years, etc.)
o Local, state, or national revenue sources for your
initiative

Part II: Matrix summary analysis
Prepare a 700-word summary of your matrix
analysis. Include the following in your summary:
o Restate
your individual sustainability initiative.
o Relate
how your initiative might impact other sustainability initiatives within your
organization.
o Describe
various environmental contexts that could impact your sustainability
initiative.
o Analyze
and summarize the financial contexts and implications your sustainability
initiative will have on your selected organization.
o Explain
the cost savings and benefits over time.
o Recommend
a local, state, or national revenue sources for your initiative and why you
believe the source is appropriate.

Cite 3 reputable references to support
your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency
websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).

Review the assessment criteria in the rubric for this assignment. 
Read the book of Romans and the book of Ephesians.
Identify one passage from Romans and one passage from Ephesians that deal with the topics of Life and Faith.
Compose an initial post of 200-250 words that identifies your passages and explains where and how you see the themes of Life and Faith at work in each of them. You do not need to quote the entire passage, but you should use specific pieces of each passage in your explanation. Post this by day four of the workshop.
Post at least three responses by the end of the workshop, following these guidelines:
Respond to at least two of your classmates.
Respond at least once to the instructor. (Remember that you can respond to the instructor’s comments on other students’ posts, not just your own.)
Attend to the details and main points of the initial post or continue the discussion in the same vein.

Original: Give the name of the original painting, the original artist, and the year (must be between 1400-1799 CE). Give some context about why the painting was made or what it meant at the time, for the original subject and artist. Include at least one paragraph of description of the original painting, using vocabulary words that we’ve learned in class, as well as the image itself or a link to it.
Changes: would you like the painting reproduced exactly, with the original background? Would you wear the original clothing, or your own? Any other details or changes?
About you: most importantly, explain why you would choose this painting and other details? Explain how this new portrait would express your identity and values, and what it would show viewers about you.
This paper should be written in a clear, professional style. It does not need to be written in extra formal academic language, however, it should be written in complete sentences, spell checked, and edited for flow and typos.
This paper must include at least 3 credible sources; one should be the painting itself, as located in a museum or other collection today. These sources are to help you fully understand the painting you’e chosen, and provide historical context about the artist, the person depicted, and the painting itsef. These do not necessarily need to be peer-reviewed articles, but they should be trustworthy.
This is a personal essay about your opinion and thoughts. You should use “I”.

Textbook(s)
Withgott, J. & Laposata, M. (2019). Essential environment: The science behind the stories (6th
ed). Boston: Pearson.

This week, we learned about one of our most vital resources, water. We also learned about the atmosphere and nutrient pollution. For your Unit 4 Complete assignment, write a narrative essay (minimum 1000 words) in which you address and discuss the questions and statements listed below. Use at least three scholarly sources and remember to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the READ and ATTEND sections in your essay. Cite your sources in APA format.
Over 70% of the earth’s surface is covered by water. What percentage of that water is fresh and why is most fresh water unavailable for direct use by organisms?
Describe the zones of aquifers and how the water table changes over time.
Discuss freshwater wetlands. Name three types and describe their function in nature.
Describe littoral, photic, benthic, and pelagic zones in the ocean.
Discuss the four layers of the atmosphere.
What are the effects of excessive nutrient pollution in surface water ways?

Choose a group to analyze in this essay. It can be a group you belong to, or a group you have heard or read about. It can be large or small. When choosing a group for this assignment, first look at the questions below to see if you will be able to answer the questions about the group. In this essay, you will analyze your chosen group and apply sociological ideas in your analysis. You will also illustrate your points with specific examples.
Identify and explain the following characteristics as they apply to your group using terminology from the lesson.
Describe the group you chose. Explain why your example is a group and not a category or an aggregate.
Is this a primary or secondary group? Does the group serve an expressive or instrumental function? Explain.
What is the leadership style of this group’s leader? How do you know? Explain.
In what ways are people expected to conform in the group? Why do people conform in this group?
only use materials from chapter 3. i will send materials.

What are you among the six position related to religion (atheism, skepticism, agnosticism, exclusivism, inclusivism, and pluralism)? Please use both rational resources and non-rational resources. The former includes academic learnings from various disciplines, such as history, science, and literature, as well as your own philosophical reflection, while the latter refers to your existential and ethical conviction, the state of being convinced, derived from or based on your commitment to the Scripture, submission to or agreement with the authority of the religious tradition, and personal experiences vis-à-vis what may be called the sacred or divine.

Topic: Discuss bitemark examinations, document examinations, and microscopic hair examinations and exactly why each is now considered “junk science”.

Research Paper
Students will write a scholarly paper that is a minimum of 6-8 pages in length (6-8 pages excluding the title page, abstract, and reference page). Format is to follow the most recent edition of the Manual of the American Psychological Association.
The paper must include at least five, peer-reviewed sources that cover your chosen topic from the list below. Keep in mind that 5 is the minimum. A good quality research paper usually contains in excess of 10. Sources should be less than 10 years old and if using statistical data, it should be less than 5 years old. Do not forget to use in text citations to credit your sources.
Note that references used for your research need to be peer-reviewed/scholarly journals. These journals typically have the following characteristics:

1. articles are reviewed by a panel of experts before they are accepted for publication;
2. articles are written by a scholar or specialist in the field;
3. articles report on original research or experimentation;
4. are often published by professional associations;
5. utilize terminology associated with the discipline.

Use of newspapers, news magazines, and similar periodicals must be kept to a minimum, and will be acceptable only as sources for supplementary information.

References like “Wikipedia,” “Psychology Today,” and “Court TV” are not primary sources, are not peer reviewed (reviewed for empirical integrity, accuracy, and authenticity), and are not appropriate references for scholarly writing (with the possible exception of use for anecdotal background information).
While dissertations are closely supervised by a dissertation committee made up of scholars, they are still considered student work. Dissertations are often included in scholarly writing, although they are used sparingly.