Write an essay addressing the topic below. Your essay should be 750 to 1,000 words, 5-7 pages (not including cover page and reference page), double-spaced, with a font size of 12 pt. Please be sure to include an introduction with a thesis statement as well as a concluding paragraph to summarize.
In each of the criminal justice systems, describe the roles, duties, and responsibilities of those functions to ensure the rights of the accused are upheld and carried out. What are the implications if one or more of the functions fails to exercise these responsibilities? Use examples (such as case law) to demonstrate where a system failure has led to consequences and consider how society would operate if the Bill of Rights never existed.
Best Writer
For this post, read the cases “Crowdfunding in Kenya” on p. 20 in Chapter 1 and “Iceland—a Small Country in a Global Crisis” on page 269 in Chapter 9. Then research information on virtual currency and Bitcoin (be sure you provide appropriate APA citations). Then, explain how a small country’s (such as Iceland) banking industry and monetary policy might be affected by crowdfunding and virtual currency such as Bitcoin. In your discussion, consider whether crowdfunding and Bitcoin are free markets that are not government regulated
For this post, read the cases “Crowdfunding in Kenya” on p. 20 in Chapter 1 and “Iceland—a Small Country in a Global Crisis” on page 269 in Chapter 9. Then research information on virtual currency and Bitcoin (be sure you provide appropriate APA citations). Then, explain how a small country’s (such as Iceland) banking industry and monetary policy might be affected by crowdfunding and virtual currency such as Bitcoin. In your discussion, consider whether crowdfunding and Bitcoin are free markets that are not government regulated
BOOK: Multinational Business Finance (Subscription)
David K. Eiteman; Arthur I. Stone
Leadership in Informatics
Create a concise summary, no more than two pages in length, explaining the following elements.
Include a minimum of two peer-reviewed scholarly sources (current within 5 years) to support your work
Introduction
Statement of personal leadership style
Change advocacy statement and rationale
Conclusion
Discuss federalism and use examples found in the current news to support your discussion. Remember to use at least one source from the left and one source from the right.
Issue: Federalism
Rule: Constitution
Analysis: Discuss federalism and use examples found in the current news to support your discussion. Remember to use at least one source from the left and one source from the right.
Conclusion: Draw conclusions based on evidence researched.
Team Challenge Case Write-Up
Team Challenge Case Write-Up
We will read about a variety of teams in class, but you’ve
certainly been on teams that are “case-worthy” too. For this assignment, write
a brief case describing a challenging team situation. It can be a situation
that has already run its course, or it can be one that is currently occurring.
Assignment
The following are the key components of the write-up, which
should be approximately 2-3 pages (double spaced):
Describe
the division/department of Nakilat
o
What is its primary
purpose? What service does it deliver?
i am working in this company
as voyage performance analyst in fleet department
o
What are critical
challenges facing the division/department?
Covid 19 restriction/ sign in-off
of crew / high coast / aging of ships / more spares needed
o
What are key measures of
success?
Describe
the team
o
Who are the members of the
team?
Voyage performance anaylst
o
What is your relationship
to the team? (leader, member, outside observer)
member
o
How does this team
contribute to overall organizational success?
As past of the voyage performance analyst
, we follow up and monitor the ships performance and operation according to the
cintracts
Describe
the team challenge
o
What is the nature of the
challenge?
More restriction – less budget
o
What were the key events
that occurred?
Covid 19
o
How did it affect the
organization?
High coast – limited ports to deliver
spares or crew change
Critical Media Literacy
Prompt: Before viewing Miss Representation and/or The Mask You Live In, familiarize yourself with the following questions. I highly recommend printing these out, or copying them into a document where you can type, and then answering the questions as you view the film:
Through the various perspectives presented in the film, what do you see as its overall argument?
How do the arguments presented in the film relate to questions, concerns, or critiques of the media, the media industry, and the impact of the media on culture and society?
What stands out in the film that is particularly convincing—or unconvincing—as it pertains to media and gender?
Critical media literacy involves skills and capacities to critically analyze relationships between media and audiences, information, and power. With critical media literacy, people have the ability to criticize stereotypes, dominant values, and ideologies in media texts. How does the film relate to critical media literacy?
Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development+Trait Theory, The Big Five test
Discussion: Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development
Discussion topic:
In this discussion activity, you and your peers will be discussing Kohlberg’s stages of moral development. Go back and read about the stages on the previous page (section 9.2) https://openstax.org/books/psychology-2e/pages/9-2-lifespan-theories
if you need to. Complete the steps below based on a classic test used by Kohlberg before making your initial post. (I have attached another chart similar to the one found in your textbook that may give a bit more info.)
Initial Discussion Post:
PART 1 Read the following scenario that is often used when trying to understand the stages of moral development.
In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman’s husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $1,000, which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: “No, I discovered the drug and I’m going to make money from it.” So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man’s store to steal the drug for his wife. Should the husband have done that? (Kohlberg, 1969, p. 379)
Your first part of your initial post is to answer whether you think Heinz should have stolen the drug for his wife. Explain why or why not.
PART 2 Read the following scenario that poses another moral dilemma.
Timmy is a fourteen-year-old boy who wanted to buy a particular pair of sneakers. His father promised him he could get them if he saved up the money for it himself. So Timmy worked hard at his paper route and saved up the $250 it cost to for the shoes, and a little more besides. But just a day before he was going to buy his new shoes at the mall, his father changed his mind. Timmy’s father was short of the money for a pair of boots he was going to buy. So he told Timmy to give him the money he had saved from his paper route. Timmy didn’t want to give up his money or his new sneakers, so he refuses to give his father the money.
Your second part of your initial post is to answer whether you think Timmy should have refused to give his father his money. Explain why or why not.
Discussion: Trait Theory, The Big Five test
Discussion Topic:
In this discussion activity, you will explore one theory of personality more closely. The Five Factor Model of personality is quite popular and thought to be fairly universal in that they show up in various cultures, ethnicities, etc. You will take a test to see where you fall on each of the Big Five traits and talk about it!
Please make sure you have read section 11.7 in your textbook to better understand various Trait Theorists and The Five Factor Model. (the previous page includes that reading) https://openstax.org/books/psychology-2e/pages/11-7-trait-theorists
Initial Discussion Post:
STEPS
A. Take the Big Five Personality Test (https://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/)
B. Take a screenshot of your results graph at the top of the results page (see my example). Attach your image to your initial reply.
C. Answer the following questions:
Choose a trait where you scored high and provide examples of how this shows up in your life in negative and positive ways.
Name and discuss a trait you wish were higher or lower.
Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Piper betle exhibit high antimicrobial activity
please write in all the following
1. abstract (no more than 200)
2. introduction (around 300 words)
3. Material and methods (I am already write it, but it need to rewrite and repharase to decrease the plagiarism (consist from 567 words)
4. Results (around 150
words)
5. Discussion (around 300 words) in this section do no forget to mention the mechanism activity of silvernanoparticles as antimicrobial agent, and explain why the Piper
betle has antimicrobial activity
What is the historical genre of the work? Is there a theoretical approach that is clear? Does the author approach the work through feminist or Marxist history? Is it about gender or class? Are these approaches suitable for the task at hand? Is there propaganda or a rhetorical element?
Format: Times New Roman, 12pt font with standard margins, 750-1000 words
Article to be reviewed: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/new-study-of-prehistoric-skeletons-undermines-claim-that-war-has-deep-evolutionary-roots/
The review should assess the argument, methodology, strength, and weaknesses of secondary sources produced by historians.
The introduction should begin by stating the author and title of the work or works under consideration.
The Review should also have a thesis, or a point to be argued.
The concluding paragraph should comment on the overall significance of
the material under consideration. What new questions has the author (or
authors) brought up or answered? What further work needs to
be done on the subject now that this material has been written and evaluated?
If possible use quotations from the same article. No outside source apart from it is needed.
Points that would help if included:
Assessment of the Argument
Examine the evidence and type of argument the author uses. Is there a. balance of primary and secondary sources? What kind of primary documents are used? Is the argument based on evidence and facts, assertion and personal opinion, or inference and informed opinion? Are the secondary documents credible and varied?
Analysis of the Methodology
What is the historical genre of the work? Is there a theoretical approach that is clear? Does the author approach the work through feminist or Marxist history? Is it about gender or class? Are these approaches suitable for the task at hand? Is there propaganda or a rhetorical element?
Strengths of the Article/Book
What makes the work useful and important? Is the work presented in a way that is clear?
Weaknesses of the Article/Book
What can be improved about the work? These should be substantive and not minor issues.
To summarize, the point is to critically review the article, states its strengths and weaknesses, and assess the argument and methodology of this source.
Social Media Court Case
This can be any court case of your choosing !
The last week in our course covers legal and ethical issues in social media. Pick a court case that involves social media and research it. Then answer the following questions:
What was the case about? Write a brief overview of the court case.
Which laws were considered broken? Describe which legal issues were brought into question.
Do you think the case violated any laws? Please explain why or why you did not agree with the court ruling.
Requirements:
Your paper should be between 600 and 900 words.
Your paper must written be in APA format, including in-text citations.
Important note: Citing a court case in the proper format is key. United States v. Paramount (1948) is correct.