Best Writer

Sociologist William F. Ogburn (1922) made a useful distinction between the elements of material and nonmaterial culture and coined the term “culture lag” for the period of maladjustment when the nonmaterial culture is still struggling to adapt to new material conditions.
Material culture The physical or technological aspects of our daily lives.
Nonmaterial culture Ways of using material objects, as well as customs, beliefs, philosophies, governments, and patterns of communication.
Consider the evolution of technology over time and the role it plays in our society today. Discuss technology within the context of material and nonmaterial culture. Identify evidence of “culture lag” that we (as a society) have experienced as it relates to technology.

RESEARCH PROJECT: BIBLICAL INTEGRATION PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
This assignment is the third and final installment of our Research Project series. You now have
an opportunity to explore what the Bible says about your chosen topic. In doing so will begin to
understand how psychological science aligns with Biblical truth. The process we have followed
in this series is one you are likely to find useful in future classes.
INSTRUCTIONS
For this assignment, you will:
1. Include the following main sections (introduce each section with a level 1 heading):
a. Introduction: briefly describe what you learned about your topic through
completion of the Research Project: Topic Development Worksheet
Assignment and the Research Project: Literature Review Assignment. Note
that APA guidelines indicate that this first section should not use the word
“Introduction” as the heading. Instead, use the title of your paper as the heading
for this introductory section.
b. Biblical Worldview Integration: What does scripture say about your topic? Please
provide depth/detail here. This section should include approximately 500 words.
Do not just provide a random list of Bible verses, instead consider and
communicate how examples, principles, and theological concepts align with the
topic you are exploring.
c. Conclusion: Bring the various concepts together as you describe what you have
learned about your topic and what you have discovered about how a Biblical
worldview informs our study of social psychology.
2. Apply current APA formatting guidelines within the following structure:
a. Title page (apply APA student standards).
b. Body/text (1000 words minimum; include appropriate APA headings).
c. References page (must include all sources cited in your paper). Remember that if
Scripture is cited in your paper it must also be listed in your reference section.
Please see the Research Project: Biblical Integration Project Example for
examples.
3. Adhere to these guidelines related to mechanics/structure:
a. All lines of the paper must be evenly double-spaced.
b. Use 1” margins on all sides.
c. Avoid the use of a first-person perspective.
d. Do not include direct quotes (except for brief quotations from Scripture). Instead,
re-write in your own words to demonstrate your understanding of the information.
e. Include an appropriate citation to identify your source(s) whenever you include
information that is not considered common knowledge.
PSYC 312
Page 2 of 2
f. Check your work carefully to eliminate spelling, punctuation, and grammatical
errors.
g. Ensure a logical and clear flow by including appropriate transitions between
sections.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

In an essay of 1300-2000 words, summarize an argumentative source and then support a thesis that analyzes the rhetorical strategies employed by the author in his/her attempt to persuade the audience. This essay should be in MLA format (double spaced, no skipped lines, last name and page numbers on every page, parenthetical citations, and works cited page). Since this essay focuses on one source, be sure to include paragraph numbers in the citations to guide your reader to the exact location of the cited information.
This essay should provide the context for the article and the connection to the current, local issue. Use the evidence in the article and place of publication to identify the target audience. The essay should assert a thesis regarding the author’s rhetorical strategies. Are they effective for persuading the target audience? Support the thesis by analyzing rhetorical elements of the article. The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate strategies of argument. The more familiar you become with these strategies, the better you will be able to make use of them in your own writing.
Summary:
A successful summary should do the following:
Include description of the article and its setting (identify the author and the publication, the implied or explicit audience, date/history).
Keep your reader informed, through attributive tags, that you are expressing the author’s ideas, not yours.
Represent the original article accurately and fairly.
Remain objective, not revealing your ideas on the issue but rather only the original author’s points.
Be direct and concise, using words economically.
Use your own words to express the author’s original ideas.
Possibly include quotations for a few key terms or ideas from the original, but quote sparingly.
Be a unified, coherent piece of writing in its own right.
Rhetorical Analysis:
The central purpose of this essay is to analyze the author’s rhetoric: how [effectively] does the author craft the argument to persuade the target audience? The rhetorical analysis will analyze the technique the author employs in working to persuade a specific audience in order to support a thesis evaluating the rhetoric.
Your rhetorical analysis will break down the argument so that you can analyze the persuasiveness of the piece. In your analysis, you should:
Assess whether, taking your analysis of the following factors into account, the argument is ultimately persuasive (which should be asserted in your thesis).
Identify the probable target audiencefor the argument.
Analyze the thesisof the article as well as the major supporting claims.
Identify the motiveof the article (the reason why the author is making this argument for the target audience).
Describe how the author attempts to establish his or her credibility in terms that the target audience will identify with.
Examine what types of evidencethe author uses to support his or her position for the specific audience .
Identify the key assumptionsthat underlie the piece’s logic.
The rhetorical goal—what the author wants to change in the audience’s beliefs, feelings or actions
The main points or claims
Appeals to emotion, logic, and authority
The author’s use of concessions, refutations, and counterarguments(or lack thereof)
Use of language, humor, and so on
All analysis should work to support an explicit thesis regarding the effectiveness of the rhetoric for the target audience. Don’t just identify the existence of rhetoric; use the examples from the article to support your assertions about how the author appeals to the values and concerns of the specific audience.
Some caution is required here. Make sure not to repeat your summary in your analysis. The summary should be an overview in your words; evidence to support your analysis should be more specific and cited. For example, when you are examining the support the writer has used for her/his claim, you should not simply list the different types of evidence used; instead, you will want to look at each type and assess whether it is persuasive, outdated, from an unreliable source, if it actually supports the claim, etc. Consider the audience and the author’s purpose at every turn. Be rigorous about your assessment; no argument is perfect, and no argument is completely flawed. Your analysis should blend critique of the editorial’s flaws with praise for the sections in the piece that seem persuasive (in other words, blends skeptical and sympathetic readings). In both of these aspects of your analysis, though, the key question should always be “Why?” Why is this element persuasive? Why does this element not persuade me? A simple cataloguing or the author’s strategies will not suffice.
When you are putting your analysis together, remember that you, too, are making an argument, just like the person whose writing you are analyzing. What does this fact mean? You need a thesis statement that will probably be along the lines of “this argument is/is not persuasive because….” You should support your claim by providing evidence that the essay is or isn’t persuasive by using your analysis of the writer’s claims, purpose, audience, assumptions, etc.
Who is the author writing to? The details of the article should be supporting evidence in the analysis

last page of of the draft should be MLA work cited page

Who is the author writing to? All analysis of the argument must consider the audience being argued to. For example, do you think the reader will be persuaded by a students’ testimony? Why or why not? the link below is the article that this paper needs to be about

Nunez: Schools should not go back to online-only learning, despite the omicron surge

For this assignment, you will analyze compensation opportunities for employees, found in Chapter Twelve. You should find an article no more than five years old on an organization utilizing one of the programs for recognizing employee compensation.
Your analysis should include but not limited to:
Name and industry of the organization.
Type of program recognizing employee contributions used.
Impact of the program on performance, morale, motivation and competitive advantage in the industry.
Alignment or contrasts with the course textbook.
In addition to the aforementioned:
Attach your article with your assignment submission.
You should incorporate course terminology and concepts to explain your positions.
Your assignment should be submitted double-spaced 12 size font in 3-5 pages in length not including cover and reference pages.

Write a 500-word essay responding to the information that you have been studying and the notes you have been taking. A response focuses on your thoughts, feelings, impressions, insights, and questions in regards to your topic and the works that you have been reading. You have been researching what others report or believe regarding your topic. Now what do you say about what they say? What are your thoughts on the problem? Please take a stand on this issue.
When writing this Reflection Essay, do not tell me about your research process. Tell me what you think about the conflict.
This response needs to be a minimum of 500 words long, but feel free to write more than the minimum, for this is your chance to draw connections between the readings and your world. The response will be graded based on the criteria found on the Grading Rubric for Essays.
*My topic is Sino-Indian

Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow in this assignment. Think of this short list as a quality control checklist, along with the attached grading rubric.
• The document should be no more than 5 pages
o Page 1 = Title Page
o Page 2 = Abstract
o Page 3-4 = Introduction, three evidentiary body paragraphs, and conclusion
o Page 5 = References
• Document should professionally formatted using titles, headers, and bullets where appropriate.
• You must include a title page and cite sources using a reference page according to APA 6th edition guidelines
• Submission is free of grammatical errors and misspellings
• Double spaced, times new roman, 12 point font, 1 inch margins
• Direct quotes should account for no more that 15 percent of paper (use direct quotes sparingly)
Please be sure to review the attached rubric. It along with these assignment instructions will ensure you have a solid understanding of the assignment requirements.

You will write a complete critique essay with introduction, critical response to the source, conclusion, and reference section. You will also review how to cite sources, and learn how to contextualize source evidence. The source will be a current argument (e.g. opinion piece, editorial) or a narrative (e.g. short story) from the mainstream press. With this project, you are learning more about how to listen deeply to a source on its own terms, and respond to it with your own critical insights and questions.

Make sure that you are formatting citations within APA guidelines. Your submission should be prepared at a minimum 2-pages Word document, Times New Roman font, 12 pitch, double spaced. No title page or reference page is required, format your in-text citations and reference.

Economic Environments of the West: Problems, Puzzles, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Industrial Revolution. This era will introduce radically different tools and techniques that require fundamentally rethinking the idea of work, productivity, and prosperity. The emergent Fourth Industrial Revolution will fundamentally alter how people work, consumers spend, companies compete, officials regulate, and markets perform. Unlike before, where these shifts unfolded over three or four generations, the West faces the unprecedented challenge of experiencing this shift in a single generation. Artificial intelligence and robots will have a significant impact on the job market, eliminating 75 million jobs worldwide by 2022. Worse still, more than half of all tasks in the workplace will be done by machines by 2025. However, more than 130 million new jobs will be created by machines in that time frame according to estimates by the World Economic Forum.
1. Forecast your personal future given:

(a) the ongoing comeback of emerging economies and then
(b) the techno-transformations powered by the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Which scenario do you prefer? Why?
2. Historically, those in the West hold that economic freedom is the catalyst of prosperity. Given the recent performance of emerging economies, do you think state capitalism might do a better job?
3. In the realm of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, should governments estimate performance with monetary aggregates, like GDP, or sustainability and stability, like human development or happiness? Who will likely benefit more from the Fourth Industrial Revolution: workers in developed, emerging, or developing economies? Why?

1. Summarize the pros and cons of federalism.
2. Explain why the courts are so important in defining civil liberties, for both the national government and the states.
3. Explain how Supreme Court rulings and federal legislation have attempted to end discrimination in the United States.

For this discussion, you will reference your course textbook in addition to your results from the Self-Assessment: Which Benefits Are Important to You? Describe the benefits package at your organization or former organization. Were benefits a factor in you applying and seeking employment at your organization?
Which benefits were most important to you? What was the percentage of employers that offer your selected benefits?
Were there benefits that you wished were available? If so, what are they? What was the percentage of employers that offer your “wish list” of selected benefits?