Best Writer

For #3A:: Genetic, prenatal, biological and physiological factors are: inherited genetic defect in retinol binding protein, maternal nutrition status, immune system status, younger maternal age.
B. Behavioral risk factors: lack of adherence to healthy,nutritious foods; low consumption of foods high in vitamin A, not prioritizing self education.
C. Environmental risk factors: insufficient fortification or foods and oils in vitamin A, poor sanitation/hygiene, lack of media coverage on government campaigns, poverty.

E‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌THN 101 Professor Curtis Marez Five Page Paper Papers should be double spaced, in 12-point font, and approximately 5 pages long. Each prompt requires you to use Alan Rowe’s essay “Film Form and Narrative” as well as one additional course reading. You will construct an argument about one of these films: Mosquita y Mari, Pariah, or Drunktown’s Finest. The best papers will likely be those where the author has seen the film more than once. I want you to work on the film:Mosquita Y Mari for this assignment because the movie is on NetFlix. In other words, you can not watch the others on NetFlix so Papers are Due to Canvas by midnight on February10. 1. Settings. Chose a film and make an argument about the significance of its settings. For this topic you will need to identify the film’s different settings and then analyze their meanings. You may want to focus on particular settings such as interiors, parties or celebrations, urban settings, and landscapes. How do different settings frame characters and anchor them in different meanings? How do settings convey information about class, race, gender, sexuality? Does the constructed world or worlds of the film comment on the limits and possibilities of our actual world? 2. Narrative. Rowe suggests that we can begin to analyze many film narratives in terms of an initial equilibrium, then the disruption of that equilibrium, and finally, the establishment of a new equilibrium, different from the equilibrium at the film’s start. Does your chosen film conform to or depart from that narrative structure? How might that narrative structure help us understand the significance of the film’s story? In particular, you may want to focus on the ending. Each film’s ending is relatively open ended. The film endings suggest possible futures for their characters but their sub‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌sequent stories aren’t told and we don’t definitively know their fates. What is the meaning of such open-ended conclusions? 3. Respectability Politics. Historically, models of respectability have celebrated heterosexual marriage and reproduction; “normal” gender roles; and respect for and deference to authority. On the one hand, by identifying with such forms of “respectability,” BIPOC communities have countered forms of racism based in ideas about their deviancy and immorality. On the other hand, identifying with respectability has reinforced the very definitions of deviancy and immorality that have been used to depict BIPOC communities as dangerous and disposable. Choose a film and construct an argument about how it represents such contradictions. To what extent does the film challenge respectability politics? How do the filmmakers use the tools discussed by Rowe to represent and comment on “respectability”? 4. Sound. Chose a film and make an argument about its use of sound. According to Rowe, sound can reinforce the continuity of action and link different scenes. Music, in particular, can establish or enhance emotion, or help lead an audience to a particular understanding of a scene. While you could focus on all sorts of sounds, you may want to focus in particular on music. Music can identify characters and attach particular meanings to them (Rowe cites as an example The Godfather, where different kinds of music mark differences of class and nationality between different characters). How is sound used in one of the three films and to what effect? Be sure to draw on not only Rowe but one other assigned reading. Here is the link where I put all required readings and documents for this order such as Alan Rowe’s essay “Film Form and Narrative” and lecture slides

This week, you will complete an ethical SWOT analysis of the technology you have selected for your Course Project. In industry, a SWOT analysis is used to create a structured assessment of a business plan, opportunity, or action. By considering strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, a SWOT analysis is an effective tool to summarize and assess products, services, and actions. Not only does a SWOT analysis help you understand the context of a particular action or problem, but it will also set the stage for action and goal planning.

Using this methodology, you will create a SWOT analysis of the technology you are investigating for your Course Project. As part of your analysis, you will evaluate the following.

Strengths:
What are the advantages of the technology?
How will it positively impact culture and society?
What are other potential gains?
Weaknesses:
What features of the technology may hinder success?
What are the limitations of the technology?
How does the technology address issues of equity?
Opportunities:
What are external factors that may contribute to the success of the technology?
What social, political, and/or cultural trends may influence reception?
What are the opportunities for growth?
Threats:
What external factors may pose a threat to the success or adoption of the technology?
What social, political, and/or cultural trends may influence reception?
What are potential hurdles to growth?
A successful assignment will

include all four areas of the SWOT analysis;
be one to two pages in length;
be composed using Microsoft Word and using 12-point Times New Roman; and
format and cite sources using the seventh edition of APA

Interview someone from a different culture. You will create a PowerPoint presentation of your findings.

For this assignment, you will Interview a client whose culture is different from yours. The client can be a patient, neighbor, grandparent, in-law, or friend. Do not use your parent, brother, sister, spouse, or significant other. This interview is the basis of your paper. Use the Organizing Framework (12 boxes in Chapter 2) to guide your interview.
Interview your selected person on three or four domains of the model. Complete a literature review of the cultural group from which your interviewee comes. Compare and contrast data obtained from your interview with what you find in the literature. Provide at least two recommendations for clinical practice, two recommendations for research, and two recommendations for the health-care organization on this cultural group; be specific in your recommendations. Value of this exercise to your current or future practice.

Submission Instructions:

Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style. Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Power point presentation with 8 -10 slides, excluding the tile slide and the reference slide.
The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

Assignment Instructions
BRAIN INJURY CASE STUDIES
Overview
Once you have learned cognitive theories and models, as you’ve done in your previous activities, you can begin to use them to help understand challenges that individuals experience with learning and cognition. That’s what you’ll do for this assignment.

Preparation
In this assignment, you will practice applying theories and models to help your understanding of several case studies. Complete the following media piece, if you haven’t already:

Riverbend City: Case Studies
Assignment Instructions
Use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] to complete this assignment.

Summarize briefly the featured case studies.
Include in your summary the condition depicted and possible causes of the memory loss using theories and research from the course readings.
Integrate your course resources and at least three peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (no more than five years old) to help support your analysis.
Describe the research methods used in the sources cited and analysis of their appropriateness.
Conduct a self-evaluation of this assignment using the scoring guide and identifying the proficiency level for each criterion. Submit your assignment and the self-evaluation (as a separate attachment).
Conclude with possible treatment options for the person featured in the case study, using scholarly research sources as a basis.
Important: Prior to submission, conduct a self-evaluation of this assignment using the scoring guide and identifying the proficiency level for each criterion. Submit your assignment and the self-evaluation (as a separate attachment). See below for more instructions.

Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Sources: Use your course resources and at least three peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (no more than five years old).
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Refer to Evidence and APA page on Campus for guidance.
Template: Use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] for your paper.
Length: 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Self-Evaluation
When you have finished, write a separate, one-page self-evaluation of your work compared to the scoring guide criteria.

Ensure that you have completed all assignment requirements (ideally at the Distinguished level).
Evaluate your performance using the criteria in the scoring guide.
Compare and contrast your self-evaluation from the previous assignment with the feedback provided by your instructor to align your personal evaluation with faculty expectations.
Indicate the proficiency level you met for each criterion.
Include the scoring guide (including comments) with your self-evaluation.
Submit the self-evaluation as a separate attachment when you submit your assignment.
Use the PSYC3500 Week 7 Self-Evaluation Form [DOCX] to complete your self-evaluation, and submit this along with your assignment for grading.

Y‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌our first post (120-150 words) shall be a response to the reading. What is the main theme, what is new, different, important in your reading? DiAngelo, R. J. (2018). White Fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Pres‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌s. Eberhardt, J. L. (2020). Biased: Uncovering the hidden prejudice that shapes what we see, think, and do. Penguin Books. King, R. (2018). Mindful of race: Transforming racism from the inside out. Sounds True. ISBN: 978-16-83640813 (paperback)‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

does proper hygiene between patients and healthcare providers reduce the risk of healthcare associated infections in nursing homes?

1‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌- Before you start writing this assignment, I would like to clarify the main points that you need to understand. Since we began this topic, we have covered history taking and physical examinations. So, what they want us to achieve in this assignment is how as practitioner take a good history from the patient using patient centre care, consultation process, 4S framework, etc… This leads to perform a correct physical assessment and therefore builds a good care plan. It is a highly important as a master’s degree student to know how to link the data together and critically analysis your discussion, so please avoid descriptive style during your discussion: good history taking good clinical examinations correct diag-nosis good care plan good patient outcomes. 2- This is a third person assignment. 3- Please listen to the attached ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌audio record file. 4- Please read carefully the following files named: history taken, per-son -centre assessment and clinical examination. 5- You can use the references in the references list of the history tak-en file in the assignment. 6- It’s very important used attachment guideline, books, and peer re-viewed articles that you will in the attachment. 7- Please provide valid articles that being published less than 5 years in clinical articles and 7 to 10 years for theoretical articles. 8- Please use Harvard references style you will find it in the attach-ment. 9- There is an example for this assignment from the university website but it’s just for general understanding and guides for this assign-ment so read it and follow my instruction under each part of this assignment. there is file named assignment guideline you will find more details. looking for 44 ref‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌erences

Write a 2-page paper describing how our lives would be different if the molecular shape of water was linear (180° bond angle) instead of bent (104.5° bond angle). You are encouraged to use sources other than your textbook to further investigate this topic. You may be as broad or specific as you wish in your discussion. Please reference any information you may use in your discussion.

Review the information in the textbook and the online article, Setting Up a Project Team (https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/team-building/building-your-project-team.php). Using the example of a mid-sized family practice clinic looking to change to a new electronic medical records system, write a paper that addresses the following questions:

Who should be invited to participate in the project and why?
Who are the stakeholders in the project?
Why are these particular stakeholders important to the process?
What is agile project management? (This may be a good question for which you conduct additional research.)
Would it be appropriate in this case?
What should the formal communication plan include?

Your paper must meet the following requirements:

4-5 pages in length, not including the cover page and reference page.
Format your entire paper according to the APA 7 style and writing guidelines.
Include an introduction, a body with at least two fully developed paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Write well and clearly using excellent grammar and style techniques. Be concise. Be logical. You are being partly graded on the quality of your writing.
You will need 3 scholarly sources from the U.S. and not older than 2017