Best Writer

In Topic 1 we took a look at different types of membrane receptors. What is the difference between voltage-gated ion channels and ligand-gated ion channels? Discuss where ligand-gated channels are located, are they active or passive, how do they work?

The first page is for this Question:
Explain what is meant (and not meant) when a researcher says a finding is “statistically significant”?
Research and provide an example of a set of data that is statistically significant. Give a brief descriiption of the study and explain your reasoning for selecting it.

The second page is for the assignment that is downloaded

Select a client from clinical experience with an acute health problem or complaint requiring at least two visits. Submit a complete H & P from the initial visit with this client and a focused SOAP note for the follow-up visit. Based on this client’s condition, conduct a literature search for two research articles that discuss various approaches to the treatment of this condition. Peer reviewed articles must address the standardized procedure or guidelines for this diagnosis. Incorporate the research findings into the decision-making for this client’s treatment. In the paper, compare and contrast or address how treatment or the plan may have been different based on the research findings. The discussion on relating research to practice should be 3-4 pages and the total paper should be no longer than 9 pages not including references. The research articles must be an original research contributions (no review articles or meta-analysis) and must have been published within the last five years. Cover the criteria listed below. The paper should be APA formatted and no longer than 9 pages.
Reviews topic and explains rationale for its selection in the context of client care. (2 pts)
Evaluates key concepts related to the topic. 2 pts)
Describes multiple viewpoints if this is a controversial issue or one for which there are no clear guidelines. (2 pts)
Assesses the merit of evidence found on this topic i.e. soundness of research (5pts)
Evaluates current EBM guidelines, if available. Or, recommends what these guidelines should be based on available research. Discuss the Standardized Procedure for this diagnosis. (5 pts)
Discusses how the evidence did impact/would impact practice. What should be done differently based on the knowledge gained? (3 pts)
Consider cultural, spiritual, and socioeconomic issues as applicable. (2pts).
Utilizes APA guidelines, cite references (2 pts)
Writing style at the graduate level (2pts)

Essay of around 900 words, discussing and critically analyzing the impact change has on people within an organisation
-demonstrate understanding of the impact of change within and organisation
-make a case for introducing Change Agents within an organisation (Sobeys, Inc a national grocery retailer in Canada – with 135, 000 employees, including 5000 – 6000 head office employees)
– explain the reason for introducing the change agents into the organisation, and discuss what they are hoping to achieve by doing so
– should including discussion of what a change agent is, their purpose and the role they undertake, and how they are perceived within an organisation

This is a Current Events discussion board. Your initial post should summarize an article that addresses an HR-related topic that is covered in this week’s material. The article must be from a mainstream newspaper (e.g. New York Times, Wall Street Journal), SHRM, or a mainstream business magazine (e.g. Forbes). The article may not be more than two months old. After summarizing the article, explain its connection to the course material, the implications to the HR profession, and your opinion on the matter. Make sure to properly reference the article.

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌his case study must also be at least five pages of narrative and include an introduction and conclusion. Explain the warning process in critical incidents and describe issues‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ that may detract from or nullify warning. Use your own research, and my essay about warning. Also, be sure to include a title page and reference/citation page. They are not part of the page count‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

–Identify the multiple causes of the problems raised.

–Identify alternative ways of solving problems.

–Evaluate the proposed alternatives in terms of their pros and cons.

–Choose one alternative or a combination of alternatives.

–Explain the implementation plans, including contingency plans in case the proposed solution would not work out as expected.

The depth of the analysis of each point will determine your grade.”

Write a review video on Homegrown Terror in Pakistan and discuss how this radicalization and resulting terror could occur in the United States. How long will it be before ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌the United States will have to contend with suicide bombers? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYE10ab0B_o USU peer reviewed articles and must be in apa 7 forma‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌t

Supporting Material and Contextual Reasoning

You will read Gunn (2021) chapter 4 that provides an introduction to types of speech support, orally referencing your sources, and the importance of contextual reasoning. In module 4, you will also complete an exercise to give you much more in-depth information about finding sources on Creighton’s campus. Note that MANY of your classes at Creighton will require you to find credible and scholarly sources that you cannot find by simply using Google or another internet search engine.

Library Encounter Online (LEO) is an interactive, modular tutorial available from the Reinert-Alumni Library. You will learn about research strategies and the resources available to you through the Creighton University Libraries to best find the type of speech support that is best for you. The LEO tutorial will take you approximately one hour to complete. Throughout the tutorial, there are several brief quizzes to assess what you’ve learned. The tutorial is located in the module titled “Library Encounter Online” and you will complete it directly through your COM 101 course.

Initial Post

By Thursday of this week, complete the following steps:

Step 1:
Write and submit to the discussion board a single persuasive sentence (or claim) that explains to your group something you have learned in your Critical Issues class so far.

For example, Gunn (2021) offers the example of human-made climate change as a place where statistics are misused. If you were in a Critical Issues course on humans and the environment, you might say: A carbon tax is the way to fight climate change. [Or alternatively, A carbon tax is not the way to fight climate change.] Your claim must refer to a central issue, question, or theme in your Critical Issues in Human Inquiry class.

Step 2:
Assume you are giving a persuasive speech on this claim in your classroom to your fellow students and Critical Issues instructor. Find one source using library resources. (Links to an external site.)that would support the claim you wrote in STEP 1.

You must find a new source and cannot use readings from your Critical Issues class. Think about how the source will be credible for your audience and if it is appropriate based on “contextual reasoning.” Remember that knowing what type of speech support to use depends on the context of the speech, and (1) what kind of speech is called for, (2) the setting and mood of the speech, and (3) the audience of the speech.

Step 3:
Cite the source in written form and submit to the discussion board.

For all written citations, you need to choose citation style. Every field has its own referencing conventions, and in the discipline of Communication Studies that is often APA style. While your Critical Issues class may require you to cite sources in a different format, for COM 101, write your citation in APA format using these guides: Purdue OWL (Links to an external site.)or APA format (Links to an external site.). Be careful as you make your citation. A few common errors we notice are:

Misidentifying the type of source (for example, treating an online newspaper as a website).
Incorrect capitalization of article titles.
Following an outdated APA style guide.
Relying on citation generators or trying to export the citation from the library databases (these often do not work accurately).
At the end of this page are some sample citations for you to look at.

Step 4:
Cite the source orally as you would in a speech. Choose a sentence from the source to quote that best relates to something you have discussed in class. Create an oral citation that includes the following information leading into the sentence you have chosen:
–the author(s) with credentials
–type of source
–title and descriiption of source
–date of source

Using your webcam, record yourself giving this short excerpt of a speech following the directions for recording videos in COM 101 (see video guideline reminders). Your video should sound and feel just like you are giving a speech and (1) have a single sentence that leads into the source, (2) the excerpt/quotation of the source you found, and (3) a complete oral citation. Use note cards for this recording so you can practice for your final speech. Your recording will count as your initial post and should be 20 to 40 seconds.

In short, your initial post to the discussion should include:

Persuasive claim
Written citation in APA format.
Video of you explaining the persuasive claim in your own words and citing the supportive source.
Video Guidelines

Stand-up while speaking.
Speak in in a well-lit and quiet area.
Use a background that is free of distractions.
Be sure you are visible from at least the waist up by standing 3-6 feet from the camera.

Replies

By Sunday of this week, complete the following replies:

After you post your written and oral citation, look at all of the other sources posted within your discussion group. Reply to two of your group members. Your replies should discuss the quality of your peer’s source for supporting their claim.

Consider contextual reasoning as well as bias as you respond. Use the questions below to guide your thinking:

Does the data support the ethical, political, or religious goals of a particular person or organization? If so, do those goals stand to hurt or disadvantage other?
Does the data support the financial gains of a person or an organization? Would such goals hurt or disadvantage other?
Does the data represent what the speaker claims it represents? How do you know?
What or who is the source of the information? Is the source trustworthy and reliable?

For the video portion pls just give me some bullet points to talk about

Explain and evaluate the effectiveness of quantitative easing and give your opinion on if the FED should continue to use this tool.