Best Writer

Discuss the impact of alcohol use during pregnancy on maternal responses after birth.The article that your suppose to use for this paper is “The impact of alcohol use during pregnancy on maternal responses after birth” DOI 10.1007/s00737-012-0305-z

Write a reflective journal on the book “American Born Chinese.”

PLEASE USE THE ATTACHED PDF AS ONE THE REFERENCES
You have been invited throughout this course to explore personal empathy-bias about the legal topics and issues that we have explored and analyzed. Being aware of one’s empathy-bias and setting these aside at work is an important part of abiding by ethical guidelines in our field. When serving the legal system or while in other professional settings, ethical guidelines require that forensic psychology professionals be fair, objective, and unbiased. To do so, being aware of one’s empathy-bias can be an important first step in setting aside personal opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints in order to be faithful to these ethical requirements.
For your Discussion, you will reflect on your empathy-bias related to the legal topics and issues you have explored and analyzed during the first 10 weeks of this course.
Note: If you are an international student, you may use your local or regional code of ethics.
To prepare
Reflect on:
Topics throughout the course and those in which you had the most trouble managing your empathy-bias
Other topics or work tasks that are most likely to elicit empathy-bias that might be challenging to manage
Ethical guidelines that might be at risk if your empathy-bias is not managed
How management of your empathy-bias could empower you to contribute more effectively to social change
Strategies to manage your empathy-bias, noting that different strategies might work better for different topics

Post a response in which you address two of the following:
Describe what you have noticed about your empathy-bias as you have explored the various topics included in this course. (e.g., what topics elicited the most empathy-bias, what topics elicited the least?)
Identify and describe topics not covered in this course that you might encounter in your workplace that you believe might elicit high empathy-bias.
Identify which ethical guidelines might be at risk if empathy-bias is not managed.
Explain how management of your empathy-bias could empower you to contribute more effectively to social change.
Recommend management strategies that would work for you in reducing your empathy-bias, noting specific strategies that might be more effective with certain topics.

Write a paper explaining the history of cremation in the past and how it is now and what’s the difference.

Read: Stress in College Students for 2019: How to Cope
https://www.wgu.edu/blog/stress-college-students-2019-how-to-cope1902.html

3. Lab Assignment 3. Complete the following (you do not need to send me your answers):
Lab Activity 4-1, Budgeting While in School
Lab Activity 4-2, How Intimate Are Your Friendships?

Write a one-page, double spaced, reflective paper addressing the following:
Explain your top stressors you experience as a college student.
Elaborate on your results from both labs. What is the interpretation of the results?
Identify three resources on campus that you could utilize to assist in reducing your stress levels.

Writing Assignment Module 3
Question:
Explain how the featured Module readings and video by Travel and Leisure, and its different destinations and presenters, supported or challenged concepts learned within the Module 3 lecture. Give detailed examples in your analysis to show your application and learning of the Module content.
Instructions:
To overview, writing assignments this quarter are to be two-pages, double spaced (500 words). You are encouraged to work with the writing center on your paper as appropriate. You are further encouraged to review the grading rubric for guidance.
You must site examples from the videos and lecture(https://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/615/) in your response and use at least 1 outside source in making your argument or position.

Case Study: Just Supporting Evidence Collection in Sexual Assault Cases
After listening to the case study-what are your thoughts on national standards for evidence collection. Why do you think this hasn’t yet occurred? What would be the benefit of a home evidence collection? What are the disadvantages?

Write an essay (social science writing style) that explains the ideas of The Social Contract and be sure to explain how The Social Contract is impacted by Policing and vice versa. It is important to note that there are two fundamental ideas that need to be expressed in your essay regarding this ground-breaking philosophical idea. Keep in mind that this course is about the Police Use of Force.
Please utilize at least three sources. Please cite the sources of your information within the context of the essay where the information is presented. Use the APA format for source citation and also for the Bibliography (List of References) which is necessary for this assignment. Primary sources are optimal and there are many primary sources available. Wikipedia and similar sources are not acceptable in a serious academic essay. Please utilize Social Science Writing Style.
Social Science Writing Style
There are different styles of writing and thinking. A well educated person has more than one style. College students who take social science courses after taking English composition courses tend to get lower grades than students who have not yet taken English composition courses. The reason why is probably because in English composition courses students are encouraged to write in a very personal style and to express their opinions. They get used to writing phrases like, “In my opinion…” or “I feel that ….” Sometimes they are also encouraged to write in a rhetorical style with lots of “we” and “should” and rhetorical questions and vague generalities about “society” and “community” and “people” in general. For narrative they have learned to use the more dramatic “literary present” in place of the past tense, as in, “and so Washington crosses the Delaware on Christmas eve to attack the British camp.” This sort of training in literary style affects their thinking style. It is an inappropriate style of writing and thinking for social science. Social science calls for a very objective and precise style. In social science even the opinion of a known expert has no value by itself; only the data matter, not who says something.
A literary style is appropriate for literary pursuits. Social science style happens to be more appropriate for pursuing a career in criminal justice. The objectivity and precision of social science style is required for reports and other documents for criminal justice agencies. Mastering social science style is a plus for a career in criminal justice.
To develop critical thinking skills all writing for this course should be done in social science writing style. The style of writing which is appropriate for social science is somewhat different from the style which would be appropriate for personal, motivational or literary writing. Social science writing style is impersonal, informational, plain and precise. The following rules apply to social science writing.
Use only plain print faces. It is rarely correct style to use underlining, bold print, color, italics or oversized print. Italics are used for book titles and for foreign words. The appropriate appearance for social science is neat but plain. Printing enhancements are tantamount to yelling, which is not acceptable in learned discourse.
Use standard margins. Standard margins are about one inch wide on the sides and about one-and-a-half inches at the top and bottom of a page. Use no boxes or lines. Use no dots or other markers to highlight anything.
Write in formal English. Write complete sentences. Clear thinking takes the form of sentences. Sentence fragments reflect fragmentary thinking. Careful thinking produces whole sentences. Use no slang and no colloquialisms. Use no vulgarities. Use no contractions, e.g., instead of “don’t”, write “do not.” Do not write in twitter style.
Write in essay format. Write in paragraphs. Do not write in shopping list style unless the assignment directions specifically say to create a list of items.
Write in plain English. Strive to be clear, not fancy. Short, clear sentences are best. Avoid jargon. Use technical language sparingly. Whatever needs to be expressed should be expressed in plain, ordinary English. Avoid abbreviations, such as P.D. or PO or CJS. Write so that any literate person could understand what is being written, even someone with no background in the subject matter.
Extended quotations are not allowed. A short quotation is appropriate in only two situations. First, a short quotation is acceptable if it is exceptionally apt and eloquent. That is rare. Second, a short quotation is acceptable if it is saying something so questionable that a reader would demand the original statement and the page reference. A page reference must be given with a quotation.
Write in the past tense when writing about past things, e.g., “Lombroso believed that…,” not “Lombroso believes that….” All authors die, and some change their minds. Past information should not be presented as present information, e.g., not “crime statistics show that…,” but rather “2011 crime statistics showed that….” However, the present tense is used for statements which are considered permanently true, such as, “The earth is round.”
Refer to an author sparingly and only by family name, e.g., “Goldstein,” not “Herman Goldstein.” Do not write “the author” when you know the author’s name. Be precise by using the author’s name. Do not use any titles, e.g., write “Holmes,” not “Justice Holmes.” In social science information is judged on the basis of the evidence for it, not on the credentials of who said it. That is a reason for referring to an author sparingly.
Write in the third person. Do not use “I,” “my,” “you,” “we,” “our,” “us.” In social science “I” is permitted only when reporting an action of the author, such as “I interviewed….” Do not use phrases like, “I think that…” or “in my opinion,” or “I do not agree that….” Simply omit such phrases, and go ahead with your statement. Social science pretends to be more objective than it is.
Respect the difference between “a” and “the.” The indefinite pronouns “a” and “an” denote “any” rather than a particular person or thing. The definite pronoun “the” refers to a particular or definite person or thing. For example, “a police department” means any police department, but “the police department” means a particular police department. An error in language is an error in thinking. If you write “the police department” when you are writing about police departments in general, you are probably assuming that all police departments are the same as “the” particular police department you have in your mind.
Use gender neutral language when referring to a person who could be either female or male. But avoid such awkward contrivances as “s/he” or “he/she” or “he or she.” Rework the sentence to make it gender neutral but smooth flowing. Some grammarians allow the use of “they” or “their” when referring to a person who may be female or male, even when referring to a single person, e.g., “When a judge gives their decision….” Notice that in this example it would have been possible to avoid the problem altogether by writing, “When a judge gives a decision….”
Avoid parentheses. If something is essential, say it without parentheses. If it is not essential, omit it. Do not supplement or correct a statement by adding something in parentheses. Do not substitute a more accurate word by adding it in parentheses, such as, “when police (detectives) interrogate….” Correct the original instead of adding something in parentheses.
Eliminate slashes. The meaning of a slash is unclear. Whatever meaning you intend should be expressed precisely in words. Avoid hackneyed slashing as in “and/or.”
Write with precision. Do not use vague words like “some” or “many” or “sometimes” or “often” or “recently” or “people.” Specify how many, or how often, or exactly when, or which people. Use words precisely. Do not write something like, “Westley felt that…” when you mean, “Westley thought that….” Avoid very general words like “society,” “the community,” “the public,” “citizens,” “democracies,” “government officials.” Instead specify which aspect or part of society or a community you mean, which part of the public, which citizens, which democracies, which government officials. Precise writing will prompt precise thinking.
Eschew rhetoric. Rhetoric is speech designed to persuade or move someone. Social science writing is intended to inform, not to persuade. Write statements, not questions. A question which assumes that the answer is obvious or that there is only one possible answer indicates that the person asking the question has not done much thinking. Avoid preaching by avoiding words such as “should” or “ought” or “must.” Omit emotional words like “sadly” or “unfortunately.” Avoid superlatives and exaggerations. Eliminate words which suggest mindless credulity, such as “obviously,” “clearly,” “certainly,” “no doubt.” Social scientists are more likely to use words like “possibly,” “probably,” “apparently,” or “evidently,” depending on which word is most accurate. To be precise and objective, avoid similes and metaphors. To say that one thing is like something else is a very loose form of thinking; it is like making shoes out of banana skins.

Writing Assignment Three: Choose one of the following:
Create an original creation myth which is either evolutionary or devolutionary or both. The myth should reflect what you think is good or bad or both about current life and society. This myth should be a minimum of two complete, double spaced pages.
Then, write an explanation of the meaning of your story and how your story fulfills the elements above. In this explanation, you should explain completely and make references to your own story as evidence. Your explanation should be a minimum of two complete, double spaced pages.
Create an original myth about a journey to the underworld. This story should reflect how difficult or easy it is to get to the underworld, how separated or linked the world of the living is to the world of the dead, whether or not there is a continuous communication between living and dead (via rituals, of course), and whether there is a strong fear of death or little of no fear of death. This myth should be a minimum of two complete, double spaced pages.
Then, write an explanation of the meaning of your story and how your story fulfills the elements above. In this explanation, you should explain completely and make references to your own story as evidence. Your explanation should be a minimum of two complete, double spaced pages.
Create a love myth which reflects your attitudes and beliefs regarding love between consenting adults (of any gender identification or sexual orientation). Your myth should show in action and/or symbolize what kind of love this is. You may include such typical love story elements as lover’s trials or ordeals and visitations by supernatural forces or beings in order to represent your beliefs and ideas. This myth should be a minimum of two complete, double spaced pages.
Then, write an explanation of the meaning of your story and how your story fulfills the elements above. In this explanation, you should explain completely and make references to your own story as evidence. Your explanation should be a minimum of two complete, double spaced pages.
Note: The story and the explanation will be graded equally, so take the explanation seriously.

The question my professor is asking for case: “What would your recommendations be to improve the One Woman Campaign?” Please follow the steps given below with how to attached the case. I also attached the case study below. Thank you so much!