Best Writer

Write a response paper on how aspects of that movie align or misalign with the “real” aspects of the criminal justice system you have learned about so far in the course.

Your Task
For
this assignment, you will attend a public hearing, or other meeting open to the
public, being conducted regarding the social policy area the student is
interested or would like to learn more.
The purpose for attending the meeting is to collect data regarding the
policy area and to observe how testimony is organized and presented. The student may also view a public hearing
via television or video on the internet.
If the student chooses to view a public hearing via a video, it must be
related to their topic of study or interest. Each student will prepare a 4- 6 page paper regarding the hearing that
was attended which will be turned in no
later than February 8th.

Students
are encouraged to attend a public hearing before this time, but availability of
hearings vary, thus this is the latest. Public hearings are listed on local,
state and federal government websites.

Your
paper should include the following points:

Introduction:
·
Identify the date of the hearing, where it was
held and the purpose of the public hearing.
What topic or proposal was being discussed? If this was related to a bill, please identify
it by number and title. If it was related to a regulation or policy, please
identify by name and number (if a regulation, for example; “Draft Chapter 9999,
Home Health Regulations.” Identify the
committee or panel and chair names.

Details
of Hearing Process:
·
Discuss the agenda for the hearing
·
Provide details about how the hearing opened up
and how it proceeded, who spoke and what groups they represented
·
Note if
there were any changes to the original agenda or if any business items were
deferred for a future date and why

Testimony
Discussion:
Who
presented testimony and what group did they represent?
Did
they make compelling arguments for or against the particular issue(s)
being proposed?
What
was strong about their testimony?
Which
issues do you think could have been strengthened and how?
What
types of questions were asked?
What
was the tone of the meeting? Did
the tone change at all? How did
people react to the change in tone?

Conclusion:
·
The student is to summarize what they learned
from this experience.
·
How did this experience help you as a future
MSW policy practitioner better understand your potential role on the policy
development process?
·
Did anything discussed or presented conflict
with the goals (e.g., promotion of social justice) of social work? Please explain /expand

Process Stages to be
followed:
Read through the assignment and
rubric carefully. Identify areas needing clarification and ask questions
in class. After you are done with this, create a personal timeline for you
to complete the following stages by the requisite deadlines.
Choose the social policy area you
are interested in and identify public meetings scheduled during the
semester on this topic.
Attend the hearing and take notes.
Write a draft of the paper. Review
APA and grammar checklists. Review with the rubric and fill out your
self-assessment.
Turn the paper in via Canvas by 11:59
PM on February 8th.

Format
The written paper
should be 4-6 pages total, including
your cover page and reference page, using Arial 11-point font size, single-spaced,
and one-inch margins. Follow the formatting style as described in the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association (6th edition). No abstract is needed. Per
the syllabus, the paper is due on February 8th via Canvas. Ten percentage
points will be deducted for every 24 hours your paper is turned in after 11:59
PM.

Prompt: There are many assessments that coaches use, initially or during the coaching relationship to support the client in creating greater self-awareness as well as a vision and goals. Chapter 8 (Moore) provides 13 different assessment. Locate one of these assessments and then administer it to a co-worker. After completing the assessment discuss it with the co-worker and provide insight into the results of the assessment. Make sure to share with your co-worker that you are doing this as part of your graduate class and that you are not a certified executive coach.
Write a paper about the assessment, the administration of the assessment, the data from the completed assessment, and what coaching recommendations or advice would you provide your co-worker. You can use additional information from the text to support your conclusions.
Requirements: Each paper submitted in this course must have a title page and a reference page. You are expected to reference and cite a minimum of two scholarly sources in each paper. Proper APA 6th Edition must be followed. If you need assistance with APA please refer to the “APA Student Paper” handout or visit Purdue Owl at https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/
(Links to an external site.)
.

In 1986, responding to the Pierce decision of its Supreme Court, the New Jersey legislature adopted The Conscientious Employee Protection Act (“CEPA”), shielding from retaliation employees who object to, or refuse to participate in, “any activity, policy or practice which the employee reasonably believes to be incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy concerning the public health, safety or welfare.” What would have been the likely outcome had Dr. Pierce sued under this [CEPA] law? Does the element of this CEPA law requiring that “the employee reasonably believes” state a subjective standard or an objective standard? Explain. Does this element make it easier for an employee to blow the whistle? What ethical theory(ies) would support an employee’s decision to blow the whistle?

For the Literary Analysis Essay, you will choose one of the authors that we have studied this semester and examine one of his/her works and make an argument about a theme, character, motivation, or historical context.

SOURCE MATERIALS:
The Library’s website will have access to a number of journals and databases that may help assist you in your search. You should use at least three scholarly sources (Sources that are derived from scholarly journals found in databases like JStor, Academic Search Premiere, or a similar database. DO NOT USE BLOGS. Blogs are unregulated, and can contain information that appears valid, but is in fact erroneous.
DO NOT use Wikipedia, Shmoop, eNotes, Sparknotes, or Cliff Notes as a source to support your argument. Restrict your outside sources to academic materials: Academic Articles, Historical Texts, and News articles from reputable sources (Huff Post, Breitbart, etc. are blogs and they are not acceptable).

You are required to use at least 5 outside sources in order to provide a background and support for your argument. These sources would go to support the argument you are making about the text. The paper will be written in MLA format, and must be 5 to 7 pages long. The bare minimum of the number of pages is 5, but a longer page count can help to insure a higher score.

METHODOLOGY:

In order to approach this essay from a historical stand point, you should start with the question: How is this author’s work a product of the societal conditions in which he/she was living? For example, if you choose to write about Graham Greene’s “The Destructors,” you would couch your discussion in terms of the historical conditions and attitudes in England. How did the war effect the psychology of the youth of the time period. What impact did the war have on these boys to make them react in the way that they did.
If you choose to do a character study, say Iago in Shakespeare’s Othello, you might start by asking what makes Iago so malevolent? In order to support your argument, you would like choose from sources written by psychologists, and historians as well as literary scholars.
You are also free to do an expanded reading of a poem. For example, if you chose Sharon Olds’ “I go back to May 1937”, you would look into the poet’s biography, criticism of the poet’s work, and perhaps even bring in some psychological texts.
Finally, the more daring of your number might choose to do a feminist reading of Joyce Carol Oates “Where are you going? Where have you been?” I would surmise that a wealth of feminist criticism could be found on the text through the library’s website. Such a reading might couch the Connie as the heroine of the story, and that her choice to leave with Arnold was just that: her choice. Moving forward one might suggest how the story, and Connie’s actions at large are resistance against male oppression. The possibilities are endless.

The goal is to explore a construction safety/health issue, find (or develop) a realistic solution(s), and share your new-found knowledge with the class. Note: You don’t have to come up with a solution(s) that has not been done before; however, when using other resources please make sure to provide appropriate citations and references accordingly. A formal report is also required. All reports are to be typed, double spaced, no less than 15 pages in length (including Title/Cover page, TOC, Main text, References, etc.) and have margins of at least 1 inch, character size 12 point, with no spelling or grammatical errors. All citations and references must use APA format.
Identify a construction safety issue (Source could be…)
Personal experience
News media report
Trade publication, or
Internet
Presentation and Report Elements (Format & Arrangement):
Cover page
Table of content
Executive summary (one page)
Introduction/Define the Problem
Background/injury statistics/rationale
What happened?
What regulations were broken?
What was the potential impact in business terms?
What was the potential impact in human terms?
Corrective measures
How would you correct the problem?
Actions taken to prevent the recurrence of the incident(s)
Describe your solution
How would you implement your solution?
What resources and material would you need?
What is the cost of the solution?
Estimated benefits
What is the estimated benefit to the company? Conduct a cost-benefit analysis.
Employee impact
Business savings
References (APA style)
Five to ten (or more if you wish) published construction safety related literature, i.e., scholarly papers and/or grey literatures (e.g., reports, conference proceedings, technical specifications and standards, technical and commercial documentation, as well as official documents not published commercially, e.g. government reports and documents).
Grading Criteria [Grad]:
Report
Content
Length 15 points Actual _______
Coherence and organization 15 points Actual _______
Subject thoroughly covered & context 50 points Actual _______
Grammar/spelling/clarity 10 points Actual _______
References 10 points Actual _______
100 points subtotal Actual_______

This week’s reading addressed cultural values, as a roadmap for behavior. You will examine one of Hofstede’s Value Dimensions, by comparing and contrasting the contributing topics.
Choose one of the following topics:
Individualism/Collectivism
High/Low Uncertainty Avoidance
High/Low Power Distance
Masculinity/Femininity
Long/Short-term Orientation
Your assignment:
Provide an in-depth comparison of the topic you chose
Examine the effect of your topic on society and intercultural communications
Explain how you can utilize this knowledge to assist in enhancing your intercultural communication skills
Requirements for the presentation include:
Create a narrated PowerPoint, with 8-10 slides, which includes the title slide and the references slide
The narrated slides should include audio recorded voiceover (As if you are talking to an audience)
Include the script within the notes section for each slide
Include 3 APA references for your presentation
Be creative and professional in a way that engages the audience, showing enthusiasm in narration
Submit a narrated and professional PowerPoint to the Unit 3 dropbox

For your initial post, you will choose between Topic 1 or Topic 2. For your responses, you can respond to your fellow students for either Topic 1 or Topic 2, ensuring a total of two responses.
Topic 1: Arguably, any value taken to an absolute extreme is likely to be logically absurd. You will examine the values of the dominant culture in the U.S. This week you will identify and interpret one of the following values for your choice:
Individualism
Science and technology
Material acquisition
In your main post address, the following:
Identify and interpret one value in a positive way
Identify and interpret the same value in a negative way
Explain how you would guard against the negative manifestations of the value without compromising the value itself
Your main post should be an APA formatted thread, with 250-300 words, including two APA references. Provide a thorough response to two classmates, with a 150-200-word response, and use APA references as needed. When choosing a classmate’s post to review, please respond first to a student that does not have a classmate response, to assure all students receive student feedback.
Topic 2: Arguably, any value taken to an absolute extreme is likely to be logically absurd. You will examine the values of the dominant culture in the U.S. This week you will identify and interpret one of the following values for your choice:
Equal opportunity
Progress and change
Work and play
Competitive nature
In your main post address, the following:
Identify and interpret one value in a positive way
Identify and interpret the same value in a negative way
Explain how you would guard against the negative manifestations of the value without compromising the value itself
Your main post should be an APA formatted thread, with 250-300 words, including two APA references. Provide a thorough response to two classmates, with a 150-200-word response, and use APA references as needed. When choosing a classmate’s post to review, please respond first to a student that does not have a classmate response, to assure all students receive student feedback.

This assignment addresses learning outcomes including:
CLO1 – Integrate key degree program concepts to produce a solution to a business issue.
CLO2 – Demonstrate team-building and business decision-making skills.
CLO3 – Evaluate different business strategies.
CLO4 – Debate and defend ethical behavior in strategic decision-making.
CLO5 – Formulate revised strategies.
The course provides a capstone experience by examining and finding alternative solutions for an existing business issue or for capturing a business opportunity with the use of concepts and knowledge gained in the prior courses taken in this degree program.

Investigate an existing management issue for a publicly-traded company.
Propose an original solution to the management issue. (The goal of the paper is to apply concepts learning throughout the Supervision and Management degree program through the analysis of the management issues and then proposing the original solution. The goal is not to report on how the company resolved the issue.)
Use supporting research, rather than opinions, to support your assertions regarding the management issue and to support the proposed solution.
The management issue and proposed solution should be the focus of the analysis and proposal.
Paper Sections:
Title page formatted according to APA style. (Do not include an abstract).
Introduction to the topic to include a clear and concise thesis statement and include the organization to be investigated.
Provide a brief history of the organization (one to two paragraphs).
Identify the organization’s primary competitors (one to two paragraphs).
Analysis and discuss the current management issue that needs to be resolved.
Propose and evaluate informed ethical approaches for dealing with the management issue.
Identify and discuss prior unsuccessful efforts that were previously attempted towards addressing the issue. Include an analysis of challenges that prevented other attempts from successfully achieving resolution. These methods could be from the organization being investigated or another organization in the same industry.
Develop a strategy to address the problem or issue and provide at least one alternative strategy.
Include a brief summary of your conclusions
Please review the Rubric for additional information regarding grading criteria. Grading will be based on content, format, and demonstration of weekly reading assignments, learning objectives, and outside research. Direct quotes are not permitted.
A minimum of 10 full pages – not including the title page and reference page.
A minimum of 10 peer-reviewed sources (not including the textbook) from the FSW library databases must be cited in the text of the paper. See the link to the Florida SouthWestern State College Library Research Tutorial. Be sure to review how to find peer-reviewed (scholarly) articles. The FSW librarians and your instructor can also assist with researching the databases.
Each page of the paper should include a minimum of one peer-reviewed source as support.
Do not use any textbook as a source.
Do not use direct quotes. Be sure to paraphrase. Do not copy and paste. The FSW Writing Centers offer assistance with writing through virtual meetings. Grammarly.com is also helpful.
Use APA to properly cite all sources.
Make sure your paper begins with a Level One Heading: Introduction (Do not confuse an Introduction with an Abstract)
Include a properly formatted APA cover sheet.
Include a properly formatted APA reference page.
Use 12 point Times New Roman font.
Double-space the entire paper.
Accurate In-text citations must be included.
APA documentation and formatting style used appropriately (including in-text citations, reference entries, and format).
A thorough analysis of the topic in relation to management, leadership, and course learning outcomes.
Spelling, grammar, and writing style
Write in the third person – such as, “This researcher…”, “This student…”, Do not use “I”, “we”, “our”, “you”, or any other forms of indefinite you.
Avoid bullet points.
Submit your own original work. Do not submit work previously submitted to any course – including your own work, that of other students, or any work that is purchased or traded from the online cheating sites, such as coursehero.
Be sure to review your assignment after submitting it in Canvas in the assignment link. Submitting an assignment that cannot be viewed, or submitting the wrong file do not constitute valid excuses for re-submitting after the due date.

To summarize, evaluate, and identify the mechanisms for the immunological basis of rejection in clinical and experimental transplant models.

Immunology of transplant rejection.
Physiology of the transplant rejection
Mechanism of rejection – what are specific molecule play role in rejection.
Clinical stage of rejection and type of rejecation.
Chronic rejecation details
how antibody play role in rejcation
What are specific method for detection of rejection in clinical and experiment transplant.
Current statical data on transplant rejection.
What are specific treatment help to prevent rejection.