Best Writer

You will select an organization of your choice and discuss what has, or has not,
made the organization a success.
Be sure to address the following areas in your paper:
What product or service does the organization offer?
Who is the target market?
Discuss what elements of the marketing mix have/have not been employed.
Is their use of the elements of the marketing mix working? Explain.
Discuss how customer value is being created and how it is fostering/hindering growth.
What is the organization’s pricing strategy?
Discuss where the organization’s key product is in the product lifecycle and what the organization can do to further enhance or maintain its product life cycle position (as recommended).
Apply specific examples from Weeks 1-4 readings and class discussions to support your paper. Textbook is Principles of Marketing, 17th Edition by Phillip T. Kotler and Gary Armstrong.
Be sure to cite at least three sources outside of your text using the most current edition of the APA Manual of Style. Outside sources can include books, websites, journals, magazines or research papers. Paper should be a minimum of 1000 words, excluding your reference section and title page. The documents should be submitted in word, double-spaced, with consistent 1-inch margins on each page and font consistent with APA guidelines.

The United States did not engage in global imperialism until the turn of the 20th century. explain the process of expansion and how the U.S. went about acquiring new terroritories. (Make sure that you include information about the Spanish-American war.)

The primary goal of this literature review is to integrate concepts from four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. The four content domains should be chosen from previous coursework in this program. In this paper, students will review the findings in the individual empirical articles, organize the research in a meaningful way, evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the research findings, and present an integrated synthesis of the research that sheds new light on the topics within and across the four domains.
The result of a successful integrative literature review may be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to research and practice. Therefore, before writing this literature review, substantive new research must be conducted via the Internet and within the UAGC Library for each of the four chosen domains. A minimum of six sources must be included for each of the four domains. Although content from literature reviews completed in prior courses within this program may be included, it may not constitute the total research for the individual domains addressed within this assignment. No more than four sources from previous literature reviews completed in this program may be utilized for this integrative review.
The headings listed below must be used within the paper to delineate the sections of content. These sections include the following: a clear introduction that provides a general review and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in which the evidence is presented through analysis, critique, and synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed.
Introduction
Provide a conceptual framework for the review.
Describe how the review will be organized. The questions below may be used to guide this section.
What are the guiding theories within the domains?
How are the domains connected?
Are there competing points of view across the domains?
Why is the integration of these domains important?
What is the history of these domains?
What are the related theories or findings?
Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized.
How and why was the literature chosen?
What is your claim or thesis statement?
Discussion
Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review.
Analysis
Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains.
Integrate concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology.
What claim(s) can be made in the introduction?
What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?
Critique
Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings.
How well does the literature represent the issues across the four domains?
Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the literature.
What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature?
Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments?
What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the literature?
What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims presented?
Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.
Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research?
Were ethical considerations different across the domains?
Synthesis
Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives.
Describe the research that has previously been done across these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist.
Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made.
Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains.
Conclusion
Provide a conclusion and present potential future considerations.
State your final conclusion(s).
Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary.
What questions remain?
What are the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life?
Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for future research?
What do the overarching implications of the studies show?
Where should the research go from this point to further the understanding of these domains and the greater study of psychology?
Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Folio portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this Integrative Literature Review, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to your Folio account and upload the revised Integrative Literature Review as a project in your portfolio. (Use the Setting Up and Using Folio (Links to an external site.) guide to create an account if you do not already have one.) The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool.
The Integrative Literature Review
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
Must use at least 24 peer-reviewed sources, including a minimum of 20 from the UAGC University Library.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the UAGC Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference list that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the UAGC Writing Center.

Each Reflective Analysis provides you the opportunity to apply what you’ve learned to artworks of your choosing (that you haven’t seen before) with an emphasis on your personal response, interpretation, and analysis while cultivating your writing and research abilities. As we move through the semester, you will build these skills with each assignment increasing in length and depth and incorporation of course terminology which will culminate in a final project that will combine all of your efforts over the length of course.
Reflective Analysis 2 focuses on how artists use the formal elements of art to communicate meaning in their work.
This assignment consists of multiple parts: a brief biography of an artist of your choosing as well as how you made your choice, your subjective response to an artwork by the same artist, critical analysis of the selected artwork, and finally, a bibliography documenting your source materials.

Process:
Begin by choosing one of the artists from this week’s lecture/reading/links that interests you – one you’d like to explore further. It can also be an artist that you are already familiar with that you think fits well with the assignment.
Find an artwork by that artist which you’d like to reflect on.
NOTE: you cannot write about the same artist or artwork you used for previous Reflective Analyses, you must select a different artist and artwork.
Then, you will provide details based on your research and answer some reflective questions in the following order which should include all of the following sections in essay form:

1. Artist (15 points): This portion should be comprised of information about the artist of your choice as well as why you selected them. Begin with: Who is the artist? Why did you choose the artist – what is generally interesting to you about it? Additional suggestions for material: date and place of birth and death, family information, lifetime accomplishments, famous art pieces, effects or impact on society, or historical significance.
* Length: At least 250 words, no more than 350 words.

2. Artwork (15 points): This portion should be your own subjective response to a work of art by the same artist you selected. Why did you choose the artwork – what is generally interesting to you about it? What was your initial, subjective interpretation of the artwork? Did it change as you found out more about the context of the artwork? What emotions, concepts, or ideas did it provoke in you? Do not simply describe the work or state whether or not you “like” the work; but rather, elaborate with specific details from the work that illustrate your response.
* Include the title of the work (in italics) and a picture of the artwork
* Length: At least 250 words, no more than 350 words.

3. Critical Analysis (15 points): This portion of the writing assignment should be your own subjective and critical response to a work of art (the same you selected above) by the same artist you chose for the biographical portion of the essay. You must base your opinion on the elements of art – using this specific vocabulary throughout. Things to consider: how does the artist’s use of the formal elements of art to emphasize and support their content – the meaning of the work? Thinking back to Reflective Analysis 1, are there broader thematic messages conveyed by the artwork? What are they? Be sure to not simply describe the work, but rather, elaborate with specific details from the work that illustrate your analysis.
* Length: At least 250 words, no more than 350 words.
4. Bibliography (15 points): You must provide a bibliography in one of the formal the correct citation styles that includes at least 3 sources. Online sources are ok, but at least one source must be a book/journal/periodical/catalog and must be in addition to your textbook, and remember, Wikipedia doesn’t count. You are encouraged to research the artwork at your school’s library by searching through books and articles, written by scholars in the field of art and art history. Check out your campus’s library online and ask a librarian or tutor for help.

Access and review the Rosabeth Moss Kanter TED Talk.

Summary of video:
1. Show up
2. Speak up
3. Look up to bigger a vision
4. Team up
5. Never give up
6. Lift others up

After reviewing, identify a situation that has either occurred or one that you are facing and apply the 6 keys to leading
positive change in that scenario.

Which change model would work best in this situation – Kotter or Lewin? Explain why.
Please Note: The situation you select for this paper will also be the situation you will use for your next paper: Change management Paper.

Your paper must be a minimum of 4-5 pages and in APA format, with 4-5 outside resources, including the TED Talk.

There is published literature and nursing education standards that call for today’s nurses to be prepared to intervene in times of disaster. This paper provides a venue for you to pull this information and evidence together in a cohesive response to the following question:
How do health care professionals best prepare and engage in emergency management interventions?
Provide an introduction to the topic (consider reviewing the significance and importance of preparedness and intervention).
Identify key reasons why nurses should be prepared
List specific ways nurses can be involved and help clients who experienced a disaster (minimum 2 distinct interventions)
Provide a summary conclusion
This paper should include the following:
Appropriately answer the bolded question listed above in a 3-4 page essay, substantiated by evidence (this is not an opinion paper)
Review and edit following the Holistic Rubric and grading rubric provided with the assignment.
Utilize APA formatting, including a title page, running head, double spacing, font size, and active tense, grammatically correct standard English language.
Incorporate sourcing and accurately cite intext, and include a reference list at the conclusion.
Submit through the Turnitin tool posted within this assignment.
Please see the posted Holistic Grading Rubric to guide scoring.

Please describe the strengths and challenges of your preparation for graduate study, your reasons for undertaking graduate study at the doctoral level and your career objectives. Provide your personal insights as to why you should be selected for participation in this program and what you expect to gain from this experience. In addition, please identify the contributions that you wish to make to your chosen field of study as well as to your community.

This paper is an abstract of two original research studies, one for quantitative research study and one for qualitative.
-Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systematic review SHOULD NOT BE USED.
-mixed-methods studies SHOULD NOT BE USED.
-your abstracts should be written in your own words, 200 words each and include the most essential information.
-use current APA style format and cite your sources
-YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ATTACH BOTH RESEARCH ARTICLES (THE FULL ARTICLES) THAT YOU USE TO WRITE YOUR ABSTRACTS (VERY IMPORTANT).
-address the following questions in each abstract:
-what type of research is it(quantitative, qualitative)
-what was the research question or hypotesis
-what is the sample (population) the sample size, and sample characteristics
-what is the setting (facility type, location, and country) of the study
-wht were the researcher’s final results and findings

The Essay
1500 words maximum, excluding the Bibliography.
Exceeding the word limit will result in a grade penalty.
Required Page Elements
No title page
Top of the first page: List your name (first name, surname), student number, title of the essay, and the date of submission
12-point Times New Roman or Arial typeface
At least 2.5cm margins all around
Double-space throughout
Number all pages
Use the style of citation (American Antiquity or otherwise) consistent with your Proposal.

Second one-page reflection and DQ 2 – Availability Ends
2:30 PM

The reflection is due before class begins.
Submit a reflection (about one page) on the readings of the day: Sophocles, Antigone, pp. 1-20, Reader.
Your reflections should show have the following components:
1. Summarize the reading in 7-10 sentences.
2. Provide 2+ key quotes/Narrate the parts you thought were insightful in the reading and explain why you took an interest in them.
3. Share your key takeaways from the text in 4-5 sentences.

4. Ask an open-ended question.