Best Writer

Discussion Topic:
(1) Please identify and discuss effective sales closing techniques (at least 3) used by companies in closing strategy. Provide justification by explaining your reasoning.

(2) Discuss some major differences of selling techniques between consumer and industrial salespeople. Please provide at least 3 clear examples. Also why are customer demographics important in selling?

Submission Format:
Answer both sections (1 and 2) to the discussion question by the given deadline. Ideally, your post should be around 200 – 400 words per section. Discussion post should be substantial and answer the questions in detail.

Discuss about the use of virtualization technology to assist an healthcare office to better transition to a more digital workload.

Write a paper about the differences of Lady Macbeth and Macbeth’s opinion of
how to achieve what they both want its from “The Tragedy of Macbeth.”
I have to write a one-page explanation of their differences, citing scene and line references as evidence for your ideas.

The most specific she got was it has to be times new roman and 12 font size with double spaces as well as a full page

Scenario
You are the new HR manager for Java Corp, a domestic cold coffee and tea company. Java Corp has had trouble retaining valuable employees, and the termination of a number of employees for performance and conduct has resulted in lawsuits. Prepare a memo to organizational management, analyzing best practices in approaches and procedures addressing each of these issues.

Prepare a memo to organizational management. In your memo:
Apply best practices in employee engagement to the selected organization.
Include two best practices by HR professionals that would benefit the organization.
Apply retention strategies to the selected organization.
Include two strategies by HR professionals that would benefit the organization.
Explain the significance of voluntary and involuntary turnover for the selected organization.
Describe how turnover can have a financial impact on an organization.
Describe how turnover can impact existing employees.
Analyze how progressive discipline can be beneficial to the organization as well as the employees.
Include two benefits of this process. For example, explain how the progressive discipline process could reduce turnover or how it is important for documentation purposes.
Analyze practical considerations in terminations.
Describe legal and ethical factors that should be considered when a termination decision is made.
Include recommendations of how an organization can protect themselves from specific types of litigation.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
Length: Three typed, double-spaced pages.
Written communication: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and professional. Your writing should be:
Concise and logically organized.
Free of errors in grammar and mechanics.
Validation and support: Use a minimum of two relevant and credible scholarly or professional resources such as the Wall Street Journal to support your work.
APA format: Format all citations and references in accordance with current APA guidelines.

Your mission is to diagnose a well-known fictional character (from a movie, TV show, book, etc.) with a possible psychological disorder. However, before your diagnosis can be made, you must first demonstrate a basic understanding of the disorder.

Then, for an extra credit opportunity, you may offer a viable treatment option for this individual, based on the various forms of therapy discussed in class and/or the textbook.

Part 1 . Identify a psychological disorder and discuss specific research from the textbook and/or lecture (e.g., prevalence, gender differences, as well as biological, psychological, and/or socio-cultural influences, etc.). You may also use outside sources, but be sure to cite them in a works cited section at the end of your assignment. Once you have discussed the disorder, identify a famous character of your choice (must be fictitious – no real people) and discuss why you think he/she may have signs of this disorder. You should be specific by providing examples of behavior and/or other symptoms.

Part 2. Based on your chosen character, and the disorder he/she may have, what treatment plan would you recommend? Describe this therapeutic approach including relevant theory and/or research.
Note:

Your main focus should be in describing the disorder and the treatment, and any discussion about the character is secondary.

Write a APA-formatted paper, double-spaced 12 font-size on any topic you desire that is related to some aspect biology. The topic submission should be in the form of a question that you will answer in the paper. Each paper should include the following sections: Introduction, Evidence/Data, Discussion and Conclusion.
There are three objectives in this assignment. The first objective is to allow you an opportunity to explore in greater depth a question in biology of direct interest to you. The second objective is to help you understand better how to gather information on a topic from various sources, including the University library system. The final objective is to improve your writing skills, most importantly how to present, cite, and analyze evidence/data from published literature.
The following process for developing and writing this paper is suggested. First, chose a topic of interest to you and one that can be covered in some detail within the page limit of this paper. You should pose this topic as a question. Second, conduct internet and library research on your topic developing a collection of several articles and papers directly related to answering the question posed by your topic.
As we will discuss in the first class, a good first step is to read through potential sources that you find in your searches and copy quotes from those sources – surrounded by quotes – into a digital note system. Also copy the link for the source, and/or the full APA bibliographic information. Keep the quote and reference material together. We will call the quoted material your “evidence”. It can include relevant facts, definitions, and commentary by others. The commentary generally should be from experts, but if the question involves issues about the way some topic in biology is affecting the non-expert public, then of course you can provide some evidence of that as well.
Third, list all the topics and information you want to present in your paper and divide the information under certain subtopics that lead to paragraphs of your paper. This should result in a paper outline. Once you have an outline, you are ready to write a rough draft of your paper. Make sure to edit your draft for grammar, spelling, content, and length. You should use the grammar and spelling check functions in a word processor such as Word, or any of a number of other available tools online (many of which are free) to ensure that your draft has had all spelling most grammatical errors removed.
Therefore, the process is that you will have posed a QUESTION, you will then have done research to gather relevant EVIDENCE, and then you will use your LOGICAL THINKING to try to come to some conclusions.
If you can produce definitive answers to your question, and possibly give recommendations, that is good. But even if all that can be made from the information you’ve gathered is a summary of what is known along with additional questions that you believe need to be asked, that can be an appropriate outcome as well. It all depends on what new information you find.
I will be looking at the qualities of your question (make it as interesting or novel as you can), your research (demonstrate thoroughness in searching), your quotation and citation to the evidence, and your thinking in coming to conclusions (how well did you weigh and synthesize evidence).
References -The purpose of a list of references is to allow the reader to find out where you obtained your information so the reader can refer to the original document if desired. You need at least 7 separate references for your paper.
References fall into different categories: peer-reviewed journals, popular journals, gray literature, and books. You will find the most accurate and technical scientific information in peer-reviewed journals, such as the Journal of Ecology, Science, Nature, etc. Your paper should have at least one reference from a paper in a peer-reviewed journal. The author or authors who wrote the scientific paper sent it to the journal to be published. The journal then sends the paper out to other scientists familiar with the technical material in the paper to review. Only if the other scientists say the research is well done will the journal publish the paper, which is why they are called “peer-reviewed.” Such a paper will tell you how the information it reports was collected and analyzed besides giving the conclusions from the research. Each year millions of scientific papers are published in peer-reviewed journals. The best way to access papers in peer-reviewed journals is to go to the University library webpage. University pays for internet access to hundreds of peer-reviewed journals. Within the text of your paper, you need to reference the source of all the information provided that is not original with you. You then attach to the end of your paper a “References” section that lists all of the references you used. Do not list a source in the references cited section that you did not reference in your paper.
One very common approach is to start with a quick Internet search, e.g. using Google and Google Scholar. (You can use other engines such as DuckDuckGo, and certainly use the assistance of the University research librarians, to find even more useful search methods.) From your search results, you should get a sense of what various experts have published relevant to your question. You should be able to fairly quickly tell by a scan of search engine results (SER) if there is any expert disagreement or controversy. The same should be found in the Introduction of any expert paper.
Since this is a learning experience, for this report, please include after the Bibliography, a list of your search terms. You should precede each term with a carat mark, e.g. “> how do I perform online research in biology”; (no quotes are needed in your list). Also, recall my praise for Wikipedia: everything written in it is not always perfect, but overall, it is an excellent encyclopedia for learning about topics. You should include at least one relevant reference/link to Wikipedia, or some comparable encyclopedic review, to demonstrate that you have tried to obtain an overview of your topic area. There are also many good scientific review papers you can use as well. If there are signs that experts do not agree on any particular point, you should bring that up in the paper and consider the different points of view. If all the expert writings seem to agree, you can note that too, but of course, if you find other information that makes you question the agreed narrative, you should mention it in the report if you believe it is worth questioning.

1. Reflect on your personal experience with diversity, equity, and inclusion. How do you envision/want to grow your abilities in these areas at SIUE? (minimum 50 words)

2.Please tell us of your financial need for this scholarship (minimum of 50 words).

3.Reflecting on your personal experiences and/or circumstances, tell us something about yourself not already or sufficiently communicated in your application that distinguishes you as a potential scholarship candidate (minimum of 50 words).

4. Write an essay about your community involvement and include details (indicate whether this was during high school or college).

Please choose ONE of the two topics below and submit your posts only on that topic.
Once you have finished all of the required reading, post an answer to the discussion prompts for your chosen Discussion Board topic. Make sure you identify in the subject line which topic you are addressing.
Your initial post should be roughly 250 words and you should address the specific materials assigned, citing your sources appropriately. Remember that at the center of our Discussion Board work is the interpretation of primary sources. Once you have posted your initial post, please respond substantively to at least two other students. Thereafter your instructor will guide the conversation.
—————————————–
Topic 1: Empires of West Africa
Required Reading:
Website: The Empires of the Western Sudan – http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/wsem/hd_wsem.htm (read The Empires of the Western Sudan page and all the primary essays listed on the right-hand side of the page: 1) The Empires of the Western Sudan: Ghana Empire; 2) The Empires of the Western Sudan: Mali Empire; 3) The Empires of the Western Sudan: Songhai Empire; 4) Trade and the Spread of Islam in Africa; 5) The Trans-Saharan Gold Trade (Seventh–Fourteenth Centuries)
Primary Sources:
Website: Al-Bakri, Roads and Kingdoms (1067 CE) – http://users.rowan.edu/~mcinneshin/5394/wk05/albakri.htm
Website: Kingdom of Mail (Al-Umari, ca. 1330 CE) – http://www.bu.edu/africa/outreach/k_o_mali/
Website: Leo Africanus describes Timbuktu (1652 CE) – https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/med/leo_afri.asp
Website: Proverbs from Ghana – http://www.bu.edu/africa/outreach/gp/
Discussion Prompts:
After reading Chapter 6 and the material at the websites, and viewing the videos, please make a 250-word initial post that answers the following questions about the primary sources:
Al-Bakri and Leo Africanus were not native to the areas they discussed. What difference might that make to their view of Ghana and Mali? How might their background have influenced what they saw and described? Did they see everything they described, or were things described to them by others? Did they think the culture that they were writing about was lesser than their own or equal to it? How does Al-Umari’s discussion of Mali differ from Leo’s? What might account for those differences? What do the Ghanaian proverbs add to your understanding of that culture?
Please hit the “Reply” button below to make your initial post.
—————————————–

Write an Essay about the value of a community college education

Plagiarism Policy
All work submitted for consideration must be the work of the author. If a work submitted is determined to be plagiarized from any source, the following steps will be taken:
The member who submitted the plagiarized work will be notified by letter of the incidence of plagiarism with proof supplied.
The plagiarized submission by that member will be disqualified from consideration for the Founders Medal Award.
The member’s chapter advisor and college president will be notified by letter of the incidence of plagiarism and proof will be supplied to each of them.

uploaded file with proposal (what the paper needs to be about) along with outline and the sources that need to be used.the paper actually needs to be 8 pages but the outline and sources are already given! please follow outline along with the sources given.

Instructions:
The format of each written assignment must adhere to the following guidelines:
All text is double spaced, no additional spaces between paragraphs; headings are allowed
Each new paragraph is indented
12-pt font in Times or Times New Roman
1-inch margins
Page numbers in the upper right-hand corner
Reference page in American Sociological Association style, American Psychological Association style or Chicago style (with footnotes)
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/583/03/ (Links to an external site.)
Alphabetical by authors’ last names
This does not count in page or word requirements
Quotations & evidence cited according to ASA style
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/583/02/ (Links to an external site.)
Quotations must be marked with “ “ marks and you must cite with the author’s name(s), the year and the page number to avoid plagiarism.
Ex: “After Anthony Comstock’s death in 1915, the power of the nineteenth century anti-obscenity societies began to wane” (Stone 2017:168).
If the source does not have a page number (website), you must indicate which paragraph it came from.
Ex: “Anthony Comstock was amongst the most influential figures of the late 1800s” (Smith 2018: para. 6)