Best Writer

Action Research Proposal
Use this template to complete the required action research proposal. Remove all prompts (in
italics) and replace with the required information. Please leave all bold headings intact.
Name:
Date:
I. Topic/Problem
a. What are you interested in? What problem do you see in your school or
classroom? What current trend would you like to investigate? Your topic should
not describe what you hope to find; it should simple be an area of interest.
Example: Meeting the needs of ESOL students in the general education setting.
Motivating high school students in the mathematics classroom.
My topic is: _________________________________________________
II. Question
a. Turn your general topic into a question or two. The question or questions will help
guide your research. Examples: What specific needs do ESOL students have in the
general education setting? How can general education teachers meet the needs of
ESOL students, specifically in literacy?
My research question(s):
1.
2.
3.
III. Methodology
a. Describe your initial plan for collecting data related to your research questions.
Refer to your textbook for more information about methodology. At this point,
your ideas are only preliminary and may change drastically before your research
takes place. There are two basic methods- qualitative and quantitative.
2
IV. Sources
a. When it is time to complete your entire project/paper, you will need a minimum of
12 sources for the literature review section. These sources could be journal
articles or book chapters. For this proposal, you will need to ensure that there is
enough written about your topic. This will eliminate potential problems during
your actual study. For this section of the proposal, you should list 6 possible
journal articles or book chapters that may be helpful to you during the literature
review phase of the project. Be sure to include a full citation in APA format, 7th
ed. You should include both articles you reviewed for the course in this section.
This means you only must locate 4 additional articles.
Possible Sources
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
V. Empirical Study
a. For this proposal, locate one empirical study related to your topic. An empirical
study is based on the collection and analysis of data based on direct observation
or experiences in the field.
Empirical Study Details
1. Citation for study (APA format, 7th edition)
2. Purpose of the study
3. Subjects/participants
4. Methods, strategies used with subjects/participants
5. Measures, instruments, or ways of collecting data
6. Results
7. Conclusion
VI. Preliminary Literature Review
a. For this proposal, you will write a preliminary literature review using the two
articles you reviewed during this course and the one empirical study you reviewed
(listed above). You will add to this review during EDU 5004 Educational
Assessment & Action Research. This initial review should be between four and
eight pages in length and should include an introduction, body, and conclusion.
3
The introduction should introduce your topic and outline the structure of the
review (chronological, thematic, etc.). The conclusion should summarize the
findings from the article and include any additional questions or points to
consider as you add to this review later in the program. The review should be
written in APA format, 7th ed. Please refer to the videos posted on Canvas for
additional information related to writing literature reviews. The literature review
is not a separate document. It is included in the proposal.

TOPIC-
** Impact of social media on relationships **

Follow the steps below and take a look at the Week Two Example Paper Download Week Two Example Paperfor an example of how to complete this paper.
Step 1: State a thesis statement on your topic.
This thesis statement does not have to end up being your final position on the subject, but for this workshop, it will serve as the position you will be defending. Your thesis statement is the conclusion of your argument.
Example: If my topic is the moral acceptability of capital punishment, my thesis could be that capital punishment is not morally acceptable.
Step 2: Present your main reason or reasons in favor of your thesis.
These reasons are the premises of your argument. State your argument in standard form.
Example: If my thesis is that capital punishment is not morally acceptable, and my reason is that it sometimes kills innocent human beings, then my argument would be the following:
Premise 1: Capital punishment sometimes kills innocent human beings.
Conclusion: Capital punishment is not morally acceptable.
Step 3: State the new premise (or premises) that would be needed in order to make this argument valid.
This new premise provides what is needed to link (in a valid way) the first premise(s) to the stated conclusion. For more guidance on how to do this, review the assigned sections of Chapter 3 in your textbook, and watch the videos What Is a Valid Argument? (Links to an external site.) and How to Make a Sound Deductive Argument (Links to an external site.).
In the above example, the new premise needed to make the argument valid would be the following:
Premise 2: It is not morally acceptable to do anything that sometimes kills innocent human beings.
The new premise connects the first premise to the conclusion in a way that makes the argument logically valid.
Step 4: Discuss whether the new premise is true (in your view) and why.
Does it have any counter examples? If it is not true (in your view), then how could you modify it so that it is true but still supports the conclusion? If it is true (in your view), how might you respond to a likely objection to it?
In the example above, the new premise may not be true. A counterexample could be war. Wars typically kill at least some innocent human beings, but that does not make all of them morally unacceptable.
To figure out how to modify the premise, one can ask the following: What is the difference between good wars and capital punishment? Perhaps it is that good wars are necessary to prevent greater overall harm.
So, one might change the premise to, “It is not morally acceptable to do anything that sometimes kills innocent human beings, unless it is necessary to prevent greater overall harm.” This new version of the premise shows what is wrong with capital punishment without also entailing that war is always wrong.
Step 5: State the new version of the argument in standard form, adding any other premises needed to complete the reasoning (meaning to make it valid).
The new argument becomes the following:
Premise 1: Capital punishment sometimes kills innocent human beings.
Premise 2: It is not morally acceptable to do anything that sometimes kills innocent human beings unless it is necessary to prevent greater overall harm.
Premise 3: Capital punishment is not necessary to prevent greater overall harm.
Conclusion: Capital punishment is not morally acceptable.
Step 6: Discuss whether the new argument is deductively valid and whether all of its premises are true.
If your argument meets both of these requirements (namely that it is valid and all premises are true), then you have an apparently sound argument; great job! If not, then go back to the steps above and repeat until you have a sound argument and revise Step 5 until it meets both requirements. (so that what you post under Step 5 above is your final, sound version).
Step 7: Once you have an (apparently) sound argument, present an objection to it.
Imagine for a moment that you are a smart person with the opposite perspective on this issue. What would be your best objection to the argument that you just gave? It can be an objection to the truth of one of the premises or to the validity of the reasoning, or it can be a counter argument intended to override your argument. In any case, express here what you take that best objection to be.
The Creating a Sound Argument Workshop paper,
Should be 1 to 2 pages in length.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of workshop in bold font
Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
Student’s name
Name of institution (University of Arizona Global Campus)
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Due date

it is 7 questions + 1 additional question that you create and answer

Read the following 4 stories with Steps 1 and 2 in mind.
“Hot Lady,” by Charles Bukowski (Links to an external site.)
“The Compartment,” by Raymond Carver (Links to an external site.)
“Indian Education,” by Sherman Alexie (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)”The Things They Carried,” (Links to an external site.) by Tim O’Brien (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
STEP 1: Pick the 2 stories that affect you the most–whatever the reason. Then, for each story, answer the following questions in at least 5-7 sentences each. In doing so, challenge yourself to annotate and apply my advice from Creative Reading and Close Reading (as well as Close Reading–Student Examples with Teacher Feedback).
What do you find most intriguing about this story? Feel free to extemporize in your own way or focus on a literary element such as point of view, character, plot, setting, symbolism, or motif (reference Introduction to Story for specifics).
After reading Characterization and Character Study, how would you characterize one of these characters (either the protagonist or a secondary character–your choice)? What are their defining characteristics? Do you find them dynamic and sympathetic (versus static or unsympathetic)? How so?
Which pattern–Freytag’s Pyramid, The Hero’s Journey, or 1 of the 6 Arcs of Storytelling (identify which arc)–do you think the story exhibits the best and why? If you don’t think it exhibits one of these patterns, then explain what the pattern is.
Given how the story started, what is the significance of the end? What has changed–and what does this change portend or mean for the characters involved?
What theme or themes do you detect? Explain. Alternatively, speak to any symbolism, parable, epiphany, lesson, or moral. What’s the takeaway?
Quote an example of the author’s use of either repetition, variety, parallelism, sound, or adjective obsession–and explain why your chosen example illustrates this principle and makes the story more compelling.
STEP 2: Come up with your own speculative question for discussion AND attempt to answer it in at least 5 sentences. Be sure the question directly relates to one of the stories at hand (whether or not you tackled the story in Step 1) and is an open-ended discussion question rather than a fact-based question. To the latter point, it shouldn’t have a clear answer; instead, it should value exploration over verifiability and encourage conversation.

Summarize: there are 4 stories, the writer can choose two and answer 7 questions + create 1 question on both those two chosen stories.

Discuss the development of smart cities and their effect on the residential real estate industry.

eek 6 – Assignment: Evaluate Changes to Project Risks during the Execution Phase of the Project Life Cycle – Due
Jan 30, 2022 11:59 PM
PM-6004 v4: Project Risk Management (9890472981)
For this assignment, create a flowchart and draft a summary that discusses the degree to which the likelihood and impact of specific risks are anticipated to change during the execution phase of the project life cycle. Create a flow chart process that the Project Manager could put in place to ensure that the project team identifies, analyzes, and plans new risks throughout the execution phase. Possible tools for creating your flow chart include PowerPoint, Visio, Draw.io, Lucid Chart, etc.
Select five of the risks you identified in your Week 2 assignment. Use these risks to conceive and discuss a procedure for managing new risks throughout the execution phase while elaborating on those risks. You will create a summary and associated flow chart for managing this risk process.
Ensure that at least one of the risks you select is a positive risk (an opportunity). In each section, draft a summary that discusses the following for that specific risk:
The degree to which you would anticipate the likelihood of that risk to change as the project moves through the execution phase,
The degree to which you would anticipate the impact of that risk to change as the project moves through the execution phase,
Whether there is something specific that could reasonably be expected to occur during the Execution phase that would eliminate that specific risk altogether (for example, the risk of not finding a contractor capable of completing the excavation for a building’s foundation is eliminated once the excavation has been completed), and
Whether changes in Likelihood and Impact would warrant a change from the originally selected Risk Management Strategy (Accept, Mitigate, Avoid, Transfer, Exploit) to a different Risk Management Strategy. Why or why not?
Your flowchart should follow this outline:
Introduction
Risk 1
Risk 2
Risk 3
Risk 4
Risk 5
Procedure for Managing New Risks during Execution
Conclusion
Length: 2-3 pages, not including the reference page. Your references can be included within the flowchart or submitted in a separate Word document.
Resources: Support your flowchart with a minimum of three (3) external resources. You are encouraged to include graphics, charts, and any other supportive visual aids.
PMBOK® Guide is a registered mark of the Project Management Institute, Inc.
The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy

Write an essay discussing software and information theft as well as digital security.

Please use sources provided

Explore the relationships between emancipatory and ethical knowledge development.
Relate personal knowing to your own experience.
Discuss aesthetic and empiric knowledge development.
Relate the patterns of knowing to nursing theory development.

Organize the content using (sub)headings of below Organizing questions/objective:
Define and describe each of the patterns of knowing (Use Chinn & Kramer’s five patterns of knowing; other articles of knowing are showing you that everybody is entitled for her/his opinion as long as s/he has made an strong logical argument).
Give one example of each pattern of knowing that you recently used in your own nursing practice.
Discuss the importance of the patterns of knowing in the development of the nursing theory.
Introduction
Emancipatory Knowing
Definition and Description [Q1]
Example [Q2]
Personal Knowing
Definition and Description [Q1]
Example [Q2]
Aesthetic Knowing
Definition and Description [Q1]
Example [Q2]
Ethical Knowing
Definition and Description [Q1]
Example [Q2]
Empiric Knowing
Definition and Description [Q1]
Example [Q2]
Importance of the Patterns of Knowing in Nursing Theory Development [Q3]

As healthcare practitioners, you will be seeing patients from
diverse backgrounds and you need to demonstrate respect for a patient’s
diversity keeping in mind your own biases about race, gender, religion, and
economic status. This is called culturally competent care. This has
become even more critical in the sensitive
world in which we are currently living!
This
assignment is an affective (behavior) competency you need to pass as mentioned
in the student learning objectives on syllabus. It is a fictional case study
with some controversial issues that you will run into in your daily lives as a
healthcare professional. Be assured your responses will be kept confidential,
read and graded only by me and Sue. The learning outcome of this assignment is
to help you understand your own biases and also to develop an open-minded
attitude while interacting or treating your patients. This skill comes
eventually and also with years of experience. This assignment and many more in
the MA program are the starting point to develop this skill.
PS: The case study has been adopted from Markkula Center of
Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. Following
the case study, there are perspectives and reflections provided. We want to
know what you think, not someone else, so please do not read these
perspectives/reflections and then copy/paste or paraphrase and use them in your
responses. If that happens, you will be given a failing grade for this
assignment.
Hence, read the case study and the associated questions
thoroughly and answer them to the best of your knowledge and abilities. If you use any other source(s), you are required
to cite the source(s) at the end of your paper on a separate page with
“Works Cited” written at the top – 25 points total
There
are five questions on the case study. Each question is worth 3 points. The
responses should be thorough, answer all parts of each question, and be no less
than 1-2 paragraphs (5-7 lines for each paragraph) to earn full credit. – 15 points
Sue
will grade for grammar, vocabulary, spelling, mechanics, citations- 10 points.

Difficult
Birth: Navigating Language and Cultural differences

(Case Study Resource:
Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University)
Following the case study on the website, there
are perspectives and reflections provided. We want to know what you think, not
someone else, so please do not read these perspectives/reflections and then
copy/paste or paraphrase and use them in your responses. If that happens,
you will be given a failing grade for this assignment.

Read the case study below and answer the five questions that follow
it.
Ana
Lopez is 17 years old and works in the U.S. as a farm laborer. Ana speaks no
English and very little Spanish; she is an immigrant from Oaxaca, Mexico, and
her primary language is Mixteco. She is illiterate. Roughly estimated to be 36
weeks pregnant, she is admitted through the emergency room to East Valley
Hospital with cramping and vaginal bleeding. Upon examination, placental
abruption is diagnosed, and the medical team recommends a Cesarean section. Ana
is also discovered to be severely anemic. Toward the start of these exams, a
nurse offers Ana ice chips (a normal procedure for laboring women), which Ana
quietly refuses. Although the medical team considers Ana’s C-section to be an
emergency measure (thus not requiring explicit consent), the hospital staff
nevertheless do attempt to obtain Ana’s consent before the surgery; she replies
“yes” to all questions and appears to acquiesce ( to everything the
medical team suggests. However, since no one on staff speaks Mixteco, they cannot
be sure that Ana fully understands her (or her child’s) situation. After the
C-section, the baby boy’s APGAR scores, which measure the vital signs of a
newborn, are quite low. He is immediately transferred to the neonatal intensive
care unit (NICU) with diagnoses of neonatal encephalopathy, a disease of the
brain, and being small for gestational age (SGA).
Ana
had arrived at the hospital early in the morning with her mother and sister,
neither of whom speaks English or Spanish. She does have a husband, Hugo, but
he was not present at the admission or the time of the birth since he feared
losing his job if he missed work for the day. Hugo eventually arrives at the
hospital later in the afternoon. He speaks no English but is haltingly
conversant in Spanish.
A
social worker, fluent in Spanish but not Mixteco, meets with Ana and Hugo and
discovers (to the best of her abilities) that Ana has no health insurance and
had not been able to obtain any regular prenatal care (which would explain why
her anemia had gone undiagnosed). She had no money even for vitamins, which
(the social worker surmised) Ana may nevertheless have taken intermittently,
when she could obtain them from a mobile health clinic. The social worker
guesses that Ana had worked in the fields right up until the previous day. She
wonders privately about Ana’s exposure to harmful pesticides during her
pregnancy. She is fairly certain that Ana has no legal immigration papers.
Once
Ana is stabilized after the birth she is allowed to go to the NICU to see her
baby. Her husband Hugo remains with her in the NICU, along with a
Spanish-language translator called for by the social worker. Through this
translator, Hugo is able to communicate imperfectly on and off with the medical
team.
Throughout
this process, Ana shows very little emotion, at least publicly, and the nurses
present are bothered by her flat, unemotional affect. The nurse manager of the
NICU in particular wonders (aloud, to her co-workers) why Ana “doesn’t
seem really to care about” her sick baby. Ana’s mother and sister,
meanwhile, speak quietly but urgently with Hugo whenever they get the chance.
Late
that evening, Hugo tentatively interrupts a nurse and asks her (via the
translator) whether the baby might be visited by a “curandero,” a
traditional healer from their community. He suggests (apparently at the
insistence of his mother-in-law) that the baby should be “cleaned with an
egg.” The nurse in charge is clearly uncomfortable with his request (and a
treatment unfamiliar to her) and responds that the baby may be too unstable to
be subjected to any “alternative” treatments. She reminds Hugo,
somewhat sharply, that his baby is very sick but under the care of the best
medical experts. When Ana’s relatives appear chagrinned and distressed by this
response, the nurse’s demeanor softens, and she gently asks them if they have
had anything to eat recently and suggests that they pay a visit to the hospital
cafeteria. Hugo looks at the ground and utters a polite refusal. He does not
repeat the request.
After
three days, Ana herself is discharged from the hospital, though the baby
remains in the NICU. Over the course of the next few weeks, the baby
stabilizes. The extent of brain impairment is unclear and, according to the
medical team, will only make itself known over time. During these few weeks,
Hugo is unable to be present at the hospital much during the day, but Ana is
regularly accompanied by her mother and other family members, who bring food
and sit with her as much as possible. The social worker pays special attention
to Ana and Hugo’s situation, particularly making an effort to get them signed
up with a Medicaid-sponsored program. While ultimately successful, this move
proves challenging, since they initially fear discovery of their undocumented
status. Ana and Hugo eventually are able to take their baby boy home, unsure of
what long-term complications he may encounter.

Answer the following questions:
IMPORTANT: Refer to Case Study
instructions before you start answering. – 25
points total
1) How does
Ana’s socioeconomic status play a role in the health crisis she and her baby
are in? What are the various factors that have landed her in this situation?
What are your thoughts on the interpreter referring Ana to a Medicaid-sponsored
program?- 3
points
2)
Should Ana’s acquiescence (accept something reluctantly without protest) to the
healthcare team’s suggestion of an emergency C-section be considered as her
consent to surgery? Why or why not? How does her cultural background, fear and
socioeconomic status contribute to her acquiescence?- 3 points
3)
Since no one on the healthcare team knew Mixteco, the language that Ana and her
husband spoke, what approach should the healthcare team have taken to make the
family more involved in the treatment plan for Ana and her baby?- 3 points
4)
What are your thoughts on the nurse’s reaction about Ana that
“she doesn’t seem to really care about her baby”? What factors
in Ana’s situation could be responsible for Ana’s stoic behavior? – 3 points
5)
What are your thoughts on how the staff at East Valley Hospital behaved when
Hugo, Ana’s husband, requested to bring a traditional healer to heal their
baby? How would you have tackled this request in a culturally competent
manner?- 3
points
Sue
will grade for grammar, mechanics, spelling, citations, etc. – 10 points

What impact does Mindfulness have on child Achievement.
The findings/results of the articles are accurately presented. and logically connected to one another.
The knowledge gained from the review of the articles is summarized and related back to the question.
One to two implementable recommendations for future professional practice are made as a result of the review of the research. (Exceptions, limitations, and parameters are integrated into these recommendations.)
The reference section indicates that at least 4 of the research articles was accessed using current research technologies.
The presentation educates stakeholders and improves their understanding of the research topic. (Exceptions, limitations, and parameters are integrated into these recommendations. )
APA and Refrences listed

Read and reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Then post what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding in each assigned textbook chapter.Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion.
Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:
Describe two activities inside your organization, or one inside and one outside your organization, that exhibit economies (or diseconomies) of scope. Describe the source of the scope economies. How could your organization exploit the scope economy or diseconomy? Compute the profit consequences of the advice.
[Your post must be substantive and demonstrate insight gained from the course material. Postings must be in the student’s own words – do not provide quotes!]
[Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review]