For this assignment you can make up a the rest of the scenario using family therapy
Scenario
Girl Child age 8 was sexual abused mom is 29 on drugs and rights take away and dad 30 was on drug off now but want child to be return to him child is in the foster care system. You are having family therapy with Child and dad to build a Therapeutic relationship with a possiblilty of child moving with dad. Child does not know dad and she has trust issues.
For each assignment students will briefly present the client and the family, and discuss the
assessment and practice theory selected (psychodynamic CBT, SFT, or narrative), and then
evaluate that method in terms of its effectiveness using evidence-based literature to justify their
interventions.
● Select a client. The “client” can be an individual, a family, or an individual in a group.
Some of you may discuss more than one client ● Develop a concise and full assessment and formulation that incorporates all relevant
aspects of a biopsychosocial approach.
● Develop a plan for treatment based on one or a combination of the theories and practice
models discussed in the course and in the readings. Identify potential interventions at
individual, cultural, and systemic levels.
● Justify your choice of interventions using theory and evidence-based information as
applicable. The work might include a variety of social work roles (e.g., being a case
manager, advocate, broker, mediator, counselor, and or a therapist). Describe and justify
with evidence the ones you have chosen.
● Briefly discuss the main features of the theoretical models from this course that support
this choice of intervention (you may be blending two theoretical models).
Specifications
● 8–10 pages (not including Title and Reference pages)
● Seven references
● 12-point, Times New Roman font
● Double-spaced with 1-inch margins on all side
The RUBIC
The presentation of the
client demographics is
succinct and concise and
includes presenting
problem, referral source,
reason for referral, and
relevant history.
Description of referral in
context with
setting/organization is
included.
References client demographic
information and presenting
problem. Accurately describes
referral source and reason for
referral. Description of referral
in context of
setting/organization is included
Fails to provide detailed client
demographic information with
insufficient attention to identity
protection. Incomplete description of
referral source and reason for referral,
relevant history, or rationale.
Formulation
(20) points
Demonstrates a concise
and accurate theory of
what is going on with the
client. Include
implications related to risk
factors, cultural
implications, and the
social context.
Demonstrates ability to
interpret information with
an application of
theoretical frameworks
that provide a rationale for
the formulation. Discuss
how this information
informs the diagnosis.
Include the diagnosis.
Accurately applies a theoretical
framework Including
implications related to risk
factors, cultural implications,
and the social context.
Demonstrates application of
theoretical frameworks that
provide a rationale for the
formulation. Discuss how this
information informs the
diagnosis. Include the
diagnosis.
Inaccurate and/or insufficient
application of a theoretical
framework. Spends more time
summarizing or repeating presenting
descriptive information without
interpretative information.
Chosen
Intervention(s)
(10) points
Demonstrates a clear
choice for the most
appropriate intervention
Demonstrates a clear choice for
an intervention. Presentation of
the rationale for the
intervention supported with
research/literature
Incorporation of chosen intervention
Basic Tenants of
the Intervention
(10) points
In depth description and
understanding of the
tenants of the method
chosen
Clear understanding of the
tenants of the method chosen
Lack of organization or presentation
of the tenants of the chosen method
Chosen
Intervention
why with this
client?
(10) points
Presents rationale for this
choice backed up with
research/literature
Presentation of the rationale for
the intervention supported with
research/literature
Reference to coursework and
research/literature is not apparent
Role of Social
Worker
(therapist, case
manager, etc)
(10) points
Clear presentation of the
role and rationale for the
social worker will play in
the chosen intervention or
method
Good presentation of role of
the social worker in the
intervention
Poor or inadequate explanation or
justification of the role the social
worker will play in the work
Treatment Plan
With evaluation
(20) points
Developed treatment goals
were described with
achievable objectives.
Demonstrated a concise
plan for evaluating
progress toward the goals
Objectives and goals are
included with a plan for
measuring progress
Clear and measurable goals are
omitted without plans to evaluate
progress
Writing
Evaluation
(10) points
The paper reflects
scholarly tone and
meticulously follows APA
style and uses original
writing with proper
paraphrasing. Paper is
fully written at the
graduate level with few or
no spelling and/or writing
errors
All phrases and sentences
are properly cited
including quotation marks,
page numbers, author and
publication date.
Reference page is
included and conforms to
all APA formatting
guideline. Paper flows
seamlessly from topic to
topic as evidenced by the
use of transitional phrases
and excellent writing
ability
The paper lacks scholarly tone
throughout and there are minor
APA errors. There are some
issues with writing style and/or
minor spelling/mechanical
errors.
There are some citations
missing or do not always meet
APA formatting guidelines.
The paper lacks flow in some
areas and exemplifies average
writing skills.
The paper has significant APA errors
and does not meet the graduate level
of writing in relation to
spelling/mechanical errors.
Citations are not APA formatted. The
paper lacks flow and reflects poor
writing skills
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|