In a Word document, share your lab experience and provide screenshots to demonstrate that you completed the lab.
1. INTRODUCTION
2. FORENSICS INVESTIGATIONS
2.1 Purpose and Objectives (Provide a brief overview of Digital Forensics)
2.2 Requirements (For example, to ensure that the evidence collected has not been tampered.)
3. DIGITAL FORENSICS
3.1 Forensics Analysis Methodology (Step 1) (List and describe the digital forensics analysis methodology and the phases of the digital forensics fundamentals and methodology.)
1. Preparation
2. Extraction
3. Identification
4. Analysis
3.2 Forensics Analysis Tools and Techniques (Step 2) (List and describe digital forensics analysis tools and techniques.)
1. Discuss the importance of using forensic tools to collect and analyze evidence.
2. Forensic Analysis Tools
3. Hash Analysis in Digital Forensics
3.3 Device Imaging Procedures (Step 3 and Lab Part2 Tasks 2 and 3) [insert and explain the key results of your workspace exercises]
1. The importance of Write Blocker
2. Describe the relevance to investigations of different devices which may be imaged such as, Disks, Files, Networks, Drives, and Mobile Phones
3. Discussion of creating a physical disk image, image loading and verification. (Answer here the disk imaging lab Task 2 and Task 3 questions from your lab to explain the aspects of disk imaging and analysis.)
3.4 Network Evidence Collection and Forensics Analysis (Step 3 and Lab Part 3)
1. Describe how Wireshark can be used to forensically identify potential suspicious network packets or indicators of compromise (IOC).
2. How would Wireshark be used to determine issues with email?
3. Answer here the Wireshark Part 3 questions from your lab to explain the aspects of analyzing traffic data.
3.5 Chain of Custody
1. What is the Chain of Custody and what steps does it include?
2. How do you ensure that the evidence you collected has not been tampered with (i.e., after collection)?
3. Why and how is this important to prove in court?
4. SUMMARY OF REFERENCES
[Provide your summary list of references using proper APA format. (Remember: You must also use in-line citations with proper APA format throughout the report.]
Argue on who wins the argument between Tucker Carlson and Dr. Ahmadu on the topic of FGC using the Modes of Persuasion. Usage of at least two logical fallacies is necessary. Write under the pretense that Dr. Ahmadu (she’s in favor of FGC) wins the argument
Logical Fallacy I used for a discussion post, can use parts in essay as well as for reference of writing style
One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.
Second Logical Fallacy I used
The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.
If any other information is necessary I can provide
Explain to them the definition of community and how to build relationships between the citizens and the police department. Also address who to reduce crimes, while working in conjunction with the police.
Writing will include referencing _ Harvard style of referencing. I have attached details of some learning resources provided for this work, but it are not limited. Writer can always do their own research and reference accordingly.
Paper structure
Title: Digital Innovation and Streaming in the Music Industry and its effects on the Emerging Economies Markets.
Abstract (Available for guidance).
Introduction:
The digital music Industry and music business (discussions on main background, value chains and how it works and how the roles relate to each other). Main research questions are: how do music consumers adopt streaming services in Nigeria and Ghana? How do digital services like streaming affect music revenue in Nigeria and Ghana?
Theoretical background:
Discuss extensively on Disruptive innovation theory, Do-It-Yourself (DIY) concept, digital rights management (DRM), streaming models, Internet of Things Model, other theories surrounding music streaming and new technology in the music industry etc. in connection with the research questions and topic.
Literature reviews:
Discuss on Digital innovations and its effects on music creation, production, marketing, distribution, and copyright management (structure of digitalization in the music industry and disruption in the music industries value chain and market transformations). Music streaming in emerging markets like Nigeria and Ghana. Emergence of music streaming in Nigeria and Ghana, streaming algorithms, opportunities, and challenges associated with music streaming, factors that determine music streaming in these markets.
Analysis and Discussion:
How do music consumers adopt streaming services in Nigeria and Ghana? (Data will be provided). What factors determine music streaming in Nigeria and Ghana (Data will be provided). How do digital services like streaming affect music revenue in Nigeria and Ghana? (Music streaming revenues and usages).
Conclusion:
References: (Web of science, acceptable publishers of books and articles).
Overview
Task: Use the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model to outline a plan to address childhood obesity rates in NJ
Purpose: Practice using the PRECEDE-PROCEED
Preparation
During this activity, you have been assigned to perform a needs assessment identifying the predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors that are leading to an increase in childhood obesity rates in NJ
Complete phase 3 of the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model by identifying the predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors. Identify this information using secondary research.
This information does not have to come from studies performed specifically in New Jersey.
The worksheet for this assignmentment is attracted below and there’s another attractment on how to complete the assignment (it can be useful)
Please answer these questions in at least 1 page.
Prompt: To what extent does power or the lack of power in this area affect communities? When should we as social workers take a stand against what we believe to be an injustice? What are the most effective ways to do this?
Provide a summary and perspective of the following article:
Jason Baron, E., Goldstein, E. G., & Ryan, J. (2022). The Push for Racial Equity in Child Welfare: Can Blind Removals Reduce Disproportionality? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
Your essay should:
Be at least 1000 words long (and should not exceed 1200 words)
Follow all conventions of grammar, style, structure, and organization discussed in this course
Have a clear introduction with a thesis statement that sets up the main points
Have body paragraphs that have a single point (these points relate directly back to the thesis) and a concluding paragraph that wraps it all up
Incorporate outside sources.
Use those sources in this paper to support your thesis and the points you’re making.
include proper in-text citation and a
References page at the end of the document.
Your essay should AVOID:
Including first or second person
THIS IS MY THESIS, PLEASE USE IT: Hoarding can be a debilitating disorder with serious consequences, leading to physical and mental health problems, financial difficulties and strained relationships.
Using the professional literature, students will critique a psychological test. Students should use a variety of resources including validation studies, testing manuals, and assessment reviews. Please choose assessments that are relevant to your future work setting. For example, a school counseling student might select an: 1.) Aptitude Test; 2.) Intelligence Test; 3.) Achievement Test. A clinical mental health counseling student might select a: 1.) Symptom Checklist; 2.) Substance Abuse Assessment; 3.) Personality Measure (e.g. remember personality is a very broad concept). This assignment is focused on developing your skills in critically evaluating a standardized assessment. Please note, that each you are assigned to a group for the final presentation. Please meet with your group early to make sure the test you choose to critique aligns with the assessment battery identified by your group.
Your critique should answer the following questions
Test Coverage and Use (CACREP.F.7.m)
What are the intended uses of the test? What interpretations does the publisher feel are appropriate? Are inappropriate applications identified?
Who is the test designed for? What is the basis for considering whether the test applies to your clients?
Practical considerations including reading level, test length, cost of the test, and level of training required for administration.
Appropriate samples for test validation and norming (CACREP.F.7.f; F.7.m)
How were the samples used in pilot testing, validation and norming chosen? How is this sample related to your client population? Were participation rates appropriate?
Was the sample size large enough to develop stable estimates with minimal fluctuation due to sampling errors? Where statements are made concerning subgroups, are there enough test-takers in each subgroup?
Do the difficulty levels of the test and criterion measures (if any) provide an adequate basis for validating and norming the instrument? Are there sufficient variations in test scores?
Describe the scaling used by the test developers (e.g. strengths and limitations)
Outline the scoring procedures.
Multicultural Considerations
Reliability (CACREP.F.7.g; F.7.h)
How have reliability estimates been computed? Have appropriate statistical methods been used? (e.g., Split half-reliability coefficients should not be used with speeded tests as they will produce artificially high estimates.)
What are the reliabilities of the test for different groups of test-takers? How were they computed?
Is the reliability sufficiently high to warrant using the test as a basis for decisions concerning individual students?
To what extent are the groups used to provide reliability estimates similar to the groups the test will be used with?
What is the standard error of measurement? What does this value insinuate?
Criterion Validity (CACREP.F.7.g; F.7.h)
What criterion measure has been used to evaluate validity? What is the rationale for choosing this measure?
Is the distribution of scores on the criterion measure adequate?
What is the overall predictive accuracy of the test? How accurate are predictions for individuals whose scores are close to cut-points of interest?
Content Validity (CACREP.F.7.g; F.7.h)
Is there a clear statement of the universe of skills represented by the test? What research was conducted to determine desired test content and/or evaluate content?
What was the composition of expert panels used in content validation? How were judgments elicited?
How similar is this content to the content you are interested in testing?
Construct Validity (CACREP.F.7.g; F.7.h)
Is the conceptual framework for each tested construct clear and well founded? What is the basis for concluding that the construct is related to the purposes of the test?
Does the framework provide a basis for testable hypotheses concerning the construct? Are these hypotheses supported by empirical data?
Test Administration (CACREP.F.7.m)
Will test administrators understand precisely what is expected of them?
Do the test administration procedures replicate the conditions under which the test was validated and normed? Are these procedures standardized?
Test reporting (CACREP.F.7.l; F.7.m)
How are test results reported? Are the scales used in reporting results conducive to proper test use?
What materials and resources are available to aid in interpreting test results?
Test and Item Bias (CACREP.F.7.g; F.7.h)
Were the items analyzed statistically for possible bias? What method(s) was used? How were items selected for inclusion in the final version of the test?
Was the test analyzed for differential validity across groups? How was this analysis conducted?
Was the test analyzed to determine the English language proficiency required of test-takers? Should the test be used with non-native speakers of English?
Please make sure your responses are formatted into a coherent narrative. Bulleted lists, or the aforementioned list of questions with your responses written underneath will not be accepted.
