Premium Writing

Module 4 Historians and World War Two
Purpose
This discussion asks you to apply the concepts from the module’s readings to present your thoughts on a major event in U.S. History. This practice helps you to develop the skill of defending a position using logic and evidence. You have the opportunity here to practice applying, translating, and re-working what you have learned to function in unexpected ways.
Learning Objectives
Recall key events, figures, and ideas of WWII and the post-war period in the United States.
Contextualize, criticize, defend, and debate significant ideas found in historical primary sources of WWII and post-war period in the United States.
Discussion Prompt
Although historians still debate whether America should have entered WWI, there is a consensus that WWII was a defensive war and therefore the “right war to fight.” Indeed, Americans who fought against international fascism and defended democratic liberalism during WWII have been heralded as the “Greatest Generation.”
For some historians, it is absolutely clear that the U.S. was on the “right side of history” during WWII. In other words, there are clear distinctions between good and evil during WWII, and the U.S. and its allies were fighting for the betterment of humanity. Nazi terror across Europe, and the atrocities committed by the Japanese in Asia brought an unprecedented level of human suffering. The U.S. liberated France, freed Holocaust prisoners, and forced the Japanese from China. The Americans, in short, were “the good guys.” For other historians, the differences between good and evil during WWII are not absolute. The U.S., we are reminded, was allies with the Stalinist regime. This alliance helped legitimize Stalin’s policies before and after the war, which historians estimate led the deliberate killing of some 10 million Soviets. And the U.S. was responsible for target-bombing civilian centers, most notably the firebombing of Japan at the end of WWII, which killed an estimated 1 million Japanese civilians, rendered millions homeless, and destroyed practically every major Japanese city.
For this discussion address the following question: To what extent is WWII morally ambiguous for the U.S.?
Put differently, are the moral distinctions between the Allied and Axis powers absolutely clear? Are you absolutely certain that the Americans were the “good guys” during WWII?
Make sure your discussion takes a clear position—make an argument. Your argument is the answer to the question: is American participation in WWII morally ambiguous? Then spend the rest of the response proving your answer to the question.
Criteria/Assessment
Failure to complete the requirements will result in lower scores.
–The discussion should be about a page long. The discussion should answer the question in language that takes a strong position and makes your answer to the question abundantly clear. Avoid writing a response that offers only a general discussion of the topic. Rather, write in such a way that makes clear you are trying to prove a point—to convince somebody of your perspective.
–Students will also respond to a classmates’ post. Your response to a classmates’ post should be about a paragraph long and of substance. Be cordial in your response to a classmates’ post.
–The discussion needs to reference at least one piece of historical evidence drawn from the list of required module readings/videos. The evidence will help explain your answer to the question. You must cite evidence with parenthetical citations.
— Present your original ideas. Discussion responses fall under the same FIU academic integrity policiesLinks to an external site. as all other assignments in the class.
See attached discussion rubric for assessment criteria.Module 4 Historians and World War Two

Each chapter in this assignment pertains to an element of a valid contract. The cases listed below in each chapter are relevant to a specific issue within the topic discussed in the chapter. For each case listed, please identify the specific issue in the case, provide a BRIEF summary of the facts, apply the relevant legal principle, and discuss the court’s decision. The court’s decision is not whether the court affirmed or remanded the case, but rather how did the court decide the case and the court’s reasoning in the decision.

Your discussion of each section may vary in length. The cases and associated discussions should be organized by chapter. The assigned cases and issue discussion for each chapter should be at least 1.5 pages doubled- spaced, but your submission may be longer in length. Please be sure that you put your name, the course name, and the assignment name on your submission.
Contracts

Write a new progress report from the perspective of Dr Nemur, Dr Struass, or Ms. Kinnian.
Criteria
-2 pages
– first person perspective
– Show Charlie’s changes from that person’s perspective
– dialogue Write a new progress report from the perspective of Dr Nemur, Dr Struass, or Ms. Kinnian.
Criteria
-2 pages
– first person perspective
– Show Charlie’s changes from that person’s perspective
– dialogue Write a new progress report from the perspective of Dr Nemur, Dr Struass, or Ms. Kinnian.
Criteria
-2 pages
– first person perspective
– Show Charlie’s changes from that person’s perspective
– dialogue Write a new progress report from the perspective of Dr Nemur, Dr Struass, or Ms. Kinnian.
Criteria
-2 pages
– first person perspective
– Show Charlie’s changes from that person’s perspective
– dialogue Write a new progress report from the perspective of Dr Nemur, Dr Struass, or Ms. Kinnian.
Criteria
-2 pages
– first person perspective
– Show Charlie’s changes from that person’s perspective
– dialogue

-Don’t use AI
-Underline Thesis
-6 peer-reviewed sources: books or articles (fully cited: title, author, year, publication service, page number.)
-Times New Roman
-6 pages double spaced.
-page numbers
-no bibliography

For this assignment, you will create a first draft of your Major Research Essay (Part I). Please note the following requirements:

–Your essay will be in response to the Major Research Essay (Part I) Prompt and my video guide to the completion of this portion of the essay. Please carefully review these items prior to beginning work on your essay.

–Your essay will be 800-1000 words. This word count does not include your heading, headers, or works cited page.

–Essays that fail to meet the minimum word count requirement will receive a summary grade of “Fail.”

–Your essay must include proper MLA in-text citations and a properly formatted MLA Works Cited page.

–Your essay must utilize a minimum of four sources.

NOTE: For more detailed assignment information, please refer to the assignment prompt and to my video detailing the requirements for this assignment.

Please note that all assignments must be submitted as Microsoft Word attachments (.doc or .docx).

To earn the extra points, please answer all four of the questions, in about 200 words each. You can use books and notes, but please use your own words, and if you quote from any sources, use quotation marks (you don’t need to include a full citation).

1. Bartolome de las Casas and Alvar Nunez Cabeza De Vaca are more sympathetic to the plight of Native Americans than most other early settlers. Use specific examples from each man’s work to show how his attitude reveals such sympathy and understanding.
2. Summarize Jonathan Edwards’ main argument in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” What is his thesis? How does he support it? What conclusions does he draw? Be specific.
3. Using specific references to THREE of her poems, comment on the common themes in Anne Bradstreet’s poetry.
4. Discuss similarities between the experiences of Benjamin Franklin and Olaudah Equiano. Are there qualities of character that both men share? Give examples from each man’s autobiography.

Review the following chapters’ Ethics and Compliance in Action items.
Once you have reviewed the items, prepare a thoughtful and complete post

Ethics and Compliance in Action
Chapter 10 – pages 10-13
Chapter 12 – pages 12-12

Prenkert, J. D., Barnes, A. J., Perry, J. E., Haugh, T., & Stemler, A. R. (2022). Business Law: The Ethical, Global, and Digital Environment (18th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

PowerPoint presentation
10-15 minute presentation summarizing your research assignment
Prepare PP utilizing bullet points, graphs, tables, and pictures that summarize your research project
Slide count 15-25
References must be included and be in APA format
See Rubric for paramaters

Write a theme analysis. Theme is about the message in the story. What is it the work trying to say to you the reader? What is the lesson(s) learned in the story? Select one story to write about. The story selections are “The Story of an Hour,” “The Prodigal Son,” and “The Horse Dealer’s Daughter.”

Your essay should be 4-6 typed pages double-spaced.

1, Get at the root causes of problems and gather data from the case that will allow you to make specific action You will want to get at the root causes of problems and gather data from the case that will allow you to make specific action.
2,t is critical that you develop a reasoned plan of attack based on the data available it is critical that you develop a reasoned plan of attack based on the data available. Moreover, you should not attempt to find out what happened to the company or business as a basis for making your decision.
3, A typical request at the end of a case is: What is the correct answer？ What is important is that you know what you would have done in that specific marketing situation and begin to construct your own framework for approaching more general marketing problems.
4, A cover page should be used that has the case name, course number, student names, numbers, and the date.
5, The reports may have a maximum of 8 pages of text (excluding the Executive Summary and exhibits), double-spaced, 2.54 cm. margins.
6, Use 3rd person’s voice.
7, Number the pages
8, Use headings and subheadings.
9, Be sure not to simply restate case facts – your job is to analyze the facts to build an argument. You can use the facts to back up your conclusions, though.