Premium Writing

Instructions: Write an informative speech using the topic of Brazil. The topic must have a least three main points with a minimum of three subpoints per main point. The speech must be the length of at least four minutes long. At least two credible/scholarly sources must be cited. When information is used from an external site, include citations through the slides to avoid plagiarism. Include pictures and any useful information that I can include when I present. Attached below is the PowerPoint template and outline you must use and fill out. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to reach out. The PowerPoint retaining to crafting an informative speech is attached below for viewing and support.

QUESTION ADVICE:

Question 2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of intersectional feminism?
There are two distinct routes you could take to answering this question but both will start the same.

First, you need a brief definition of feminism. You do not need a history of feminist thought!
What problem(s) did feminism aim to address? Presumably you will talk about forms of oppression. So you’ll need a definition of oppression too. Use a philosophical source, not a dictionary.
Why was intersectional feminism introduced? What problem(s) does intersectional feminism address that previous theories of justice (feminist or otherwise) missed?
Try to give your own examples to explain what is meant by ‘single-axis oppression’ and ‘muti-dimensional oppression’. Use authors such as Crenshaw/Nash for your definitions.

Route 1 – Thinking about Crenshaw and her critics/supporters
What objections must intersectional feminism overcome?
For evaluation, assess whether the benefits of intersectional feminism are greater than the weaknesses.
To strengthen your assessment, tell your reader why you make that judgement.

Route 2 – Thinking about multiculturalism, traditional feminist responses, and intersectional responses.
Start as before. Next…
What is the goal of multiculturalism?
Explain the early feminist objections to multiculturalism (think Okin, Shachar)
What might these objections ignore?
Look at the writing from Mookherjee and the response to her on the reading list (it’s a practical rather than a critical response, I would suggest).

Readings for both routes:
Again, see the reading list. In addition, try this:
Section 3.4 of Allen’s SEP: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-power/ (understanding 3.3 will give you a more rounded understanding of 3.4).
MARKING ADVICE:

Choose one title from the questions below. Your essay should be between 1700 and 2000 words. This limit includes your title (do give a title!), your footnotes and your essay. Your bibliography is not included. Words over 2000 will not count towards your grade.

Citations take this format: (Newey, 2020, 211).

Note: this is an argumentative, critical essay. You must display the following skills and qualities to do well:

Scholarship. This means you should provide accurate referencing, with page numbers. I will deduct serious marks for failing to include page numbers, since everyone has been advised on this many times. Also, write well. Edit carefully. Eliminate typos.

Knowledge and understanding of academic texts: This means you must have accurate descriptive content from philosophical sources: this means journal articles and books. Don’t use blogs, newspapers, disctionaries, thesaurus.

Critical thinking: This means you must evaluate what you read. Compare responses from authors who disagree with the main view. Offer your answers and reasons for accepting one view over another.

Originality: use your own examples to explain a point or a view. Give your own opinion about the strengths and weaknesses of a view or theory.

Integrity: your work must be your own research. Give credit to any texts you use. IF you take a point from a lecture slide, go and read the original (best) or at the least, credit the slide.

ABSOLUTELY NO PLAGIARISM

Analytical Book Review of The Jacksonian Persuasion Politics and Beliefe by Marvin Meyers.
Has to be at least 1500 words:

Part I: This is a brief outlineof the contents of the book. In the space of one or two paragraphs you should be able to convey the parameters of the book’s contents. DO NOTsimply reproduce the book’s table of contents.Part I: This is a brief outlineof the contents of the book. In the space of one or two paragraphs you should be able to convey the parameters of the book’s contents. DO NOTsimply reproduce the book’s table of contents.

Part II: Here is the place for a careful summary of the author’s thesis. The thesis is the primary idea the author is trying to prove and convince the reader to accept. You must first identify the thesis and then show how the author either substantiates or fails to substantiate this thesis.This will undoubtedly take you a page or two to do a good job.Part II: Here is the place for a careful summary of the author’s thesis. The thesis is the primary idea the author is trying to prove and convince the reader to accept. You must first identify the thesis and then show how the author either substantiates or fails to substantiate this thesis.This will undoubtedly take you a page or two to do a good job.

Part III: This is the most important part of your book review. Here is where you describe your reaction to the book. Some of the questions you must answer include: Do you agree or disagree with a book’s conclusions? Why? Did the book support or contradict what you read in your textbook on the same subject? (YouMUST quote some of the relevant passages from both books.)Part III: This is the most important part of your book review. Here is where you describe your reaction to the book. Some of the questions you must answer include: Do you agree or disagree with a book’s conclusions? Why? Did the book support or contradict what you read in your textbook on the same subject? (YouMUST quote some of the relevant passages from both books.)

Still need content? Should responding to the above questions still leave you short of 1,500 words, consider answering one or more of the following questions:
•Did you detect any biases on the part of the author?
•What was the author’s background and why did he or she write the book?
•How in your opinion could the book have been improved? You must be specific and keep in mind there are NO perfect books.
•Did you enjoy reading the book? Why or why not?
•Would you recommend it to others?Still need content?

I have the book and will overnight it.

Research Case Analysis – Each student will prepare an individual written research-case analysis. The case data should be collected from a primary case study (field placement) and may be supplemented by other materials. The case is to be illustrative of some challenge the person is facing or has faced and resolved or continuing to work.
The analysis of the case should be organized around a conceptual frame of reference, including a synthesis of the thoughts of others (Literature Review Integration) about the presenting problem, (Be specific in defining the problem drawing from any assessments or case records, observations of the client by yourself and your colleagues, and the perspective of your client and/or any significant others/family members) underlying assumptions and theoretical perspectives of the problem. Elaborate on at least two theoretical models of change (one must be a developmental theory) that are plausible given the nature of your client’s problems/key issues even if they do not form the basis of the intervention, you have been using (you must draw upon the theories we have covered in class, but you are not limited to these theories). How would each theoretical perspective point to a different path of intervention for clients experiencing this problem?
In your conclusion include an intervention plan for your client, including goals and the specific methods to be used to attain these goals. Importantly, your goals and interventions must be written with enough specificity to enable others to be able to implement the interventions in your absence and to evaluate their success.
A process recording should be attached to the paper to reflect an aspect of your clinical skills.
The Paper must adhere to APA guidelines, 10-15 pages, minimum of ten (10) references date range 2012-present, double-space, one-inch margin & 12 font size, Times New Roman. Proofread your paper before processing your paper through Grammarly Premium and include the Grammarly Premium score with each paper submission.
Research Case Analysis Outline
Section I
Summary of the Case Facts
A detailed description of your client demographics, diagnosis, reason they are receiving services and the type (name and description) of services they are receiving
Review of Literature related to Key Issues
Review peer- reviewed literature pertaining to your client’s diagnosis- cite at least 2-4 journal articles
Review of Literature related to Issues of Diversity
Review peer-reviewed literature related to your clients age, race, religion, etc. – cite at least 2-4 journal articles
Section II
Integration of Theory and interventions
Discuss theory selected, rationale for selecting theory (rationale is based on research, information from journal articles, textbooks, etc., its evidence based)- cite 2-4 journal articles
Discussion of approach to Intervention
Beginning Phase
Middle Phase
Ending Phase or Ongoing Phase
Discuss interventions selected and how you apply the interventions in the beginning, middle and end phase of treatment – cite 2-4 journal articles
Relate the Intervention to Evidenced Based Practice
Discuss how the interventions you selected are related to evidence-based practice, provide supporting research that the interventions are evidence based practice- cite 2-4 journal articles
Section III
Discuss your philosophy about behavioral change and growth to the approach in V
Discuss your personal view about change and growth and it’s influence on how you engage with a client, build rapport, select interventions, and timing of incorporating interventions
Conclusion
Summarize your work
References

My field placement is with the American Red Cross – Service to Armed Forces Services

I will be looking for a strong analysis and textual examples (quotes and paraphrases).
I will be looking for good critical thinking skills and your understanding of rhetoric.

Main Essay Question:
Based on two of the course readings, which author or speaker has the stronger rhetorical argument about gender?
Purpose:

In our previous essay, we examined and constructed an argument based on how media represents gender. In Essay 2, we will continue our argumentative skills by comparing other viewpoints on gender. The goal of this essay is to get you to practice using quotes, analysis, and rhetorical analysis to enhance your own argumentative and essay writing skills.

For this essay, you will construct a compare and contrast essay discussing two authors or speakers that we have read or watched over the semester. Your thesis will answer the main essay question listed above.

Task:

To complete this essay, you will construct a compare and contrast essay of two pieces that we have read or watched over the semester. You will bring in a total of 4-6 main points from these two pieces and determine which author/speaker has the stronger argument. You must discuss at least 2 major points from both articles or videos. Based on the information you bring in, you will determine who has the stronger argument and why?

As you write, you may consider thinking and writing about how each speaker tries to appeal to their audience. You may consider a few of the following to assist your analysis in their points: the use of personal examples, research, data/statistics, cultural information, tone, language, relatability, audience, education, influencer status, mode of presentation, accessibility, etc.

Helpful Tips: As you decide on 2 articles or videos, think about who the speaker is, what the speaker wants to accomplish, and who the speaker is directing their argument to. This will help in the analysis part of your essay.

ask:

To complete this essay, you will construct a compare and contrast essay of two pieces that we have read or watched over the semester. You will bring in a total of 4-6 main points from these two pieces and determine which author/speaker has the stronger argument. You must discuss at least 2 major points from both articles or videos. Based on the information you bring in, you will determine who has the stronger argument and why?

As you write, you may consider thinking and writing about how each speaker tries to appeal to their audience. You may consider a few of the following to assist your analysis in their points: the use of personal examples, research, data/statistics, cultural information, tone, language, relatability, audience, education, influencer status, mode of presentation, accessibility, etc.

Helpful Tips: As you decide on 2 articles or videos, think about who the speaker is, what the speaker wants to accomplish, and who the speaker is directing their argument to. This will help in the analysis part of your essay.

ask:

To complete this essay, you will construct a compare and contrast essay of two pieces that we have read or watched over the semester. You will bring in a total of 4-6 main points from these two pieces and determine which author/speaker has the stronger argument. You must discuss at least 2 major points from both articles or videos. Based on the information you bring in, you will determine who has the stronger argument and why?

As you write, you may consider thinking and writing about how each speaker tries to appeal to their audience. You may consider a few of the following to assist your analysis in their points: the use of personal examples, research, data/statistics, cultural information, tone, language, relatability, audience, education, influencer status, mode of presentation, accessibility, etc.

Helpful Tips: As you decide on 2 articles or videos, think about who the speaker is, what the speaker wants to accomplish, and who the speaker is directing their argument to. This will help in the analysis part of your essay.

ask:

To complete this essay, you will construct a compare and contrast essay of two pieces that we have read or watched over the semester. You will bring in a total of 4-6 main points from these two pieces and determine which author/speaker has the stronger argument. You must discuss at least 2 major points from both articles or videos. Based on the information you bring in, you will determine who has the stronger argument and why?

As you write, you may consider thinking and writing about how each speaker tries to appeal to their audience. You may consider a few of the following to assist your analysis in their points: the use of personal examples, research, data/statistics, cultural information, tone, language, relatability, audience, education, influencer status, mode of presentation, accessibility, etc.

Helpful Tips: As you decide on 2 articles or videos, think about who the speaker is, what the speaker wants to accomplish, and who the speaker is directing their argument to. This will help in the analysis part of your essay.

Use this video,

And the Pdf below as the two articles.

Objectives of the Writing Assignment:
This course is about politics, governmental policies, and people. Select a topic which covers a current event or situation that addresses a local or foreign issue, problem or person of international consequence.

Paper:
Three pages or 750 words, 3 sources; font of 12 characters per inch; Times New Roman theme font; double spaced; and margins 1”.
Expectations:
What your paper should focus on:
1. Address the various sides of the issue with conclusions based on your own analysis of the issue, and demonstrating an understanding of its complexities.
2. Compare and contrast the different viewpoints of sources used on your topic taking into account the limits of a position.
3. Present an informed evaluation of the evidence and different viewpoint surrounding the topic
How they interact,
The impact of government policy,
How and if they benefit society,
If it is worthy of the cost,
If the policy needs to be changed, expanded or eliminated,
What effects they create – good or bad

*Please go through the instructions properly and write accordingly.
Thank you! *

This is a good example of using an environmental scan to make decisions regarding an organizational mission and vision statement. And, while this likely helped the organization to refine these statements it really didn’t involve the type of decision-making necessary for strategic planning for a healthcare organization. In my experience, healthcare scanning supportive of strategic planning decision-making is comprehensive and evaluates the community, and usually involves conducting both a SWOT and PEST analysis for the organization.

Why would you think that healthcare organizations would need to conduct both of these analyses in order to support organizational strategic planning decision-making?

Provide in-text citations from no fewer than 3 scholarly sources for each reply to support your perspective on this issue.

Provide a complete properly formatted reference list at the end of the post.

Final: Critical Response Paper
File Types doc, docx, pdf, and pdfx

In Times New Roman, 12 font, double spaced and 4 to 6 pages, respond to the following prompts, remember to that you are
expected to integrate (synthesize and reference) materials from lessons, articles and videos when formulating answers:

Part 1 – Of the articles in module 3, choose three articles and a video. What do they reveal about grief, trauma, healing or resilience? How does economic inequality, global economic interdependence, racism, violence, natural disasters, terrorism, and /or war shape our experience of grief, trauma and resilience in family life, in your own life and greater society? Use materials in the course to support your answer.

Part 2 – Of the articles in module 2, choose two articles and a video. Discuss the role of marriage in the 21st century? Does confronting the social forces of “divorce” make for a better marriage or is that all we really need is love, could it solve the problems faced by the families? Why or why not? Also, consider marriage as a commitment, sacrament or and/or legal contract.

Part 3 – Of the articles in module 1, choose three and a video. Compare and contrast the articles, show what they reveal about creating family and the changing cultural expectations of parenthood, fatherhood and/or motherhood.

Part 4, Final – Upon reflection on materials from lessons, articles and videos explain shifts in perspectives or understanding. Explain broader social contexts that are significant to your perspectives and personal development, lessons, connections and opportunity for growth or foreseeable challenges that are significant to your life story in American culture, family and relationships.

Rubric
Critical Response Paper – SOC 215
Critical Response Paper – SOC 215

My paper is written in Times New Roman, 12 font, double spaced and 4 to 6 pages
(Measures formatting)
5 pts

My paper is well written (little to no grammar errors), thoughtful, engaging, includes the citations and reference page, if needed. (Measures grammar)
5 pts

My paper answers all parts of the question prompt clearly, identifies the articles and movies being used, applies content to their
lives and provides real world relevance when applicable. (Measures structure)
5 pts

My paper seriously engages with my chosen reading, OER, and other relevant course concepts/readings/materials to develop analysis. (Measures foundational knowledge)
10 pts

My paper thoughtfully connects and extends current coursework and synthesizes it (puts it together) in an innovative way that demonstrates relevant and applicable learning experiences. (Measures application of knowledge and critical thinking)
10 pts

In the paper, I illustrate my vision for the future. I write about a future direction for growth (challenges) and application of strength. I write about the broader social contexts that are significant to my perspectives and personal development. (Measures reflection)
10 pts

Total Points: 45

Focusing on the intersection of aesthetic and technological film history: synchronized sound. How did “the coming of sound” impact the way movies “made meaning”? incorporate readings in both Corrigan, T. (2015) A Short Guide to Writing about Film (9th edn), Boston: Pearson, and Gomery, D. and Pafort-Overduin, C. (2011) Movie History: A Survey (2nd ed), New
York: Routledge.; and make sure you incorporate class screenings from both Duck Soup, Casablanca, and The Grand Illusion

bjective: To create a lesson plan with UDL components and to evaluate that lesson plan.
Scenario: Eleven-year-old Liam is in your sixth-grade classroom and has been diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type. Liam has difficulty paying attention, remaining motivated, and completing academic tasks and is frequently disruptive in the classroom. You want to address Liam’s unique challenges and, at the same time, make the same learning opportunities available to all of your students. Therefore, you focus on integrating UDL components into a new lesson plan that you are implementing for your next reading unit. To organize your thoughts, you outline the elements of your lesson plan with a UDL approach in mind.
Assignment
Create a lesson plan using UDL components that address Liam’s possible barriers to learning. First, identify one UDL method for each stage of the lesson plan: introducing the lesson, teacher input, guided practice, independent practice, and evaluation. First, identify one UDL method for each stage of the lesson plan: introducing the lesson, teacher input, guided practice, independent practice, and evaluation. Tailor the first two columns of the lesson plan structure presented in Table 8.6 of the text for Liam and his classmates. Tailor the last two columns (Possible barriers and UDL methods) based on your predicted barriers and UDL methods you plan to use. Choose a specific reading strategy (you may select a concept or you may tie your lesson to a reading or some sort of novel study-be creative-I want this to be your choice!
Write your self-evaluation after you have completed your lesson plan and for each item of your lesson plan: Explain how this item addresses the issues in the scenario; give evidence from the chapter supporting this component; describe and justify how your lesson plan will improve teaching and learning in the scenario.
This activity will consist of two pages: page 1 is your lesson plan and the second page is your self-evaluationbjective: To create a lesson plan with UDL components and to evaluate that lesson plan.
Scenario: Eleven-year-old Liam is in your sixth-grade classroom and has been diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type. Liam has difficulty paying attention, remaining motivated, and completing academic tasks and is frequently disruptive in the classroom. You want to address Liam’s unique challenges and, at the same time, make the same learning opportunities available to all of your students. Therefore, you focus on integrating UDL components into a new lesson plan that you are implementing for your next reading unit. To organize your thoughts, you outline the elements of your lesson plan with a UDL approach in mind.
Assignment
Create a lesson plan using UDL components that address Liam’s possible barriers to learning. First, identify one UDL method for each stage of the lesson plan: introducing the lesson, teacher input, guided practice, independent practice, and evaluation. First, identify one UDL method for each stage of the lesson plan: introducing the lesson, teacher input, guided practice, independent practice, and evaluation. Tailor the first two columns of the lesson plan structure presented in Table 8.6 of the text for Liam and his classmates. Tailor the last two columns (Possible barriers and UDL methods) based on your predicted barriers and UDL methods you plan to use. Choose a specific reading strategy (you may select a concept or you may tie your lesson to a reading or some sort of novel study-be creative-I want this to be your choice!
Write your self-evaluation after you have completed your lesson plan and for each item of your lesson plan: Explain how this item addresses the issues in the scenario; give evidence from the chapter supporting this component; describe and justify how your lesson plan will improve teaching and learning in the scenario.
This activity will consist of two pages: page 1 is your lesson plan and the second page is your self-evaluation